User talk:Aleenf1

New message from Timothytyy

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) § Proposal for removing NBAD criteria 1 and 3. Timothytyy (talk) 12:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

#

Edition should be noted in roman.

hi. Can you tell what law underlines this? Show me its rule.

In the following article it is the opposite.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFC_Asian_Cup#Format

The official logo of the games also uses English numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2022_Asian_Games_logo.svg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1998_Asian_Games_logo.svg

and ... .

If you don't have a convincing answer, I can revert the edit. In addition, many other multi-sport competitions on Wikipedia do not use Roman numerals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viexo (talk • contribs) 19:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@Portalian: Hi, I would like you to help me. I anglicized the Asian game numbers but this user romanized it. I messaged twice for several days. The user is not willing to interact and respond. I want to know your opinion. Because I saw in the edits that you edited this article. Pan American Games, FISU World University Games and Many other articles use English numbers. The official logos of the games do not have Roman numerals. The use of Roman numerals was related to the past Olympics because it was held for the first time in Greece. Today, the use of Roman numerals is obsolete.Viexo (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Just a reminder

Hello,

Just passing by to remind (just in case) that i had done some replies on your talk in Talk:2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights

It had been quite a lot since I posted that replies, and you and the the other editor had not also replied top that reply, i decided send this reminder for you and him so we can finsh this issue as fast as possible

Also please, read the side notes i had put on that reples, i had noticied that maybe some mistake is happening with you and the another editor fusing two different edits into a single basket, the India edit is not related for this case.

I am open to any talks there, please dont be afraid to talk there, i will be open to reply ASP, as long we can reach a consensus, I just want finsh this before the kickoff of the first game tomorrow. Meganinja202 (talk) 15:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 10:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aleenf1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry i didn't vandalise as reported, and where is consensus the reporter said about, the reporter also engaged in edit warring without any consensus, I'm just correct what have been doing wrong. As you can see the reporter also reverted even that's error.
You can see language is not the matter, which he seems ignored, he try to warn, where he warn me about, he seems trying hard to defend his editing even that's factual error. Aleenf1 10:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You aren't blocked for vandalism. Additionally, your threat to evade your block, below, shows you aren't operating in good faith. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The block is for edit warring, not for vandalism. You were just blocked for edit warring on June 28 and just made 6 reverts within 24 hours on 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights, going well past WP:3RR. - Aoidh (talk) 10:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Even is correct the wrong things count as edit warring, good job you, ignore my request. You all getting horror by letting someone bypass. --Aleenf1 10:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Getting hard to get the things right back the correct way with right things, looks like i have to let it turn bad and erosive. What is the point of MOS and rules. --Aleenf1 10:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it's edit warring even if you believe that you are correct. There are exceptions to 3RR but believing you are correct is not one of them. Per WP:Edit warring: Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense. I should also note that you are aware of 3RR, as you warned another editor of it before immediately continuing to edit war one minute later. If you have a disagreement with another editor the solution is to seek dispute resolution using something like WP:3O, WP:DRN, or WP:RFC, not by edit-warring. - Aoidh (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Is the reporter also seeking dispute resolution? While i'm talking on talk page, he just one way song, its okay, the editor also might aware but you let it go, good job, you claimed he is "unaware". --Aleenf1 10:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Do you have a diff showing that the other editor was or should have been aware of 3RR before they made those reverts? - Aoidh (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: The truth is with this block, you can let people put wrong things and run away, while people need to cleanup the messed punished, good luck Wikipedia. Hope you find yourself great with your administrator ship. And maybe is time for me to put the note after 18 years. --Aleenf1 10:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You see where is ANT1 come from, a Greek broadcaster showing in Cyprus? Where is Venezuela broadcaster come from, i check not even the broadcaster making that path, while keep rolling back to defend, is he even check his edit? Or just come to defend his edit, what a ridiculous... --Aleenf1 11:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Even i'm rolling back, i'm still re-add the legit entry he added, not just blatantly revert. Bullshit all. --Aleenf1 11:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Is it unaware or is it defending? Please speak to me, if is it unaware why know to report? How you judge people of unawareness? Please see Talk:2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights, at least an editor warn about, is it he "unaware" as you mentioned. --Aleenf1 11:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Respectfully, I am not sure what you're asking me. If you're asking why I told the other editor on their talk page that I did not block them because they appeared to not know about 3RR, it is because I could find no evidence that they were ever previously warned about or mentioned 3RR and therefore may very well have not known about it, reinforced by the fact that they did not make any further reverts after being made aware of 3RR. By contrast you are demonstrably aware of 3RR as you warned them of it while making reverts yourself, and have been blocked for edit warring previously. - Aoidh (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Talk:2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights, that's talk, and you mentioned "unaware", good job. You are fooling me by saying "unaware" while that's mention of avoid edit war on article talk page. Fully respect your perspective. Okay, i let it go. Thanks for your blocking. My job done --Aleenf1 11:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

If you're referring to this edit that mentions "edit war" in passing without any mention of 3RR or elaboration on what edit warring is, I saw that and that is a far cry from being notified about WP:3RR. Once the editor was notified of 3RR, they stopped reverting. You did not. - Aoidh (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: "Once the editor was notified of 3RR", do i been notified? Okay your point is right and other people are wrong, administrator knowing how to punished people only. I hope more hoax information added. My wishes always come true. --Aleenf1 11:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You were aware of edit warring by virtue of your previous blocks for edit warring (and this), and of 3RR specifically by virtue of this edit and the fact that your archives have a history. You don't need to be notified every time you edit war, especially when you're warning others of it while doing it. - Aoidh (talk) 12:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: I'm pleasantly happy i'm revert to correct the messed, yet still convicted. Happily to let go after all, with admin says they are "unaware", and can keep the wrong things inside, even it was factually error. Hope god bless your adminship. As i said, is no longer matter for me, i seen lot of ridiculous, and now even getting ridiculous. --Aleenf1 12:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

No need unblocks, i will only edit on IP now, even you can make it permanent. Bye. --Aleenf1 11:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Yamla: If i want to evade, i will evade, knowledge has no room for factual error, even i'm been blocked for 3RR. Whether is good faith or not. If those blocked can make an article getting better, than you can keep blocking. --Aleenf1 13:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

If you can get complacency by blocking, go ahead, Wikipedia can be choose to be better or more hoax. --Aleenf1 13:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Such archaic policy no longer working and just making a lot of right things undone, a right things are never stop by a block or time. Whether you see this as a threat, nothere, whatever. --Aleenf1 14:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Allengland logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allengland logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of UEFA Europa League broadcasters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of UEFA Europa League broadcasters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UEFA Europa League broadcasters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)