User talk:Sunmist/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Hello you have been on Wikipedia for so long you deserve a medal for reviewing people's work GamerCat2016 (talk) 08:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

shankar mahadevan removal content

Hi, thank you for your reply. I have removed that specific content because it is a false information about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.169.167 (talk) 22:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to tell me, when I was going through recent changes, it looked like you removed information without explaining what for. (a lot of people remove stuff by accident, or just to test) To avoid confusion in the future, use the edit summary box to explain what changes you made. Sunmist3 (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your good work there. I've indeffed. Bishonen | talk 23:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC).

Draft:Genetic Method

Dear Sunmist3, The deletion of my web page on the Genetic Method of teaching mathematics was deleted because of copyright infringement of my own homepage http://horstbeyer.eu.pn/ . Is this serious? Best regards, Horst Beyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horstbeyer (talkcontribs) 21:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia can only accept content under certain licenses. (with exceptions, such as fair use) If you would like to include your content, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. As you own the web page, a quick way is to add a notice stating that the content is under a free license. Sunmist3 (talk) 21:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind information. Just sent a "copyleft notice" to "permissions-en@wikimedia.org."

Best regards, Horst Beyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horstbeyer (talkcontribs) 23:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The aithor's edits seem to be of poor quality. I don't know if the club is notable.Xx236 (talk) 08:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

I've PRODDED it. It hasn't been covered significantly in reliable sources, and it can't be notable just because of "its most notable alumni, Peter Stanifer." Sunmist3 (talk) 02:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

unfounded accusations

Sunmist,

I received 2 messages from you to stop edits, the last one accusing me of vandalism. I don't know why my IP address showed up on the July 25 edits, but I assure you it was not this 65 year old grandmother who "vandalized" those 2 pages, and I do not appreciate being so accused. I am clueless about how to edit at all and have no interest in doing so.

Penny70.215.199.10 (talk) 23:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for letting me know. IP addresses are oftentimes shared, and can change frequently. Unfortunately, this means that people may receive erroneous warnings for edits someone else did. These warnings do not keep you from reading Wikipedia. I have cleared the warnings from your IP's page, and added a notice that the IP is shared. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Sunmist3 (talk) 07:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Too-speedy speedy tagging

Thanks for patrolling new pages, a vital and under-appreciated task, but please don't tag newly created articles with WP:CSD#A1 or WP:CSD#A3 too soon after creation. While things like copyright violations and attack pages need to be tagged at once, new contributors often put in a word or two and then click "Save page" to see how it looks: it is discouraging and BITEy if a speedy-deletion template pops up at once. For incomplete articles like Zimbabwe Hyperinflation Pictures just now, you should make a note of the title and wait at least 10 - 15 minutes before tagging. See {{uw-hasty}}. There is general advice about new page patrolling at WP:NPP, and about speedy tagging at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Sure, I'll slow it down. I thought the title Zimbabwe Hyperinflation Pictures implied that the editor was going to leave a link to some pictures and probably not much else, but I get that tagging it ASAP can be BITEY, even if the article is ultimately deleted. Sunmist3 (talk) 07:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

The word "Bestselling"

Hello, Books and other forms of medium can actually be consider best selling, best selling is not an opinion and actually means that this medium got an higher amount of sales then competitor "x". Therefore in most cases (albeit reliable sourcing of the best selling status) its not an peacock term at all. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

It certainly can, but in this case the only source claiming it's a bestseller appears to be the publisher themselves. Actually, that portion of the sentence appears to have been copied verbatim from the publisher. Without a reliable source, (or at least naming a competitor) it's effectively meaningless. (bestseller according to who and compared to what?) If it turns out that it is indeed a bestseller, I see no problem with calling it one. Sunmist (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Sunmist, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

about wordpress security

Hi, Mr. Sunmist, I was surprise that you was cancel my link about wordpress security, If you carefully look at that blog about wordpresse and server security then thats really great for readers If you again read that blog and wikipedia article then you realize that I am taking really good decisions for readers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mangeshvthakur (talkcontribs) 07:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mangeshvthakur, blogs are usually not considered reliable sources or appropriate for external links. I'm sure they're great, but they don't quite belong on Wikipedia. Sunmist (talk) 07:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Paul Tibbets

I did not vandalize any pages. This man dropped a bomb that was responsible for over 100,000 deaths, is that not true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.187.230 (talk) 20:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

I did not accuse you of any vandalism. As I said in my message on your talk page, just because death tolls can be added up does not mean that reliable sources consider Paul Tibbets to be a mass murderer. To include this in the article, reliable sources need to actually state that he is a mass murderer. Otherwise, this can be considered synthesis, which is a form of original research, which is not accepted on Wikipedia. If you can find reliable sources stating this, feel free to add it. This was also discussed a bit on the talk page, so I would recommend saying something there before re-adding it.
The same also applies to Charles Sweeney, where you have made a similar edit.
Sunmist (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC); edited 20:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your help today. Patient Zerotalk 09:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

/Milicent_Hathaway Page

Hi Sunmist, thanks for adding the deletion tag, I actually started it on my sandbox, not sure why it has got saved on mainspace, so I just moved the content under my personal sandbox now.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skdwived (talkcontribs) 03:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

ACC tool access request approved

Sunmist, thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you are identified to the Wikimedia Foundation and approved your request.

You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarise yourself with the process.

Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.

Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC.

Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!  DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 17:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
571 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Vulnerability (computing) (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
3,504 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Malware (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
216 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Password manager (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
967 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Security hacker (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
562 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Internet security (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
1,994 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Firewall (computing) (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
243 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Human intelligence (intelligence gathering) (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Cleanup
265 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Database security (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Cleanup
340 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Tailored Access Operations (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Cleanup
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Fight for the Future (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
2,360 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Cascading Style Sheets (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
51 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Larrabee (microarchitecture) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
525 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Cyber-attack (talk) Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
3,670 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B ITIL (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
219 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Security-focused operating system (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
346 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C OWASP (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
1,776 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Kernel (operating system) (talk) Please add more sources Merge
10,345 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Denial-of-service attack (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Merge
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Basic sequential algorithmic scheme (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dorothy E. Denning (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Obstructing government administration (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Information Security Awareness Forum (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Carl Landwehr (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C LifeBEAM (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Middle East Internet Exchange (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
42 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Secure coding (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Phil Reitinger (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start RazorThreat (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Houston Tower (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
83 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mandiant (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
This is given to you for reviewing others and mine make sure you read my user talk GamerCat2016 (talk) 06:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Question

@Sunmist: Hello, how do I join the Recent Changes Patrol?

Hi, Mdriscoll03! Thank you for your interest in patrolling. Recent Changes Patrol isn't a formal group, so you can patrol at any time. However, you should have a good understanding of vandalism and good faith edits, and be able to tell the difference between the two before starting. For instance, at Jesús Franco, this edit doesn't appear to be vandalism, but you reverted the IP and warned them with {{uw-vandalism1}}. Mistakes happen, but it's very important to properly identify vandalism; reverting edits can discourage new editors, and scare them away from the project. At Black president, you correctly identified the vandalism, but reverted to another vandalized version of the page. Be sure to check that you are not reverting to another vandalized version, as this can make it harder to spot/fix for other patrollers, and doesn't fix the problem.
I would suggest getting some more editing experience before doing Recent Changes Patrol, or only handling the more obvious/blatant vandalism edits for now. You can also focus on improving 'needy' edits, such as ones that are improperly formatted, have spelling/grammar errors, etc. After you have more experience, consider joining the CV training program if you plan on patrolling and fighting vandalism long-term. Lastly, you should sign your edits to talk pages and noticeboards (but not encyclopedia articles) by adding four tildes (~~~~) to the end of your post.
Sunmist (talk) 08:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Sunmist,
Breaking the back of the backlog
We now have 819 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.
Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

Sandbox Request

Please Use The Sandbox To Configure It | Freeride Games | Talk

I'm not entirely sure what you meant. If you're asking that I use the sandbox, I already use it occasionally. If you're looking for the sandbox, it's at Wikipedia:Sandbox. Sunmist (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

The Sandbox Allows People To Edit It — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freeride Games (talkcontribs) 13:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Crypto Wars revert

I believe you made a mistake, connor whicher is a big cause of crypto wars going on currently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexcochrane0 (talkcontribs) 14:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@Alexcochrane0: Hello, I reverted your edit because you added "...Hillary Clinton's and other idiots' access to cryptography..." to the article. Referring to people as "idiots" is not neutral or acceptable in an encyclopedia. Also, be sure to cite your sources; unsourced information may be removed. Sunmist (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Slander

He can slander but I cannot swear????!?!?!?!!??!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!!???!?!?!?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.198.66.10 (talk) 02:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Ramaksoud2000 did not slander you, they left a note on your talk page telling you that they didn't think your edit was constructive. Personal attacks, such as your comments on Ramaksoud2000's talk page, are not permitted here. Please be civil to fellow editors.
It is possible that you share an IP with someone else, which would explain how you were warned for something you didn't do. To avoid this in the future, consider creating an account. Sunmist (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Sunmist,
Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Vandal

Here is the new one: User:The King of automated WV. Dustin (talk) 00:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry for the late reply, by the time I saw your message they were already blocked. Sunmist (talk) 18:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox country at games. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Feminist stripper article

"feminist Stripper" should not exist as a article. Stripper as a article already exists and at most "feminist stripper" should be a sub section under that article. Not its own article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.252.148 (talk) 03:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@64.110.252.148: Please discuss this on the talk page and/or nominate the article for deletion (or propose a merge) instead of blanking it. Sunmist (talk) 03:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Cold War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Cold War. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox song

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox song. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Sunmist,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 819 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Sunmist,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 819 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quaerenz

Hello Sunmist, Yes I am sorry, I made a mistake creating my user page, thank you for your collaboration. --Quaerenz (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I was wondering how hard it would be to change the colors on File:Java programming language logo.svg. The red and blue colors were abandoned several years ago (long before Oracle acquired Sun) in favor of an orange-ish/teal-ish palette (RGB 248 / 152 / 29 and 83 / 130 / 161 ). See http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/java/java-licensing-logo-guidelines-1908204.pdf for current documentation on this. Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 05:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

One more thing I realized: it isn't just a matter of color substitution: in the 2003 and later version of the logo, the word "Java" and the TM symbol are in the same blue/teal color as the cup. Only the steam is in orange.
If you're not able to change this, please let me know, and I'll dig up an SVG editor.--NapoliRoma (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
...and fixed. Sorry to clutter up your talk page like this!--NapoliRoma (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox software. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox religious text. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Why

Why did you have to delete my work? I know someone was going to copyright it eventually, but at least give me a chance to copy and paste it somewhere else. I was working on that for literal WEEKS and you come along and delete it off of MY userspace. I'm pissed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brodyargo (talkcontribs) 17:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Brodyargo: The only content removed from your sandbox was the copyrighted Bee Movie script; I took care to leave everything else intact. Wikipedia cannot host non-free content, (except in some circumstances, such as fair use) so it really did have to be removed. Consider asking an administrator for a copy of the deleted content. (although you may not be able to get a copy, as it was deleted for copyright infringement) Sunmist (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Medical resources. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Dreaded 45 day list

Hello , just a poke to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Big Brother Canada (season 5). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Policy. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Sunmist,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 819 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox official post. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Talk header

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Talk header. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox country. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Taxonbar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Taxonbar. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Recent death Aboriginal Aus. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Birth date and age. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox scientist. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox writer. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Legobot (talk) 04:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Unreferenced

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Unreferenced. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:American Greetings logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Greetings logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (Community).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- (Radiphus) 15:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sunmist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gråen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gråen. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter. Legobot (talk) 04:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of France

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of France. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Wikidata/2018 Infobox RfC. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox writer. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Niantic Labs logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Niantic Labs logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Viruses. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Death year and age. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

To sharp, or not to sharp, is that even a question?

Sunmist, I think there's just a simpler way to fix the what-should-it-be-called debacle.

Firstly, they misnamed it to begin with. If it's musical connection they desired to have, and it needs to be non-special-character(ized), it should have been named C-sharp, with da hyphen, standard for Anglicizing key- and scale-names.

I'd put this comment into the C Sharp TALK but am not certain how to do that, hence my note to you. Not sure how the tildes work....

[..ps..C++ is a misnomer, too, IMNSHO.. am not a C++/Linux guy but ++ is a -post-, not a -pre-, so.. Seems to me it shoulda been called ++C, as in make massive improvement then use it. No? Grin. Maybe that's what they meant, but, like Google, it's not what they came up with.]

Criticatlarge (talk) 20:35, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Criticatlarge

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Iobdb name

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Iobdb name. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Notability

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Notability. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Other
Moving to Draft and Page Mover
  • Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
  • If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
  • Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
  • The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
  • The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

  • Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
  • In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
  • MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
  • User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
  • User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
  • User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
  • User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
  • User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Sunmist, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
  • ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
  • There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Sunmist,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
  • Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sunmist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Sunmist,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank you for your work reporting WP:RD1 violations! You made an excellent catch. TheSandDoctor Talk 15:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spongebob-squarepants.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spongebob-squarepants.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sunmist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Cellular network because they seemed ....

Hello Sunmist


Thank You on letting me know that You have removed the link I posted.

While I appreciate your right to choose what you want on your page I still do consider the link I have posted to be of use to the readers interested in mobile networks.

Best regards

Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.180.92.217 (talk) 10:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mike, I removed your link because I didn't think it complied with our external link policy. In particular, it looks like some sort of blog, and is apparently trying to sell equipment. We usually avoid linking these kinds of sites in articles. Sunmist (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. Legobot (talk) 04:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello Sunmist,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Country data New Caledonia. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template namespace. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Moving a page. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Revdel requests

Hey, just a reminder that when you put in a revdel request, please remove the CV from the article as well. ♠PMC(talk) 00:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Oops, sorry about that! Thanks for fixing it. Sunmist (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Rfc

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Rfc. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Spanish general election. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox country. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello Sunmist,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019/Phase 2. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Ahnentafel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Ahnentafel. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Legobot (talk) 04:33, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:POV check

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:POV check. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Infobox

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)