User talk:Anthony Bradbury/Archive20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
removed Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant and unashamed refactoring of another editor's talk page post[edit]

I decided that this was one of the rare occasions when changing another editor's post is reasonable. Please reprimand me severely if you disagree. (Incidentally, the editor knows full well that evading a block by using sockpuppets is unacceptable, having been told that in his guise as other sockpuppets.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would we call that a time out? Thank you for correcting my finger slip. Yes, I know that he has been told on other accounts' pages, but he had not been so warned on this one and he hopes, if unblocked, to make this one his only page. So it was for the record, and to create continuity.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I quite often post a large chunk of explanation on a blocked editor's talk page about stuff which I know full well he or she has already been told. My comments are ostensibly addressed to that editor, but in fact they are there as a record to help other editors who may need to know, such as administrators reviewing unblock requests. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I was strongly tempted not to refactor your post, not because of a misplaced reverence for Wikipedia's talk page guidelines, but because the idea of creating an account to avoid a clock seemed like a pretty amazing idea, and worth preserving. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Hey, I am a new editor on wikipedia. I already have submitted 2 drafts of general use. This time, i am also writing about on page optimization, if you may see my draft. In meantime i am learning how to use externel reliable sources and for that i used my clinic from where i am taking treatment and what resources for reliabilty i saw i used them. It's ok if you delete my draft article but why have you deleted my user page. It's not ustified. Plese revert your commited action. i want to complete my draft and be continued with wikipedia. Meenakshi Rana (talk) 08:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons for the deletion of your articles are contained in the deletion notifications; I understand that this is clear to you. You are correct in saying that I deleted your userpage; it has also been deleted, prior to my action, by another admin. The reason is straightforward, and is completely justified. A userpage is intended to be a page on which you may, if you wish, post details about your activities, hopes, expectations, skills, interests, etc., as they relate to your editing within Wikipedia. It is also acceptable to include brief biographical details. We do not want to know about your past or present employment, your family history, your education, etc. The page is about you as a Wikipedia editor only. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Re-Submitting Content for a deleted page[edit]

Hi Anthony Bradbury"talk" Our page EaseMyTrip was live on wikipedia since more than an year. This week, it was deleted stating it promotional. I don't know how this can be possible. Please suggest what can be done. We have not made any major changes amritabarnwal (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I created a page and submitted it for approval but it was declined, and deleted. The message I received is: If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. The deleted page was Draft: AutoBuy, and I have new content for that page to submit. I wanted to contact you as it said to first contact the person who deleted the page. Should I just go ahead and resubmit my content? It will be different, more neutral content. Thanks in advance for your help. Crystalhartwell (talk) 03:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have revisited your draft. As previously submitted it is grossly promotional in phraseology, and would need a total re-draft to be acceptable. Eliminating all the adjectives would be a good start, although not in itself adequate. Do you have a commercial relationship with this company?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. May I submit the revised content (I understand about eliminating adjectives, but not just that will make it adequate)? Should I go back to the original draft page and resubmit, or start a new page? Many thanks again. Crystalhartwell (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend starting afresh. In my opinion the original draft is beyond redemption. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. I re-submitted for AutoBuy. I hope I did it correctly. Eager to make any further changes to the new content in order to have it approved. Many thanks in advance.Crystalhartwell (talk) 18:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock from Louisiana[edit]

Hi there. Are you able to look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:104.243.168.194. You have blocked this editor in the past. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding inappropriate deletion of CSQ Research Canadian Think Tank website at csq1.org[edit]

Can I ask you to restore this Canadian Think Tank listing page please? I have explained politely citing facts, that Deb's assessments of: A7 No Importance - Does not apply. Economics, Government Policy, Politics, World Peace NGO Organizations are discussed in more than 150 pages of researched articles and books at this website. Content exceeds sites of other Canadian Think-tanks two or three-fold; and G11 - Unambiguous advertising or promotion - Does not apply. The site documents Worthwhile Venture Impact Campuses, Transition Economics, Maturity Modelling for Government Policy Globally, Certification Programs for Projects Mgmt & Technology Investment, and articles also support Wiki documentation in Economics, Kondratiev Waves, World Peace and others. I just noticed the deletion and question why these very subjective points were not raised for many much more trivial sites presented as Canadian Think Tanks by Wikipedia - Do you have the content text that I added here in May?

I do not see any text by you in May, on this or indeed any other topic. The article you mention appears to have been created by you in late June of this year, and consists of some three lines only; it mentions none of the things you list in your message to me, and does not appear, from the text, to possess any encyclopedic notability. Had I come across it I would have deleted it, but in fact I did not; it was deleted by Admin Deb. It follows that I am not prepared to restore it. You are entirely at liberty to ask the delting admin. If you do so it will save time if you sign you post, which you did not do in your post to me. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
removed Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted userpage[edit]

Dude, did you even check the page? Or just hit delete? I went through the requirements for a users page and hit them all. Seriously...

You will note that I repositioned, and correctly titled, your unsigned message. To answer your question, yes, I read the whole page. It absolutely does not fulfill the requirements of a userpage. The personal data appropriate are your skills, intentions, aspirations, expectations, etc. in the context or your editing within wikipedia. Your expertise on kettlebells, which is obviously important to you, is of no interest here; and your editing work on Wikipedia, be it past, present or future is not mentioned. I suggest that you review the userpage requirements, which you say you have gone through. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On reflection I will concede that the second sentence of your deleted page is within policy requirements; it is, however, the only one which is. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony, you deleted a page I created for Sheikh Tarik. He paid me to create the page hence the content is almost the same. Can you let me know how I go about this since this is the write up he gave me? Regards MUK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukaiser (talk • contribs) 16:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note[edit]

I was in the process of reverting Open Theology to a redirect when you deleted it. I've restored the page but I left the other revisions deleted. Primefac (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Speedy deletion of Chlara Page[edit]

Dear Anthony,

I just get shocked today that i received the message about the Speedy deletion of Chlara Page, it claimed"A tag has been placed on Chlara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.discogs.com/artist/4457401-Chlara. "The wording is similar because i'm the person who also managing the discogs artist profile. And i have all the right to post the information about Chlara because im the person who hired by her record company to edit her profile, instead the information of Chlara in other language is partly WRONG!

Chlara's page is not just for us. Its also for her fans or new fans that who listened her facebook live streaming/ public performance and more performance to know more about her! Therefore, if anything i can do better or you want me to show more sources and evidence to prove my right to all my wordings, please let me know and give me and Chlara a chance to be on Wikipedia, make Chlara's page to the public again.

Regards, Vincent 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Josearce3 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy to accept that you hold copyright on the material used in the Chlara page. It is nevertheless protected by copyright law, and there is a procedure which you are required to go through before it can be accepted here. Please see donating copyrighted material, and if this is unclear then copyright policy. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anthony,

I see Wikipedia's point and i will discuss with my boss and send the required documents, since im just employed as a part-time staff, it takes time to communicate to my boss. Please hold the Chlara page and we will do that as soon as possible. Thank You!

Regards, Vincent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josearce3 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent; deleted material always remains within the server memory and can be accessed if appropriate. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anthony,

Very Sorry about that, the situation is that im the part time staff of the company evomg and the boss is often here, and my English is not really good but i tried to understand it. My question is that if i want to activated my Chlara Post i need to send a "statement of permission"(Which is the template from wiki) to make my Chlara content available? And do i need to provide more statement to prove that? Very sorry about my confusion.Josearce3 (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and Regards, Vincent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josearce3 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Josearce3 (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anthony,

My Boss called Ashley, he already sent the email to the permission email address, please help check and let me know if the information is not enoguh

Thank you and Regards, Vincent Josearce3 (talk) 02:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony,

We have waiting for a month, can you help me to check if you received my Boss (Ashley)'s official email or we have more things need to give you? We want our artist on wiki and we can't stand that the unofficial Chlara wiki is still there but our official one still cannot going on Wiki. Please help !

Regards, VincentJosearce3 (talk) 03:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An e-mail sent officially to Wikipedia would not come to me; and it did not. If he has not heard tell him to e-mail again. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

repeat[edit]

Draft:Deng Zhonghan also exists.So have tagged Draft:John Deng Zhonghan for speedy deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biyadishamo (talk • contribs) 13:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason for deletion of either of the drafts. When (if) one is accepted as an article the other can be deleted.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mehrdad 12 and Sockpuppetry associated with User:History of Persia / User: Artin Mehraban[edit]

There is an issue with User:Mehrdad 12. A friend of mine stumbled upon this historically innaccurate map (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:131Etendue_de_l%27Empire_Fran%C3%A7ais1.png) added to a the French colonial empire page. It was created by the afforementioned user. User:Mehrdad 12 has accounts on the Persian Wikipedia as well as Wiki Commons. He freqently falsifies image edits and contributions without sources and adds his self created images to articles. Most of his edits have been reverted by me, or others such as User: LouisAragon. I feel his image edits in particular are damaging to the integrity and mission of Wikipedia and Media Wiki.

I have a good reason to suspect that this is User: Artin Mehraban who formerly had a sockpuppet account as User:History of Persia. The MO is very similar. Bad English, no reason for edits, false information, and focus on revising Persian History, "Afsharia"("Mehrdad 12" associates with this on the Persian Wiki, and "Artin Mehraban" edited this article on the Persian Wiki) and image editing without sources. I also should point out that the name is very similar (Mehrdad v Mehraban.) I am bringing this to your attention because i believe action needs to be taken to block the account based on the history of edits. -- User:R9tgokunks (gespraec) 04:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This sockpuppetry appears to already have been noted and acted upon; both accounts you mention are checkuser-blocked. as to the map in Commons; I am not an admin, or even an editor, there. I take your point about the map, and suggest that you take the matter up within the Commons framework. Obviously, of course, I have no authority within the Persian Wikipedia.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

--[[User:Anthony Bradbury|<span style="color:Red;">'''Anthony Bradbury'''</span>]][[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|<sup style="color:Black;">"talk"</sup>]] → --Anthony Bradbury"talk"

to

--[[User:Anthony Bradbury|<span style="color: Red;">'''Anthony Bradbury'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|<span style="color: Black;">"talk"</span>]]</sup> → --Anthony Bradbury"talk"

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore User:Luang Pradit Pairoh[edit]

Hi. User:Luang Pradit Pairoh contains page history that should be histmerged into Luang Pradit Pairoh. Please restore the page. Thanks in advance. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, all sorted. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Removed speedy delete tag[edit]

Hello! Please, could you explain why you removed the speedy delete tag from this sandbox? The author has not edited it since 2008, and is not present in enwiki for five years. Article (List of municipalities of Norway) is being actively updated for this period. It is obvious to me that it is the abandoned draft. With respect, --109.238.80.85 (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the editor is not active in enwiki. But CSD G13 deletion only applies to articles previously submitted via WP:AFC, which this sandbox was not. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

added Joe Roe
readded JzG
removed Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DRV[edit]

Hi, I notice you did not ping me nor left any comment while deleting a page I created.I still say that it justified its notability and have started a DRV.Bingobro (Chat) 04:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the author in this situation is not a policy requirement within Wikipedia. As to the article, I suggest to you that this airline may well achieve Wikipedic notability when it commences operations; until that, in my opinion, it has none. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About deleted userpage[edit]

Hello, I created a page and submitted it for approval but it was declined, and deleted. I attempted a contest, but the removal was very quick. The message I received is: If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. The deleted page was Ray Brown (Producer), and I have new content for that page to submit. I wanted to contact you as it said to first contact the person who deleted the page. Should I just go ahead and resubmit my content? Should I do this from an account not named for the Wikipedia entry? Did you have concerns with references or notability? Do you have the deleted page as the copy editing and links and references were work I would like to retrieve and edit as possible.Ray Brown (Producer) (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did not, in fact, create an article; you created a userpage, although I assume that this was not your intention. The edit you created is correctly quoted by you as User:Ray Brown (Producer). A userpage in Wikipedia is a page on which a user can indicate his/her interests, skill, achievements, expectations, expertise, etc. as these factors apply directly to his or her Wikipedia editing. Brief biographical details are acceptable, but a retailed resume is wholly unacceptable.
Secondly, the creation of autobiography here is strongly discouraged. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks I moved to a draft in my sandbox and submitted for review. It looks like more work required to avoid "autobiography". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akumalbay12 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting[edit]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing a backlog, need advice[edit]

Clearing through old requests at CAT:UNB, and came across User talk:RealJohnBambenek. I don't know enough of the background of the case to close his request intelligently, but it looks like you do. Can you resolve his unblock request one way or another? It's been 9 days and probably should be taken care of. Thanks! --Jayron32 16:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2015–16 Alaska Anchorage Seawolves men's basketball team[edit]

This article went through AfD, so is not eligible for G13 speedy deletion.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unscintillating, G13 deletions are normal practice for drafts that have not been edited for 6+ months. You are welcome to request a REFUND. However, given that you're the one who moved the page to the draft space I'm surprised you're contesting the deletion. Primefac (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
This was an out-of-process deletion, not "normal practice", so the puzzle is that you aren't encouraging an administrator to follow "a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow".  Unscintillating (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Had it remained as an article, with a previous history of AfD resulting in a "no consensus" decision, then a speedy deletion would be very unlikely although not forbidden by policy. But any draft which is neither edited nor submitted within six months may be deleted under CSD category G13. And it was. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that you read the CSD policy, as there is no ambiguity for G13.
As for the idea that G13 can be applied to articles in mainspace, articles in mainspace are not bread that goes stale.  There is a different concept that comes from software, where Wikipedia policy and practice might be lacking, which is maintainability.  Unscintillating (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As of August 2017 G13 can now be applied to any page in the Draft space. While I personally do not agree with this decision, it was made. There is nothing done "out of practice". Primefac (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: I am sorry that you do not like my decision (I assume that you referred to that, not to the CSD policy). You will, of course, be aware that the text remains available if called for. I feel that there is little option is this situation; if a draft exists, has not been edited for six months or more, and the author has been notified of impending deletion, what else is there to do? I am aware that this draft, unusually, had been brought back to draft space from article space, but even so it must be treated in the same way as any other draft. There was, you will appreciate, a lot of time in which the draft could have been edited, and it was not. Certainly I could have returned the draft to article space, or I could have moved the draft into the requesting editor's talkspace, but neither is really in line with current policy. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I find your decision to delete it perfectly sound. I was indeed referring to the G13-for-all decision earlier, mostly because I know a fair number of editors affected by it who then have to immediately turn around and request a REFUND. Primefac (talk) 17:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for misunderstanding your point. Even after the change in policy I have tended to avoid heavy-handed deletion of drafts which are time-expired but were not initiated at AfC. Most, surely, are deletable but some can sensibly be saved, by one means or another. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of ASAP TyY[edit]

Hello Anthony. Can you please undelete it and move it to draft space where I can work on it?

Thank you so much.Castelliaj (talk) 23:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have two problems with this request, which normally I would be happy to at least consider. One is that it was not I who most recently deleted the article; the second is that it has already been re-created.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of ePUAP[edit]

Hi Anthony! Please review my message on Talk:ePUAP. --RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 01:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I concede the point and have restored the article. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings[edit]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Shaw[edit]

Happy New Year 2018 I would like to know why did you delete the page Ravi shaw please reply as soon as possible thanks💓💓💓💓💕💕💖💗 Shapin36 (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article because it makes no valid claim of notability. Note that the article was previously deleted some months ago for the same reason. Merely being an actor does not mean that the person described is necessarily an appropriate encyclopedia subject. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

added Muboshgu
readded Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned
removed None

Bureaucrat changes

readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1996 Delhi blast[edit]

Can you restore this article? It seems that you probably didn't checked the talk page where one editor took the responsibility of the article per WP:BANREVERT. I had checked the article and the sources supported the content. Similarly, another G5(1996 Dausa blast) was declined under these circumstances. Capitals00 (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you re-read WP:BANREVERT. It appears to me that the article was created by a blocked editor. Are you denying this?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It was, that's why I had linked you to other article, and discussion is here: Talk:1996 Dausa blast#Contested deletion, an article created by same blocked editor but not deleted after G5. Capitals00 (talk) 13:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • I always apply G5 rigidly; I will delay on the article you mention only because there is ongoing discussion about it - why there should be is not clear to me. I expect to delete it in the absence of alternative emerging consensus. I will, of course, not restore 1996 Delhi blast.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Humayoon Shams Khan/ Actor-Model[edit]

Hi Anthony sir!

I hope you doing amazing, this is Humayoon Shams Khan , I'm Canadian actor, model and director...

" https://www.google.com.af/search?source=hp&ei=aehVWrnlEsfevgS3qJbQAw&q=humayoon+shams+khan&oq=humay&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.35i39k1j0i131i67k1j0i67k1j0i46k1j46l2j0i131i46i67k1j46i131i67k1l2j0i67k1l3j0.129.1301.0.3376.5.4.0.0.0.0.307.597.2-1j1.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..3.2.595...0i46i67k1j46i67k1.0.IHls7KsYMsA "

My PR team tried to create my Wikipedia page but since you have deleted my page long back due to some errors, and i'm really sorry about that. It will be amazing if you un deleted my page so my PR team can professional start working on my page because this year my 2 new movies are coming and here is link of my film on wiki " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torbaaz "

Thank you so much and i am waiting for your replay sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humayoon Shams Khan (talk • contribs) 10:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You, or as you say your PR team, created a user page here. A user page is intended to contain information about the user's skills, intentions, expectations, history, etc. as it applies to their activity within wikipedia. A brif biography is usually acceptable; details relating to activity unrelated to Wikipedia editing are not acceptable. Your two forthcoming movies, for example, therefore have no place on a user page. The page will therefore not be restored. Writing about yourself is strongly discouraged; if someone, not you, wishers to creatre an article - not a user page - about you, this will be assessed without prejudice. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, I want to inquire one thing, I had created one page name Ujjwal Patni. I want to create that page. I have enough resources and references to create this page but I need you guidance to create page. Please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.70.174.8 (talk) 11:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you say you have created the page I am not certain what question you are asking. You sent this message to me while using an IP address; I would suggest that you use your registered account from which to edit. If you want to create a page then you are free to do so; I seriously suggest that, to avoid disappointment, you do so in the articles for creation page, which contains a full explanation and instructions. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Omeezy Chappo[edit]

Hello Anthony Bradbury, I was wondering if the Omeeezy Chappo draft can be undeleted. I am in the process of figuring out how to produce the correct copyrighting for the photo I added back in December.

Recovery of deleted page.[edit]

Hi Anthony,

I appreciate my page was marked for deletion and so it was deleted, but is there any way you could recover for me the contents of the page and put it back into my sandbox so I can continue to work on it?

Thanks, Josh.

I will put it on your talk page. I must say that it is, as posted, a very long way from being notable. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paalam Kalyanasundaram[edit]

Hi I gave you all the details Correctly.. Then why you have deleted my created page Paalam Kalyanasundaram "talk" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater (talk • contribs) 13:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, please note that I have correctly formatted your request, which you failed to sign. The answer to your question; he lacks claimed encyclopedic notability. I will point out that since I deleted the article and you created it again (which you should not have done) it has been deleted again by another admin. If you choose to re-create it you will be running a serious risk of being prevented from editing here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Blurpeace • Dana boomer • Deltabeignet • Denelson83 • Grandiose • Salvidrim! • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Stargardt disease[edit]

Hi Anthony

You recently deleted Stargardt disease with the reasoning that is was a duplicate, but the article you link as the duplicate is the one you deleted. I think there has been a mix up, could you have a look?

Many thanks

John Cummings (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles appear to be exact duplicates. Current article has history, references, etc. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for not being clear, what I was trying to say is you had just linked to the same article twice, so they appear as duplicates but there is only one article. Thanks, John Cummings (talk) 08:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There were two identical articles. Now there is one. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hlavní strana[edit]

FYI, Hlavní strana has been restored. It was not listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems for over seven days, so your deletion reason is blatantly incorrect. Please be more careful when using the delete button. -- Tavix (talk) 23:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am always careful when using the delete button. And the page was re-deleted, by another editor, a few hours after it was restored. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


He is not careful about using the delete button at all. Anthony Bradbury and a few other "Editors" are a bunch of censor artists that determine what the 'FREE encyclopedia' will have in it. They are ignorant about many things and will freely delete content they don't understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Channard (talk • contribs) 16:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ira Trivedi[edit]

Hi,

Did you see my message on its talk page? I think it's a backwards copy. Also, it had existed for several years, so any infringement would be complicated. Adam9007 (talk) 00:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Article restored.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prof Daddy Hezekiah & Draft:Prophet Daddy Hezekiah[edit]

Tony, many thanks for zapping the first of the above. You may want to have a look at the second, which is the same rubbish in a different guise. He had a third Prof.Daddy Hezekiah, with a full stop, that's thankfully already gone. I've no doubt the author will try again, probably with something like Pastor Daddy Hezekiah. His whole editing pattern is very concerning. Very poor articles with clearly promotional intentions and almost certainly driven by an undeclared paid editing interest. Thanks again and best regards. KJP1 (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! KJP1 (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have warned the creator of the article that further re=creation will risk a block. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

relevance of Dale of merchants[edit]

Hello, a couple of days ago I created an article about a card game called Dale of merchants. I think that you though that the article was about a web page or about a web game. It is a physical game that you buy in physical shops (it made of cards mainly (and a dice and a board)) and you deleted the article. The game was first published in English, and due to its sucess its rights were bought in other countries and it was subsequently published in Spain, Portugal, China, Poland, Italy. Moreover, due to its success an expansion of the game (new cards) were published two years later and new expansions are due to be published in 2018 and 2019. In my humble opinion any game that is translated and published in several countries is a relevant and important game. Much more if expansions are released. Other wikipedia articles about games of this kind and success (Codenames, Dominion,...) are not deleted. So, what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salvadorcases (talk • contribs) 13:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even as a card game I feel that notability is not shown especially clearly. But the article is harmless, and I have restored it. As an aside please note that it is recommended that you sign talk page edits (but not article edits) which you do at the end of your post either by adding ~~~~ or by clicking on the pencil icon at the top of the text box. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you deleted it again? -- Salvadorcases (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. RHaworth did. Looking at his delete message, which you would have seen had you looked for it, it appears that he also thought is was a web game. -- Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Salvadorcases, learn to provide wikilinks when you talk about articles. "The article is harmless"! No it is not - it is probably spam. Anthony Bradbury restored the page, but failed to remove the speedy tag so it got deleted again. Situation rectified. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is his delete message? -- Salvadorcases (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you had provided a wikilink and followed it, you would have seen the message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by spam?--Salvadorcases (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:SPAM. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the author of the game nor I have any connection with any game company, I just happen to like the game, the same way I like many other games and so I have contributed to some wikipedia articles about games of different companies--Salvadorcases (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neither I nor RHaworth have made any comments about yourself. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not commenting about me and I am the only author of the article, in what other sense can it be spam?--Salvadorcases (talk) 23:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about the article are not comments about the author. If you wish to prolong this pointless conversation I suggest you read WP:TROLL first. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, I would like to know if there is any way one can turn a pointless conversation into a productive one that can lead to the lift of a ban on an article. Thank you very much.--Salvadorcases (talk) 22:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apply at deletion review. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

Hi, Anthony, can you kindly e-mail the content of Family of Upendrakishore Ray to me, if there is anything substantial? On a side-note, despite the conversation at this AFD, this part. subject do seem to be quite notable but given the poor quality of the creator's articles, I wasn't much surprised to see it A7ed.Regards:)~ Winged BladesGodric 13:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article consists of one part-line stating that this Bengali family exists, followed by a list of family members, all of whom have their own wikipedia articles already. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! ~ Winged BladesGodric 06:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hey can you please add refrence in my article.dont worry this script is already on wiki but its name is not that which i named it. Muhammad Ali b (talk) 16:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please add your own references. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 08:52, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft - David Humphreys[edit]

Dear Tony (if I may so call you)

I was a little perplexed at your 'speedy deletion' of my draft article on Bach's Four Duetti, partly because I was still working on it and I do think you might have waited to judge it in a finished state. There is no article on the Four Duetti as such, though there is one on the publication (Bach's Dritter Theil der Clavierübung) which contains them. I am sorry you find it 'unsalvageably incoherent and I am of course open to any suggestions. I submitted it because it does contain material on the Duetti, including an explanation of their function which does not appear in the main article. The title would have been 'Bach, Four Duetti' or similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D Humphreys (talk • contribs) 17:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clavier-Ubung III contains, among a number of other things, a long piece on the four duets. If you feel that more data are appropriate please edit the existing article; do not create a fresh one. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I should have added that the incoherent comment was posted by the nominating editor, not by me. My deletion reason is as I stated it; I should have deleted the incorrect comment, and for failing to do so I apologise.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

added Lourdes†
removed AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of self[edit]

You might want to have a second look at this speedy deletion. It's an article that has been around for 12 years and had hundreds of edits. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have looked. It has 535 edits dating back twelve years, as you say; it is an essay, and discusses things which are largely matters of opinion. I will not contest any move to restore the article, although I may well comment in any discussion thereon, but do not feel that my decision should be reverted. There is no policy here which instills immunity from deletion to articles with a long history.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean to imply that it's age prevented it from being speedily deleted. It's just that speedy deletion of long-established pages is very atypical and often inadvertent. And since A11 doesn't really apply to the topic of self, I thought that might be the case here. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It could be argued that AfD might have been more appropriate. But I am inclined, as things are, to wait and see if there are any other comments forthcoming. I do remain convinced that the article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. It is, in my view and as I said earlier, an essay.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Outline of self[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Outline of self. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sro23 (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiByte[edit]

Hello, first of all a cordial greeting.

I am interested, as a member of DigiByte's follower community, to know what were the exact reasons why DigiByte's wikipedia information was removed, because as far as I saw, it complies with the requirements (No SPAM, it is not commercial)

DigiByte is a blockchain technology with open source and free use. It is derived from Bitcoin, which is the mother of all projects based on this technology.

The DigiByte developer team has as a fundamental interest to provide this technology to the world so that anyone can use it, even in wikipedia it could be used for the protection of user data.

We thank in the name of the community to provide feedback on this, and if possible, re-position the page.

Thank you very much.


Att.

Calvo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calvobrato (talk • contribs) 13:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted as a result of a community discussion at articles for deletion, which gave a unanimous decision by those editors participating in favour of deletion. AfD decisions are not often overturned, but you are welcome to make the attempt at deletion review page if you wish. I will not personally restore the page. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ekushey Padak in Language and Literature[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Ekushey Padak in Language and Literature as an A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, Ekushey Padak in Language Movement. The article you deleted was not a copy. The Ekushey Padak in Language and Literature is about award awarded to individuals who have significant contribution to Language and Literature while the Ekushey Padak in Language Movement is awarded to individuals for their role in the historic Language Movement.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it was not a copy but there was a very considerable overlap. I suggest that rather than trying to make a similar page you just add to the existing one. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Page Deletion Rekha Kurup[edit]

  • Rekha Kurup is an article red listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Activists
  • Rekha Kurup is not only an author of a best selling book, both in India and US, but also a multi-discipline personality.
  • I had cited at least 4 links revealing her popularity, activities etc.
  • Even if you think that the article does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant, I wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement.
Thanks N Sanu / എന്‍ സാനു / एन सानू 02:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Article text is transferred to your talk page.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the Prasanth Manghat Page[edit]

Dear Anthony,

Greetings!

We noticed that, unfortunately, the profile article on Prasanth Manghat(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prasanth_Manghat) was pulled out from Wikipedia. Confessing honestly, we are not the experts in Wikipedia and we might have, however unknowingly, gone ahead and posted some information which you, with a senior and a much respected profile, did not approve of.

We render our unconditional and sincerest apologies, if that is the reason for the profile to be pulled down. We would need your guidance in the same.

We tried to figure out who all are there on Wikipedia in the healthcare segment in the UAE/GCC and found few profiles which, we believe, are not as impressive or far-fetched as that of Prasanth. I am sure you would have gone thru them.

In our defense and perhaps in order to convince you that Prasanth deserves to be present on Wikipedia owing to the sheer interest in the industry on his profile, apart countless of other reasons, we are sharing the profile of Prasanth Manghat, the CEO and Executive Director of NMC Health.

Just few statements as a summary on him:

He joined NMC as the CFO in 2009. Worked on getting it listed at the LSE in 2012. A first from the UAE. NMC remains the only GCC based company, as on date, to be listed at LSE and is a part of FTSE 100. Guides NMC to buy assets in different treatment classes (Fakih, Americare, Dr. Sunny’s and Clinica Eugin) and forayed into an inorganic growth route in 2015 as he gets promoted to the ranks of the Deputy CEO. He goes international with the acquisition of Clinica Eugin and guides NMC expand further in Spain, Denmark and Italy apart from consolidating at Columbia and Brazil. Leads NMC to acquire UAE’s oldest hospital : Al Zahra at Sharjah and takes NMC to the LSE 100 as the Market Cap of NMC goes close to GBP 7 billion (March 2018) with a the stock price of GBP 2.10 in 2012 to over GBP 35 in March 2018. NMC although is a 44 years old company but it was Prasanth, under whose leadership it made a huge turnaround and went global. Accordingly, Prasanth is a much sought-after thought-leader when it comes to subjects like, Healthcare in the UAE/GCC, Tech in Healthcare, the M & A in healthcare and the future of healthcare in terms of IVF, Long Term Care, Paediatrics, Geriatrics and Non Communicable Diseases (NCDs) like obesity, diabetes, hypertension and etc..


Anurag Dev Kashyap (talk) 08:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You will notice that I have deleted the extensive list of links you posted, which I have no need to read. The article still exists as a Draft, and is therefore available for you to edit into an article appropriate for this encyclopedia. I will clarify that comment; the facts which you have chosen to post in my talk page are the facts which should have been included, possibly in more condensed form, in the article. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anthony, thank you for your guidance. Will re-work the article and upload it in draft.

Thanks and Regards Anurag Kashyap Head - Corp Comm & Comms Strategy NMC Healthcare, Floor 28, Corporate Office, Etihad Towers 3, P O Box 6222, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. T: +971 2 4978381 | F: +971 2 6332256 | M: +971 565061147 Anurag Dev Kashyap (talk) 13:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony,

I have redrafted the article based on your guidance. Would you so be kind as to please go through the draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prasanth_Manghat) and share with us your comfort and/or advice if any. Thanks, Anurag Kashyap Head - Corp Comm & Comms Strategy NMC Healthcare, Floor 28, Corporate Office, Etihad Towers 3, P O Box 6222, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. T: +971 2 4978381 | F: +971 2 6332256 | M: +971 565061147 Anurag Dev Kashyap (talk) 20:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me good enough to submit. Please be aware that while I have authority bto delete articles I have no authority to approve them. That is for the community to decide. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Не могли бы Вы стать моим наставником?--Весельчак7 (talk) 13:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want an answer please write in English. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you became my mentor (or how do you call it).--Весельчак7 (talk) 09:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy to answer specific questions, but I feel that I have neither the time nor indeed the skill needed to fulfill the role of mentor. I suggest that you go to WP:ADOPT and follow through from there.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are russian translates encouraged here? And how do you relate to Russian Wikipedia?--Весельчак7 (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Only English is allowed here. Neither I personally nor the English Wikipedia relate in any way to the Russian Wikipedia.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I meant translations of Russian articles into English.--Весельчак7 (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They are not encouraged. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LMFDB article[edit]

Hi Anthony,

How can I find out why the draft article about LMFDB was deleted in 1/2017?

Thank you very much.

73.16.162.194 (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The draft article was submitted, and declined in June 2016. As nothing further was done with the article it was deleted under CSD category G13 in January 2017.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmeralda Galea Camilleri[edit]

Hello, it looks like you missed several steps in fully closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmeralda Galea Camilleri because it is still displayed as open at the various Deletion Sort pages. Also, even though I voted "Delete" aren't you supposed to give it more than just 48 hours? Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly true. But I did not action the AfD template: I actioned the CSD G7 tag which was at the top of the page(request by author to delete). Looking at it now, it does appear that the deletion reason relates to the AfD, not to the speedy. Probably my error, but the speedy delete takes priority in this situation.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter![edit]

Happy Easter!
I wish you a holy and happy Easter! L293D (☎ • ✎) 05:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

added 331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG
removed Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando

Guideline and policy news

  • Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
  • Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
  • The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
  • The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous

  • A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Budmaster?[edit]

The newbie does not understand what was wrong. Were you opposed to the User name? Something that was on the User page? David notMD (talk) 23:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Budmaster could, if he wished, have asked me directly. I do not bite! To answer your question; specifically, I did not delete Budmaster, I deleted user:Budmaster, and this makes a meaningful difference. A userpage must not be used for advertising or promotion of any kind, be it for products, services or organisations. A userpage should be used by a user to indicate his/her interests, skills, aspirations, history, intentions, etc. as they apply to his/her editing within wikipedia. You will presumably be aware that this userpage was nowhere near this format, and this is why it was deleted. Whether an article (as opposed to a userpage) with the same text and entitled Budmaster would have been deleted as an advertisement is a possibility but not a certainty. But as a userpage it was not acceptable. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating value of Ori Shavit[edit]

Hi, I want to create the page you deleted almost 1 year ago, Ori Shavit. The page/value was denied because of notability concerns. Since the person has gained more recognition, has issued a book and already has a Hebrew page (that should be connected via WikiData), I would ask you to please undelete my draft, if that is possible (so I'd continue editing and adding from the same point I stopped), or let me know what is necessary for having the entry rewritten. Thanks, --Nexen.love —Preceding undated comment added 12:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to WP:REFUND/G13. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I've replied to your message. Thanks. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dealing with it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Took a little time, as I anticipated, but no problem. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects[edit]

You've deleted four redirects created after detailed discussion here as "implausible". I find that hard to follow given the fact sources are listed there. Can you shed any light? I can't see the form the redirects were created in but they seem like classic {{R from nickname}} cases. Thanks. -- BobTheIP editing as 92.29.28.146 (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This might be in reference to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Redirect request: Big Hoose, The Big Hoose, Big hoose, The big hoose. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. "the big house" exists, but I do not see the need for a redirect in dialect. Whether an editor looking to read about HMP Barlinnie would expect to find it by typing in "big hoose" is in my opinion unlikely; if this is felt to be an unreasonable view restoring one or more of the redirects will not cause me any grief. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please. An editor, I agree, isn't going to use such language unless perhaps quoting somebody; even then, it'd be necessary to explain in such a way as to make a direct link more logical. A reader, however, is much more likely. I read WP a lot and find nickname redirects very helpful to navigate myself onto topics from elsewhere that I'm peering in on as I read other sites. I can imagine, say, a Londoner or US reader using The Big Hoose or Bar-L in the same way I use the Gunners or tankbuster to read up on stuff. -- BobTheIP editing as 92.11.149.25 (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Big Hoose is restored.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've gone ahead and added citations for the prison's nicknames into the article (though I suspect better places than the lede could be found, but it's better than nothing). -- BobTheIP editing as 92.11.149.25 (talk) 19:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Prof Dr.EGR SOLOMON page[edit]

Hi Anthony,

Can you please let me know what is the criteria I missed which made the page to fall in deletion category. Prof Dr.EGR SOLOMON is a famous Doctor in India for the past 50 years and his contribution to the society is vast. He passed away recently and I created this page in remembrance of him and his achievements which will be helpful for the future generations. I would like this page to be published and please let me know what details i have to provide for it.


Thanks Venkaram (talk) 08:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Venkat[reply]

Overpaid, oversexed, and over here[edit]

Hello, I am curious as to what was exactly copyright? quotes are quotes. Actual sentences were amended from the original articles and books I used for sources.

Can you help me create the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odinshed (talk • contribs) 22:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The title, of course, is an acceptable quote. But I suggest that you review your text and compare it to the text from which you copied it. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

I hate you
HOW DARE YOU DELETE MY PAGE, IT WAS JUST A JOKE I HAD WITH MY FRIENDS AND THERE NO REASON FOR YOU TO CARE! IT WASN'T RUDE AND I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU CARE SO MUCH TO DELETE THE PAGE!

the page was kinkyeow by the way Ellen.maguire3 (talk) 21:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We do not do jokes here; if you want to post jokes, do it somewhere else. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC

Deletion of Casa Pacifica Article[edit]

You apparently tagged my page for speedy deletion and then deleted it immediately before I had a chance to respond.

In my original article, I provided a number of citations showing why the subject was notable.

Can you please elaborate on your decision, specifically why you do not feel the subject was notable?

Ideally, you should reinstate my article since I did not have sufficient time to discuss this with you prior to you taking action.

TIA.

Not so. The page was tagged for speedy deletion by DGG who is, incidentally, a vastly experienced editor. I deleted the article approximately one and a quarter hours later. I have just reviewed the article, and do not see a reason to reverse my decision. You have the option of seeking a community view at deletion review. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TappyToon Deletion[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to know why TappyToon was deleted since it met all the requirements. It's a webtoon website like Spottoon yet this page was deleted. Is there a reason for that? AquilaXIII (talk) 02:11, April 29, 2018 (UTC)

It was deleted under speedy deletion category A7 - a website with lack of appropriate assertion of notability. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

  • AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
  • When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
  • The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
  • There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For Family and Tradition[edit]

I strongly disagree with your decision to speedify this article instead of proposing for deletion so that people interested in Estonian and/or LGBT issues could have a say and true consensus could be formed. It is in Estonia a well-known ultraconservative/anti-gay hate group (cf. Save Ulster from Sodomy) that has 24,700 Estonian Ghits and a number of English Ghits: [1], including a mention in The Independent article Estonia becomes first former Soviet state to legalise gay marriage. Its leader Varro Vooglaid is often seen in talk shows on Gay rights issues representing the views of the opponents and the adherents of the organizations are often seen in anti-Gay rallies. Thus, I recommend that you undelete this article. Regards, Miacek (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note your opinion, but do not agree with it. you are free to appeal to the community at deletion review. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:52, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dave's Marketplace[edit]

I disagree with your decision to delete this page. It is referred to in the page List of supermarket chains in the United States — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hshinc (talk • contribs) 23:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your opinion. If you wish to obtain a community opinion you are free to do so; go to deletion review.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Messiteca[edit]

Thanks. I was going to delete them on the spot, but in some cases (like, when it's not someone doing Imaginary Survivor on their user page) I follow this process. Drmies (talk) 00:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Richmit[edit]

Why did you delete my page? This was my page that I wrote for fun about MYSELF. It was not harming anyone and was not on the public domain. It was for me and I wrote it nearly 10 years ago while at university during my dissertation years. I find this a completely unacceptable. You had no right to delete this as it was mine. You never asked or even questioned what it was. You just deleted it. It was a story and history that I created for myself as a memory. You have deleted a memory. This is seriously ridiculous as it was not harming anyone. I am seriously upset about this. Why did you not ask?! Richmit (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The least you can do is let me have the chance to backup the page elsewhere and save it. Richmit (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that the page was created by you and about you. You are quite wrong in saying that it was not in the public domain; all Wikipedia pages, including userpages, are public and universally available. Whether it was harming anyone is wholly beside the point; it was inapprop[riate as a userpage. In Wikipedia a userpage is intended as a locale in which an editor can write about his skills, aspirations, expectations, intentions, etc as they apply to his/her editing on wikipedia. It is not intended to be used for anything else. the text still, of course, exists. it you wish I can post it on your talk page. Let me know. If I do this please do not shift it back to your userpage; that would now, after this conversation, qualify as dispuptive editing. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. Could you post it on my talk page nd I will save it on my desktop at home. Thank you Richmit (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I ma still awaiting the Anthony and have been awaiting for over a month. Please advise when you will be posting my deleted page for me to save elsewhere. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richmit (talk • contribs) 17:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umar Khalid[edit]

I want to open discussion for deletion for Umar Khalid. There are two persons with same caliber and notability who are already existing Shehla Rashid Shora & Kanhaiya Kumar Accesscrawl (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to initiate community discussion at deletion review.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that you compare the length and significant detail contained in those two articles, as compared to the one you are asking to be restored. I also suggest that you should look at the long article Umar Khalid which was deleted by community decision in 2016. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In 2016, the Major reason for deletion was insufficient coverage. However, if you google now, there is huge coverage. Also, I can ensure you that I can work upon the article to match the significant lengths of Shehla Rashid Shora & Kanhaiya Kumar Accesscrawl (talk) 17:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Accesscrawl: I suggest you work on it in your sandbox or draft space (Draft:Umar Khalid). That way you have time to work on it without someone coming along and deleting it as unsuitable for main article space — which was the case here. It's a good practice to avoid using main space for drafting articles. Draft them somewhere else and then move them to main space when ready. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at deleted page[edit]

I was looking at random AfC submissions to accept or decline them, and I found Draft:Humphrey Lloyd Hime. It seems to be very well sourced, and based on what this person's done in his life and how many books reference him, it seems to be a notable topic. I was thinking about maybe accepting it. However, I realized that you had speedy deleted it when it was in the main namespace per WP:CSD#A7. Are you able to take a look at the deleted Humphrey Lloyd Hime page and see how it compares to the draft? Thanks.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 13:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Al Ameer son • AliveFreeHappy • Cenarium • Lupo • MichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony, pay attention and at least wait for a response to the Editor's questions[edit]

Anthony, you reminded the Users to be nice, and we suggest to also be nice. You deleted the page that was in dispute for deletion not waiting even 5 min for a response, when the Contest for Deletion was posted. Reasonable time, at least several hours should be given for a response. Plus multiple discussion supporting the page were listed on the Talk page, but when ListedforDeletion was started by Lem, it was lasting only for 1 day, ignoring almost an year of history of discussion by other users. Same day when Lem listed the page for deletion, he obtained to "Delete" opinions and deleted the page, not allowing other users to vote. This is against the policy "be nice" or even the policy to base a deletion on consensus. Please review and undelete the page "Geodakyan Evolutionary Theory of Sex". It is the theory of mathematical biology and not a self-promo, considering that the author of the theory is probably about 100 years old.KaiStr (talk) 17:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. The page which I deleted was a re-post of an articles previously deleted by reason of community decision at articles for deletion. For this category discussion is not appropriate, given only that the articles is the same as the previous on; I checked, and it was. If you wish to make the claim that the AfD was conducted incorrectly, and please note that I did not contribute there in any way, then this is the wrong forum in which to argue it. You should, as was suggested to you earlier, go to deletion review. Incidentally, while I agree everyone should be nice I do not recall saying so in this context.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KaiStr is a single-purpose account with an obvious WP:COI issue with the topic, but refuses to disclose it. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware that it was a single-purpose account. I looked while confirming the correctness of the deletion. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:03, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What is wrong with being specialized in my field, and me having just one topic of editing? Neither of you know mathematical modeling of evolutionary theory, but somebody should inform the public about important ideas. However WP:COI is not applicable here, contrarily to Mr. Lem's position. I understand that Mr. Lem doesn't is caught up with his hate against Russian science but, Anthony, perhaps you should be more careful about the judgement on whether or not a consensus was reached for deletion of the 1st page? Clearly Mr. Lemm unilaterally organized "a quick kill" after hammering this page for a long time (just please review the Talk of the deleted page), launching a clear personal vendetta on the ETS Talk page. Then, miraculously, 2 "delete" opinions showed up immediately when Mr. Lem launching the deletion, and the whole decision about "consensus" was based on those 2 opinions (conveniently coming out of the bushes in the same day, what the odds?), not from people who work in this field. The consensus was not based on the opinion of people who participated in the discussion on the Talk page and they didn't have even a chance to notice the urgency or might be didn't have a chance to response within 7 days. This ETS theory is not shared just by 2-3 people but by a whole generation of Russian scientists. It is sad that Anthony hesitates to reverse his (too rushed and not based on consensus) action, and even didn't let me reply to the initial "speedy deletion" message when the page was posted for the 2nd time. The rules indicate that I can contest the deletion, and I contested it right away. I have to be given a chance for posting explanations, however you didn't give me time to post it: within several minutes the page was deleted. Considering his actions around the 1st page, Mr. Lem should be excluded for bad practice and bad faith - what mechanisms of protection against Editorial biases does Wikipedia has? Also, please post the link here to the archive of the deleted Talk page - I want to copy all the material of the former discussion and make this matter more public. Apparently, Wikipedia is affected by "human nature" and showing the flaws of it will improve future editing. KaiStr (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What is wrong with Nothing is wrong in editing in your area of expertise. The badly wrong thing is the relentless promotion of the work you are associated with. This is called "conflict of interest" and disallowed in wikipedia: WP:COI. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You persist in missing the point. I have no interest in discussing the AfD, and no intention of doing so. The deletion which I performed was on the basis that the article, having been deleted at AfD, must not be recreated. As you have been told repeatedly, if you are unhappy with the original deletion take it to deletion review. You will gain nothing at all by arguing here. Please stop doing so. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Colour era in India cinema[edit]

Hi, indipedia is crowdsourced so are you sure they didn't copy the Wikipedia article in later edits, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Africa Muslims Agency page history[edit]

It seems the history of User:Namiba/Africa Muslims Agency, which now resides at Africa Muslims Agency, may have gotten lost when it was accidently moved to User:Africa Muslims Agency, which you subsequently deleted (came across this due to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Namiba/Africa Muslims Agency). If so, could you perform a history merge to Africa Muslims Agency? Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of through a history merge. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue[edit]

Anthony,

This morning, I received a message from you accusing me incorrectly of a copyright violation on a wiki titled "David W. Barre." You apparently discovered a .pdf with identical text that I had uploaded a day earlier, but which I have not been able to figure out how to delete as it is not a text file. I responded to your note by posting a protest, asking you to check the author's name on both items, mine "Wilkenw." In spite of this, you or someone else erased my wiki, apparently without bothering to check that I had posted both items.

So, how do I get rid of the .pdf, so that I can re-post the "David W. Barre" wiki which I have authored??? Bill Bill Wilken 00:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkenw (talk • contribs)

Please read donating copyrighted material which explains the procedure to follow. There is no need to delete the .pdf. I should say that in my personal opinion the article, as submitted, may well fall foul of speedy deletion criterion A7, although as an involved party I would not myself make that determination.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hina Khan awards page deleted[edit]

Hi Anthony. Can you kindly explain why the list of awards page was deleted? Thank you.--Princessruby (talk) 08:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page was a re-creation of a page previously deleted following a community discussion and decision at articles for deletion. If, as it appears, you are unhappy with th3 previous deletion you have the option of appealing at deletion review. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam[edit]

I restored it as it was an active AfD. It will likely be deleted anyway, but this is best. Enigmamsg 04:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being an active AfD does not preclude speedy deletion if the speedy criteria are met, as they are in this example. I will not wheel-war as the issue is essentially trivial, but for the record I do not agree with your action. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You could have stated your case at the AfD then and closed it. Enigmamsg 14:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Schröder[edit]

Mr. Bradbury I wanted to follow up on the page Albert Schröder and the question of whether I deliberately created a false article. The answer is that it is false and was being done so for the purposes of a University project. Following it being flagged as a hoax I immediately flagged it for speedy deletion as I do not want it to remain on wikipedia. I wanted to thank you for the time you have spent to fact check the work on wikipedia. The thesis I am working on in University has been to document the increase load of false or misleading information that has been created on the web. Over the past few months myself and two undergraduates have been stress-testing information sites of varying reliability in order to gauge how efficient and fast that site’s administrative community is at eliminating and fact checking false information. My apologies for unnecessarily taking up your time however hopefully the results of my research may hopefully, in the future, be applied to better help the curating community in combatting the spread of disinformation online. Infinityplatinum (talk) 5:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

added Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
readded Gogo Dodo
removed Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes

removed Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Salick deletion[edit]

Hi Sir, You deleted an article that I was working on with User:Natureium to eliminate all promotional tone or content. Please retrieve or put that in my sandbox so I can fix the issues, so you can check. I tried hard to find quality references and information. I'll appreciate your help. PLease help me learn. Thanks Calabond (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi, Tony. Welcome back. I hope you had a good break. Probably I should take a break soon, too. We all get a bit worn out at times. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page Emily_L._Spratt[edit]

I want to request the undeletion of page Emily_L._Spratt.

I added the needed citations that the previous discussion demanded. I carefully reviewed the guidelines of Wikipedia:Notability and Spratt does have significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. I have provided verifiable evidence of this subject’s notability in the references. This subject has been notable since 2005 upon receiving a major award, therefore subject’s notability is not temporary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerWilson (talk • contribs) 19:12, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article. The majority of the citations you include are irrelevant in terms wikipedic of notability, either being bare mentions of Ms Pratt or being articles by the subject of the article and therefore by definition not independent secondary sources. There are, however, two citations which mention her in some detail; this is barely enough, but is adequate to qualify for retention or the article. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Växjö United FC[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Växjö United FC. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 11:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Den10[edit]

How do capitalize off an existing name that has been published. This isn’t an autobiography or anything, just many post Den10 has acquired - Smoke Dza Featuring Den10 Substance abuse @iHipHop ( http://www.ihiphop.com/blog/mixtape-download-smoke-dza-substance-abuse/ ) 12/01/2009

Den10 1010 Winz 2010 @bandcamp @theplanesgotit ( https://den-10.bandcamp.com/ ) 10/10/2010

Rolling Stoned featuring Den10 @wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_Stoned ) 08/30/2011

Den10 10 Minutes of Fame @Thesource @midnightnate ( http://thesource.com/2012/01/23/premiereden10-10minutesoffame/ ) 1/23/2012

Smoke Dza featuring Den10 Burn @hotnewhiphop ( https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/smoke-dza-royal-song.1283072.html ) 03/20/2013

Loaded Lux @HipHopdx interview mentions Den Diddy Aka Den ten - Den10 ( http://hiphopdx.com/interviews/id.2107/title.loaded-lux-draws-parallels-between-battle-rap-fatherhood-cinema “ Loaded Lux Recalls Battling Against Den Diddy (a/k/a Den Ten) DX: Thank you for taking it there. It’s kind of ill, because you’ve experienced both sides of that. But there are battle rappers out now who have never experienced “ 5/13/2013

XXL PREMIERE: RFC featuring Den10 - The Outsiders @XXL ( http://www.xxlmag.com/rap-music/new-music/2014/11/premiere-r-f-c-featuring-den10-outsiders/ ) 11/12/2014


Den10 - Pain “All Hip Hop Premiere” @allhiphop @hueymixwitRILEY ( https://allhiphop.com/artists/bodega-bamz/ ) 6/1/2016

Your limited command of the English language makes it difficult to understand what you are asking. You appear to be asking how you can capitalize on your musical skill in Wikipedia. The answer is that you cannot. Apart from that I do not know what you are asking. Note that in Wikipedia you cannot write about yourself. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]




Nevermind. It has been deleted by Ian.thomson. Nonetheless, it would be interesting to see if they are the same, as if so we may have a problematic editor on our hands, jumping accounts to copy/paste deleted content. Once again, sorry for hassling you, Stormy clouds (talk) 22:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]
@Stormy clouds: I'm pretty sure it's the same user. Den10 Music registered their account before User:Diddaler was deleted. I think the name change was innocent and they just didn't realize they aren't supposed to promote themselves. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ian.thomson: - thanks. Suppose we should jump straight to socky conclusions, given that a new account is recommended for new users seeking a name change. However, I would suggest that there is a need to nip the promotional, autobiographical wishes in the bud as soon as possible, lest it create more headaches for hard-working admins like yourself. Stormy clouds (talk) 23:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

added Sro23
readded KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
  • Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mickey (alt)[edit]

Hi there--just to let you know, I created the User:Mickey (alt) account and redirected the page to User:Example because of the use of that account's name as an example in the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry page. You appear to have deleted the redirect and I won't recreate the page, but I just wanted to explain my reasoning for redirecting the page when it's an unlikely search term.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 05:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SALTING Sad ass[edit]

According to the deletion log , the article has been repeatedly re created. Therefore, I think it might be a good idea to salt the article --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Learning Test re-created[edit]

Hi AB,
You deleted this article following the outcome of this deletion discussion. As you can see from my edit summary here I have adopted a "let's wait and see" attitude to the re-creation of the article.
Your thoughts about this?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the article as a CSD G4 deletion. In fact the re-created article says somewhat less than the original, but nothing extra. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I am confused as to why my article was recently deleted? I believe I cited independent sources from the company, and I have no affiliation with the company myself. In fact, it appears there are far more schools associated with CLT in 2018 than in 2016 when somebody first created this article. Please let me know your thoughts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed sanfrancisco (talk • contribs) 23:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The original article with this title was deleted as a result of a community decision at AfD. The article you posted says less than the original, but what it does say it says in exactly the same way. Your sources and lack of affiliation were not a consideration.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this explanation, AB. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:22, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fauzly and MCC214[edit]

I don't think that MCC214's English is worse than Fauzly's, because I don't think that they are two different people. I think that they are the same. I will be filing an SPI.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Point taken. I had thought about it, but did not have any substantive evidence to go on. Clearly you have gone into it in more depth. For the record, and without in any way arguing against your statement, I do feel that the English used in the MCC214 account is worse than that used in the Faulzy account; obviously it is easy to imitate a lack of linguistic competence, to a greater or lesser degree.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unheadlined edit[edit]

Hi, was this a mistake? --Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; thank you for pointing it out. There was a long run of inappropriate edits about volleyball which I deleted, and this one clearly got mixed in with the deletable ones. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question on a few G6s[edit]

I wanted to ask if you'd reconsider two of your recent G6 deletions:

  1. You deleted Man la Yahdhuruhul Faqih a few days ago with the rationale that Man la yahduruhu al-Faqih already exists. That doesn't seem to be a valid G6 reason, in particular as it contradicts A10; as it had been around since 2008, it should have been redirected.
  2. You deleted Cocksucker with the rationale redundant. Likewise, that isn't a valid G6 reason, in particular as it was a perfectly valid soft-redirect using {{Wiktionary redirect}}.

I figure I'd ask you since there are two at once, but it seems to me they were both improperly tagged and should be restored. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've gone and restored Cocksucker as it resulted in a broken redirect from Cocksuckers. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Amorymeltzer: I will not argue with you, except on this page. But I invite you to return to Cocksucker. You will find that it goes nowhere and says nothing. As to the first deletion you merntion; I concede that there is an "al-" in one version ad not in the other. I believe that typing either version will default to the same page at present, but will revert my deletion if you wish.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Amorymeltzer: Having restored the article I took another look at it; I suspect that it may well still qualify for speedy deletion under a different category, but obviously will let another make that decision. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you, I appreciate the quick response. You and the tagger were quite right that it was a duplicate of Man la yahduruhu al-Faqih, so I've redirected it there. As for cocksucker, yes, it's not anything of great significance, but it is a redirect to wiktionary, so it's not nothing. If you think it should be deleted, I don't have any real thoughts on the matter, except that it should go through WP:RfD. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not like taking more than one bite at the cherry, so will leave it alone.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great American Hypocrites[edit]

Hi Anthony. There's a discussion at the Teahouse about Great American Hypocrites, which you deleted as an attack page. It was previously a redirect to Glenn Greenwald, the author of a book titled Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics. As there is nothing in the page history that constitutes an attack, I assume the nominator misinterpreted the title as an attack on Greenwald himself. Either way, I don't think it meets the G10 criteria. Would you mind undeleting it? (Or object to me doing so?) – Joe (talk) 12:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The title is clearly an attack, but I will concede that the article itself is not. I have undeleted it. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. – Joe (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz
renamed Optimist on the run → Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

added Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdish Dog[edit]

You deleted this in 2012. We now have Kurdish Dog Breed claimed to be a 5000 year old dog breed. The original draft Draft:Kurdish Shepherd Dog seems to be copied from here but by only a few days.

Ah, now this is only FYI as I've deleted it. Mohamad137026 was making the same edits and was blocked for copyright violations, the article mentioned above was created by Bukan1400 who turns out to be a sock. So I've CU blocked both. Doug Weller talk 15:06, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say![edit]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bombing of North Korea, 1950-53[edit]

You recently deleted the above page as an unambiguous copyright infringement. I don't think that should have happened because it is largely an expansion of the "Bombing of North Korea" section in the Korean War article, started by me from various sources. The "Sourcewatch" article appears to be a copy of Wikipedia, not the reverse.--Jack Upland (talk) 21:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Bombing of North Korea 1950-1953#Contested deletion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:14, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In response to Finnusertop's comments, which have since been deleted:
1. Yes, it seems the "Sourcewatch" article was created first, but both articles were created by Tednace based on material from other Wikipedia articles.
2. "Sourcewatch" is public domain.[2]
3. Even if it wanted to, "Sourcewatch" couldn't claim copyright over material copied from Wikipedia.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments noted. It might have been helpful if the link between the articles had been mentioned. I will restore the article. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

added Justlettersandnumbers • L235
removed Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter

Interface administrator changes

added Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333

Oversight changes

removed Guerillero • NativeForeigner • Snowolf • Xeno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my KLASK article?[edit]

Hi Tony,

What happened? I have gotten so much constructive criticism from other editors and without a warning you delete what I have worked on/edited for months? I apologize that I am not an experienced editor, but a heads up would have been nice. This is so demotivating and I am really sad inside. Can you bring back the article so I can correct what you don't like?

´( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BB:180:25FE:4D3:3F46:7C55:DA24 (talk) 13:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find this article: indeed, I cannot find anything at all that you have written. What is the exact title of the deleted article?----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's called KLASK. It's a draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:KLASK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BA:8F6:9600:2D73:1B04:AAAB:75C3 (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BA:8F6:9600:3431:722C:E721:4597 (talk) 17:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was without references or sources, but the deletion reason was as a copyright violation. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true! It was completely ready to be published. The comments of references and sources were all corrected!! All of them! And a copyright violation should be pointed out. Not a reason to delete months work. Can you please bring it back!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.165.77.141 (talk) 11:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo? Can you please bring back my article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.117.4.74 (talk) 10:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will not return it to article- or draft-space, because copyright violating articles must not exist in either. I will restore it to your talk-page, but if you post it without complete re-wording to avoid copyright violation it will be deleted again. Remember that close paraphrasing is not acceptable.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Ross[edit]

Fr Anthony Ross - it's possible that you may have had adequate grounds for deleting the article about him. Since you did not state them, and left me to lucky dip in a blanket wikipedia paragraph for what they might be, I would ask on what grounds you consider this action to have come within your definition of being "nice"?Delahays (talk) 07:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The grounds were stated by you - an article already exists, as was stated in the deletion rationale. I do not understand your concern. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To Admin[edit]

Hi Admin I wrote an article & added many notable links of it including MTV Music Chart , Newspaper , magazine but when it comes to review your mods bring people & decline the article as we fought with each other. If you think the article i wrote is not notable then explain why mtv music have wikipedia pages here ? If still not notable you can delete I'm done with it , thanks for everything dear admin.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&title=Draft:DJ-Kamal_Mustafa&create=Create+new+article+draft#Career SiddiqFarooq (talk) 15:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the (or even a) admin, but Article X doesn't justify Article Y. You need to prove that DJ Kamal Mustafa is notable with newspaper articles, news magazine articles, and/or music magazine articles that aren't interviews and that discuss him in depth. Name-drops, interviews, and "news" releases will not cut it.
As to the MTV chart, we only accept a small number of recording industry sales charts as sources, and none of MTV's charts are among them. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am an admin, but not the admin who deleted this article, so why the conversation is appearing on my talk page is not clear to me. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Wohl[edit]

Hi Anthony, would you mind restoring Jacob Wohl to my userspace? You can delete my existing Sandbox and place it there if you like, or wherever is easy. I noted you were the deleting admin here [3]. As of the past couple of days a great deal of news articles have appeared about him and I suspect these, combined with some of the earlier stuff, would satisfy the GNG. I'd like to give it a go. EnPassant (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will insert the article into your talk page. Please pay careful attention to the various comments posted in the AfD. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On going to the page I find that the article currently exists, so my comment (above) is inappropriate. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks anyway, Anthony, looks like someone beat me to it. :) EnPassant (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance with challenge to article redirect/merge[edit]

Hello. A few days ago, editor Hyperbolick created an article on Blexit. When I saw the article, I then added additional info and reliable sources to the article to ensure that the article is well sourced. Unfortunately now, the article has been merged into the Candace Owens article, without any prior meaningful discussion to achieve consensus. On the article's talk page, the editor Hyperbolick suggested merging the article, and only 15 hours later, without waiting for any editor (e.g. those editors who contributed to the Blexit article) to appear to make their opinions known, the article was merged into the Candace Owens article. I protest against this merger as it violates WP:MERGE: there was no merger proposal, there was no merger discussion, and the time between the suggestion and the actual merger was just 15 (fifteen) hours. I also kindly ask you to please restore the Blexit article, so that we can have a meaningful discussion on whether or not the article should be merged. This way we can achieve community consensus in the usual proper way. Thank you. 77.2.2.197 (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't care either way. Would've preferred a Walkaway Campaign article. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am not clear as to why you are asking on my talk page. I did not merge it. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't how to reverse a merger or a redirect, and so I decided to contact an administrator for assistance. I went to Wikipedia:List of administrators/Active and picked an admin from that list. Besides, the merger was in violation of Wikipedia's Consensus Policy. The information page on merging stipulates, that discussion must take place prior to a merger. If you cannot or will not assist in this case, pls kindly point me to an info page where I can inform myself on how to undo a redirect/merger myself. Thank you. 95.114.82.207 (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reversing a merge requires admin permissions. I suggest that you attempt to find an admin willing to do this, which I am not, at WP:ANI.
Thank you for the info. 95.114.82.207 (talk) 21:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Boing! said Zebedee2[edit]

You may wish to remove TPA--Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a move[edit]

Hi, can you please help me locate the previous discussions that prompted you to move pastırma to pastirma? I am asking because even English language sources spell it pastırma. Phoenetically, it would make more sense for it to be spelled Basturma (but that creates the confusion of the b being replaced with a p sound in spoken language). "Pasteerma" just doesn't make any sense and only seems to serve the purpose of replacing ı with i, which is not correct in English or any other language. Seraphim System (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not moved it.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ok, I was going to move the page but I saw it had previously been moved by a well-known sockmaster in the area so I took a closer look at the history instead of completing a unilateral move. I saw in the move log for the redirect [4] that you had moved it to Pastirma in 2013 (so long ago you probably forgot). Due to the history, I wanted to check if you would be opposed to my moving it again. (Right now I am leaning towards Basturma as that seems to be more recognizable in English) Seraphim System (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I looked back, but I concede not back to five years ago. I have no objection to your moving it, so long as the move is in accordance with wikipedia policy.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]







ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of a previously deleted article[edit]

Dear Mr. Bradbury,

I was looking to write an article about a pianist, but saw that a page was created and deleted a couple years prior due to not meeting the requirements of WP:MUSICIAN. Seeing that you participated in the deletion discussion, could you approve for it to be created again? I believe it now strongly meets notability requirements. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nathan_Lee)

The musician in question has since won a major competition, and received news coverage in both the New York Times and the Washington post.

Here is the new draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nathan_Lee

Thanks Ycaartists (talk) 06:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that your draft article is currently awaiting review. If approved by the reviewing editor it will be placed automatically in article-space. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ycaartists (talk) 06:46, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issam Mahfouz[edit]

There's absolutely no way this could have qualified for deletion. I know your deletion was in good faith, but having reviewed the page, and talking to the actual author of the page, via email, G7 could not qualify because CBlewer has substantially modified the article from the one initial edit of the "original author" up to the point they requested the article deleted in bad faith. I will be happy to discuss via email if you wish. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 00:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It has already been restored in Draft form. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:17, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Bradbury, the concern is that it will be deleted again once moved back to main space. My opinion is that it doesn’t qualify for G7 at all. —CYBERPOWER (Around) 12:10, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Reo Martins[edit]

I'll love to know why you deleted an article on Eyitayo Ogunmola, which I created, without prior notice of any sort of contravention. Moreover, it was an article in progress. Thank you for an expected response. ReoMartins (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ascentium Capital[edit]

Anthony, thank you for noting the update. I have requested to retrieve the article. Previously, Davisonio had reviewed the article and gave the decline reasons, and that is why I noted the changes to Davisonio's suggestion on his talk page. I understand that the reviewers are busy and intentionally did not want to resubmit the article before hearing from Davisonio. Please retrieve the article. I will work on it further and resubmit it. Thanks for your help! IrfanAli512 (talk) 14:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:REFUND/G13 ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GridDB Draft Page[edit]

I would like get a copy of that deleted draft and make the necessary changes to get it published. Is there a way you could provide the original draft && give me some insights on what I need to change to get the article published?

Thanks. IllegalThoughts (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)IllegalThoughts — Preceding unsigned comment added by IllegalThoughts (talk • contribs) 00:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will place a copy of the deleted draft in your talk-page. Please note that the draft was deleted as being a copyright infringement: any re-creation must be in your own words, without either copy-pasting or close paraphrasing. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion of the Kirsten Nimwey article[edit]

Hello! How many commercial publishers you can court mostly writing in Tagalog if your book is not a localization of the Bible, or a handbook for schools supported by the government, or like that? There are a Wikia page of the The Explorers universe and regular illustrative work on the Mr. Mac Bible series for years to be kind of notable too.

I regret to say that I have the remotest idea as to what your unsigned comment means. If you lack skill in the English language I suggest get a native English speaker to help you. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To say in short I’m appealing to you to challenge the deletion of the mentioned page Kirten Nimwey. There was a notion of lack of notability for that subject from Cabayi resulted in a speedy deletion nomination you had executed, but I’ve put some additional comments on that you’ve barely understood above, though.

If you wish to challenge the deletion you are free to do so at deletion review. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards[edit]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

readded Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz
removed Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike

Interface administrator changes

removedDeryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards[edit]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of AROUNDtheTREE[edit]

The article provided just the basic info about the company. I don't understand how that's commercial. What was the problem exactly ? Mention to specific products ?

4throck (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was very clearly a promotional piece designed to advertise the company. If you are unable to recognize this, then I suggest that you refrain from creating articles until you have gained a better understanding of editing principles within Wikipedia. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amardeep Sada[edit]

Hello Anthony Bradbury, I've been looking around for articles to add on wikipiedia and have noticed one in particular that looks very interesting. That of Indian serial killer Amardeep Sada. I was going to add it but I noticed that you had already created it and that it was subsequently deleted. I was just wondering if you'd be interested in working with me on creating and expanding it if I make it as a userspace draft? Please let me know what you think.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create this article; I have not created any articles for a number of years, and never at any time about Indian serial killers, or indeed any Indians at all; or any serial killers. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:38, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On looking back four years I see that on December 21st 2014 I deleted the article as being a copyright infringement; that does not imply any enduring interest in the subject. You are wholly free to create a replacement article, being of course careful to avoid copyright or other WP:CSD problems. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Commander of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations[edit]

Please undo the delete of "Draft:Commander of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations", as the article did not have any copyright violations. All of the information was public domain information from the US government. -- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Commander_of_the_Air_Force_Office_of_Special_Investigations&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFixur (talk • contribs) 14:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Apologies . ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haligator page deletion[edit]

This page does not promote any business or any other organization whatsoever. It is a page about a school alumni group. Please consider and reply me soon. Thanks_ _ Supun999 (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. The problem is that the article was not deleted as being promotional: it was deleted (in July 2017) under category A7, which is lack of claim of significance. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring Draft:Radiology Cafe[edit]

Dear Anthony I would like to continue completing a draft page for Radiology Cafe, but it was deleted. I'm happy to start afresh or you could restore it whatever is quicker? What should I do? Chrisgdclarke (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added Enterprisey • JJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5 • Jenks24 • Graft • R. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry previously page created called AEVI[edit]

Hi Tony,

My name is Amelie, I would like to create a page called AEVI, a company in Financial Services. (No affiliation) I have created a very basic draft but noticed that you previously deleted one with this name. I just wanted to check before I submit.

Thank you

AmelieMGArras (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Amelie[reply]

Amelie: I am answering here as I am uncertain if you look at your (blank) user talk page. I did indeed delete the article you mention. I did that at the request of the editor, but the record shows that said editor received three messages in quick succession giving as opinion the judgement that the company lacked wikipedic notability. If you can show that this condition has been overcome then I see no reason why you should not create your version. I suggest that you do it as a Draft in WP:AFC.

YGM[edit]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

~ Rob13Talk 01:56, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Balakot[edit]

Hi there! You deleted the page 2019 Indian Balakot Air Strike under WP:G5. The content of the former article at that title was used in merging into 2019 Balakot airstrike and is necessary to satisfy WP:CWW, notwithstanding that it was contributed by a banned editor. Can you please restore the page? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of the article is virtually the sole editor thereof. He is a checkuser-blocked serial sockpuppet; I am very unenthusiastic about restoring his article. If you choose to do it yourself then I shall not object to your action; as the article is not overlong, if there really is essential information in it can this not be extracted with article restoration? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shivaji Sondhi[edit]

Hi, I had a system crash while editing the draft article Shivaji Sondhi. Can you restore it please? 

Qcmt2019 (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not clear as to what you mean: the draft article remains in the archives, so any problem your system has experienced is irrelevant. To apply for restoration of the article (which I deleted in May of last year) use WP:REFUND/G13.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry -- I had started a new entry on this, and thought the deleted article was the one I had started. Qcmt2019 (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also sorry - I am not being difficult; the deleted article is the only one retained in the encyclopedia. When your system crashed I am afraid that it must not have saved your work. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recovery of user page[edit]

Hi! I had submitted my user page for deletion by mistake. Will it be possible to recover the same?! Thanks!! --- User:TheInnocentBystander 13:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Happy wikying. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you!! --- User:TheInnocentBystander 05:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


M.R Ghanoonparvar[edit]

Hi AB, hope all is well. It appears you just deleted this page.[5] I had addressed the issue a few minutes ago, so I find this a bit odd. I had also left a message on its talk page as well, but no one replied. Yet it just got deleted. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is still a certain amount of overlap, but I have given you the benefit of the doubt and restored the article.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kudumbashree[edit]

You've deleted the article Kudumbashree. The page is very relevant and I don't understand why it was deleted Subins2000 (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. The page which I deleted was a redirect to a previously deleted page.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Rogers[edit]

...was a legitimate sports biography before being replaced. diff I don't know that it would survive AFD, but there is some third-party coverage. I'm assuming you deleted it because of User:CataracticPlanets's A7 tag, and didn't see that he reverted himself (and the hijacking) just before you deleted. Please restore the versions dated in 2017 and 2018. —Cryptic 00:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, User:Diannaa went ahead and restored. If deleting the college football player actually was intentional, we can discuss at AFD. (I'd probably be in favor of deletion myself, just not as a speedy.) —Cryptic 03:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G6 deletion of Kotra Tehsil[edit]

Why did you delete Kotra Tehsil under G6? Sam Sailor 09:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Fintelum deletion under G11[edit]

Draft:Fintelum page was deleted under G11, however, I don't think that this should be the case. G11 states "Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion" and I truly do believe that the article was written in a neutral fashion. I anticipated that, if the article needs some fixing, it would be noted in the talk page, not simply auto-deleted. That's why it was added to the draft, not published. —Magickriss 09:19, April 25 (UTC)

In my view the draft article was clearly promotional.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some tips on how would one write it in non-promotionally so it would comply with your views of what is promotional? —Magickriss 09:03, May 13 (UTC)

Phoebe-Retta[edit]

I would like get a copy of a deleted draft for "Draft:Dynamic Yield". It said there was a draft created on this topic in 2016, but since I'm not the creator of that draft and I'm just getting started on submitting articles, I want to see why the last submission was rejected to learn a bit more about article creation before I attempt submitting one. Can you provide the original draft & give me some insights/tips on what prevented that version from being published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoebe-Retta (talk • contribs) 14:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamani Nayar[edit]

Hi, Anthony can you restore the "Draft:Yamani Nayar" without the exhibitions list? I think the exhibitions are the portion that were G12 copyright from the saatchi page [1] The rest is good original text with citations. This is the approach used for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Juliette_Losq which had the same problem. I will rework the list. Thanks for your help. BartholomewSenior (talk) 02:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.saatchigallery.com/artists/yamini_nayar.htm
No. But I can and will post a copy of the deleted article ib your talk page, for you to modify. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate that. Thanks for your help. BartholomewSenior (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular[edit]

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
 Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)[edit]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring drafts[edit]

I don't know if you get undo notifications, but I thought I'd drop a note regarding the ones I just performed on some of your recent edits. If you're giving a user the text of a deleted page, please make sure that you're not pasting copyvio content when you do it! Also, it's generally not a good idea to have "article text" on a user talk page, especially if there are WP:AFC headers such as {{AFC submission}} - things like that should probably restored/copied to a user subpage or emailed. Primefac (talk) 03:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

{ping|Primefac} OK, noted. Are you saying, then, that if a bona fide editor posts a copyvio in draft, which gets deleted, and he then asks for a copy of his text to correct it I should refuse him?----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:14, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Not refuse outright, but transfer it only by e-mail or other off-wiki means.—Odysseus1479 21:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


AKatyayan[edit]

I would like to complete this pending article which was deleted by you due to inactivity "Creating Draft:Ted Neward". Professional commitments never gave me enough time to do additional research and put external links and references. Please restore this page, so that I can attempt this again. Thanks a lot. Akatyayan (talk) 09:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:REFUND/G13 ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Draft:Free Republic of Verdis[edit]

I noticed you called my article about Verdis a 'hoax'. I'd like to state that Verdis isn't a how and if it was, you could do the same thing to all other micronations out there including Liberland.

Can I please have it unblocked

Verdis website: Https://verdisgov.org/ Would be great if you could make an article on it to be honest. We just want to get on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnjoyableWiki1 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring the article would not be in the best interests of wikipedia. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seyyed_Ali_Mohammadiye[edit]

> The Seyyed_Ali_Mohammadiye article has been deleted by you.

Can you guide me? Improve it? Rabin.r (talk) 22:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We deleted this article on fawiki. User:Rabin.r and User:Parisa700 are sockpuppets of User:MrNewWritter. --  ARASH PT  talk  22:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LOTR undeletions[edit]

Hello Anthony. I've undeleted Special effects of The Lord of the Rings film series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Production design of The Lord of the Rings film series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (and redirected them with {{R from merge}}) because they did not qualify for speedy deletion. The history of those pages are required for attribution since the content was merged to Production design of The Lord of the Rings film series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page deleted OMLP2P[edit]

Hello Anthony Bradbury

you have deleted my article OMLP2P due to following reason: - A tag has been placed on Draft:OMLP2P requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.expressbusinessdirectory.com/Companies/omlp2pcom-C843734.

for your reference following profile were created by me only (http://www.expressbusinessdirectory.com/Companies/omlp2pcom-C843734) and i have done some changes in that profile so that my OMLP2P article can be approved.

Requesting you to review it again, this will be very helpful for me as all the article content is created by myself and it is unique.

Thank You Sushant Redekar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushant.redekar (talk • contribs) 07:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see donating of copyright materials----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni[edit]

Hi Anthony,

I see that you have reviewed and deleted my draft for the Christopher J. Gramiccioni page I was creating. You deleted the draft based on G11 and G12 and I assure you that my intentions are not to promote or violate any copyrights. If my draft is restored I will be sure to make the necessary changes to make this article acceptable for Wikipedia guidelines. If you are unable to restore my draft to Wikipedia I would still like a copy of it through an alternate medium (email or my talk page).

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cswendeman (talk • contribs) 19:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Verdis[edit]

Greetings Anthony,

It appears this "Verdis" guy is back after you've took down the Draft:Free Republic of Verdis, he has started the Draft:Verdis.

Link to the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Verdis

Thank you. DerpyUser420 (talk) 19:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Basil Bahrani[edit]

He also has User:Basil Bahrani/sandbox, looking at his edits, not sure if he is here to contribute or not. Wgolf (talk) 22:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

General Enquiry[edit]

Hey i saw that you recently deleted Pradeep Khadka cause of Copyvivo article. Pradeep Khadka is a well-known award winning Nepalese actor with mutliple blockbuster movies. Can i start his article ? Let me know , thanks. Owlf 17:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to create anything you wish, so long as it does not violate any of the rules or policies of Wikipedia. Including WP:COPYVIO.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:KLASK[edit]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KLASK".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hi I just created a new page for a South Korean TV drama titled 'Designated Survivor: 60 Days' but it has been speedy deleted due to copyright issues. I would like to edit the page so as not to infringe the copyright issue, however the whole article is gone. Do you have the original copy so that I do not have to type everything again? Because the copyright is only for a small portion which I can edit quickly.

Thank you very much.

Wojciech Waleczek[edit]

Hi. Could you please help me to move an userspace draft about an award-winning composer into article space? I would appreciate this a lot if you could review it or tell me who could review the article. The draft is about Wojciech Waleczek—a succesful pianist from Poland whose numerous achievements deserve to be celebrated with his own Wikipedia page. He took 3rd prize at the Premio Mario Zanfi competition and was the absolute winner of the 4th Franz Liszt National Piano Competition—to name just a few of his accomplishments. Mr Waleczek already has his articles on German and Polish Wikipedia. Hope to hear back from you. Regards, AngelOfDestiny (talk) 13:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Christopher J. Gramiccioni[edit]

In addition to the post from June 27th on this page I would also like to add that I had permission from the source http://mcponj.org/meet-the-prosecutor/ to use their information, I understand if the language was too similar but as I said before I am willing to make the necessary changes. With the permission from the site I see no reason for speedy deletion under copyright and would appriciate you restoring my draft or sending me a copy to rework it. Thank you again.

I do not in any way dispute your statement as to permission granted by the source you specify. I am afraid that a simple statement to this effect id insufficient. Please follow the appropriate links in WP:COPYVIO.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will you Review this Draft?[edit]

Hello,

Some years ago you deleted an attempt to create an article page for 'Domicology' citing A11. Would you mind taking a look through the start of this draft page to provide some feedback as to how to best augment this draft to pass through the review process? The claims of significance for this page are that the profession of Domicology is the only in the world that explicitly utilizes lifecycle sustainability frameworks to examine the relationship between the life cycle of the built environment and the lived experience of communities; and that this field of study is currently being conducted exclusively at Michigan State University (Though other institutions of higher education have since referenced Domicology in their own courses).

The desire to have this article added to wikipedia is that additional information regarding the social, environmental, and economic impacts of blight and abandonment (information originating within scholarly, peer-reviewed publications) can be added to the page. This information is not currently offered on the 'urban decay' article. The temporal dimension that Domicology offers on these phenomena is significant enough that it warrants creation of new article (or so I believe).

Please take a look, and let me know the best way to proceed. I don't have any interest in 'gaming the system' or utilizing wikipedia for self promotion, instead i'm most interested in showcasing important scientific research that will genuinely further the mission of wikipedia as a whole.

Thank You

MSUCCED1 (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Nat[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MSUCCED1/Domicology

PS: I'm unsure as to why the link to that artists page is included in this post.

regarding my userpage[edit]

how did you find me? is there a process to who you target? also sorry for posting my linkedin i guess i just realllly want a job Chriscush765 (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reason for posting here; it was a useless exercise. This is an encyclopedia, and data is found, when looked for, by the title of the required page. It is not like a book where you can scan through the pages. The only way to find your userpage, as an ordinary reader, would be to type in the exact page name, which is "User:Chriscush765". How would anyone searching for employees know that? It is possible, with specific instruction, to search for new pages, which can be checked to determine if Wikipedia policy is being followed; that is how your page was noticed and referred to me for consideration. Advertisements, including resumes, are always deleted. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When I came up to the page and tagged it for speedy deletion, what I thought was that I saw was in the category of unambiguous advertising. It was my gut instinct really. James-the-Charizard (talk) 14:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely correct. It also qualifies for deletion under category CSD:U5, which in short form is inappropriate posting on userpage.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sam8521[edit]

Hi Tony. You might be interested to know that the above user is requesting an unblock, some 10 years after you refused a similar request. They were 14 at the time so 10 years is quite a significant interval. Do you have any feelings either way about their request? --kingboyk (talk) 04:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that ten years is a significantly long time, during which people can change. However, as I made a determination on this block before, albeit not the final determination, it is not appropriate to make a definitive judgement on his new unblock request. The admin who placed the block remains available, although clearly it is unlikely that (s)he will retain a specific memory of it. It should be noted that this editor was known at the time of the block, to have used at least eighteen sockpuppet accounts. I propose that an admin finding the unblock request should be left free to make their own decision. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Draft:Henry Ohaegbulam[edit]

Hi Tony, you deleted a draft I was creating for Henry Ohaegbulam due to the fact that it was believed to have been created for advertising purposes. I want to ask that you kindly restore the draft for me. I was going to effect the necessary changes but it got speedily deleted before I could find the chance to. Please, help resolve this and restore the draft. I'll make every necessary adjustment in less than 12 hours of the restoration. If you cannot grant this, please tell me why so I can avoid such costly mistakes during the creation of future drafts. Thanks a lot. DHOPE4YALL (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the draft which I deleted. I am sure that you had perfectly reasonable motives in its creation, but nevertheless it appears that the entire draft is essentially a promotion piece of a person without adequate encyclopedic notability. You are wholly free to seek a community view at the deletion review page. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Administrators' newsletter – August 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict[edit]

You deleted Carrie Symonds at the same moment I converted it to a redirect. No biggie, but having a redirect may stop people from recreating it.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: Fair comment. Feel free to revert me and insert redirect if you wish. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lectonar has admin-protected it, so even if I did restore the redirect it may look offside to use the admin bit to do so. I still think it would be a helpful redirect as Symonds is mentioned in Johnson's article and infobox (and the page has 6k+ views in the last 30 days), but I'm not overly fussed about it. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo: I protected after a request at RfP, as indeed the article was getting repeatedly recreated, but have taken the protection back to extended-confirmed. Am off to work now, but please ping me when you did the redirect, and I will reprotect fully. Lectonar (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar Too late. Apparently Störm recreated the article under another title to get around the protection and then Fences and windows moved the article over the protection. Too convoluted for me, so I'm stepping away. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware of protection when I moved it; the page linked to John Worboys, which I created, so I got a ping. I checked previous speedy deletions and those versions were sketchy, the current one is quite different. A rush to salting this when she's clearly not a nobody is not a balanced approach. Fences&Windows 23:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai[edit]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Can you delete Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kiyanu Kim please? I think it has a lack of information. 2402:1980:824C:AE08:B2BC:59B3:D1ED:3C33 (talk) 11:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please make this request through the usual channels.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template deletions[edit]

Hi, you just deleted dozens of templates, like Template:Italy Squad 1978 FIBA World Championship, which were tagged as {{db-g4}} by Sawol. Several of these templates were created several years ago, the aforementioned one 12 years ago. The cited discussion was Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 8#Template:Angola Squad 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup, which was initiated and closed this past May, four months ago. The items discussed there only concerned templates for the years 1998, 2014, and 2016. The speedied templates were from other years and were not nominated in the aforementioned discussion. They could not have possibly been subject to speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G4 as recreations of templates previously deleted via deletion discussion, as no such discussion took place. Can either of you please explain your actions? ƏXPLICIT 12:42, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed to me that the discussion, which covered a large number of templates, could reasonably be taken to include other templates which were in all significant features similar to those for which deletion was agreed. If you feel that this is not the case I would appreciate explanation of your reasoning. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CSD criteria have very narrow definitions and are not particularly open to interpretation. The templates you deleted failed to meet several aspects to qualify for speedy deletion under G4. They were not: a) recreations of templates that were previously deleted; b) sufficiently identical copies in terms of content, not purpose—G4 has never been broad enough to cover the latter; c) previously deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. The deletion of these templates appear to be out-of-process. ƏXPLICIT 23:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I hear what you say, although possibly not with full agreement therewith. But I have no wish to argue the point; it does not seem to me to be worth arguing. what are you suggesting? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that these templates did not meet the CSD criteria and should not have been deleted under G4. The speedy deletions noms should have been declined. The templates should be restored and sent to WP:TFD.
On a side note, let me see if I can get better understanding of your application of G4. Let's take File:Fantasy Ride Deluxe.jpg for example, which is an alternate cover for the album Fantasy Ride. It deleted as a result of this discussion because the the only difference between that cover and File:Fantasy Ride Standard.jpg was the color scheme. Would you argue that G4 is broad enough to be applied to all alternate covers where the only difference is color, even if they were uploaded before the discussion took place? ƏXPLICIT 03:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would not argue at all about a deletion which was performed some ten years ago, not by me. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Very well, I will be taking the matter to WP:DRV. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 September 7. ƏXPLICIT 10:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
readded Floquenbeam • Lectonar
removed DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes

removed Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mohamed Abdullahi ibrahim isack[edit]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury,

Just curious why you thought this user page was worthy of deletion. We usually allow editors to post a bit of information about themselves on their user page and he wasn't "promoting himself" or any business. It seemed harmless enough and it was a brand new editor, he had only been active for 45 minutes. Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or why you deleted User:Rezoanul basher! Editors are allowed to post brief biographical information about themselves on their user pages. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz:The first userpage you mention contains only personal information, including links to a variety of media pages, which seemed to me to be inappropriate. Would you not agree that the userpage should at least focus primarily on wikipedic activity, with personal information as a secondary subject? If editors use the project as a vehicle in which to discuss their own personal aspects exclusively we run the risk of turning into a variant of Facebook.Your second example seems to me not to be at all controversial. It is a clear and obvious promotional piece, again without any obvious relationship to wikipedic activity.These are my thoughts, which still appear to me to be sound. If you feel that either of these userpages do in fact deserve to exist, then please go ahead and restore them; I would not agree but will not contest.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:53, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ujjwal Patni[edit]

Just want to recover my page data which was deleted by you (Ujjwal Patni). I really want to create that page because Ujjwal Patni is a famous public figure, top selling author author, which achieved 3 Guinness world records, Motivational Speaker shiv khera. If I was doing anything wrong help me to recreate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnuragKulkarni09 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had some difficulty in identifying the page in question, as you posted it in a sandbox under your username, and then did not sign your edit. Your draft consists of fifteen words only, and do not indicate any notability for their subject. Are you aware that a longer article about Ujjwal Patni, who may or may not be the same person, was deleted (not by me) some seven years ago?----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Jephson[edit]

This disambiguation page was deleted as it did not link to any existing articles (WP:G14). Since then I have created articles on Anthony Jephson (died 1755) and Anthony Jephson (died 1794), so if the page is restored it should now have at least two blue links. Opera hat (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please reverse your deletion of rarest element[edit]

Hi Anthony Bradbury,

I recreated rarest element, as I was opposing Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_13#Xest_Y which at the time was closed as unopposed. It is clear by recreating it that I was opposing the close, so the original delete reason does not apply. I think it is a worthwhile redirect to have. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Registering your opinion by reversing an already closed discussion is an incorrect approach. In my personal opinion the deletion reason stated is a valid one, in that Wikipedia is not meant to be a collection of trivia. Nevertheless, if you feel that the redirect is valid then feel free to take it to deletion review. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article delete (Question)[edit]

Hi Anthony Sir

I have nominated few pages for deletion 7 days has been passed but the articles are not deleted now i have two concerns how the pages were approved and patrolled by editors if they were not notable and how come now editor saying that the page is not notable and no references found in google. i have put the tag on 13 september and 14 september but the pages are not deleted yet kindly let me know is 7 days enough or there is other criteria ?.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleena_(actress) (i nominated this page for deletion on 14 september) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salahuddin_Toofani (i nominated this page for deletion on 13 september) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buz-e-Chini (16 september)

Thanks پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk) 08:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles nominated at the articles for deletion page are normally retained for seven days after nomination; it is not unusual for them to take a day or two after that period to be definitively processed. You need take no further action.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark[edit]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Question[edit]

Hi Anthony,

Like many of the comments I see om this page, I am writing to ask about a deletion of a page that I created for Parag Vaish.

I tried to make sure and include links to show "credible indication of importance" such as a link to his appearance on Fox Business Channel, a link to his newest book and also to his public speaker profile. What else do I need to add to make this fit your guidelines/the guidelines of Wikipedia? I can definitely use some guidance.

He has been a leader in closing the gender pay gap. I thought about including that info and just blanked out on it. Would that be worthy of inclusion?

Sorry if I seem clueless. I really do appreciate any help you can give me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackArmstrongFan (talk • contribs) 07:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The independent Pharmacy[edit]

The article had secondary sources and required to be written again for some obvious reasons of promotion. I did submit it again. Can you explain the reason for deletion? (SmartCaptcha (talk) 15:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

The draft article still appears to me to be inherently promotional. If you wish to take it to deletion review I will not contest the consensus reached. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Luis Dato[edit]

Hello. There has been a confusion about my draft and the article Luis Dato. I am quite new in the wikipedia and i did not know the rules well. i deeply apologize. I revised the Draft: Luis Dato to the wikipedia's standard. Please review it. Thanks. Stephentalla (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I may owe you an apology; I am uncertain. I do not seem to have deleted your article about Luis Dato, although I agree that some admin has. I appear to have deleted your userpage, at your own request. It may be that your request was intended to refer to another page; I do not know. O

Please clarify for me which page you intended to have deleted - if any - and which you intended to remain. If it helps, I do not see anything wrong with the Luis Dato article. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anthony. Out of frustration, I requested my userpage to be deleted. The reason was, my article Luis Dato was deleted (by Bearcat). Apparently, there is a copy of the article in the Draft and i decided to move it as an Article. the move was a mistake. and i conceded and i apologize. perhaps, you could help me revive the article Luis Dato. I have a copy of the article in the Draft, though. Stephentalla (talk) 05:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is edit the draft, which exists now, until you are happy with it, and then submit it as an article.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
already revised and submitted. Could you help with the review? :) thanks! Stephentalla (talk) 06:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Draft[edit]

Hi Anthony,

I see that you have reviewed and deleted my draft for the OBAKEIDORO! page I was creating. If my draft is restored I will be sure to make the necessary changes to make this article acceptable for Wikipedia guidelines. I would like to delete all the references pointed out and resubmit. If you are unable to restore my draft to Wikipedia I would still like a copy of it through an alternate medium (email or my talk page).

Thank you C4JZwJBR (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let me first apologise for the delay in responding to your post; I have been out of the country for just over a week.
I deleted your draft as a copyright violation. Articles here obviously depend on good references, but must be written entirely in your own words. I cannot place a copy onto your talk page because that would commit the original copyright offence (talk pages are not private). I will e-mail a copy to you.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reply. I want you to send it to this email address.
lda6lge@gmail.com
C4JZwJBR (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Carline Daur[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Caroline Daur. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Grace Ihejiamaizu[edit]

Hi Anthony, I received a notification that this article had been deleted, so I guess I worked on it at some point! The reasons for deletion were A7 and G11. A7 is "no importance" which I'm surprised at as her biography is listed on the World Economic Forum site, and G11 is "self promotion" which I'm also surprised about as I usually spot that type of writing and edit it out myself. Were there other reasons? Maybe copyright vio that I missed? TIA. MurielMary (talk) 07:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are in fact several edits attributed to you just over a month ago. I have reviewed the article following your post ad have, after some thought, restored it. I am not wholly convinced that the importance claimed is of sufficient weight to justify retention in the encyclopedia, but retaining it does no harm.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Anthony. To me this is blatantly promotional. Any objection to me deleting it? Deb (talk) 17:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I was thinking about moving it to draft, actually. Deb (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Welp, it is promotional in tone, but no quite enough to fire off my CSD response. If you look sideways and squint, there may be an assertion of significance. Draft sounds like a good place.-- Deepfriedokra 17:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The two previous posts reflect the degree of ambivalence that I felt, after initially deleting the article, when this deletion was questioned. My original feeling was that it was promotional; I am happy if you choose to delete it; or move to draft if you wish.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony, Deb. I think draft would be appropriate so I can improve on the tonality. I may have been a bit biased due to my acquaintance with the said person but I created it as a draft and it was approved, I am still relatively new here, but speedy deletion after approval leaves one confused whether it's an opinionated or gender bias thing. It would be more useful if the promotional paragraphs are highlighted. Opatachibueze (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May I assume that the apparent hint that I was either opinionated or gender-biased is just due either to my misunderstanding or to ambiguous phrasing on your part?
As to the point you make regarding approval; acceptance of a draft for inclusion in mainspace sets the bar at a lower level than that for consideration for speedy deletion; or indeed, for any deletion procedure. Consideration for deletion of an article which been through WP:AfC is not unusual. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my page[edit]

What was the reason for my page being deleted? How was there mis-use if everyone referenced is a relative and all of which are public figures actors, producers, artists, athletes etc. I even left articles on myself which can he referenced on major publications such as IwantEDM.com PenninoAnthony (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You created a userpage: a userpage is intended to be a page about your activities, expectations, interests and actions in relation to your erditing on wikipedia. A brief biographical comment is acceptable as an udjunct to the rest of the text. Information about your family is not appropriate on a userpage, nor are references to articles about yourself. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a right and accurate about famous entrepreneur Muneeb Mushtaq, But again I am getting the message regarding promotional content. If somebody write about himself then it will be consider as promotional. I think on every profile your mood is different. Here is a wikipedia profile which I have follow after several deletion. Now Check it it has same content as Muneeb Content. Please check below content and wikipedia account.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankur_Warikoo

He is the co-founder of Nearbuy and Little App. He served as the CEO from Aug 2015 (when nearbuy.com started) to October 2019. He announced his step down as the CEO in a LinkedIn post,[2] in October 2019.Warikoo started the Groupon India business in April 2011, which is when Groupon entered India through an acquisition. In addition to serving as the CEO of the India business, between 2013-2015 Warikoo also managed the Groupon APAC business of Indonesia, Thailand and Philippines.[3] In August 2015, Groupon India went through a management buyout, where the India management team (led by Ankur) bought out the majority shareholding of Groupon, partnering with Sequoia Capital.[4]

Note: With the name of Muneeb M. Mushtaq it was live 2 month ago but now you are saying it is promotional what is the answers.

And Please tell me my promotional content?. Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MuneebM.Mushtaq (talk • contribs) 11:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I have no further comment to make; please re-read my original comment above. Also note that in Wikipedia writing about yourself, while not absolutely forbidden, is strongly discouraged. And articles written about oneself are always very likely to be seen as promotional under Wikipedia guidelins. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day[edit]

Good Day, How u doing please can i have your personal mail to take to you? Ezekiel Dogara hope (talk) 09:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Wikipedia e-mail is enabled. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:05, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Children of the Lens[edit]

Notice

The article Children of the Lens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional group with no evidence of notability. Fails NPLOT, NFICTION, GNG. BEFORE fails to find any discussion that goes beyond mention in passing/plot summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article some thirteen years ago, as Wikipedia newby, and had actually forgotten that I had done so. I have no interest in preserving it.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Innermost Circle of the All-Highest for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Innermost Circle of the All-Highest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innermost Circle of the All-Highest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
removed Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion review for Marina Suwendy[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Marina Suwendy. PERSONSOFMALAYSIA (talk) 04:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I being notified of this? As far as I can determine I have done nothing to this article, which appears in any case to be extant.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


deletion review of Souptic Chakraborty==========[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Souptic_Chakraborty&action=edit&redlink=1

Dear Anthony , you have deleted the entire article because it contained a reference of imdb.com if its there we could have removed it but deleting the article is not a solution and neither we are promoting any website.I created this page so that others can know more about this public figure and about him, hence i would request you to please reactivate this article so that i can remove the hyperlink reference of imdb. Thanks Humchandan (talk) 12:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the article, not because of a reference (although in Wikipedia IMBD references are not regarded as valid) but because of copyright violation. That being so I cannot reactivate the article as that perpetuates the copyright violation. If you wish I can e-mail the text to you (if your e-mail is enabled here) but the article, if you submit it again, must be written only your own words. Please let me know. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anthony, could you please send me the email of the entire content with reference and also tell me which content was a part of copyright violation so that i can check it and get it rectified, thanks Humchandan (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Taifa (disambiguation)[edit]

You declined my speedy nomination of Taifa (disambiguation) as erroneous. I was wondering whether I misunderstood the criteria, or if it just wasn't obvious to you from the way the page is formatted that the first item on the page (Taifa) is in fact a primary topic. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may well be that it is my understanding which is faulty. As I understand it, Taifa takes us to two distinct items and, as such, disambiguation is appropriate. I do not understand your comment about one being a primary topic.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wait… Now that I scrutinize the CSD criteria more closely, I think it's actually been changed. It used to be that a dab page that had two items but where one was the primary topic was considered unnecessary; looks like that was removed when the criterion was split from G6 or 68 (whichever one it was). I'll ask at the CSD talk page to make sure. Sorry for the misunderstanding. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DRV request notice Comment[edit]

Deletion review for Kahler v. Kansas[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kahler v. Kansas. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Omanlured (talk) 16:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring deleted pages[edit]

Hello, I noticed a few years ago you deleted a number of World Cup qualification articles which were created by a blocked user. Would it be possible to restore these pages (listed below)? They are notable topics which are useful to Wikipedia, and it would save a considerable amount of effort from having to recreate them. Thanks, S.A. Julio (talk) 08:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List

Deletion of Death of Carlos Gregorio Hernandez Vasquez[edit]

Hello User:Anthony_Bradbury, I tried responding to you where you posted your message, but haven't heard back. I'm trying here now. Hi @TomCat4680:! Nice to meet you. I just typed something up using the above live, but it's unclear to me whether you'll receive it. Anyway, please undelete this "article." Yes, there was little of substance because I did not have enough time to add more. My intent had been to scaffold and fill in the details soon thereafter. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paxperscientiam (talk • contribs) 22:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article contained no content whatever except for an infobox. That being so I do not feel comfortable rec=storing it, but will post it to your talkpage. Please bear in mind that an infobox in isolation is virtually guaranteed to be speedy-deleted. If you create the article again I suggest that you use WP:AfC, and create the infobox after the article. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding a page deletion (I didn't open this thread, but I see you haven't been notified, so I'm notifying you). The thread is "Suggestions for Sadhu Shetty?".The discussion is about the topic Sadhu Shetty. Thank you.– Levivich 21:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bass Drops Music Visualizer[edit]

My page Draft:Bass Drops Music Visualizer has been speedily deleted under CSD G3, why? 36.81.233.137 (talk) 02:52, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I really cannot believe that this is meant as a serious question.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bass Drops Music Visualizer is a part of Renderforest music visualizer. 36.81.233.137 (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That may well be the case. But your draft article was written in a styl4 so far different from styles acceped here as to render it wholly unsuitable for inclusion in this encyclopedia. I am absolutely not prepared to restore it; if you wish to challenge this decision please do so at deletion review, not here. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, I note that Renderforest has been deleted four times from the encyclopedia. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Draft:Bass Drops Music Visualizer[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Draft:Bass Drops Music Visualizer. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 36.81.233.137 (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion for Pannonian mixed forests[edit]

Hi, you deleted my first Wikipedia page because it had some text in it that was the same as from https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/pa0431

The rest of the page was not copyrighted at all and was my own work. How can I view the previous page so I can remake the page with the problematic text reworded? I don't wanna restart the whole entire page.

Please help me out. This was my first article and I had a lot of source material (articles, papers, etc) downloaded because I was planning on working on the page today. I didn't think the WWF copyrighted their page because it is a nonprofit and the research in question was funded by the EU. I know better now and it won't happen again, but is there any way I could reuse the rest of the source code please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tr3ndyBEAR (talk • contribs) 21:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand that the violation was not intentional. For the future, note that all published text, from any source, should be regarded as copyright protected unless this is expressly denied within or with the text in question.
I will send your deleted text to your talk page. Please review it and then delete it, as technically maintaining it even on a talk page is a copyright violation.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck[edit]

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはAnthony Bradburyたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:11, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [6]

Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020[edit]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
  • A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

Technical news

  • Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Sidoti[edit]

Sir. After knowing that my draft would take three months to be revised, I received an answer the following day saying that publication was denied on account that there were no footnotes/"inline cites"(?). In reality, the text is not very long but has ten footnotes. Since I'm already used to editor's silly restrictions I saw no alternative but to write to you and request some sense. Yours Peiris Fox (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will you like to help us[edit]

Hello Anthony Bradbury! Actually I want a little help from you. Me and SilkTork are working on the title Sandeep Maheshwari on User:Kashish pall/Sandeep Maheshwari . We have completed it almost and need little help to finish this quickly so can you please help us? Kashish pall (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary![edit]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very Bradbury happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous draft redirect deletions[edit]

Hello Anthony. Redirects are not eligible for WP:G13. Additionally, redirects that are a result of page moves from the draft namespace to the main namespace should be retained. I have just reversed a number of these that were nominated by Thepenguin9. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft talk:OnePageCRM deletion?[edit]

I see User:Athaenara deleted Draft talk:OnePageCRM under G8, apparently it got restored, and then you deleted it under G13. But the base page, Draft:OnePageCRM is still there. Help me out here? -- RoySmith (talk) 21:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind. I see. user:NadiaReckmann recreated it. Sigh. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anthony[edit]

I have a problem with citation when ever I am citing a source it shows a warning called" text web ignored help" how it can be resolve thanks have a nice time

I am sorry, I have not come across this ever. I suggest you make use of the "help" page, remembering to sign your post when you do.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Maizbhandariya:, the problem is that you add | between Cite and web, or Cite and book, it should be Cite web|title=title|url=link and so on. I've fixed it for you at Thaika Shuaib. You must take a note of WP:REFB, if you still face referencing issues. Regards - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chidi Okoroafor[edit]

Was not an abandoned draft?! ——SN54129 06:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My error. Profound apologies. Draft is restored.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was, however, an apparent test page devoid of content. Deleted again.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks AB, yes, G2 all the way! Apologies for sounding testy:) ——SN54129 08:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).

Administrator changes

removed Gnangarra • Kaisershatner • Malcolmxl5

CheckUser changes

readded Callanecc

Oversight changes

readded HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Polyteknikkojen Ilmailukerho[edit]

I see on 26 April, an article that I had created years ago (14 years?) had been deleted. I know standards were lower in those days and I have not been back to it since. You may even be right in your decision. However I was not given a chance to look at it and improve it. There was no alert. I would have hoped the article's creator would have been notified. I don't regularly review the list of articles proposed for deletion, and neither should I have to.JMcC (talk) 10:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Perhaps incorrectly, I did not feel that visiting the original author of the aerticle after fourteen years was appropriate. There were a number of contributors subsequent to your draft, although the end result of their edits, in my opinion, still qualified for a deletion under category A7. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In which case, please re-instate the article so that I can see what it looked like when you deleted it. I may be able to improve it with material and references from the much larger Finnish version. I also want to look through my bookshelves. At present I am staying out in the country, well away from London. It may be a few weeks before I can do my research.JMcC (talk) 09:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will not restore it to mainspace, but I will put it in your talk page.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No text has been posted on my talk page. You say that you were incorrect in your behaviour when you deleted the article. Please correct your error. It would seem that simply restoring it, would be closer to Wikipedia's policies. JMcC (talk) 09:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me; I did not and do not say that my deletion was incorrect. It was not. Restoring the article would be totally against Wikipedia policies. Why it did not appear on your talk page is not clear to me, but I will re-post it there.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-instated the article. It seems to be impossible to see the discussion that took place with any other parties before the article was deleted, but the criteria that you cited are mystifying. How can you delete an aircraft design organisation that is responsible for the construction of 536 aircraft? What next: Boeing? The article had links to over 20 other articles.JMcC (talk) 11:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although I have re-instated it, I see that we have now lost the history and talk page. Usually when an article is moved, Wikipedia policy is to retain these rather than just creating a new page. The process you have chosen seems to run counter to this principle. JMcC (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article talks about a student flying club, so calling it aircraft design organization mystifies me. I do not agree with your reinstatemet of the article unilaterally, but will not move to remove it again as this would appear to be harassment, or abuse of privilege. Compaing the club to Boeing appears to me to be fatuous; let us see if any other editors pick up on it.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Equivalent organisations are the German Akafliegs. They also design and build aircraft in much the same way. Some are built in-house; some have been sub-contracted. Their universities produce graduates who have practical and much valued experience in the aircraft industry. Other countries whose light aircraft industry has disappeared could learn valuable lessons from the Akafliegs and PIK, so the fact the article is about a small country should not make us act parochially. If you start deleting the smallest aircraft builders and then move up to the the next smallest, where do you stop? Hence the reference to Boeing. I am unaware of any process for undeleting articles and so a new article seemed to be the only option. I can't see why you posted the text on my talk page otherwise. I do not see a problem in creating a new article; I was unaware of any permission was needed. By re-instating PIK, I hoped to demonstrate that an old article can be brought up to standard, if proper notice is given. I can improve some of the references within a few weeks when I can get at my reference books such as Jane's. I am also a former owner of three PIK aircraft. JMcC (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I placed the article text on your talk page, giving you notice of so doing, in order to make it easier for you to improve the article. You have no need to demonstrate your ability to resurrect inadequate articles; similarly, you have no need to explain to me how to perform my function as an admin. I am aware of the Janes series, and my library contains issues for several years. They do not contain articles on student aero clubs. As you point out you have decided unilaterally to revive the article, and I have already stated my reason for taking no further action. This conversation is now closed.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also think this discussion should be closed. But to give you a reminder about human fallibility:
Page 27 of Jane's World Sailplanes and Motor Gliders "The PIK series takes its name from the Polyteknikkojen Ilmailukerho, which was founded at Helsinki Technical University in 1931. The series began in 1945 but the PIK-3 was the first type to be produced in series. It was designed by Lars Norrmen and Ilkka Lounama as a small cheap sailplane suitable for construction by flying clubs. The prototype first flew in the summer of 1950." This edition published in 1980 by Jane's Publishing Company Macdonald and Jane's Publishing Group Limited ISBN 0710600178 JMcC (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting user talk[edit]

I'm not fussed by bureaucracy so if you are aware of a reason to delete User talk:Et4y that's fine by me. However, I'm wondering if you might have missed that it was a user talk page where others had contributed. No need to reply, just ignore or restore as wanted. Johnuniq (talk) 23:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user has stated the intention to withdraw from Wikipedia: deletion of their talk page as at their own request, on this basis. This seemed to me to be a valid reason, indeed pretty much the only valid reason, to delete a talk page (I did recognize it as a talk page). But given that the user has declared the intention to withdraw from the project I guess it will not affect him/her either way, so I will restore the page if it seems important to you.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but don't worry about it. I was sure the WP:Deletion policy specifically excluded user-requests for deletion of user talk pages (that is the community standard) but it's not mentioned there. I see that WP:G8 excludes user talk pages but that's not what I was thinking about either. Even WP:U1 is not quite what I was thinking. At any rate, I was only concerned you might have overlooked the nature of the page. Johnuniq (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think there needs to be a much stronger reason to delete user talk pages. Users wanting to vanish is not a good enough reason. The page can be blanked instead. I will count this kind of deletion nomination as bad faith. However I am only commenting in general. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zonic[edit]

Zonic was at WP:AFD and a long standing article and I believe your CSD A7 was inappropriate. I may care to work on that presently. Please Refund. Thankyou. 22:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

It was a one-line article with no included detail and, specifically, no claim, expression or inference of notability. you have the option of taking your request to deletion review if you wish. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete review for Danial Hajibarat[edit]

I created Danial Hajibarat's article based on WP:ARTIST, but because the article has already been created by someone else and deleted. My new article was deleted. I request the return of my Danial Hajibarat's article. Thank You very much Mina.FAMI (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has already been deleted by community consensus at WP:AfD. I am therefore not prepared to restore it.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what article has been written about this in the past,But the article I created was based on WP:ARTIST,I read the discussion of deleting the article,This article appears to have been deleted for personal reasons, not Wikipedia! Even now, the article I created has been deleted based on WP:ARTIST, and you insist on not creating it! Anyway, thank you very much. Mina.FAMI (talk) 14:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pradeep Khadka[edit]

I saw that previously you deleted Pradeep Khadka cause of copyright violations. He is famous actor from Nepal and eligible enough to be on wikipedia. can i create the wiki page of him? Owlf

You are perfectly free to create a wikipedia page on this person, but you must do it using your own words. Using text from another source, as you did in the deleted article, is a breach both of Wikipedia policy and of common law, and it is absolutely not allowed here.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know about that and for your kind information previously I did not create his article. I saw that it has been deleted for the multiple times and being Wikipedia Nepal editor I wanted to create his article. so thought to take an approval before I create it. Owlf 06:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Zonic[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Zonic. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Location is at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 May 21. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Gadon Article[edit]

Good day!

Why the page has been deleted? The user who nominated the article to speedy deletion did not respond to my replies. I firmly believe that the page is free from bias and neutral in nature. It does not promote also specific things or person. The subject, Larry Gadon, is a known personality or said to be a public figure already here in the country of Philippines. It has been cited by 20 citations come from different independent sources and multimedia platforms. Please review again. I am hoping for the recovery of the page.

Thank you and God bless! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the page, as stated in the deletion notice, on the basis that the subject lacked appropriate claimed wikipedic notability; please note that blogging is regarded here as being intrinsically non-notable, and coming 28th in a legislative assembly election is similarly not of sufficient importance to qualify here. Neither is being the originator of an impeachment procedure of a legislator not of international significance worthy of inclusion. The second reason, being a promotional article, is self-explanatory. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zonic draftification[edit]

Hi. I'm back. And you are probably entitled to roll your eyes. Following the endorsed A7 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 May 21 can I please request draftication of Zonic including talk page. Alternatively can you give permission for me to make the request at WP:REFUND (I need to be able to point back here if making such a request). The DRV was ambiguous as to whether draftification of Zonic was permitted and I will totally respect a veto by you or DRV closer Sandstein. Emailing the latest version would be effectively pointless as I can copy a recent enough version from [7]; my preference remains for draftification however. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Djm-leighpark, I have no opinion about this. Sandstein 12:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As I imagine you are aware, the deletion review agreed overwhelmingly with the deletion, with two editors only, while agreeing with deletion, suggested that letting the AfD go to completion might have been better. But having said that, I have no objection to the making of a request at WP:REFUND.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my user page[edit]

Why did you do so, may I know the reason buddy. And I did nothing even then. Vishal 16:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalttplayer (talk • contribs)

Answer is on your talk page.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G13 Abandoned Draft[edit]

Out of curiosity, why do you use this deletion summary when deleting newly-created drafts that are tagged for speedy deletion for other reasons, such as Draft:Why is why? Passengerpigeon (talk) 22:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An error. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).

Administrator changes

added CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
removed Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL

CheckUser changes

removed SQL

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NITYAM KUMAR[edit]

  • 15 June 2020: 13:36 (UTC): Anthony Bradbury deleted page User:NITYAM KUMAR ‎(U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion in userspace)
  • 15 June 2020‎ 13:40 (UTC): User:NITYAM KUMAR recreated. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 15 June 2020‎ 14:23 (UTC): Ohnoitsjamie blocked NITYAM KUMAR with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) ‎(Promotion / advertising-only account: also WP:CIR). No further action needed. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Бо́же, Царя́ храни́! - blocked[edit]

I just wanted to appraise you that, having had my attention drawn at AIV to this revdeled edit by User:Бо́же, Царя́ храни́! to George Floyd protests, I felt that an indefinite block was far more appropriate for such deeply offensive remarks. My block rationale was a bit lengthy, and got truncated, but if the editor wished to appeal the block I would leave it to other admins, including yourself, to weigh in and unblock, if they felt it was a better course of action than the one I have taken. This was most certainly not a gut reaction on my part, and I took some twenty minutes or so deciding whether or not to take action, and wavering between a shorter 1 week to 6 months block and how that might or might not be sufficient for such an awful post to a page which, a week ago, was gathering a quarter of a million page views a day (now down to 40,000 per day), and how you had already warned them about any recurrence. The truncated element of my block rationale mentioned an earlier edit to a recently deceased persons page (Troy Sneed) which is suggestive of a desire by this editor to cause offence by posting on Wikipedia. I recognise that blocks are meant to be preventative, not punitive, but in this type of outrageous edit, I personally feel it was justified. I'd like to think others admins would, on reflection, also agree. But I'll respect the outcome of any unblock appeal they might try to make. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)  [reply]

English only please (Response to Anthony Bradbury)[edit]

This is the English Wikipedia, and only articles written in English are allowed here. Unless this article is translated into English it will be removed.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


Hello Mr. Bradbury, as a matter of fact, the article was written in English first. However since the individual is Bulgarian and many of the references and links are in Bulgarian, it made sense to be written in Bulgarian as well. Both pages (In English and in Bulgarian) are similar and cover the same information. This is just to cover all bases. In English, the name of the person "Златко Живков" is written "Zlatko Zhivkov". Thank you

No. I say again the article will be deleted if not in English. There are no exceptions to this policy.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • (talk page stalker) I assume you guys are talking about Златко Живков? Yup, this really is a fundamental rule. On the English language wikipedia, we write articles in English. For one, that's what our readers expect. But also, because that's what (for the most part) our editors can read; for articles not written in English, we have no practical way to maintain the article, verify that it meets WP:V and WP:N, doesn't violate WP:BLP, WP:CV, and so on. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@RoySmith: Yes, that is the article in question. I have told the author, both here and on the article talk page, that it must be translated or it will be removed (I have been an admin for 12 years+, and will do it if I need to}. I hope he will translate it; I cannot speak Bulgarian and make no comment about the content of the article.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet for Wwikix?[edit]

Hi Anthony! user:Wwikix caused havoc for very long time in the categorization and content systems, especially for cats and for the Netherlands (where he is from), while disregarding our conventions. There is new user user:Blueyeah who is behaving by a similar pattern. I cannot tell for sure if he is Wwikix but he must have previous WP experience, hitting the road running wild. As an expert to Wwikix, could you look into possible sockpuppetry or other remedies? I have not reported possible sock puppetry in ages. Probably since Haham Hanukah 13 years ago. gidonb (talk) 12:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AS far as I can determine I have never heard of or interacted with user:Wwikix. I can look, but there are admins better experienced at sockpuppet work than I, as you will know having been here for so long.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anthony! You were the one to reject his unblocking request, i.e. had most recently dealt with him. At your suggestion I'll turn to another admin. Thanks for the response! gidonb (talk) 01:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As you say, I refused his unblock request in October 2016. I failed to see that when looking after your recent post. I would still, however, claim only limited expertise in sockpuppet identification, as I said earlier.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NP. I consulted with another admin who engaged with the user, then reported 3 sockpuppets and an old account. I do have lots of experience at WP, just not in this domain. I concentrate mostly on content creation and improvement. I'm sure we'll have other opportunities to collaborate! gidonb (talk) 07:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

undeleted Battle of Ceber[edit]

Hey just a heads up, I've undeleted Battle of Ceber, which you good-faith G3'd as a hoax. Based on the tagger's somewhat dubious CSD history, I did some poking around on Polish Wikipedia and found sourced articles referring to it there, so I've come to doubt it's truly a hoax. I've undeleted for others to have a look at (see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#8 years-undetected hoax article). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thank you for the heads-up.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Call girl delhi[edit]

You may wish to revoke TPA.--Cahk (talk) 07:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cahk: I do not understand your message. This editor has made only one post, his userpage, which I deleted and for which I awarded him a block. It is usual not to delete user talkpages, and I considered it but chose not to do so. Obviously no-one has labeled his post as a TPA, and I am certain that they would not. What are you asking me to revoke? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He has now added an appeal on his talk page relating to covid-19, which is irrelevant to your initial post.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheGreatest38482[edit]

I was about to ask TheImaCow when the page disappeared, G5 in violation of which block? Cabayi (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The editor was blocked by User:Bsadowski1. It would be more straightforward to ask him/her. I only deleted the userpage. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:41, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My question was about the G5 deletion, not the block. I don't see how the G5 criteria were satisfied. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When investigating originally, I found a previous block applied by Fastily, but cannot now locate it. What point are you making? He is blocked under another name, and is editing. How do you interpret G5?----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's how interpret it, but I didn't see an associated blocked account, nor any mention of one. The fact you can't locate one now reassures me I wasn't that far off track. In my ideal world TheImaCow would have named the master in the G5 nomination.
The SPI reports & G5 tags which say little more than "I've seen some socking, guess what I saw" - they're getting under my skin. Cabayi (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry; it's an honest block and an honest userpage deletion, and I would explain it if I could. clearly a link has dropped off somewhere. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

L&B[edit]

is one of the main shipping lines in the world. You have very rapidly delete it.-Arorae (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

as Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance, there is already a complete article on WP:de.-Arorae (talk) 21:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your article is only just over one line long, and gives no indication or claim of notability. I see your claim that a full article exists on WP:de. This is not relevant here. For an article to be retained here it must, by itself, fulfill the criteria required by the English Wikipedia. Your article does not. You are welcome to create a full article and submit it for inclusion; note that the rules for article inclusion are not identical to those on WP:de. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of different rules (en/de), but the stub was not completely useless. I will write it again, with all the sources from German newspapers.-Arorae (talk) 23:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

Administrator changes

added Red Phoenix
readded Euryalus • SQL
removed Jujutacular • Monty845 • Rettetast • Madchester

Oversight changes

readded GB fan
removed Keegan • Opabinia regalis • Premeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apple731a[edit]

Hi, saw your note on their talkpage. They actually closed the Latimer A. McCook afd as delete which was reverted as only admins can close as delete. Also, they created the User talk:Syed Tasawar Bukhari for an account that has no edits live or deleted so may be preparing a sockpuppet or meatpuppet account, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As yet no edits made on that account, so I have for now just warned him; I will block him if he edits. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Draft:Jagrit Pratap Singh[edit]

Hi Anthony, I received notice of the speedy deletion of the in-progress article on Jagrit Pratap Singh. I understand in some ways how it could look promotional, but please keep in mind that the draft was being worked on to ensure it was in compliance with standing policies. As the draft is now gone, I request a copy for future reference, which can be left on my talk page. Thank you, Kaszper (talk) 09:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft is on your talkpage as requested. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of User:Dougiamas[edit]

Hi Anthony, you recently deleted my user page ENTIRELY without discussion User:Dougiamas ... I'd really appreciate for the last version to be copied to my Talk page so I can work on it to remove whatever was deemed to be wrong about a page about myself on my own user profile. —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry; you have misunderstood the purpose and function of a userpage. It is to write about your personal skills, abilities, achievements, expectations, interests, etc insofar as these areas relate to your Wikipedia editing. Your deleted userpage goes way beyond this, covers a very significant range wholly outside this definition and description, and is unacceptable in its entirety. Essentially, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social medium. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of User:Johnbplett[edit]

Hi Anthony, you recently deleted my user page ENTIRELY without discussion User:Johnbplett It is disapointing that I muyst go thryogh great pains to contribute to Wikipedia. I proposed one articel [1] to contribute. Immediately I was banned, for every reason immainable. User:Dodger67 took my subnition and used it almost as is excluding me as its origional souce. Is wikikpedia an imfomation monopoly or a free encyclopedia? I can contorbutre extendivly to Wikipedia as much of what I see is outdated, and there is volumes of nessesary real world knowlege missing. For example, do you know how many regulatory bodys there are in South Africa? Did you know that unless you have exhasted the use of the relivant regualtory bodies the courts can turn you away? All of this is missing from Wikipedia, but if I propose it, then it is all rupbish? I'd really appreciate the last version to be copied to my Talk page so I can work on it to remove whatever was deemed to be wrong about a page about myself on my own user profile. 11:04, 25 August 2020 (SAST)

The page you have created is titled as a userpage. The function of a userpage is to indicate an editor's abilities, interests, skills, intentions, history, etc., in relation to the editor's writing within wikipedia. Your page does not come close to this. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Companies_and_Intellectual_Property_Commission

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

174.70.78.194[edit]

user:174.70.78.194 is abusing her talkpage. CLCStudent (talk) 13:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. They are allowed to blank their usertalk page, and adding a two word winge does not really count as abuse. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Dhanraj Nathwani[edit]

Hi Anthony, you recently deleted a page I am yet to edit with further citations for Dhanraj Nathwani. I request you to re-look in this action of deletion and suggest me that what can I do to restore the page. First, I want to ask that you kindly restore the draft for me. I am going to give the necessary changes to make it as per wikipedia policy and guidelines. Kindly help in this and suggest further action to restore the page. હમઝા ઘાંચી (Talk) 05:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, this page was deleted earlier this year, not by me, after an articles for deletion discussion and vote. On inspection the decision appears sound. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

Administrator changes

added Eddie891
removed Angela • Jcw69 • Just Chilling • Philg88 • Viajero

CheckUser changes

readded SQL

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of user page[edit]

Speedy of User:Pmatthews21: Per my contestation the page appeared to contain a Template:UserboxCOI (possibly misformed). And I think a mere one line description. So I really question was CSD:U5 appropriate ? (User (talk) page was on my watchlist and hasn't come off of it whihc probably meant I wasn't too happy about something). However was the U5 appropriate. I notice you don't seem to have responded to my contestation on the talk page, simply deleting the page. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In my opnion this page qualified for deletion not only on the basis of being an inappropriate user page, but also on the basis of being an advertisement (which I did not trouble to include). So yes, U5 was wholly appropriate. If you wish to seek community consensus you can do so at deletion review. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like they were declaring what topics they intend to work on and included a COI tag accordingly (though they weren't entirely successful). I don't see any content subject to U5 or G11 on that page.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ponyo, I agree. We ask people to declare that they have COI. That's what this user did. Then slapping them down because they also included some marketing-speak seems disingenuous. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for User:Pmatthews21[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Pmatthews21. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Book categories[edit]

Please restore the below categories:

  1. Category:Books by Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Category:Books by A. J. Ayer: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Category:Books by Alan Gewirth: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Category:Books by Bhikhu Parekh: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Category:Books by Chris Knight: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Category:Books by Dean Hamer: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Category:Books by Dennis Altman: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Category:Books by Derrick Sherwin Bailey: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Category:Books by Jean Hyppolite: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Category:Books by John Caird: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Category:Books by Jonathan Lear: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Category:Books by John Toland: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Category:Books by John Gagnon: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Category:Books by John Finnis: CSD G5 ({{db-banned}}); additional information: {G5 user: User:Skoojal } 18:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While they were all created by a banned user, WP:G5 states that "G5 should not be applied to transcluded templates or to categories that may be useful or suitable for merging." There's nothing wrong with the categories; they were all appropriately populated with book articles prior to deletion. Cheers, gnu57 05:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The categories are not, I think, suitable for merging, and their usefulness is arguable. I had intended to protest the validity of the deletion, but on reflexion will restore them. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. It's counterintuitive, but WP:SMALLCAT allows for works-by-creator categories that group only one item. Cheers, gnu57 15:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Avani Soni[edit]

Hello Anthony Bradbury. Sorry for disturbing you. Can you check Avani Soni and its talk page ? The article was nominated for "speedy deletion" week ago, but not yet deleted. I am creator of the article, and want to make sure whether the article really meets speedy deletion criteria. I believe that there is enough media coverage on the subject. I am not opposing deletion. If it is not suitable for Encyclopedia, it should be deleted. Please see If the page can be survived. Thanks. --Imfarhad7 (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Imfarhad7 - I've moved the page to Draft:Avani Soni where, having a conflict of interest, you can develop it and submit it via WP:AFC which is suitable for those creating an article with a conflict of interest. Ask at WP:TEAHOUSE if necessary. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will leave it initially to the new page reviewer, as it is now in draft format. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

Administrator changes

added Ajpolino • LuK3
readded Jackmcbarn
removed Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
renamed There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [[Special:SecurePoll/v

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anthony_Bradbury/Archive20&oldid=1211792861"