User talk:Yanksox/archive4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rather get fucked up the ass[edit]

I'd rather get fucked up the ass than use wikipedia, the biggest storehouse of shit on the internet.

Yanksox is a faggot




Hello,

Why do you redirect the Oregon Humane Society page to Humane Society, yet alow Humane Society of the United States to have their own page?

Barbara

Got a live one[edit]

Another yeller. My talk. - CrazyRussian talk/email 05:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an excerpt of your contrib log:
07:58, 16 June 2006 (hist) (diff) m Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Adams-Short (delete) 
02:47, 16 June 2006 (hist) (diff) The Nodd (cleanup) 
You edited until 3AM, went to sleep, woke up, and five hours later you were back on WP. This stuff is worse than crack!! :) :) - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KFBN[edit]

Thanks for shifting my warning over to KFBN's talk page. It's time for me to go to bed, it seems. - Fordan 12:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Boston - CT vandal decided to f-bomb my user page [1], even though I never interacted with him. What's his deal? - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both .127 and User talk:69.177.236.204 have already been blocked for 24 hours. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We can ask an experience admin to block his range for a bit, but no worries, mate. It's just an irate Connecticutan. Been worse. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let's me know if there are any other IP's he's used - within the next few hours, I will block him on sight, without going through the warnings. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So do RFCU. Keep 'em in check, baby. I'll be at work a few more hours, and then I'll see you on the other side of Shabbat. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:69.177.134.133 blocked 48 hrs. - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Exhaustive... - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Concerning the "CT vandal" - if you use the Geobytes IP tracer, the IP addresses all trace to Connecticut, particularly around Naugatuck. Also, I've put in a request for semi-protection for the affected articles in question. Just to let you know. PentawingTalk 18:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am not very familiar with protection policies and practices, and prefer to leave it to others at this early stage in my sysop career. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you OK?[edit]

Are you okay?? =/ I love you. Srose 20:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup project for you[edit]

Yousef al-Khattab. I already asked Joe weeks ago, but he's apoplectic about the U.S. performance at the World Cup. I cannot touch Y al-K myself because of the obvious bias issues - it'll be obvious to you when you read the article. Basically, it needs to be rewritten from scratch as a proper stub, minus the UE nonsense, the children's names, etc. Let me know if you'd be willing to undertake. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a decent stub under there - not that that person has ever done anything substantive - but lots of attention has been attracted by that fact that he is such a weirdo. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very unique - but didn't do anything notable. Deserves an article - but not a perfect subject. Use ((inuse|XX hours)) - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Changed it to 56 hrs, 17 minutes, and the time it takes to sip a diet coke without breathing. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more blocked and yr page s/protected. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blunder on your part?[edit]

I believe this was an unintended consequence of reverting using popups. You reverted to the previous vandalised version. o_O Don't worry, I've been caught out by this "feature" before too. Kimchi.sg 21:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Addict[edit]

I share that with Wikipedia now, though. You don't share it with anything, just so you know. :) I love you, Nick. Srose 21:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I love you so much. Srose 22:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Byteusa: What do you mean?[edit]

On the byteusa article: I read the notable page you posted, but... How does an article such as newegg differ from this one? What could be changed so that I does meet one of the criteria?

In my view, this article is part of the "whole of human knowledge" as well neutral. Thanks for your help. --§p¥ÐêR ÇÅñض܊ 22:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


So you're saying because ByteUSA is currently closed, there is no reason to have it here? ByteUSA was a huge subsidary to another company making hundreds of thousands of dollars per years. I give up. Whatever the editors think.... --SpyderCanopus 22:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which ended with the result of (74/0/0). If there is anything I can help with feel free to ask. Also, if there is anything I am doing wrong, please point that out as well. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Highest regards, DVD+ R/W 01:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Editor's Barnstar
For repeatedly beating me to the punch on the new pages patrol, and your seemingly omnipresence at AfD's, I hereby award you the Editor's/Deletion's Barnstar! Excellent work! --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You're welcome, and thanks :) --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yousef al-Khattab[edit]

I have reduced the time on your {inuse} message on Yousef al-Khattab to 4 hours, from an earlier 56 hours. If you mark articles as "in use" for very long periods, it can be counter-productive, since the message is more likely to be ignored by other editors. -- The Anome 07:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! As one of the primary contributors to this page, I wanted to let you know that I asked User:Srose to delete the page (which it seems as if she's done) and the talk page (which remains) because of it's violation of Wikipedia policy regarding userspace, which can be found here. I wanted to approach the users directly, rather than proposing an MfD or the like, as the personal nature of the content doesn't need to be scrutinized by the community to determine whether it should or shouldn't be allowed on Wikipedia. You can see my and Srose's talk page for the conversation and original request. Please note that my request is not a result of any personal animosity to either you or the other primary contributor; in fact, I made the request not only because it's clearly violating policy, but because I didn't want another user putting it up for MfD or bringing it up during an RfA or something. Cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 17:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support[edit]

Dear Yanksox/archive4,
Thank you very much for your support on my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuiviénen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

al-Khattab[edit]

hehehehe "yanksox even desecrates the jewisj sabbath 2 fight islam" hehehehehehehe - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Burlington Center Mall[edit]

A description of the location and a listing of anchor stores is typical for most shopping mall articles. See List of largest shopping malls in the United States for a sampling of articles, many of which include far more detailed listings of stores. The Burlington Center Mall article was updated to reinsert the appropriate information. Rather than an unembelleished reference to WP:NOT, please provide a detailed explanation of what is being removed and why. Alansohn 04:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've already seen WP:INN, but thanks for the suggestion. The address had been removed in an earlier edit, and I agree that it's not relevant. Alansohn 04:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out...[edit]

Adam Shapiro. My work. Go on Gmail. - CrazyRussian talk/email 06:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CT friend is back[edit]

[2] - CrazyRussian talk/email 00:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Juice Plus[edit]

I'm glad to help. What did you have in mind? Rhode Island Red 03:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah...w/e shutup

The anon is a friend of Ich, see [3]. —Khoikhoi 04:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi

crud![edit]

You're right, that AfD will cost me an edit or 2... I better hurry up and find something else to edit, 4,350 (or so) isn't enough! :) --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning![edit]

Check your mail, minu armsam. I love you. :) Srose 10:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pffffffft. Or not, I guess. :P Srose 13:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? Ahh, jeeeeeeeez... Try it again, maybe? I'll reload a few times. Srose 13:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I got it. Did you get mine?... Srose 13:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC) =( Srose 13:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm at home. Sorry, I was on another site. Srose 14:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get any email... I don't know. Email me when you get a shot. I may email you. Srose 15:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on my RfA[edit]

Hey Yanksox, thank you for your question on my RfA. I've replied now - please take a look. If there's anything else you want clarified, please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers, Tangotango 15:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I replied[edit]

by email. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out User talk:69.182.30.39 - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saryn Hooks[edit]

You participated in the Finola Hackett AfD. Please also join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saryn Hooks (second nomination). Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're advising others that my story is up for a "delete." If it's for OR, I don't think you followed the discussion as close as you might have. Still, I don't mind my story falling by the wayside, but not for OR or becuase one or two (in this case) don't like it. I'd like an overwhelming vote by those whose stories I can read. I don't want to see their stories because of resentment, but I'd like to know they can write. I know I can, and I think you know I can too. Again, "Aamjiwnaang: ....." does not have a OR problem.Bud Whiteye 00:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Bud Whiteye[reply]

Matthew Krissel[edit]

Wow, a little quick on the gun with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Krissel weren't we? I barely had time to change my mind before you already userfied the article. Please let the AfD closers perform their own actions in the future. It gets a little confusing when we try to do something to find it's already been done (or change our minds and find it's done anyway). Thanks! --Deathphoenix ʕ 01:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. I can simply delete the article in userspace. --Deathphoenix ʕ 01:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, no worries, no need to feel sick. Almost every edit on Wikipedia can be undone by someone else. :-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 01:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

heyo[edit]

ahh okay, sorry about that man. i think i agree with you more now when i think about it.

thanks brotha -ctpaquette

Matthew Krissel[edit]

hahaha... no problems, that's not a mess up. Now deleting the Main Page, that would be a mess up. --Deathphoenix ʕ 03:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dr sears[edit]

Dr sears pulled his comments off the Juice Plus discussion page. I was debating whether to revert them back just to document the that vandalism the page has undergone. What do you think? Rhode Island Red 04:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The new anon sure has been busy. I'll keep an eye out and take the next revert. They'll get tired eventually. Rhode Island Red 05:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

--Bhadani 14:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Hello Yanksox, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 17:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have to see this[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116 (2nd nomination) - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: article titled "Gary Freedman"[edit]

Gary Freedman is notable in that he authored a lengthy blog that is written entirely in the form of quotations. It is, to the best of my knowledge, the only blog of its kind.

The Central High School of Philadelphia is a Wikipedia entry and should have a link.

WOW -- After so Much[edit]

Thanks so much Yanksox: (I clicked on that "little" talk thing) I thought everybody was off on other projects. I couldn't see how they were going to see my responses. By now, I felt their must be another process. Anyway, please (I don't have it in front of me) where I wrote "advising..." (again, I'm not looking at it); that was not accusatory. I thought someone takes the lead, and talks to others (not me) regarding my piece. That's it on that. However, I sure would like to discuss it at length, because it is a disaster similar to Chernobyl (I told all this to Zoe - she must be busy elsewhere) but without the the nuclear waste, but so many, many other chemicals are all over the atmosphere here(water ground and air), so much so you can develope photo film in the St Clair River (the international channel between US and CDA) merely by dipping it in a pail of the "clean water." It is not my POV alone (NPOV) that this wasteland is so thoroughly polluted (including the plants and refineries officials they agree - they are continually working with us, so far all attmpts have been futile, 'we/with them' are not giving up) I am quite happy to get your kind response, I can't thank you enough for being willing to discuss this. So many, over the last two days, so many responses from me to editors have gone without a hint that I am getting a response. Like I said, I thought it was some's job to make recommenadations, and other's come along after and do something else. While that didn't seem like a big seller in an editing sense, I was going to try to ask elsewhere. You are very kind, thank you. Bud WhiteyeBud Whiteye 23:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YankSox[edit]

Recieved and noted. Will look forward to your editng. I am not going to shoot myself. BWBud Whiteye 23:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yanksox21[edit]

Well done Yanksox: Can I do a rewrite? Or is a good idea, or good information that nobody had before get only one shot? One editor keeps wanting me to write about Sarnia and the story might be OK with some obvious changes.( Sarnia is the Canadian City next door to Aaajiwnaang - you can spell that easier after two honest attempts) But, Sarnia is relatively OK. They are downwind and downstream from the problem. Bad PR may be their only problem, but they work with us too, looking for stop measures. BTW They get freshwater from huge Lake Huron. Anyway, I'm used to editing, most writers are. If submitters complain alot or right away, it's because it may be the first time writing where they have to be edited. PS If I wrote about Sarnia, it would be like writing about Bhophol (sp) only using New Dehli to capture readers. While India as a whole suffered, the victims were in Bhophol alone. Anyway, I'd love to take your instructions and do a re-write if it's not against the rules. (Like everybody only gets one shot or something????) BWBud Whiteye 12:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yanksox21[edit]

Yes! RO. I am pleased to do a rewrite, I can't start this moment, but how much time do I have? Thanks Again BWBud Whiteye 12:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yanksox21[edit]

Thank You. I don't know what delete means anyway. If it means I'm gone, I'll go wishing I could have worked with a couple of you, even to have met you. A few of you are really good and kind. But, the world is as it is. I still won't shoot myself. But I am a VietNam Vet and I'm getting pretty damn ticked off. Just kidding, but I am a VietNam Vet, Sgt Whiteye, (not a lifer, just a Troop USMC) if you Google at all, there is a good short piece there done by some Digital Company, gives you a quick (one page) glance. A admin has been here and said that if the work has been elsewhwre it is okay, not OR. Zoe (editor, admin??) said it is wrong?? {{please help me}} I am used to only one right and one wrong kind of thing. I read the admins BIO, he is an admin. Bud Whiteye 13:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)BW[reply]

Yanksox21[edit]

Thanks Again: I don't know if you're writing to me or to Zoe?? I may need more than two days?? A Week??? Thanks, BWBud Whiteye 13:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yanksox21[edit]

Got it. I understand about being busy ( I believed your were all along, I didn't know how you were staying with me except that you may have cared about the writers.) Bud Whiteye 13:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)BW[reply]


When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. - CobaltBlueTony 16:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

headline text[edit]

At the risk of self-promotion, I want to say that the blog "Significant Moments" is extremely unusual, if not unique, either in blogging or among published books. In addition the blog has significant literary merit, which you can see for yourself. That fits a common definition of "notable," even if it doesn't fit Wikipedia's definition of notable.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Garyfreedman (talkcontribs) 11:34, 21 June, 2006

That's great. Of course it changes nothing as we follow the standards of notability layed out on Wikipedia, not any others. --Lord Deskana I VALUE YOUR OPINIONS 16:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


OK, Yanksox. I've totally rewritten the entry. I've eliminated the obvious puffery and focused on the one significant issue, a blog (or book) written entirely in the form of quotations.

These are the issues I would focus on:

Does the blog possess a quality of uniqueness?

Does the blog possess literary merit?

Can Wikipedia envision that literary specialists or others might search for references to a work written entirely in the form of quoatations, known as Melitzah?

I believe that there are people out there who might look for references to Melitzah. Incidentally, my information about the literary form known as Melitzah is drawn from Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi's book titled Freud's Moses: Analysis Terminable and Interminable. Yerushalmi is a professor of Jewish Studies at Columbia University.

Yanksox21[edit]

Hi! I'm not against what you said about let the page run out and go over to Aamjw... First Nation. I would like very much to get my article "encyclopedic-ready" as it were, (or so to speak). So that I know I lived by the rules, met the requirements, and go on to help Wikipedia with the best of my ability. I don't understand yet what going over to the other site really means, e.g., would they like me to barge in on them?, how would I know I, on my own with your help, can reach the goals of the Wikipedia as a stand-alone effort if I merge with someone elses ideas; will we get the recognition of working hard toward a goal, if we mix our stuff up???? Thanks Again Yanksox, I really feel you have the best in mind for me, and I'm willing to follow. I have always believed in learning to follow before leading. Thanks, your friend, Bud W Bud Whiteye 22:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A : Wow That Was Quick[edit]

Yanksox: That was quick. I'll cut and paste as you suggest. Also, I do know the Community and its people, they Native American (Indians) as am I. They are Ojibwe (O-jib-way), I am Lennilenape or Delaware (either is good, they are one and the same). We speak different languages, but we both speak English. Hope this is helpful. Thanks, BWBud Whiteye 22:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will Do[edit]

Will Do, Bud Bud Whiteye 22:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yanksox21[edit]

Thanks "Y" I'll try it with this one. (IT WORKS, I saw in my preview) Bud 23:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yanksox, this is regarding the {{nothanks}} template that you placed in User talk:SHLAMA regarding the above article. This template refers to "copyrighted" information. However, I was unable to locate a copyright for this text. Were you able to find a copyrighted source? Or was using this particular template a mistake? Thanks, Accurizer 00:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response on my talk page. I was able to verify the information elsewhere, and the text is not identical. I also revised the article somewhat. I think it's o.k. now. If you disagree just let me know. Thanks again. Accurizer 00:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for clarifying. I had not seen the earlier version. Regards, Accurizer 00:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all, I've seen your quality work here so I figured there had to be something more than initally met the eye. See you around. Accurizer 00:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My (Mtz206) RfA[edit]

Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. My Request was successful with 41 supports, 12 opposes and 5 neutrals, and I'll do my best to live up to your expectations. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. -- mtz206 (talk) 02:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yanksox[edit]

Hi Yanksox, I just took down the A7 CSD tag on Alfred Sommer (aerospace engineer). I read the article and the Del West article and I think there is assertion of notability. Please feel free to PROD or to AfD if you disagree. Thanks, and keep up the great RC patrolling -- Samir धर्म 04:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You![edit]

Yanksox; an Old Barnstar! I am truly touched. I just want to thank the academy, and my agent, mom, the folks at Wikipedia, and my bros Yanksox and TBooher. Peace. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rhode Island Red (talkcontribs) .

ANI - username[edit]

Indef for troll and username.Blnguyen | rant-line 06:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

I really wish they'd be clever once in a while... —D-Rock 14:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ross Petot[edit]

Please explain the reason for wanting this article to be removed? I just finished restarting this article that was removed for unknown reasons the other day? Dwain 15:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Excuse me but what you sent me does not give any reason for the article that I recreated of such a notable and well known piano player to be deleted. It was not the same article since it was never voted on a new article about this person could be created. Dwain 16:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on user's talk

:)[edit]

I love you!! :) Thanks for the smile. :)

Love, Sable

Yanksox[edit]

Yank...: I've pasted my article into Aamjiwnaang First Nation. I haven't done a rewrite yet, because I don't know what the next step is. If I start a "User Talk: Aamjiwnaang..." Will I'll be assailed all over again for all the usual suspects (NPOV, OR, etc) {{please help me}} Bud {{talk}} 17:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AWARD![edit]

The Minor Barnstar
For going there extra mile here, where he could have just as easily nominated the article for CSD, I award Yanksox this barnstar. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't biting, just nibbling![edit]

Yanksox, I appreciate the hospitality. I wasn't so much trying to "bite the newcomers," as much as I was just becoming very frustrated with the vandalism that we get. I tend to use Wikipedia a good amount, especially dealing with a couple of the articles I helped out with with a previous username and anonymously.

As a note, the links to your girlfriend and back are adorable. --Sempersoph 04:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wowzerz[edit]

Still quick on the draw, I see! You're an inspiration! --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS 14:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A short Esperanzial update[edit]

As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SSP[edit]

Hello Yanksox. I noticed you created a suspected sock puppet case, Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/FruitsAndVegetables133. Unfortunately, I have had to take this case to WP:RFCU, here. Please feel free to comment on the matter, though you do not have to if you don't want to. Thanks, Iolakana|(talk) 17:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of AWB[edit]

Hello Yanksox. I noticed this edit that you made to a closed RFA. In the future, it would be great if you could try and prevent future modifications to closed RFAs. Thanks! -- Where 23:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it; it is no big deal :). Just try and watch for it in the future. -- Where 03:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Yanksox (Fri)[edit]

Hi, Can I share with you when I'm done my first re-write?? Also, I've written many university papers and had to footnote or use end notes without exception or they would "f" you. "f" after "e" that is; NOT the usual, other, perhaps salacious interpretation. (But, both foot or end notes use numbers 1 thru ..., only end notes deal with a page at a time vs at the end) Is this good for Wikipedia? I can write a dry piece with the best of them. Your Friend, Bud {{talk}} 01:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey von Arx, S.J.[edit]

Not quite sure how you rewrite a basic bio...the underlying content will be the same. I just restored the link to the longer original bio of the Fairfield University website. I do have permission from the Marketing VP of the University to use the content from the website in expanding the Wikipedia article.

Scottrstanley 04:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)][reply]

Jordan Hasay[edit]

No you got it right - I was on a roll with new page patrolling and also going on very little sleep, not a good combo, I didn't even see your previous edit and edit summary before I tagged it. I think I'll turn in for the night before I make another slip. Thanks for catching this --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eh I don't judge users by their talk pages... if you looked through mine I'd probably come off looking like a cross between McCarthy & Hitler for all the "evil" linkspam hunting & removal I do! Take care --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which...[edit]

Which do you think is more appropriate? band or bio? for the speedy delete of Nico martin. .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 02:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! No problem, and either one would work. You got there first, anyways. .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 02:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


AfD[edit]

No, you didn't at all! You really changed my mind. If people were afraid of arguing a point, what would Wikipedia be? A bunch of people not arguing points, thats what. :P But really don't worry about it, if anything it was my terse unexplanitory reply to your explination. Wikibout-Talk to me! 03:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm. Moi delitsoso! (Sorry to all of the people who can actually spell in Spanish who are cringing) Who isn't a little insane? And do you know Srose in real life, right? Wikibout-Talk to me! 03:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good, and good luck with that. If you didn't know her in real life, that would be really, really creepy. Though I wouldn't have said that if you didn't... anyway, cheers. Wikibout-Talk to me! 03:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

indefblocked. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay![edit]

Happy two year anniversary!!! I love you! =)

Srose 15:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can you please call me, by the way?... Srose 15:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

a wiki-cookie for you[edit]

An award to acknowledge your extensive and detailed grasp of the utterly irrelevant  :) --Doc Tropics 02:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to my Talkpage. Feel free to come back and drop in a quote of your own. --Doc Tropics 02:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Camp network obviously notable when taken together - so merge everything into one... - CrazyRussian talk/email 21:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hakamia is back, making productive changes. FYI. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CLC Radio page submission(s)[edit]

Sorry about the extra submissions, this is only the second time I have submitted at Wikipedia and it will be a while before I get used to how the editing/submitting system works. If I make a change to a page and then mark it minor change, is that also a concern?

Thanks for the warm welcome, Yanksox[edit]

I'm sure I'll be ringing your Wikibell (!) for help. I'm one of the original moderators at Flyertalk.com, currently on a 3-month sabbatical as I start grad studies this term, so I'm pretty comfortable with the general rubric of this place so far. I look forward to becoming an active member of the community. – Samantha Johnston 22:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 26th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 26 26 June 2006

About the Signpost


Quicker deletion of non-compliant images proposed News and Notes: 100 x 1,000, milestones
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report On Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 23:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of Tony Estrada[edit]

I am writing to disagree with the speedy deletion of the page Tony Estrada. I am, in fact, Tony Estrada and own ALL of the information posted and does NOT violate any copyright permissions or laws. I would appreciate your consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonfyre (talkcontribs)

Merci![edit]

Thanks for the message you left me. It was encouraging.

--HarlaMary 12:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Keira-Mari

Gold sucks[edit]

Re [4], Gold is an offensive color. You should pick something darker and less flashy/more readable. - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Yank" in black and "sox" in red, per team colors. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 00:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yank color is Blue, not Black! - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, I'll use black since they have pinstripes. Yanksox 21:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I thought it was a good trade for the Celtics, as explained in this brief breakdown;

  • They were able to save money by trading LaFrentz as part of the deal; Theo Ratliff has an equally-terrible contract, but Ratliff's has only two years left on it compared to LaFrentz' three.
  • In as far as talent, I feel that it's a wash between the big men. Ratliff plays better defense and LaFrentz plays better offense. Each have questions about injuries and both were/are not going to play much in the upcoming two seasons, as Doc Rivers and Danny Ainge will probably use the bulk of the frontcourt minutes to further develop Al Jefferson, Kendrick Perkins, Ryan Gomes, and Gerald Green (I'm assuming Green will play SF, not SG).
  • One has to view the Telfair trade with eyes looking towards who the Celtics could've chosen with the number seven pick, had they kept it.
    • I've seen Foye play quite a bit in college (on TV and at the 2005 Big East Tournament) and it's clear that he benefitted from Villanova's game plan, which relies heavily on a three guard set for offense. His collegiate offensive statistics were inflated a bit as a result of this, but he can play, regardless. He's not a pure point guard, but then again, neither is Delonte West, so I think he would've fit in well with the Celtics system.
    • Rudy Gay was another option at the number seven pick, and I've never liked him, as it seems as if he often "mails in" his performance. In college basketball, atheletes can excel on superior talent alone, but in the NBA, it takes long hard days in the gym to become a premier player. On and off the court, Gay comes across as a player who wouldn't be willing to put forth the extra effort (which is sad, as he has the talent to become an all-star caliber player in time).
  • Personally, I don't like Telfair's attitude (based on the ESPN film), but he's a undeniable talent. I haven't seen him play much in the NBA, so I have to look at the stats and what the analysts have been saying over the past two years. His statistics from this past season are skewed, as he broke his finger eight games into the season and when he healed and came back, he had to compete for time with Jarrett Jack and Steve Blake. As a new point guard, it's imperative that one plays consistent minutes on a daily basis to get a feel for the players that share the court with him. Telfair never had that consistency, and his game suffered for it. If one looks to his statistics from before he got injured, he had good, if not great numbers for a then-20 year old in the NBA.
  • The second round pick that the Celtics receive and Dan Dickau going to Portland are non-factors, as the Celtics already have two second round picks next year and it will probably be traded as filler at some point. I'm a fan of Dickau, but it looks like he's going to have a hard time making an NBA roster this season, as he's been injured. It all depends on his performance if he plays in a Summer League and how he's been able to recover from his injuries.

With that, it seems like a good trade for the salary cap savings in 2009 and an interesting young talent in Telfair. I'm on the fence about Foye's eventual NBA career vs. Telfair's, but I'll defer to Ainge's judgment, as he obviously knows more than I do about each player. The 2006 draft was weak by all accounts and if Telfair entered the draft this year, he'd probably be the first overall pick, as pure point guards that can shoot, pass, and play defense at respectable levels are a tough commodity to come by. In short, good trade as of now and time will eventually tell if it was a step towards reaching 17. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 05:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • In as far as the need for a a real point guard (i.e. a pure point guard who played at the one in college), I think it all depends on each team's style and gameplan. Combo guards Dwayne Wade and LeBron James both led their respective teams in assists this past year and both teams had productive seasons (especially in Miami's case). Delonte West played SG in college, while Jameer Nelson played PG at St. Joe's. Both play the point in the NBA and have almost identical statistics (points, rebounds, assists, and the all-important A/TO ratio). The Celtics have a lot of fast athletic wings that can score (Pierce, Allen, Green, Gomes, Szczerbiak), so I think Delonte, who is still learning how to play PG, could fit in well with the team in the future. With that, it's nice to have back-up plans in Rondo and Telfair (the latest rumor out of Boston, however, has the Celtics trading one of the three PG's along with Szczerbiak, Green and/or Jefferson to Philadelphia for Allen Iverson; but I don't take much stock into rumors).
  • I wouldn't expect much from Theo Ratliff. He's 33 years old with a history of injuries. He will be primarily used for defensive purposes when the Celtics play a team with a dangerous low-post scorer. He averaged about 5 minutes a game last season and I would expect he'd play more with the Celtics, but not much more. The Celtics traded for him to unload LaFrentz' contract, not for his potential contributions to the team.
  • The lack of experience at C/PF isn't as much of a problem as it was in the recent past, as the Celtics have young players Kendrick Perkins and Al Jefferson (who now have five years of NBA experience between them). Both have shown their enormous potential on the court in brief spurts throughout the season. Perkins averaged 15 rebounds per 48 minutes last season, and had a 19 rebound game. Jefferson averaged 21 points and 15 rebounds per 48 minutes last season and his stats are a bit skewed as he was injured for most of the season with ankle problems and only started eight games. Also, the Celtics recently hired Clifford Ray, a renowned C/PF coach, to work with both players, so perhaps they will learn from him and improve their individual games over the off-season. One needs to remember that neither player attended college, so with high school players (especially those who play PF/C), one cannot reasonably expect the player to contribute at a productive level until at least their third year in the NBA (at age 21), because they didn't have the coaching and game experience that one would normally receive in college. Take a look at Jermaine O'Neal or Tracy McGrady's careers and you'll see that they didn't produce in their first few seasons either. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 19:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, I wish. I am a research assistant for ESPNBoston, however. It's a nice part-time job to have while I'm in school, but Bill James-esque, I am not. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 21:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to TCD hoopydinkConas tá tú? 06:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your sig[edit]

Lookin' good. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 18:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow[edit]

First time I've been called that!...

Just wanted to show you the very first time I was called something on wiki. :P

I love you.

Srose 18:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I didn't say it was that bad. (I remember the Australian guy.) I just wanted to let you know, since it's a WikiFirst. =P Check your mail... Srose 21:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not really great, but survivable. I set a personal all-day record of number of edits today. Yes, I was bored and lonely. Srose 21:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also didn't eat until 3:45 PM O_O Srose 21:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requiem for a Dream[edit]

I think it's good that you're creating the novel page. If I may make a suggestion, I think you should do the following: Instead of making a page for the novel, make a page for the film (Titled "Requiem for a Dream (film)") and move the information on the current page to that one. Then you can use the current page as one for the novel. Does that make sense? Nqnpipnr 02:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well in that case, would you like me to create the new page so you can just fix up the novel's? Nqnpipnr 02:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I've never read it, but I love the movie and I want to improve that page. I'm starting the film's page now. Nqnpipnr 02:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do want to read it someday. Looks pretty good. Nqnpipnr 14:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my RfA![edit]

Thanks for voting!
Hello Yanksox/archive4, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! itsJamieOhNo Talk 06:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for the speedy revert, I would never have caught it myself. Thanks, and I hope your editing continues well! .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 15:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD/Ari Libsker[edit]

Heh... I shall call you henceforth Jahiegel Jr. :) - CrazyRussian talk/email 21:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page! I'm really grateful and I appreciate it very much. :) G.He 22:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Newman High School AfD[edit]

Dear Yanksox. I beg your pardon for causing offence. I thank you for taking care to remove a terrible statement. I was not suggesting you had not read the whole thread. I referred you to the "discussion above" merely to avoid repeating myself not to make a sarcastic comment. I would not want arguments thought to be unanswerable because they are unanswered. --Stroika 12:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hostage Life, considered for deletion[edit]

See the talk page for explanation of the article's creation Jeridus 14:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Sue Bale & notability[edit]

You put a note on the article for Sue Bale about notoriety and inclusion - I've added some more materials an citations - does this meet the criteria? — Rod talk 18:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Norris School District[edit]

So what are you doing then? I don't understand.

RE: Norris[edit]

so what are you doing then? i dont understand

Good morning, sunshine...[edit]

Check your mail. =)

Srose 14:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]