User talk:SmartCaptcha

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SmartCaptcha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 11:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Hello SmartCaptcha, thank you for your efforts to improve marketing-related content. But please note that blogs, PR platforms and similar sources with a promotional agenda are generally not considered reliable sources. Please see WP:RS for more information, and try to provide uninvolved, non-promotional expert sources with editorial oversight. Please feel free to ask on my user talkpage or at WP:Teahouse if you have further questions. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 11:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Indepedent Pharmacy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Indepedent Pharmacy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC) DGG I need your help to remove every content from this page that you find is specifically representing an entity. The page says that this page needs to be fundamentally re-written. Thanks.[reply]

If you are looking for the draft, you'll find it under the correct spelling. Deb (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Deb I have already resubmitted the draft following the last tag instructions. (SmartCaptcha (talk) 15:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

I think there remains a problem. The article as it stands does not really make a claim of notability, which is essential for it to pass review. Deb (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deb It is registered by CQC and GPhC and have secondary sources as provided to me. Secondly the article didnt have notability issues.It was declined for having some promotional content and required a re-write. Can you check it again. I think it has enough online presence.It would be really helpful. (SmartCaptcha (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Just to clarify - the fact that no notability issues were flagged first time round doesn't mean there aren't any. I don't see any claim to notability in the revised version and that's what I'm advising you to address when you re-draft it. If another admin subsequently deleted it, you will need to take that up with him/her. Deb (talk) 19:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nu Image Medical (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sceptre was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nu Image Medical and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nu Image Medical, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sceptre (talk) 01:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SmartCaptcha! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sceptre (talk) 01:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nu Image Medical (January 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nu Image Medical and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nu Image Medical, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 10:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]