User talk:MPFitz1968/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Request
MPFitz1968, you seem to have good access to episodes (at least, it seems that way to me!), so I have a request for you: when you are able, could you check any of the following Jessie (TV series) episodes – "Creepy Connie Comes a Callin'" (Season 1, Episode 7), "Creepy Connie's Curtain Call" (Season 1, Episode 23), or "Creepy Connie 3: The Creepening" (Season 3, Episode 11) – and check to see if Sierra McCormick's character is credited as just "Connie" or "Creepy Connie" or "Connie Thompson"? Even IMDb has it as "Connie Thompson", but I'm skeptical and wondering if the credit is just "Connie"... Thanks in advance! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: In all three episodes, McCormick's character is credited as simply "Connie" (McCormick is also billed as a special guest star in the season 3 episode along with G. Hannelius), as shown in the end credits of the episodes. By the way, Jessie is currently available on Netflix, which is how I checked. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks – that what I figured. On my end, I still haven't signed up for Netflix – with my work schedule, I don't think I'd use it enough to justify paying for it. Maybe this summer, when I'm mostly not working! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Follow-up: I've submitted corrections for this to IMDb (to change the character listing to just "Connie"), but I've been a little disappointed with IMDb as of late, so we'll see if they actually accept my submissions on this. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of 'Til Death episodes#Listings for seasons 3–4 appears arbitrary and WP:OR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Credit corrections
Please see User:Amaury/sandbox/Credit corrections for an in-depth explanation on this. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: I believe MPFitz1968 has gone through a bunch of other series not listed there (e.g. I think MPFitz1968 has done... Wizards of Waverly place, and some other shows that I'm not remembering, too). It'd probably be a good idea to list all the shows MPFitz1968 has done there too. FWIW. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Of course. I'll separate it into two sections. One section for articles in my sandbox and the other section for articles not in my sandbox. MPFitz1968 can add his other corrected articles there, and Nyuszika7H is welcome to do the same. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
For the first time ever with Liv and Maddie...
...Kali Rocha as Karen Rooney has missed an episode, and I have a feeling we'll see IPs or other editors trying to add an unnecessary and a trivial note saying something along the lines of Note: This is Kali Rocha's first-ever absence in the series.
Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Also of note is that until this episode, Dove's body doubles changed order in the credits each episode. This doesn't seem to be the case this time as Emmy Buckner is listed first both in this and the last episode. (Nyuszika7H, this may be of general interest to you since I mentioned it quite a long time ago to you somewhere.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I think I've discovered a pattern here. All of the odd production code numbers have Shelby Wulfert listed first and all of the even production code numbers have Emmy Buckner listed first, and they've been airing episodes in the following order: Odd, even, odd, even, etc. However, that's not what happened with these two latest episodes as we have two weeks in a row with even numbers. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I guess this isn't the first time. Never mind me. All the way back with "Kang-a-Rooney" and "Skate-a-Rooney" in the first season, we had two odds in a row. And there are also many more like that of either two odds or two evens in a row across all four seasons. Still looks like "odd, even" or "even, odd" is a pattern they followed in a lot of cases. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I think I've discovered a pattern here. All of the odd production code numbers have Shelby Wulfert listed first and all of the even production code numbers have Emmy Buckner listed first, and they've been airing episodes in the following order: Odd, even, odd, even, etc. However, that's not what happened with these two latest episodes as we have two weeks in a row with even numbers. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sure I will keep an eye of those odd bits of trivia, which is as unnecessary as something I reverted in the last 24 hours, from the LoE for Victorious [1]. By the way, I'm not sure I've seen that Liv and Maddie episode yet ("Big Break-a-Rooney"). MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is Liv and Maddie something you've been keeping up with or just Stuck in the Middle and former series Girl Meets World? Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'll admit, I haven't been watching too much outside of Stuck in the Middle or Girl Meets World recently on Disney Channel. Got so much going on outside of that and Wikipedia at the moment. Plus, I recently started on Amazon Prime (in the middle of the free trial, but I plan to hold on to it for the $99/year) and is cool to be able to watch the first seasons of iCarly and Victorious (again) free with that subscription. Also watching Just Add Magic there. Down the road I am planning to stay with the streaming services (Amazon and Netflix), and drop cable TV - it has just become way too expensive at Comcast to justify my keeping it if all I'm gonna watch is Disney Channel or Nickelodeon. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, how much are you paying a month for Comcast? We're with DirecTV and have been paying $62.72 a month, though it went up to $64.72 starting with the February bill. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- The package price (bundled with the Triple Play which includes X1 and Performance Pro Internet) is $110/month, which is discounted as I'm on a twelve-month commitment right now (which ends in December), and will go to $140/month after that. (Thank goodness, I didn't go with a two-year commitment.) But add in the "other fees and taxes", and it's over $140 for each bill right now. I remember not too long ago I was paying $90/month for the bundle (not including the other fees/taxes) - but the change has to do with my apartment complex discontinuing an agreement with Comcast regarding the cable TV part, which was included with my rent. My cable TV got cut at one point in December, and I had to rearrange the plan, and Comcast didn't have any prices lower than what I settled on. But the bottom line after evaluating how much I actually watch cable TV was that I don't watch much outside Disney Channel or Nickelodeon. Maybe some sports especially during the NFL season, but not a whole lot. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure which package we're on. It's not the super basic one, but the next one up, I think, so we don't have Nicktoons. But yeah, if you're just going to watch those two channels, there's always Netflix and the sites themselves, though the latter might be an issue when you cancel Comcast. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I had tried to go to CenturyLink (which uses high-speed DSL instead of cable) not too long ago, but that fell thru when the technician told me the phone wiring in my apartment was too old and they couldn't upgrade it. I have thoughts of cancelling Comcast still, but may not while I'm still living in my current apartment. Regardless, I'm gonna cut the cable TV part after the commitment. Performance Pro Internet with Comcast alone drops my price to about $80/month, and could go down to as low as $50/month with Performance Basic (but I will likely not like the speed).
- Oh, if I were to cut cable TV, it's bye bye Disney App (or Watch Disney) ... I would not be authorized to watch their content, even on the Internet. And I think it would be the same with Nickelodeon. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure which package we're on. It's not the super basic one, but the next one up, I think, so we don't have Nicktoons. But yeah, if you're just going to watch those two channels, there's always Netflix and the sites themselves, though the latter might be an issue when you cancel Comcast. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- The package price (bundled with the Triple Play which includes X1 and Performance Pro Internet) is $110/month, which is discounted as I'm on a twelve-month commitment right now (which ends in December), and will go to $140/month after that. (Thank goodness, I didn't go with a two-year commitment.) But add in the "other fees and taxes", and it's over $140 for each bill right now. I remember not too long ago I was paying $90/month for the bundle (not including the other fees/taxes) - but the change has to do with my apartment complex discontinuing an agreement with Comcast regarding the cable TV part, which was included with my rent. My cable TV got cut at one point in December, and I had to rearrange the plan, and Comcast didn't have any prices lower than what I settled on. But the bottom line after evaluating how much I actually watch cable TV was that I don't watch much outside Disney Channel or Nickelodeon. Maybe some sports especially during the NFL season, but not a whole lot. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, how much are you paying a month for Comcast? We're with DirecTV and have been paying $62.72 a month, though it went up to $64.72 starting with the February bill. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'll admit, I haven't been watching too much outside of Stuck in the Middle or Girl Meets World recently on Disney Channel. Got so much going on outside of that and Wikipedia at the moment. Plus, I recently started on Amazon Prime (in the middle of the free trial, but I plan to hold on to it for the $99/year) and is cool to be able to watch the first seasons of iCarly and Victorious (again) free with that subscription. Also watching Just Add Magic there. Down the road I am planning to stay with the streaming services (Amazon and Netflix), and drop cable TV - it has just become way too expensive at Comcast to justify my keeping it if all I'm gonna watch is Disney Channel or Nickelodeon. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is Liv and Maddie something you've been keeping up with or just Stuck in the Middle and former series Girl Meets World? Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Re: Bunk'd
One thing I noticed about Friday's episode is that it had cutaway segments similar to Liv and Maddie and Stuck in the Middle. I don't recall that being done with the series before and was wondering if it would be trivia to mention it in a note. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Re: Genre of Ride
I'm thinking you and/or Nyuszika7H should watch the first episode if and when you can to determine the genre. Twice an editor changed the genre with no real explanation other than a "this is wrong" statement. Unless there's a reliable source I'm missing somewhere showing the genre. Hunter Street, that new article I created, for example, is a comedy, which is supported by that Variety article. Amaury (talk | contribs) 09:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: I'm planning to watch that show somewhen, but without a reliable source, it's best not to include a genre at all. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Trying my hands at creating my very first article...
...that's not a WP:SPLIT!
Geraldo Perez, IJBall, Nyuszika7H
Link to the draft: User:Amaury/sandbox/Hunter Street (2017 TV series)
I was going to create it directly in the main space, but unlike with Legendary Dudas when I had IJBall help me with that and create it, I can't really find any reliable sources on the Internet. It's also not yet listed on The Futon Critic or Zap2it. The only site I can find a mention of this series with quite a bit of information on is this blog site which we all know is obviously not a reliable source. The only reliable sources I have are one YouTube video which supports the series itself and a commercial on Nickelodeon that supports both the series itself and its premiere date. The series is already on the Nickelodeon site, but they seem to have changed their layout as there's no "About" tab with the character names. I even checked Game Shakers, thinking maybe it's because character information and the like for the series is unknown, but the layout is the same there with no "About" tab. Although if you click on the "more" button, there is a brief description of the series with some character names, but I don't think that really helps with anything, though I could be wrong.
Anyway, for the information box, I copied and pasted from Template:Infobox television, but removed all of the fields I believe are irrelevant, something I always do when I clean up articles in my sandbox.
So, I believe I've gone as far as I can for now, but you guys are more than welcome to help, especially if information pops up in a reliable source and I'm not around, for example. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: I was able to find this at Variety which tells you its from Blooming Media (studios). But I've found literally nothing else, including no evidence of a scheduled premiere date yet. So I think it'll need to continue to incubate in your User space for now. One other thing – there is no other TV series titled "Hunter Street", so I would advise moving the draft to just Hunter Street (TV series) when it's ready to go into Mainspace... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Genre and company added. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: Somebody already tried to beat you to creating Hunter Street (TV series) (but did it totally wrong!), so I advise that we just go ahead and move your draft into Mainspace. But because of the "squatter" at Hunter Street (TV series), you're going to need my help as a WP:Page mover to pull this off. Just let me know when you're ready... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Go for it.
I'm tidying up List of Make It Pop episodes right now. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Go for it.
- @Amaury: Somebody already tried to beat you to creating Hunter Street (TV series) (but did it totally wrong!), so I advise that we just go ahead and move your draft into Mainspace. But because of the "squatter" at Hunter Street (TV series), you're going to need my help as a WP:Page mover to pull this off. Just let me know when you're ready... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Genre and company added. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The article is now created: Hunter Street (TV series). Geraldo Perez, IJBall, Nyuszika7H, and MPFitz1968, those of you interested in watching this for the long-term, you know the drill: User:Amaury/sandbox#Main Articles (CS). I know you'll add it Nyuszika, haha! Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- And a special thank you to IJBall for the help. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
@IJBall: Doesn't add much information, but this was recently posted. Is that site a reliable source? Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Possibly:
World Screen is a 32-year-old publication covering the international media business. In print and online it offers news and analysis on trends in the media industry across the globe, as well as insightful, exclusive interviews with leading executives. Its sister publications include TV Europe, TV Asia, TV MEA, TV Kids, TV Real, TV Formats, TV Drama and TV Listings and the Spanish-language TV Latina, TV Niños and TV Series.
So it appears legit. I say: use if for now, but try to replace with better sourcing, when it becomes available. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
IJBall, Geraldo Perez, Nyuszika7H, Michael
Now that Hunter Street has more information and looks more like a "normal" article, if any of you are interested in actually watching it for the long-term, please be sure to update my sandbox with a check mark in your spot. Right now I think only myself and IJBall are watching it, though I'm not sure if this will be short-term or long-term for IJBall. And, Nyuszika, I uploaded the logo for the series, but it may need tweaking, size-wise. I keep forgetting about that. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- In my case, I haven't decided yet – I'll watchlist the article at least through new episodes airing. I think I'm slowly moving in the direction of watchlisting more "old" TV series, but I don't plan to start watching too many currently airing TV series (there's too much potential "drama" with other editors in watching current TV show articles...), not even the ones devoted to shows on Disney or Nick. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Like those under Former Series in my sandbox, eh?
Luckily, there seems to be very little or no drama with the articles of currently running series that are listed in my sandbox. At least that's how I see it. I think the only ones where drama came up were Girl Meets World and K.C. Undercover with regard to absences, but even that died down pretty quickly, and then Lost in the West in regard to the ratings, though I ended up unwatching that one as it wasn't worth it. It's their way or the highway, and they're going to quote guidelines, which are, again, called guidelines for a reason, until they're blue in the face, as you put it the first time this came up alongside the apparent writing credits issue with K.C. Undercover. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Geraldo Perez, Nyuszika7H, IJBall, Michael
- @IJBall: Like those under Former Series in my sandbox, eh?
- This isn't related, but I'm just going to post it here. I've added Andi Mack to my sandbox, and I've gone ahead and placed a check mark in your spot, Michael, but please remove it if it's not correct. IJBall, I'm assuming you're just short-term, so no check mark needed. The more watchers the merrier. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey!
Who said you could steal my job with Liv and Maddie and Bunk'd? 
Anyway, what do you predict for this week's Liv and Maddie, Bunk'd, and Stuck in the Middle, the last one of which didn't have its time slot changed? Bad range? Good range? Mediocre range? Also, you may have noticed I've started this project, so I won't really be providing comparisons here anymore, and I'll just point you to there. It's basically duplicating information in the episode lists, but then expanding on that by showing the increases and decreases and such. (Obviously, it's still in the works.) My messages were probably getting annoying, anyway. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: Wow, what I can do with my time when I'm under the weather (fighting a nasal cold at the moment)! Thankfully, I remembered there being a new episode for more than Stuck in the Middle this week and decided to watch Liv and Maddie (part 1 of 3 for their series finale) and eventually Bunk'd on Watch Disney ahead of its Disney Channel airing ... and just jotted down the credits. As for viewership, that seems to be a yo-yo each week when it comes to Disney. Hopefully, Liv and Maddie will pick up a bit more than the February episodes, which were the lowest of their entire run; getting at least one million may sound like a victory at this point. Bunk'd has only been back for about a week after not having any non-holiday episodes for over three months, so hard to gauge that one after being introduced to its new time slot; probably will be within a couple hundred thousand viewers, either way, of the "Food Fight" episode last week (which got 1.18 million). Stuck in the Middle has displayed more of the yo-yo effect I was talking about, up one week, down the next (2.13, 1.09, 1.37, 0.99). Perhaps that yo-yo effect continues this week, as 0.99 million is almost as low as it gets (then again, I could be wrong here).
I think I'll take a look at that link, Amaury. Thanks for pointing me to it. I had no problem with your presenting it on my talk page, though where you have it now is a bit better. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- I've added some additional sections for Girl Meets World and Stuck in the Middle.
- It's just such a shame that their ratings plummeted drastically beginning November 18 last year, and this was before Girl Meets World ended, so I honestly don't know what's really to blame. Lack of advertising? Speculation, at the time, about Girl Meets World ending? What? Hopefully they're able to recover at some point, not just for a week—like on January 6—but long-term. I mean, Nickelodeon's had some shows that just didn't do well, like Bella and the Bulldogs during its second season, but not with all of their shows which seems to be the case with Disney Channel here. And if you take a look at the Nickelodeon articles you're watching, such as The Thundermans, or even Game Shakers and School of Rock, you'll notice they kind of jump around as well, but not to the extent that Disney Channel has been dealing with. Amaury (talk | contribs) 09:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: This may be of interest to you as well, at least with Girl Meets World and Stuck in the Middle. Maybe you and Michael can figure out where ratings seemed to start declining for Girl Meets World. There was something I read somewhere where a decline in ratings was one of the reasons why Disney Channel canceled or simply just didn't renew—I don't really know which one is appropriate—the series. That's what people were speculating and alleging, anyway. For me personally, I felt the series was doing between decent and excellent up through Girl Meets Her Monster from season three, and after that is when ratings took a dive and only recovered slightly (consistently), at least for Girl Meets World, not so much for the other series, when new episodes resumed on January 6. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's just such a shame that their ratings plummeted drastically beginning November 18 last year, and this was before Girl Meets World ended, so I honestly don't know what's really to blame. Lack of advertising? Speculation, at the time, about Girl Meets World ending? What? Hopefully they're able to recover at some point, not just for a week—like on January 6—but long-term. I mean, Nickelodeon's had some shows that just didn't do well, like Bella and the Bulldogs during its second season, but not with all of their shows which seems to be the case with Disney Channel here. And if you take a look at the Nickelodeon articles you're watching, such as The Thundermans, or even Game Shakers and School of Rock, you'll notice they kind of jump around as well, but not to the extent that Disney Channel has been dealing with. Amaury (talk | contribs) 09:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Well, there are the numbers. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey, is this on your watchlist? If not, could you please add it? We've had some vandalism at this one the last couple of days – people continually adding Coconut Head to the main cast, but not even using the actor's correct name. So it would be helpful to have more eyes on this one. If it continues for a couple of more days, I'll go ahead an ask for protection on it at WP:RfPP... Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I can help out as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I've added it to my watchlist. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Tangled: The Series
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IJBall#Nickelodeon_wins_2016 Even though I present that theory as a possible reason for SITM's huge drop in viewership, I will not dismiss the boycott Disney theory (though I'd wait to see if new shows like Tangled, Andi Mack, and the long-awaited sequel to Descendants continue this trend of sagging ratings later in the year). MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Of course this is only the first episode, and Stuck in the Middle season two had a strong start as well, but look what happened there. Still... http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/showbuzzdailys-top-150-friday-cable-originals-network-finals-3-10-2017.html Archived 2017-12-08 at the Wayback Machine Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Re: Henry Danger
Because it was the lead-in to the KCAs 2017, I'm guessing "Space Invaders, Part 1" will get at least the same ratings as "Hour of Power (3.16 million), if not more. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- The wait is agonizing. I gots to know. Ha! I'm also eager to see how Hunter Street did with its first episodes. I don't know if I'd be pushing it by hoping for around two million or more. I mean, they advertised it pretty well like they do for all of their shows. http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/wednesday-5-11-2016-fast-nationals-delayed.html Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Nicky, Ricky, Dicky and Dawn - "What's the Worst That Quad Happen?" episode summary
Not related to this discussion, but I'll just put it here. You want to take a stab at trimming the summary I added for last night's NRDD episode? I didn't realize I made it quite so long. I don't think you have to watch it in order to trim it. 
Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- That one sure is long! I'll see how I can shorten it, but no guarantees on whether I can get it short enough. I think I'll tag that one, and other summaries in that episode list I saw were also pretty long. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Probably all by me, LOL! I've written summaries for the following episodes, including the above. I think I've told you before that sometimes I just get a bug up my butt and can write good summaries for this series in particular and other times not, hence the skipped summary in one episode and then a summary again on the next episode and such.
- Rock 'n' Rules (S2 E12)
- Doggy Door Afternoon (S2 E16)
- Three Men and Mae B. (S2 E17)
- Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Sicky (S2 E21)
- A Brief Case of Popularity (S2 E23)
- New Kid on the Block (S2 E24)
- What's the Worst That Quad Happen? (S3 E7)
- Probably all by me, LOL! I've written summaries for the following episodes, including the above. I think I've told you before that sometimes I just get a bug up my butt and can write good summaries for this series in particular and other times not, hence the skipped summary in one episode and then a summary again on the next episode and such.
Liv and Maddie marathon
Thought this may be of interest to you and IJBall: https://twitter.com/Descendants2015/status/844750155656105984 Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm more interested in knowing when they'll air all episodes of the 3-part series finale, back-to-back, as I haven't seen it yet... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Re: Henry Danger: Space Invaders, Part 2
Would you watch tonight's episode if you can and verify that there was a Zoey 101 clip? I've already deleted my recording. I didn't notice a clip of the show when watching the episode, and if there was a clip, because it was so small, it probably doesn't deserve mentioning and is just excess trivia more appropriate on Wikia. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: At the moment, I'm not sure I can watch that episode yet as it doesn't appear to be available on demand. Definitely not at Comcast's Xfinity, but I'm not sure about Nickelodeon's site. I see one that says "Space Invaders", but I don't know if it's part two. MPFitz1968 (talk) 05:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: I just watched that episode on Nickelodeon's web site. I do notice the Zoey 101 clip while the girl (not sure who she is, as I don't watch this show normally) is flipping thru channels on the TV to find where they are airing her "Fred Lobster" commercial (she gets frustrated over her commercial getting constantly interrupted by special reports from space). As for noteworthiness on that Zoey 101 clip, it's plain trivia and doesn't merit inclusion even in a note; the clip shown isn't even for one second. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Semi-related, but is this also trivia? (The note also happens to be in the wrong spot. Should be under the absence.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: IMO, yes – mentioning the Octo-pie thing is find for a Wikia, but is essentially WP:TRIVIA for a Wikipedia episodes list. (I wonder if there couldn't be some mention of this somewhere – maybe at Schneider's Bakery article? A section about references to one Schneider's Bakery TV series on another?...) Incidentally, this is exactly the kind of thing that leads to this(!) which I also consider to be (unsourced) trivia that should be removed. (On my end, I do plan to nuke sections like the latter in a couple of months...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Re: DJV11181988
Could you or IJBall file an ANI report? I'm at college, and my laptop's battery is dead, and I can't properly do it on my tablet. Their antics are getting annoying, and this isn't their first rodeo with disruptiveness. GP and I have dealt with them before. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please also temporarily watch the articles in question (see contribs). I've got likely socks of them now. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: Two things – first, it's better that the person who knows the situation best be the one to file the report (on my end, I honestly don't know the particulars of this one, and I'm generally avoiding ANI in any case) and it's OK if it takes a couple of extra hours to file, and 2) just looking at the most recent diffs from this one, I'm not sure you'll make any headway on this one at ANI, as they'll likely just say it's a "content dispute". In terms of the BFW edits, it's probably time to let people move it into the "cancelled" column – while we still lack a "strong" RS verifying cancellation, there's also no question at this point that it is cancelled, so fighting the labeling of it as such will be a losing battle. (Now, BFW is different from both Lab Rats: Elite Force and Gamer's Guide... in that respect, as both of the latter are lacking anything even close to sourcing confirming cancellation.) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury:@IJBall: I was in the process of doing the ANI report, but then I just wonder if the user has even seen the talk page discussion at Talk:Best Friends Whenever. I'm going to remind them about that discussion, hoping they will communicate in some way or at the very least stop making the disruptive edits till it's clear what we come up with in the discussion. But given what sources we've evaluated over on that talk page, especially M Magazine, it's a pretty good indicator the series has been cancelled, yet still not quite a reliable outlet. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
@Amaury: Another user has updated List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel to move BFW to the section "Repeats of ended series" (as in, saying it has been cancelled) [2]. I will support IJBall's position about not continuously reverting on this matter (it's probably time to let people move it into the "cancelled" column
), even though we still lack the solid source which supports the official cancellation. Also, that article is indefinitely semiprotected, so this isn't IPs or new editors that are making this move. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, again – at least there's something to verify cancellation in the case of BFW, even it's not fully "official". That's different than the Lab Rats: Elite Force or the Gamers' Guide... cases where we don't even have a "partial" confirmation of cancellation from sourcing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
To tie up a loose end here, DJV11181988 has now been blocked (6 months), after being reported at AIV a couple of days ago [3]. Appears to be related to the disruptive editing they've been doing lately, but I haven't dug thru their most recent contribution history. MPFitz1968 (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Andi Mack
Just as an FYI, that was intentional because The Futon Critic is more accurate than Screener. Once The Futon Critic updates I'll add it to the title column as well. :) Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Peyton List
Are you kidding, UNSOURCED ... NOTHING IN THE ARTICLE ... seriously. I have never been reverted before, and this is just a lie on your behalf, a complete and utter lie, Also, I am trying to disambiguate the two Peyton List's by adding in singer, at the moment both actresses have the same lead line. Damiantgordon (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- I noticed my mistake, and put a dummy edit summary here [4], but is her singing notable? I'm not thinking so from the source I came across in that section [5]. And I suggest you be civil or you could face sanctions. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- I feel like you made a claim about me that was false, and damaged my reputation as a Wikipedia user, and I think that the courteous thing for you to do would be to say sorry for your mistake. Also, have you not read the bit of the article saying that there is confusion with her namesake because they both have the same lead line ... if you are not happy with my change, can you make a change to differentiate them? Damiantgordon (talk) 18:37, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Damiantgordon: Article shows she is able to sing as are a lot of people. Nothing showing professional credits and a career as a singer. Best it is a hobby or occasional thing, it is not something she is known and notable for doing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Fair enough, good point. Damiantgordon (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Damiantgordon: Article shows she is able to sing as are a lot of people. Nothing showing professional credits and a career as a singer. Best it is a hobby or occasional thing, it is not something she is known and notable for doing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- I feel like you made a claim about me that was false, and damaged my reputation as a Wikipedia user, and I think that the courteous thing for you to do would be to say sorry for your mistake. Also, have you not read the bit of the article saying that there is confusion with her namesake because they both have the same lead line ... if you are not happy with my change, can you make a change to differentiate them? Damiantgordon (talk) 18:37, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Re: Tangled: The Series
- March 24: 1.30 million
- March 31: 1.05 million
Is it time to start throwing a #DisneyChannelRatingsWillNeverBeGoodAgain party? Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Is it you, or Nyuszika7H, that's good at using the {{CMain}}, etc. templates in cast tables?... In any case, if you're good with these, and you're bored some time, Chicago Hope's cast table is in need of a little "modernizing" if you're up for it... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I don't recall using the CMain template, so I probably will not undertake this. Something I'd have to use my sandbox for if I am inclined to attempt it. Oh, BTW, I just looked at Nyusiza7H's recent contribution history, and I recall Amaury alluding to him earlier somewhere else. He hasn't made any edits since March 15; if he is away, hopefully it won't be for too long. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- No worries – I'm probably just confusing you with Nyuszika7H. (And, yeah – I know Nyuszika7H is away. And I'm not all that comfortable with using CMain, etc. templates myself, which means I'll probably just leave the Chicago Hope cast table as is. It's not a big deal...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Hmm, thinking about it some more, I am recalling I came across CMain, but I haven't really messed around with the cast tables in a while. Still not sure I want to give it a try without experimenting, though. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry, I haven't really been active here lately. I'll take a look at it tomorrow, though it would be nice to also confirm the credits themselves, but I don't watch the show. Maybe I can find episodes online to stream – or downloading shouldn't be an issue either, now that our ISP upgraded the network infrastructure here recently and we have VDSL with 120 Mbps download and 50 Mbps upload. (They don't even have that plan on their site, only 120/10 and 1000/200. Maybe it's a special offer for old customers or their site is outdated.) I haven't been that busy all the time, I just kinda forgot about Wikipedia apart from the occasional use to look some things up. And I'm already not liking some stuff I've seen changed since then. :P nyuszika7h (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Nyuszika7H: Welcome back. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry, I haven't really been active here lately. I'll take a look at it tomorrow, though it would be nice to also confirm the credits themselves, but I don't watch the show. Maybe I can find episodes online to stream – or downloading shouldn't be an issue either, now that our ISP upgraded the network infrastructure here recently and we have VDSL with 120 Mbps download and 50 Mbps upload. (They don't even have that plan on their site, only 120/10 and 1000/200. Maybe it's a special offer for old customers or their site is outdated.) I haven't been that busy all the time, I just kinda forgot about Wikipedia apart from the occasional use to look some things up. And I'm already not liking some stuff I've seen changed since then. :P nyuszika7h (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Hmm, thinking about it some more, I am recalling I came across CMain, but I haven't really messed around with the cast tables in a while. Still not sure I want to give it a try without experimenting, though. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- No worries – I'm probably just confusing you with Nyuszika7H. (And, yeah – I know Nyuszika7H is away. And I'm not all that comfortable with using CMain, etc. templates myself, which means I'll probably just leave the Chicago Hope cast table as is. It's not a big deal...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Bunk'd: Camp Stinky Waka absence
I wonder if something important came up or the like off-camera because, like Kali Rocha in Liv and Maddie, that is quite unusual for him to be absent as I think he is one of the top-level actors in regard to starring status, if that makes sense. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was surprised Ravi wasn't in this episode, particularly with Tiffany's mom in it (who was expecting to see the "scientific" bunch that her daughter has been hanging around with). As for why his absence, we could guess but not know the reason unless it's documented in a reliable source. MPFitz1968 (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: What's this about Kali Rocha? I don't see any mention for an absence for her (nor a source) at either Liv and Maddie of List of Liv and Maddie episodes... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2017
Just want to let you know, this is not so much a correction, as the title shown at the top of the window/tab (able to be copied by bookmarking, then copying the default text) shows what I put. The actual heading on the article is just slightly different this week. Ss112 18:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I wonder why they're different. Oh well, I usually copy/paste the article's title from the text. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Bunk'd
Likely in effort to try and improve ratings, Disney Channel is moving Bunk'd from 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM beginning Friday, April 21: https://twitter.com/nickandmore/status/851629287501434880 I realize that isn't reliable to use as a source on here for articles, but an unreliable source isn't necessarily incorrect, just can't trust it enough, hence my linking to it here in a general discussion. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hopefully it will improve the ratings but I'm not too sure about that. I did note in the Twitter feed about there being a gap between Bunk'd and Stuck in the Middle (two hours worth between the two shows on Friday, and weeknights in general). But I'm still holding to, and you've mentioned at least a few times already, a boycott on Disney Channel leading to these low ratings overall. And now not just because of the GMW cancellation. Glancing at a Google search when I type in "Disney Channel boycott" also is pointing to something LGBT-related in animated shows/movies Disney is broadcasting or behind (Beauty and the Beast, Star vs. the Forces of Evil, in particular). I haven't looked at these articles too closely, but seems like parents and Christian groups are behind this latest effort to boycott Disney Channel. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:18, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Absolutely ridiculous! I could understand if the opposite were true, but Disney Channel is doing the right thing by trying to catch up with the times and showing and promoting acceptance as it's now way more accepted than it used be. These people and groups need to stop discriminating. Of course this is just another theory right now, but still. IJBall, Nyuszika7H, Geraldo Perez, your thoughts? Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- I guess Disney Channel actually used to have early Friday evening premieres before: http://www.nickandmore.com/2016/12/10/disney-channel-returns-to-mid-2000s-premiere-style/ That was when their ratings were good, so I think they were actually hoping to see an improvement when they made the change this year, but I'm thinking ratings, in this day and age, would have been at least a little better if they left everything the way it was before 2017, even with the potential boycott stuff going on now. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Absolutely ridiculous! I could understand if the opposite were true, but Disney Channel is doing the right thing by trying to catch up with the times and showing and promoting acceptance as it's now way more accepted than it used be. These people and groups need to stop discriminating. Of course this is just another theory right now, but still. IJBall, Nyuszika7H, Geraldo Perez, your thoughts? Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
What to do...?
I'm coming to you for ideas, MPFitz1968! But what to do with an edit like this? You were the one who brought up the point about "episode counts" in cases like these, and while I don't necessarily agree that they should (always) be removed, in no way is it "right" to remove the "recurring role" listing (which defines what kind of role the actor had) from the 'Notes' column, leaving just the "episode count" (unsourced, of course). The biggest issue here is that User:Musdan77 is a long-term editor, and he obviously has certain ideas on how Filmographies should go (and, of course, I don't agree with a number of things he does). So I really don't know what to do – I'm doubting bringing this up to Musdan77 is going to change either of our minds... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I'm in agreement that the "recurring role" status should be there; Musdan77's claim in their edit summary that "it's obvious" is not true. Like in that diff you showed me, they even took out "main role" for another entry, though for that one it appears that show's pilot is being filmed and that status would need to be sourced. But where it indicates 21 episodes or 7, how do we know that it's a recurring role or not? Could easily be a main role for a short-lived series. While someone could click on the link to a TV series to find out if it's a recurring or main role, why go thru the extra step? I'm still in the camp of episode counts not being in the filmography table for an actor/actress if unsourced, since MOS:TV prohibits it under WP:TVCAST, but if these tables fall under WP:FILMOGRAPHY, this might be one case where this needs to be discussed at their project in light of what has gone on at WP:TV, so there's agreement between the two projects. Episode counts for main cast is pure trivia, though not necessarily so for recurring or guest cast, but in either case per WP:V, it needs to be known where these counts came from and hopefully from reliable sources. Anyone could change these counts for an ended TV series as a form of WP:SNEAKY vandalism, and we'd have a question of what to believe without the sources.
I haven't checked yet if any discussions have been brought up at WP:FILMOGRAPHY regarding these episode counts in the tables, or the main/recurring status of actors in TV shows, but without something solid in their MOS, or some sort of consensus at the project on this matter, you and Musdan77 could be clashing about this for a while. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- I can tell you that there has been a discussion about "main role" vs. "series regular" terminology (I argued pretty strongly for the former, another editor preferred the latter (at least initially)). I dunno if there's been a specific discussion about whether "main role" or "recurring role" is "needed" to be included in the Filmography or not. But considering that the WP:FILMOGRAPHY example contains a specific "Recurring role" entry example, and has since I added the current example in Sept. 2015, it seems to me that someone would be justified in restoring it using WP:FILMOGRAPHY itself as the rationale... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, the other problem with the original edit is the unexplained switch away from the revised MOS:DATERANGE as well... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Need some eyes on Dog with a Blog
Already reverted both by myself and GP, this editor is clearly not getting the message. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Fridays
You're pretty much guaranteed to beat me now. We moved from DirecTV to Charter Communications on Saturday, April 15, and so we only have the west feeds now, I'm guessing because it's cable and not satellite, though I was told higher packages might have the east feeds from the technician, but I don't think he was too sure. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- I actually didn't have access to Disney's east feed until I changed my service plan with Comcast in December, which gave me HD content, and Disney's east feed on my set of channels is in HD (the west feed which I've had all along is SD). That change in service plan, BTW, was not planned on my end, but necessary due to an agreement between the apartment complex I live in and Comcast ending, as cable TV was essentially a part of my monthly rent, but now it's up to the tenants to set up the cable TV part. That change also led to a significant increase in my monthly bill with Comcast (jumped from $106 to $140 when including all the other fees and taxes - not to mention my rent recently went up as well), and is the reason I'm cutting the cord around year's end; I still plan to keep the Internet part with Comcast, though.
I haven't yet updated Bunk'd, but I know it has aired and I've got all the credits written down for the episode (did that ahead of time when I saw it on Watch Disney). MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
You gonna be shortening that summary soon?
Anyway, I've got suspicions editors will try to list Aidan (Nicky) as absent in this recent episode due to only being in about the last five minutes of the episode for the family photo, similar to Auggie in one episode of Girl Meets World, I think. His absence for most of the episode was explained as his character being at camp, but I knew he was in the episode because this is one of those series that only lists main actors who are present in an episode, just like Degrassi from season 13 and up. When Brian (Tom) was absent for the last three episodes of season two, he wasn't listed in the starring credits. This is the first time this has happened with the quadruplet characters, so whether or not that's something that was planned and meant to be part of the script, I don't know. If not, maybe the actor was sick for the first part of the shooting and had to miss it, but of course, we can only speculate. But regardless, yeah... Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:17, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks; List of Girl Meets World episodes
Thanks for catching the error caused by my revert. I was trying to rid the article of "Oz is a bastard" or something to that effect. So I reverted the two edits by the last IP user. The problem arose because a previous user had inserted "Hamlet" instead of "Romeo and Juliet" and that erroneous change then was restored. Frankly, I would not have known that was an error and which was the correct play. Sometimes there are successive vandalisms by more than one user, as you no doubt know. I suppose that had my suspicions been raised by that previous change to an established article, there would have been a way to check it. In fact, I did not suspect it or even notice it was a recent change by another new IP user. In any event, I thank you for being sharp, knowing or finding out the correct play and making the change. That is a benefit of having more than one person keeping up with his watch list or watching recent changes. Donner60 (talk) 08:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Re: Andi Mack
Whether it will stay good and consistent is another story, but how do you and IJBall feel about the the premiere of Andi Mack? What do you predict for both the 18–49 rating and total viewers? Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I won't get to this until tomorrow, at the earliest... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- When I first saw the premiere episode, four weeks ago, I was no doubt surprised when Bex revealed her big secret to Andi. Something like that I would normally see in a soap opera or a perhaps a big primetime drama series. Definitely new ground for Disney Channel. How Andi deals with this secret, even beyond the first two episodes, will be something to watch. As for ratings, that could be all over the place, especially with the first two episodes being available to cable/satellite subscribers who have DC for the past four weeks (the first episode anyone could view, though). How many of those who previewed the episodes when they came out are willing to watch again when it airs on DC tonight, as well as those who haven't seen it yet, will tell the story. Many series premieres on DC have gotten great numbers before, but given how long the premiere of Andi Mack has been out before airing on DC might skew things here. If they turn out to be on the low side, let's hope that's not a trend for future episodes, at least in this season (I'm thinking future episodes will likely be available online a lot closer to the DC air date). MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hopefully! I mean, even Hunter Street, a weekday strip series which I love, has been doing better than Disney Channel and it's not even originally from the US, though the US does seem to the primary audience. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey, Michael. Would you happen to have any ideas on the names of the artists and songs used in this last episode? For one of them, I tried searching "Tonight Is All Mine" on YouTube to no avail. They were really good songs. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- I'll have to watch the episode again since I didn't pay attention to the songs. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Amaury: After watching "Dancing in the Dark" again, I did hear the songs but have no idea about their titles or the artists behind them. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Famous in Love#Needing to discuss changes prior to making them. Geraldo Perez, Nyuszika7H
If none of you have any strong opinions one way or the other regarding the layout, don't feel like you have to comment, just wanted to invite you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Excuse me but it wasn't me changing the "Emison" and "Haleb" edits I was editing it back to the original page it was before. Youtubebaran (talk) 22:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Youtubebaran: Then will you please explain these edits here [6]. You may not have been involved with the IP vandalism over at Pretty Little Liars, but what you did is still disruptive. Case closed. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
LOL disruptive how is that disruptive I got rid of the names that aren't part of the main cast calm your shit .
Youtubebaran (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Youtubebaran: Watch your tone. The list there represents all who have been part of the main cast throughout the entire series, past or present. WP:TVCAST dictates that all main cast members from the first season on be listed. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Okay so why waste your time telling me tell the ones who actually vandalize the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youtubebaran (talk • contribs) 22:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)