User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2010-December

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started

2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

talkback[edit]

Hello, Geo Swan. You have new messages at Lifebaka's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

my reply. Geo Swan (talk) 11:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect guest house, Jalalabad listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suspect guest house, Jalalabad. Since you had some involvement with the Suspect guest house, Jalalabad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). RGTraynor 21:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5 Pages at 4 MFDs[edit]

I have nominated five pages from your userspace in four different MFDs. You can find them at todays MFD log. Fram (talk) 09:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Rauf (Sipah-e Sahaba Pakistan)[edit]

The article Abdul Rauf (Sipah-e Sahaba Pakistan) is now up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Rauf (Sipah-e Sahaba Pakistan). Fram (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2 AfDs[edit]

I have nominated Taliban Deputy Defense Minister (at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taliban Deputy Defense Minister) ~~and Jamal Muhammad Alawi Mar'i (at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Muhammad Alawi Mar'i (2nd nomination))~~ for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Sattar (Taliban commander) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Abdul Sattar (Taliban commander), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Sattar (Taliban commander) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 10:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raiwand, AF listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Raiwand, AF. Since you had some involvement with the Raiwand, AF redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 00:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3 MFDs and 2 AFDs[edit]

I have nominated three pages from your userspace for deletion. They can be found in today's MfD log. I have also nominated Fahd Saleh Al-Muhayani and Majid bin Hamed bin Abdullah al-Haseri for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahd Saleh Al-Muhayani and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid bin Hamed bin Abdullah al-Haseri. Fram (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Sheikh Sanif terrorist camp[edit]

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Sheikh Sanif terrorist camp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Sheikh Sanif terrorist camp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Sheikh Sanif terrorist camp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 01:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Al Ghanad training camp[edit]

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Al Ghanad training camp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Al Ghanad training camp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Al Ghanad training camp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 02:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Shamsad training camp[edit]

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Shamsad training camp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Shamsad training camp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Shamsad training camp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 02:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Mehrez training camp[edit]

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Mehrez training camp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Mehrez training camp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Mehrez training camp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 02:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Kara Karga training camp[edit]

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Kara Karga training camp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Kara Karga training camp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Kara Karga training camp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 02:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian house listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Syrian house. Since you had some involvement with the Syrian house redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 03:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afghan guest house listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Afghan guest house. Since you had some involvement with the Afghan guest house redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 03:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan guesthouse listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Libyan guesthouse. Since you had some involvement with the Libyan guesthouse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian guesthouse listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tunisian guesthouse. Since you had some involvement with the Tunisian guesthouse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Esmatulla (Guantanamo detainee 888) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Esmatulla (Guantanamo detainee 888), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmatulla (Guantanamo detainee 888) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 04:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

93 Pages at one Mfd, plus 2 other[edit]

I have started three MfDs about pages in your userspace: two individual ones, and one mass nomination for 93 very similar pages. You can find the full list at today's MfD log. Fram (talk) 14:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wali Mohammed (Guantanamo detainee 560) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Wali Mohammed (Guantanamo detainee 560), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wali Mohammed (Guantanamo detainee 560) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 15:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Shahzada Akhund[edit]

I have nominated Shahzada Akhund for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzada Akhund. Fram (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Saifullah Rahman Mansour[edit]

I have nominated Saifullah Rahman Mansour for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saifullah Rahman Mansour. Fram (talk) 15:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abid Raza for deletion[edit]

The article Abid Raza is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abid Raza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 02:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Qalandar Shah for deletion[edit]

The article Qalandar Shah is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qalandar Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afd for Abdul Baqi (Guantanamo detainee 656)[edit]

I have nominated Abdul Baqi (Guantanamo detainee 656) for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Baqi (Guantanamo detainee 656). Fram (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question about MfD[edit]

Someone already notified you of this, but a large number of your notes pages are in a mass MfD. Would you mind indicating your position on this? --N Y Kevin @865, i.e. 19:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources discussion[edit]

I've started a discussion about the OARDEC summary reports at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reliability of US military summary reports. You may wish to correct any misconceptions or mistakes I've made. A word of advice - keep it brief. I've noticed that you often use "wall of text" responses, and these aren't usually very effective (User:Abd being the best example of the genre). Fences&Windows 21:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4 Afds[edit]

The pages Abdul Salam (Taliban leader, Kabul front, 2001), Abdul Jabar (Taliban leader), Abdul Haq (Taliban leader, 2008) and Abdul Aziz (Taliban leader) are up for deletion at todays AfD log. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Salam (Taliban leader, Kabul front, 2001) (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Jabar (Taliban leader), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Haq (Taliban leader, 2008) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Aziz (Taliban leader). Fram (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Mullah Rahmatullah[edit]

The article Mullah Rahmatullah is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mullah Rahmatullah. Fram (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mullah Rahmatullah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mullah Rahmatullah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Family photo of Majid Khan, in 1999.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Family photo of Majid Khan, in 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Rahmatullah[edit]

I have nominated the article Rahmatullah for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahmatullah. Fram (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2 more AfDs[edit]

The articles Daftar al-Taliban and Jihad Kandahar are up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jihad Kandahar and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daftar al-Taliban. Fram (talk) 12:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AE mention[edit]

Hello George. I mentioned your userspace drafts at WP:AE#Per Honor et Gloria as an illustration of how I believe such pages ought to be handled. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 06:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Epstein[edit]

Why did you move the page? Do you object if I move it back? He's by far the most notable Richard Epstein, and thus Wikipedia MOS conventions are that he should be at the Richard Epstein page rather than it being a redirect. THF (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved him because the previous disambiguation of "Richard Epstein" and "Richard A. Epstein", was inherently ineffective and confusing. Both men could be described as "Richard A. Epstein". And, among the links to these two individuals, about a dozen of them pointed to the wrong "Richard A. Epstein".

I created a disambiguation page, and piped about fifty links.

So, are you suggesting the disambiguation page should be at Richard A. Epstein (disambiguation)? Geo Swan (talk) 15:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, my preference/recommendation would be (1) Richard A. Epstein (disambiguation) should redirect to Richard Epstein (disambiguation); (2) Richard A. Epstein should be moved to Richard Arnold Epstein or Richard Epstein (mathematician); and (3) Richard Allen Epstein should redirect to Richard Epstein using the current {{dablink}}. THF (talk) 15:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had already moved Richard A. Epstein to Richard Arnold Epstein.

Your approach has the problem where people who only know the Mathematician will link to Richard Epstein, without realizing that that link is for the lawyer. The advantage to the current approach is that a periodic check of any articles that link directly to Richard Epstein were clearly made by individuals who weren't aware that there are two Richard Epsteins. The disadvantage to your approach is that periodic checks of the what links here button will provide a much longer list of articles to be checked. Geo Swan (talk) 19:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a problem for any same-named person where one is several times more common than the other, but isn't a celebrity. E.g., Michael Dobbs (which is the example in WP:DISAMB). The primary article is the law professor, who is linked to many more pages, not the mathematician, who is most notable under a pseudonym. The wikilinker is supposed to be checking their links to ensure that they're going to the right page. THF (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dobbs example however is not a good match, as Richard A. Epstein gives the appearance of being sufficiently uncommon that worrying about disambiguation seems unnecessary.

Yes, contributors should check each wikilink they make, to double-check that it is to the appropriate page. But, realistically, they don't a significant fraction of the time. Pantograph and Pantograph (rail) are frequently confused. Pantographs used for powering rail vehicles are so much more common than the original use of pantographs. Every couple of months I check the "what links here" for pantograph, and find multiple instances that should have linked to pantograph (rail). Fixing these requires human judgment. Tonight I found over fifty instances. It took over an hour to fix them. Fixing the instances where someone doesn't check they have the correct Richard Epstein could also be time-consuming. This will be an order of magnitude less work if both Richard Epstein and Richard A. Epstein are redirects or disambiguation pages -- as then we know they were linked in error.

As to which one is the more notable, no offense but the current state of more links to Allen than Arnold may merely indicate that more lawyers have contributed to the wikipedia than mathematicians. Geo Swan (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tablighi Jamaat and allegations of terrorism for deletion[edit]

The article Tablighi Jamaat and allegations of terrorism is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tablighi Jamaat and allegations of terrorism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CordeliaNaismith (talk) 16:40, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Ghafar (Afghan mujahideen fighter) for deletion[edit]

The article Abdul Ghafar (Afghan mujahideen fighter) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Ghafar (Afghan mujahideen fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 08:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) for deletion[edit]

The article Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..Anotherclown (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Ghafour (Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin leader) for deletion[edit]

The article Abdul Ghafour (Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin leader) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Ghafour (Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin leader) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 03:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) for deletion[edit]

The article Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..Anotherclown (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bismullah (Guantanamo detainee 968) for deletion[edit]

The article Bismullah (Guantanamo detainee 968) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..Anotherclown (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) for deletion[edit]

The article Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.