User talk:D Humphreys

William Byrd

I am distressed that you seem to have begun a reversion of edits war with Ariedartin, who was following Wikipedia policy in reverting your replacement Byrd article. Please see User talk:86.31.136.17 for an explanation of Ariedartin's reasons for the reversion. Also see Talk:William Byrd for more of my own feelings on this matter. -- Chuck (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

David, thanks for your reply on my user page. I moved your comment to my talk page, but in the future, it would be much simpler just reply here on your own talk page - or on the Byrd talk page, since the discussion is about the Byrd article(s). As for your replacement article, if you want others to do the editing necessary to make it up to Wikipedia standards, then I would suggest you copy it to Talk:William Byrd and ask that someone help to incorporate it into the main Byrd article. Thank you! -- Chuck (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'll do that

David

I've now inserted a formatted version of my William Byrd article. I did this because I genuinely felt that the old one was insufficiently detailed. No doubt it would benefit from further work.

David

William Byrd (August 2011)

I have reverted your revert on the William Byrd article, and I summarized my case pretty darn well. Yet, you reverted my edit without an explanation at all. Who do you think you are?! You don't own the article! Classicalfan2 (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Non nobis Domine 0001.png

Thank you for uploading File:Non nobis Domine 0001.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Inserting Images

Have you read Help:Images? - By the way which music typesettign system did you use? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Non nobis Domine (canon).png

A tag has been placed on File:Non nobis Domine (canon).png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Non nobis Domine.png

A tag has been placed on File:Non nobis Domine.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mass for Four Voices (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tudor, Tridentine, Gloria, Mary Tudor, John Sheppard, Sir John Petre and Agnus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Byrd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Byrd may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David Humphreys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David Humphreys, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Denniss (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

This draft is entitled "David Humphreys" but is about Bach's duetti. This renders the drat liable for speedy deletion unless corrected. You have only a short time in which to do this. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

On further investigation this topic is already the subject of an article, so I have deleted it. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Great Service has been accepted

The Great Service, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, D Humphreys. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, D Humphreys. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)