User talk:Hongqilim

Archives[edit]

Possibly copyright violations at 2019 Parapan American Games opening and closing ceremonies[edit]

Hi! An article you created, 2019 Parapan American Games opening and closing ceremonies, was flagged for possible copyright violations. Using Earwig's Copyvio Detector, I found three sources from which it appears some information in the page was copied and pasted: [1], [2], and [3]. See for example the comparison here [4]. I encourage you to edit the article to rephrase things in your own language -- otherwise other editors may have to remove content from the page. Let me know if you have any questions! Themillofkeytone (talk) 21:18, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2017 Taipei.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2017 Taipei.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from First World Plaza into First World Hotel & Plaza. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 18:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ignorant about the rules here, never bother to read them, took previous warnings lightly because they did not show any sign that my activity would be threatened. Would offer to report to Moneytrees and other admins that previously sanctioned me each time I am here editing like every month. Should my block be lifted, I also offer to return the articles to their original state before I came to edit and have all edits which involved with unattributed copy editing and copyright content removed as stated in the investigation report. I hope Wikipedia would improve its' service here to ensure users will not easily commit mistakes and improve themselves to become better users.

Decline reason:

Becoming a better user and avoiding mistakes is on you. If you "never bother to read [the rules]" you can't expect to be surprised when you get blocked for violating them. I see nothing in your comments that shows you understand that you were the problem. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I mean I never read them, will read from now on. I might have use the wrong word to express my message.

Decline reason:

You will need to explain what copyright is, and under what circumstances copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia. Since copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we need to know that you understand these things. WP:COPYVIO may help you. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the first time I was blocked as I had been editing without problems in the past years while admitting I made serious mistakes in those years. After reading rules about copyright violation and guide to appealing blocks, I hereby acknowledge that:

I have read and understood that I should not copying material without the permission of the copyright holder.
I have read and understood that I should attribute texts when texts are copied from one article to another.
I have read and understood that repeatedly post copyrighted material despite appropriate warning may result in administrators blocking me from editing.
I have read and understood the Questions and Answers regarding copying text from other sources for Wikipedia articles.

And, I hereby assure that once my user account is unblocked, I will not continue any form of editing that may or is seen as infringement.

Questions to administrators:

Is there anything else I have to do before I return to usual editing activities should I be unblocked?
Or is there anything else I have to do before I could be unblocked?
Do I have to repair the articles that I have damaged?

--Hongqilim (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Before I unblock you, could you please describe what you do when copying text between articles? (To answer your questions; 1&2: no, I don't think any sort of extra work before being unblocked or any sort of restrictions are needed. For 3, I request you help out at your CCI Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Hongqilim; if you remember copying from specific sources please make a note there.)Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 22:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to help at the CCI, make comments under the listings like this on where the text was copied from or if you don't know where they were copied from, without removing the diffs. Also, you don't need to clear the CCI to be unblocked, I'll unblock you once you give the correct answer to my question above. If you have any further questions please ask. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 21:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as another note, you don't need to attribute edits like this where you're taking an existing list article and then modifying the data, since lists of names/titles/medal tables/other statistics aren't copyrightable; also, if the text is stuff you wrote for another wikipedia article, you don't need to attribute it. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 22:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

World Break: Aria of Curse for a Holy Swordsman[edit]

Thanks for weighing in. As you can see I'm working on this CCI. most of the edits of fine and thank you for your many contributions to international athletic games. I have found a few items, which I have fixed. I've had a couple cases where our tool suggests there's a problem but the results don't completely make sense which is why I reached out to MoneyTrees, who doesn't seem to be active at the moment.

Thanks for identifying the text came from fandom. In a recent exchange with one of our copyright experts, Diannaa explained how she handles text from fandom. in short she provides proper attribution at the bottom of the page as seen in this example:

Draft:Crystal_Miracle_Princess

I think the comment at the top of the page is intended for reviewers and appropriate for a draft article. In the case of the article you contributed to adding the explanatory note at the bottom of the page should be sufficient. Is that something you can do?--S Philbrick (Talk) 17:05, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is.--Hongqilim (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hongqilim, Thank-you! S Philbrick (Talk) 16:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hongqilim, I see that you are helping a lot, thanks. S Philbrick (Talk) 17:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome.--Hongqilim (talk) 08:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problem identified[edit]

I identified a problem with this edit It seems too close to this site which predates your edit.

Would you be willing to help me resolve this, either identifying something that I misunderstood, or if not, suggesting alternative wording that makes the same point without being a direct copy. I think your block prohibit you from actually making the edit but if you suggest wording to me I can make it for you. For what it's worth, I'm very impressed with how much work you've done on international games and Wikipedia is a better place for your involvement so I'm hoping we can resolve the CCI, confirm that you understand our concerns about copyright and lift your block.--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was there long before I came. That revision was actually a revert edit. And this is the last revision before I started editing there.--Hongqilim (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hongqilim, Thanks, that's helpful. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal re unblock[edit]

I see that you use a page says:

Hi I am just having copyright issues with Wikipedia. I will return when all issues have been resolved.

As you know, I've been working on clearing many of the items. I'm impressed with how much work you've done to add content related to international sports competitions. While some of those edits included the use of copyrighted text, I think you know understand what is permitted, what is not permitted, and when attribution is needed.

There are a small handful of items that I haven't fully addressed. In almost all cases, it involves the inclusion of material from media guides or other promotional items which you understandably thought were permissible for use, but in fact are fully copyrighted and need to be fully paraphrased if used. One option, which I don't really like, is the need to identify the matching material and simply remove it. the result would cut out important aspects of some articles and would not be good for the reader. The better approach would be to fully paraphrase the material to make the same point but do so with original language. That option would be a little more work. I'd like to unblock you on the condition that we work together to clean up the remaining items. What you think?--S Philbrick (Talk) 13:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good idea. (Hi I am just having copyright issues with Wikipedia. I will return when all issues have been resolved.) Actually that was a message for other users in case they ask me for help.--Hongqilim (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hongqilim, I just unblocked you because I don't think the block is preventive anymore, I think you understand not to copy from sources anymore, your work on the CCI and earlier appeals show that. Just remember to say something in the edit summary like "copied from (article name)" when copying content between articles, alright? Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI help} 05:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright.--Hongqilim (talk) 06:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hongqilim, I did understand that the message was directed to other users who might be looking to you for help, but I also took it literally – that you were not planning to return until all issues were resolved. I discussed this with Moneytrees, and we are in agreement that Wikipedia is better off having you editing as long as you now understand our copyright policy. I hope you will work on rewriting the text in the few remaining issues and I'd be happy to work with you. If you want to take it on yourself, that's fine but if you could let me know when you complete any of the items, I'll update the CCI list and we should be able to close it soon. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed my mind about that message. I am willing to work with you on the CCI list. As of now, I have done almost all of them, if not all.--Hongqilim (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hongqilim, wow, that's great. I'll go check it out. S Philbrick (Talk) 17:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Hongqilim (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CCI update[edit]

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Hongqilim is now complete. Thank you for your assistance in the evaluation of this CCI!

--MER-C 18:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Welcome.--Hongqilim (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Southeast Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Astro Arena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Televisyen Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kayan language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Pacific Deaf Games[edit]

First of all, thank you for your participation in this article. Second, it would be much better if you could make a separate article for each year. --DeafoteX (talk) 10:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Hongqilim (talk) 11:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2012 ASEAN University Games Mascots.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2012 ASEAN University Games Mascots.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2016 Malaysia Para Games Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2016 Malaysia Para Games Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASEAN University Games 2012 Logo.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASEAN University Games 2012 Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TraXX FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Machang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

State native names[edit]

Just a note that the addition/removal of native names in Malaysia place names was a subject of dispute before, therefore please obtain a consensus before removing them again. I take no particular opinion on its removal, but it helps to avoid continual addition/removal on these pages. Hzh (talk) 14:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of capitals in Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jasin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2006 ASEAN University Games logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2006 ASEAN University Games logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2006 ASEAN University Games mascot.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2006 ASEAN University Games mascot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2014 ASEAN University Games Mascot.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2014 ASEAN University Games Mascot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of sports[edit]

I think 1 problem from you is you have too much illustration, "although Archery, Boxing, Fencing, Judo, Kabaddi, Karate, Shooting, Taekwondo and Wrestling are also martial arts", are you defined it or organisers defined it, you have reliable sources to prove it?

I know you just want to populous your idealogy, written, but please those of your "thinking" have never officially published. --Aleen f1 14:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you only don't like my newest edits. If you don't like some of my old edits too, I guess I can move on. It's not like I want to freak you out. After all, you are a reviewer here, aren't you?--Hongqilim (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a problem of liking or unliking, i'm already mentioned to you, are you defined the list of martial arts or the organisers, and you just simply insert without any verifiability. --Aleen f1 14:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, fine, I got what you mean. Do what you have to do as a reviewer.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hongqilim please do not feel your edits are not valued. I think your edits are constructive and should remain on the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see.--Hongqilim (talk) 03:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Start behaving on my talk page[edit]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. Sneha04 ^💬 16:26, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check with the admin if I vandalise.--Hongqilim (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continued Harassment[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on Talk:1998 Commonwealth Games, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Sneha04 ^💬 16:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report me to the admin please!--Hongqilim (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at User talk:Sneha04. Sneha04 ^💬 02:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your actions against me, I already report your problem to 2 admins here. Let's see how they deal with us.--Hongqilim (talk) 04:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, no matter how much warning you posted on my talk page, Your warnings on my talk page are practically useless to me! Because you are not admin!--Hongqilim (talk) 07:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I haven't examined this situation yet, I can say that any user may issue warnings, not just admins. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://web.archive.org/web/19990427222543/http://www.kl98.com.my/results/default.html --Hongqilim (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Message[edit]

Your message was very confusing to me. If you are attempting to report something, please link to the relevant edits instead of copying them to my user talk page. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sneha04 keeps deleting my messages. I want to present it as evidence.--Hongqilim (talk) 08:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last resort.--Hongqilim (talk) 08:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Incidents[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sneha04 ^💬 08:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to wreck havoc, because you viewed me with suspicion. I want to talk to you, but you keep insisting I am wrong!--Hongqilim (talk) 08:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing User talk:Sneha04 for a period of one month for persistent violations on user talkpage, see Special:Diff/1103113755. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 11:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admitted that I had bludgeoned, blanking and antagonized User:Sneha04, User:Aleenf1 at their talk page repeatedly previously and being rude at them at times. I was struggling to find ways to resolve my differences with these two users and I admitted I had also misunderstood their roles as users in someways as well as being uncivil towards these users. Still, I don't agree with User:Sneha04 that I had committed vandalism on 1998 Commonwealth Games, which is where the incident arised from. I recently only discovered a way to resolve the conflict between me and the other user, which is through Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. I found it at the top of the noticeboard and I really wished I could resolve the conflict this way if I found it earlier, but my concern is: is there other way to do it and how do I know if the allegation of the other user against me was untrue? Hongqilim (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see anything in your unblock request which indicates why being forced to keep off Sneha04's talk page for a month will in any way detract from your ability to contribute constructively to the encyclopaedia. (I also can't see where you were "struggling to find ways to resolve [your] differences with these two users"; on the contrary, I see you persistently battling to prevent any such resolution.) JBW (talk) 18:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only doing it because they wanted it. First, they removed my conversation with them and then issued warning on my talk page. I replied to their warnings, telling them to take action against me for vandalising the article. But since there was no reply from them, I deliberately battling them so that they can prove to me that they can take action against me even as an ordinary user. Since I cannot continue explaining my actions at the investigation page, here it is. I considered their warnings as requests for me to grant them permission to take action against me, and only did so to help them to fulfil their wishes.--Hongqilim (talk) 03:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; block has now expired. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment from the blocking admin: "I was only doing it because they wanted it... I considered their warnings as requests for me to grant them permission to take action against me, and only did so to help them to fulfil their wishes." Hongqilm, these are worrying statements, and I'm wondering now if you're competent to edit Wikipedia. Also, have you forgotten that you can edit the whole of Wikipedia excepting only User talk:Sneha04? There's nothing stopping you from using the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard right now to resolve the disagreement. It's true that the DR noticeboard will expect you to notify Sneha04 on their page that you're seeking dispute resolution with them, but you can just state in your request that you're unable to edit their page, and somebody else will take care of the notification. Bishonen | tålk 07:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

https://web.archive.org/web/19990427222543/http://www.kl98.com.my/results/default.html My edit on the article was based on this archived medal tally. I don't usually trust other user's opinion because their judgement are not always right and sometimes wrong. When Sneha04 said I have no right to speak of, I was so confused. What does that even mean to me as a user?--Hongqilim (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Universiti Sains Malaysia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Since you have been blocked for copyright probelms before, this is your only warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also found copyvio on National University of Malaysia — Diannaa (talk) 01:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I committed similar offense at University of Putra Malaysia (1104888383) and Universiti Malaysia Sabah (1104354119) which had been removed in my latest edits.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. — Diannaa (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome.--Hongqilim (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please include edit summaries[edit]

Hi @Hongqilim I saw your edits on Segamat, please include edit summaries so other editors know what you edited, thank you. Danial Bass (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I am adding information about the local authority of Segamat. Check the comments in the history page.--Hongqilim (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop redirecting article[edit]

Please stop redirecting articles without having a discussion first with other Wikipedia editors in that article's talk page. A topic can have its Wikipedia article as long as it has multiple secondary sources per WP:GNG, and populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable per WP:GEOLAND (which includes small town, villages, mukims etc). Even if an article doesn't have sources or very little sources, it is our tasks to improve it to add more sources and content, not to redirect them just like that. That's the purpose of having stub-tagging to articles. Chongkian (talk) 02:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If people want to keep them, I am fine with it. I once returned Telok Mas as full article, but it was redirected again by User:Onel5969. Please talk to them if you want to keep the article.--Hongqilim (talk) 07:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag bearers at the Olympic Games[edit]

Hello! Can you add articles about flag bearers at the Olympic Games from 1920 until 1988. Both in Summer and Winter Games that should mostly be at the Opening ceremonies Parade of Nations. Yours sincerely, Sondre 193.161.216.9 (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Sukma Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblem of Dabong District Council.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of Dabong District Council.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabah FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaufort.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perry2022.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Perry2022.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johor FM logo 2021.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johor FM logo 2021.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1998 Commonwealth Games Calendar[edit]

Template:1998 Commonwealth Games Calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2002 Commonwealth Games Calendar[edit]

Template:2002 Commonwealth Games Calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Perak FM logo.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Perak FM logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Perak FM logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Perak FM logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sri Aman FM logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sri Aman FM logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lost World of Tambun logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lost World of Tambun logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Your edit to Radio Thailand has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa Sorry, was it a mistake just now? If I added copyright violated content to Wikipedia, then removed it, do I still have to report it to you? Hongqilim (talk) 12:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was some additional content I had to remove beyond the material you had removed yourself. Please don't paste copyright material into Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Udini Square logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Udini Square logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ai FM logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ai FM logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Radio Klasik logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radio Klasik logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at 2022 Commonwealth Games medal table. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 01:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know if there is someone else I can explain my actions to. Hongqilim (talk) 09:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you file an unblock request, patrolling admins will likely stop by to assess. — Diannaa (talk) 12:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had one prior case of Copyright Violation, which had been resolved in 2021, following an investigation involving my actions in the 2019 Parapan American Games article. Prior to yours blockade, I committed similar offences in several Public University articles such as Universiti Sains Malaysia, University of Putra Malaysia, Universiti Malaysia Sabah and National University of Malaysia, as well as an article related to a State Radio Station in Thailand. There was an unattributed copy within Wikipedia, which involved the articles of Singapore in Malaysia and 1964 Malaysian general election, but was resolved by User:Diannaa. About my recent actions at 2022 Commonwealth Games medal table, I had try to keep the information I published as short and simple as possible without trying to elaborate too much, so as not to violate copyright. But I admit that I could have made it a bit shorter without including content that may be aimed at promoting the medals such as the one in this link https://www.birmingham2022.com/news/2603780/birmingham-2022-unveils-medals-for-the-commonwealth-games. Is there something I can do about this? I currently also edit articles related to the 2022 Asian Games which is currently held in China, but none of them face similar issues. I hope my explanation will shed light on the issues that I currently facing, and I am willing to cooperate with all admins to help me out of my situation.

Decline reason:

It is simply false that you only had one prior instance of copyright violation. This can easily be seen here on this talk page. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hongqilim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We had several prior cases of Copyright Violation, which had been resolved in 2021, following an investigation involving my actions in the 2019 Parapan American Games article. Prior to yours blockade, we committed similar offences in several Public University articles such as Universiti Sains Malaysia, University of Putra Malaysia, Universiti Malaysia Sabah and National University of Malaysia, as well as an article related to a State Radio Station in Thailand. There was an unattributed copy within Wikipedia, which involved the articles of Singapore in Malaysia and 1964 Malaysian general election, but was resolved by User:Diannaa. About our recent actions at 2022 Commonwealth Games medal table, We had try to keep the information we published as short and simple as possible without trying to elaborate too much, so as not to violate copyright. But we admit that we could have made it a bit shorter without including content that may be aimed at promoting the medals such as the one in this link https://www.birmingham2022.com/news/2603780/birmingham-2022-unveils-medals-for-the-commonwealth-games. Is there something we can do about this? We currently also edit articles related to the 2022 Asian Games which is currently held in China, but none of them face similar issues. We hope my explanation will shed light on the issues that we are currently facing, and we are willing to cooperate with all admins to help us out of our situation.

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not demonstrate an understanding of the issues that led to the block related to the continued insertion of content that violated copyright, which most certainly was not resolved in 2021. This unblock request, along with comments like this, do not give any confidence that you understand why you were blocked or that the issues would not continue if you were to be unblocked. Aoidh (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hongqilim[edit]

Hongqilim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Check requested by Hongqilim (talk)
We had several prior cases of Copyright Violation, which had been resolved in 2021, following an investigation involving my actions in the 2019 Parapan American Games article. Prior to yours blockade, we committed similar offences in several Public University articles such as Universiti Sains Malaysia, University of Putra Malaysia, Universiti Malaysia Sabah and National University of Malaysia, as well as an article related to a State Radio Station in Thailand. There was an unattributed copy within Wikipedia, which involved the articles of Singapore in Malaysia and 1964 Malaysian general election, but was resolved by User:Diannaa. About our recent actions at 2022 Commonwealth Games medal table, We had try to keep the information we published as short and simple as possible without trying to elaborate too much, so as not to violate copyright. But we admit that we could have made it a bit shorter without including content that may be aimed at promoting the medals such as the one in this link https://www.birmingham2022.com/news/2603780/birmingham-2022-unveils-medals-for-the-commonwealth-games. Is there something we can do about this? We currently also edit articles related to the 2022 Asian Games which is currently held in China, but none of them face similar issues. We hope my explanation will shed light on the issues that we are currently facing, and we are willing to cooperate with all admins to help us out of our situation. Hongqilim (talk) 13:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Modifying unblock requests[edit]

You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 13:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need me to go back and review also the copyvios I did before my first block? Ok, I will do it and let you know. How about that? Hongqilim (talk) 13:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now I wonder who will be helping me to achieve this feat. Or maybe I can just be a storyteller who tells the story of how I came to Wikipedia, only to commit academic offences and got blocked twice. Shall I begin with chapter 1? Hongqilim (talk) 14:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. I can go do meaningful activities like jogging while waiting for this problem to be resolved. Oh, and even writing a story too. Hongqilim (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Story sketch[edit]

I will be making a sketch about my story in Wikipedia on paper first. I know its not easy to make admins confident in me, so that's why I use unblock request to start a conversation with everyone.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Story start date[edit]

The story will begin on Saturday 7 October 2023, so I will go check my contributions first.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do this. You have access to your talk page solely so you can contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 14:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review of the Original Source[edit]

Not confident enough? How about have some chat instead? About the one in 2022 Commonwealth Games, there are several things I probably should never had in the articles which included the ribbon of the medal, the exact location of the factory and excess details of the medals. If I could be unblocked, I will try limit the sentences I want to add to the article like one or two per citations. I had tried to reduce my sentences in all the articles I edited over the past 8 years, but I didn't realised that my actions still greatly affected the integrity of the articles which I was involved. If the article about copyright violation is too long, do I still need to read the entire article or just part of it? I don't know which part of the article concerns me the most. I think I would probably need days or even weeks to finish reading it, maybe? I don't know how thorough I should read the article because I could have misunderstood what the rules meant to me. If you ask me, I am always alone. There is no one I can talk to, although sometimes I get involved in fighting everywhere in the Wiki. Whenever I did wrong, I will unknowingly walk into wrong places. Guess that makes me unfortunate seriously, just like how I bump into walls each time in real life.😌 Taking a break is the best option for me right now, although I still have unfinished business here.--Hongqilim (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Yamla (talk) 12:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #81522 [edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:All Seasons Place logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Seasons Place logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1992 Summer Olympics bids has been nominated for splitting[edit]

Category:1992 Summer Olympics bids has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS[edit]

UTRS appeal #84741 has been declined, as have six earlier UTRS appeals. JBW (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #84829 is closed.[edit]

User:deepfriedokra/SO light -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Centre Point Sabah logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centre Point Sabah logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]