User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 14

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

List of 2022 Winter Olympics broadcasters

I belatedly realized that this edit was not needed, since your creation was a cut-and-paste, rather than a copy-and-paste.

For the cut-and-paste, this and this is the right approach. TJRC (talk) 02:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

For now, it is cut-and-paste, for future, is it no newest information can be added? Check before you speak and check the previous Olympics broadcasters list. --Aleen f1 03:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

No, you can continue to edit it; you just need to keep the attribution links as CC-BY requires. TJRC (talk) 04:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Then i think your comments are not necessary. --Aleen f1 04:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

No, just pointing out that you need to have those talk page entries I added for you. if you do a similar split in the future, make sure you add them. TJRC (talk) 21:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my recent misguided edit on this page, Aleenf1. I didn't realise the mobile view wouldn't show all the same punctuation as the desktop view. I'm still not sure why the mobile view doesn't show the interpuncts that separate the broadcasters on the desktop view—do you have any idea why this is? I'm not even sure why/how the interpunct separators are showing? I would have thought the asterisks before each broadcaster would show as bullet points. Anyway, the mobile version still doesn't have separators and so is not very readable—any ideas how to fix this? Also, I wasn't sure why you had reverted my edits at first... I was puzzling over it for ages and trying to work out how to respond, until I looked up the page on desktop. Perhaps next time you could undo rather than rollback so you can explain why it was done. Thanks very much. Ben wren (talk) 03:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Penstrokesbox

Template:Penstrokesbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your revert of List of 2022 Winter Olympics broadcasters

May I ask why you reverted the anonymous user's edit here? As far as I could tell, it was a perfectly valid edit to make and was easily verifiable through the source the user included. OhKayeSierra (talk) 02:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

After taking a closer look at the edit history, it leaves me with more questions than answers, unfortunately. Why are you reverting so many users that are trying to contribute to this article? Per WP:ROLLBACKUSE, you should only be using the Rollback flag in cases of clear vandalism and leaving an edit summary in other cases. More importantly, WP:OWN says that others have a right to make changes to the article, and that no one "owns" content. I have reverted your reversion of that anonymous user because it was clearly out of process and was a perfectly valid edit for the user to make. I strongly suggest that you stop reverting others that are trying to contribute to the article, since these other users are trying to improve it as much as you are. OhKayeSierra (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

You read the ref, any meantioned of Domican Republic? --Aleen f1 06:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

And what is your valid edits about, an edit which got ref but never mentioned the right things? --Aleen f1 06:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor fiji logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor fiji logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivorcookislands.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivorcookislands.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Piped links

Hi! In this edit, you reverted my edit, adding the comment Not the case here, still redirect. However, according to the WP:NOPIPE style which I've cited, there's actually a preference for a redirect over a piped link. Best, Iveagh Gardens (talk) 18:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Please read the clear example there. --Aleen f1 13:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

And it was obvious, what you done, had made the links become redirects, which does not lead the example of the manual of style you shown. --Aleen f1 13:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

It's in the second example there, preferring [[Mozart]] to [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]]. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 16:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

See WP:NOTBROKEN. --Aleen f1 01:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Editing of articles under your supervision

Since you supervise a lot of sporting event articles, would it be ok if I submit my proposal to you first before I edit the article in question?--Hongqilim (talk) 10:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, i don't, I'm only do what it is logically. --Aleen f1 11:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Your recent editing history at 2022 Asian Games shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Asian Games martial arts

How should I say about this if the disciplines in this group changes categories from one edition to another? Or should I leave the list alone. So far of all the sporting events, I only see such trend in the Asian Games.--Hongqilim (talk) 10:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Is it a concern? How it categorise, will not affect the sports or events status. --Aleen f1 11:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

It is a concern. A clear note describing the grouping of sports is necessary as they are all run by different International Federations. DO NOT remove without explaining why this is not necessary. I agree with @Hongqilim here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

What is the concern? You never mention it. It never change the status quo of the sport. --Aleen f1 23:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

The concern is grouping sports that are not related as one. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Grouping sport not related as one, so even not related and to different IF, would it affect anything? Anything?! --Aleen f1 11:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, because we are presenting the information as one sport, even though they are not and are run by separate IF's. You don't have consensus here, and along with @Hongqilim we both agree this should be here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I think you just want to highlight your point, without logically and ridicule yourself. --Aleen f1 11:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Its just not my point. Again @Hongqilim also has the same POV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your lie, how you know the other person not agree with removal. I'm already said, you just don't want to lose yourself. --Aleen f1 15:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Again, Hongqilim introduced the edit to the article (which I think should be there), and you reverted it. Only you are not agreeing with this edit and have no consensus for its removal. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

So i need consensus to remove it, so ridiculous, you always right, man. --Aleen f1 15:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Per WP:BRD, someone added it, the edit was reverted. Now the discussion happened here where two editors questioned your revert. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Are you having consensus too to revert back? So much ridiculous to yourself. --Aleen f1 15:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Another ridiculous, are you a person failed BRD? Comeon @Sportsfan 1234, read properly the BRD, i'm the one who question the addition, and BRD doesn't mention how many editors who are "questioned", you only want to established your own point. ...And don't be revert 3RR warning, doesn't help yourself too. --Aleen f1 22:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are saying. If you are questioning BRD, please re-read the policy again. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sportsfan 1234, you are the one who need to look through or re-read the policy of BRD, look through the flow, you are the one who doesn't understand, blatantly raise up own point. --Aleen f1 22:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hongqilim was bold, you reverted and there is a discussion here on if it should be included. Two editors agree it should be included (ie the discussion). I am going to end this conversation here because you seem to be throwing a temper tantrum because you didn't get your way. My recommendation is perhaps starting a RFC if you feel that strongly about the removal of this. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sportsfan 1234, still failed yourself on this, BRD not working on you, it also not get to your way too. Soon or later it will be eradicated too due to pointless. --Aleen f1 23:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Fine, it's your job as a reviewer, so do it. No one's going to stop you. You've won, ok?--Hongqilim (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Your recent editing history at 1988 Winter Olympics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aleenf1 reported by User:Sportsfan 1234 (Result: ). Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring about the style of place names at 1988 Winter Olympics and other articles

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

A bombshell of inconsistency and letting more inconsistency. God bless you. --Aleen f1 11:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

An administrator which do not honour the Wikipedia guidelines and Manual of Styles. --Aleen f1 12:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Fma12 (talk) 00:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

No valid reasons for reversions

About this reversion of my edit, I'm writing you this because I don't want to be involved in a senseless edit warring. The edit summary you gave (MOS:flags/icons) does not apply for the changes made.

In the case of MOS:flags, there is no problem to show flags on lists/tables and they are discouraged on infoboxes (this is not the case). About MOS:icons, they are not allowed in prose format (this isn't the case, either). If you can be more specific about your point, it would help a lot. Otherwise, your reversions are not appropriate and pretty disruptive.

For the reasons above, I'm going to go back the reversions you made. If you continue this behaviour, I'll be forced to report you. Thinks should not be that way. Please be reasonable, I see you have been blocked recently and guess you don't want to be in that situation again. Fma12 (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Stop threaten people, MOS:WORDPRECEDENCE and MOS:NOICONS, where icons should serve an encyclopedic purpose and not merely be decorative. Flag icons may be relevant in some subject areas, where the subject actually "represents that country or nationality". Go seek your consensus. --Aleen f1 22:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Follow a path of football article, doesn't warrant you to "copy" the path to another sport article. I'm welcome you to report my behaviour, it seems like you are threaten to follow you without obey the MOS. --Aleen f1 22:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I did not threat you, I WARNED you. Your reversions have been disruptive so I did not follow any path but I just added some paramethers to improve the table. You did not give any valid reason to support your arguments so I have reported you. Fma12 (talk) 00:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Seems like you didn't have valid reason otherwise than breaking the Manual of Style. --Aleen f1 00:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Calling me childish?

But you treat other people the same, don't you? This is the pot calling the kettle black. Go reflect yourself before you criticise others.--Hongqilim (talk) 11:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

You acting it now (childish). --Aleen f1 17:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox field hockey

Template:Infobox field hockey has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Fifa 2022 world cup Broadcasting rights

Hello. You reverted my edit due to unsourceness. But I don't know how you didn't see the source S.h.t 2007 (talk) 12:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Aleenf1!

Happy New Year!

Aleenf1,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Timothytyy (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

March 2023

Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Hockey at the Commonwealth Games that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Go for it, i'm waiting for more of your inconsistency. Aleen f1 13:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Asian Games. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please review WP:MSE event articles. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Please review WP:ICONS, and how to obey Manual of Style, rather than making threat here. This doesn't mean you start a project, you can disobey MOS, where MOS:TOOMANY already explained when icons are added excessively, they clutter the page and become redundant. The icons has been available in the events calendar, where it already become redundant. When it not strongly enforced, you "think" everything should be follow it on your manner. --Aleen f1 16:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

These also included your violation for MOS:DECOR, icons should serve an encyclopedic purpose and not merely be decorative. When you likely to oppose for adding an icons just to serve for decoration rather than informative. --Aleen f1 16:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2022 Asian Games. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Still unable to explain the situation of failing to obey MOS:ICONS. --Aleen f1 01:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aleenf1 reported by User:Sportsfan 1234 (Result: ). Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Doesn't affect me, while i'm blocked, i'm still fighting, at least you mean not to to discuss. --Aleen f1 01:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

New message from Timothytyy

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) § Proposal for removing NBAD criteria 1 and 3. Timothytyy (talk) 12:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

#

Edition should be noted in roman.

hi. Can you tell what law underlines this? Show me its rule.

In the following article it is the opposite.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFC_Asian_Cup#Format

The official logo of the games also uses English numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2022_Asian_Games_logo.svg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1998_Asian_Games_logo.svg

and ... .

If you don't have a convincing answer, I can revert the edit. In addition, many other multi-sport competitions on Wikipedia do not use Roman numerals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viexo (talk • contribs) 19:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@Portalian: Hi, I would like you to help me. I anglicized the Asian game numbers but this user romanized it. I messaged twice for several days. The user is not willing to interact and respond. I want to know your opinion. Because I saw in the edits that you edited this article. Pan American Games, FISU World University Games and Many other articles use English numbers. The official logos of the games do not have Roman numerals. The use of Roman numerals was related to the past Olympics because it was held for the first time in Greece. Today, the use of Roman numerals is obsolete.Viexo (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)