User talk:FreeRangeFrog/Archive 13

Deletion of Taburu Tuilagi

I spent a lot of time on my project on rugby coach Taburu and I was not pleased when it was deleted as it was a 'blatant hoax'. Taburu is a widely known coach with Saints and as a Saints fan myself, I can tell you he is a real person, despite what you think! Could you please re-instate the page? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omgainsley (talk • contribs) 11:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't really care that you were not pleased. To quote from the article: He is famous for his emotion and his banter. His efforts were rewarded in late 2014 when Taburu was given 'demi-god' status in the inner circle. Morgan Freeman was pleased to reward Taburu of his progress and fellow inner circle member Agatha Christie stated that Taburu was true pleasure to work with. It is highly unlikely that a rugby player born on the year you claim and with the credentials you concocted in that article would not have a single existing Google search result. Please contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, or just go away. The last thing we need around here is another hoax, especially one that involves the Tuilagi family. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of C.Niek van dijk

Dear free range frog, Could you please tell me why the page I created for prof. dr. C. Niek van Dijk was deleted? I'm a doctor at the Academical medical centre in Amsterdam and put a lot of effort in writing this page. Prof. dr. C. Niek van Dijk is a well renowned orthopeadic surgeon, known all over the world for his advancements in minimal invasive foot and ankle surgery. Everything I wrote is true. Could you please inform me how I can make a page for him without someone deleting it? thanks in advance. Rmgerards (talk) 09:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea if the subject is notable (he would have to meet either WP:BIO or WP:PROF) but the reason it was deleted was the overall tone of the article, which was written as if you had been creating a fan page for the man. More importantly, it was largely unsourced. How about you start over, submit a draft for review, since you seem to have a conflict of interest anyway. Just make sure he meets those notability guidelines to begin with. Wikipedia doesn't care about "truth" so much as what can be verified through coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of SALVA DE LA CRUZ.

This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 08:34, 20 February 2015 FreeRangeFrog (talk | contribs) deleted page Salva de la Cruz Pastor (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salva de la Cruz Pastor) Hi i want to know the reason of being deleted that page, I don´t know so much about wiki pages, english, but I want this page to be online, because Salva is a footballer ( now he is playing in the oxford city team) and as the same as Vicente Guaita Panadero ( a football mate from valencia´s team) has wiki in English, he has to have it too. Please, correct the article, do all the changes necesaary (you that know how to make them) and put it again online, because on his offcial site is a link of that page ( www.salvadelacruz.com) in other links and when people ticks on " the free enciclopledia" it´s ugly that appears that the page has been deleted. I trust on your correction and in doing that site online soon. Thanks Salva de la Cruz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.235.183.105 (talk) 12:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

There was a deletion discussion, and consensus that the subject does not meet the inclusion guidelines. If something has significantly changed between my close of the deletion and now, you may request a review here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The user Shraddha Arya

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shraddha_Arya well they keep on adding unreliable sources and removing the tags and stuff. (Possible sockpuppet of Sadman, I am not sure, I am sure they are a sockpuppet of someone though), I sent them several warnings too. Wgolf (talk) 14:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Clarification

Hi frog!

How are you doing today? I need a clarification on autopatrol user right permission. Am aware that the tool is usually granted to experienced and prolific article creators to reduce the workload of NPP and that a suggested standard to grant this right is the prior creation of 50 valid articles, not including redirects and disambiguation pages. However can the flag be granted to

• editor who had only created disambiguation pages (about 140 disambiguation pages for example)?
• editors who had created below 40 pages?. Thanks Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 19:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Wikicology: When the preferred requirements are not met, it's up to the administrator's discretion. Are you planning on requesting the permission for yourself? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks my extraordinary frog! I already have the flag. I was granted few weeks ago, having created over 170 valid articles not including redirect and disambiguation pages. I really learn't a lot from you, you are indeed a role model. Thank for making me a more competent wikipedian. If there is anything you want me to know, please feel free to let me know. I will surely be glad to know it. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

User account without logs

Hi, someone posted a question about a deleted article on my talk page today (which is weird because I haven't done much for the last two days) and when I checked them out a bit I noticed:

• Their talk page was never created even though whoever marked the page should probably have notified them of the speedy deletion
• They have no contributions other than posting to my talk page (which I suppose is normal if they only thing they did was create a now deleted page)
• They have no logs... this is the puzzling one, when I looked at their account creation log to see when it was made it was empty

I suppose the first two can be explained away but I have no idea how a user account could have no creation log. PhantomTech (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@PhantomTech: That's because it's a SUL account created in Commons, not here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh, thanks. PhantomTech (talk) 19:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Kindly delete all things of Ray Marcano related to him

Hello , kindly delete all information about Ray Marcano .He don't want to share his information on wikipedia.If you want to verify that please contact to Ray Marcano.

Thanks, Taha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahafarooqui (talk • contribs) 19:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

The article is up for deletion, and as I said, that's where you should be arguing for deletion, not blanking the article or moving it. We don't straight up delete articles by request. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I would agree with FreeRangeFrog. Taha, you need to understand that the AfD discussion is the only thing that you really need to focus on right now. Just randomly moving pages and blanking them is considered disruptive, and therefore cannot be tolerated. McDonald of Kindness (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Kindly tell me How many days will it takes to delete his page from wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahafarooqui (talk • contribs) 20:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion runs for a minimum of 7 days, and there is no guarantee that it will be deleted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

but the person(Ray Marcano) don't want his information on wiki.I see that you are admin of wiki,I think you have a rights to delete his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahafarooqui (talk • contribs) 20:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please see WP:DEL for more information on how and why articles are deleted (or not) from Wikipedia. The wishes of the subject very rarely come into play, because people cannot prevent other people from writing about them. In the press or media or Wikipedia for that matter. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't have any idea, really, how all of this works, so I tried to enlist some help in getting this article removed under the notability guidelines. But since I don't understand the process I'm at a loss on the proper way to make my case. I believe that should be the focus --- I simply don't meet the notability guidelines. Rmarcano (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

The process has started, the deletion discussion is linked from the article and its removal will depend on the outcome of the discussion, which will run for a minimum of 7 days. Your wishes to remove the article have been noted, and the criteria should be centered around notability, which is normal. However there is as I said no guarantee that the article will be deleted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Edits

Hello, I am not sure why my comments about how to improve the Michael Berube page were removed. As the talk pages are a space where editors can discuss the improvements to a page, I guess that my comments were possibly entered in an inappropriate section. I made a new section, recommending that a the page have a criticism section. 68.40.88.219 (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

LEAP Africa

I no longer have access to the article you deleted. I need it to make changes.

Leapsandbounds (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

If you enable your email I will send it to you. Restoration is out of the question because the reviewer noted there was also a copyright violation involved, possibly from your own website. See WP:MYTEXT for more information. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

I think something has been miscommunicated. I am not a direct affiliate of this organization. All the information I provided came from the orgs website, and not from any personal source. Thank you for providing information regarding retrieving my draft. My email as been enabled. Leapsandbounds (talk) 09:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't matter either way, the org's website or any other website, it's still a copyright violation. Contents sent. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

I tried to re-create the page using the same title but Wikipedia is telling me that it cannot be done. What is the solution?Leapsandbounds (talk) 09:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Start over here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Sadman is back it appears

I put a SPI a few days ago and it seems like this person defiantly is him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shraddha_Arya Wgolf (talk) 19:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

@Wgolf: Take it to ANI perhaps? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

As it turns out there was even a OLDER account, I've just tagged a bunch of articles as a db-banned also. Wgolf (talk) 02:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

My name is on your website other than my page

Alonda Shevette (talk) 06:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Hello, I would like to know why my name is on this site other than than my page. This is false information linked to my name, my name is Alonda Shevette and I would like all other pages to be remove. I am in fact the only Alonda Shevette you will find online and I did not create or give permission to anyone else to create a page for me. This is misrepresentation of my name and could cause harm to my career opportunities. Thanks!

Sorry but I have no idea what you're talking about. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to know why my name is on this site other than than my page. This is false information linked to my name, my name is Alonda Shevette and I would like all other pages to be remove. I am in fact the only Alonda Shevette you will find online and I did not create or give permission to anyone else to create a page for me. This is misrepresentation of my name and could cause harm to my career opportunities. Thanks! Alonda Shevette (talk) 06:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Alonda Shevette

Oh. Well the article has been deleted and the person who created it has blanked his talk and user pages so I guess the problem is solved. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to know why my name is on this site other than than my page. This is false information linked to my name, my name is Alonda Shevette and I would like all other page articles to be remove. I am in fact the only Alonda Shevette you will find online and I did not create or give permission to anyone else to create a page for me. This is misrepresentation of my name and could cause harm to my career opportunities. Thanks!Alonda Shevette (talk) 06:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Alonda Shevette

It doesn't matter who created it, it's deleted now. Please stop creating a new section on my talk page and repeating the same thing every time. Frankly I'm not sure how any of this is causing "harm" to your career. If you mean Google search (I suppose), those go away after a while because Wikipedia reports them as deleted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Salted lock on Alonda Shevette ?

I don't see the salted icon (light blue lock) on the page Alonda Shevette, only when I use the URL that would create the page when it isn't salted. What needs to be done to put the lock there?Naraht (talk) 15:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

The lock is a visual "feature" of a rendered page, a template. Since there is no page, it's still salted but there can't be a visible lock. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

McKinsey & Company

I don't know if you remember this particular issue, but they're back. Same issue on some articles about their competitors[1][2]. Quite a game of wack-a-mole. CorporateM (Talk) 19:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Reverted like the last time. Not sure what is up with that. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, when I did some of my first COI edits 5+ years ago, I thought creating a Competitors section was a great way to create backlinks to my client's page. I thought they were acceptable, because I saw them on lots of other articles. I imagine one of the companies listed is looking for plugs. However, that's just my increasingly cynical attitude. Give me another couple years and I'll fit right in at Wikipediaocracy (yuck!) CorporateM (Talk) 20:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Paradiso LMS page deleted on March 15

Hi FreeRangerFrog,

I realized Paradiso LMS Wiki page ([[3]]) was deleted by you on March 15. This Paradiso LMS page was linking to LMS List (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_learning_management_systems).

I can see all the other LMS softwares in there active except Paradiso LMS so I was wondering what was wrong with the post? Looks like none of the other LMS´s listed in there were deleted. Let me know please if you have any info about this particular post and why it is deleted.

Thanks a lot,

Best,

Zeck E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.143.59.82 (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Please sign in to your account. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Sigh. OK so regardless of whether you're logged in or not, Wikipedia is not the place to advertise your products. We are not a directory. The conflict of interest guidelines are clear - you or the editor you are paying should be going through Articles for Creation if you have a conflict of interest. So try that instead. It doesn't matter what else is in the LMS list either. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Article deleted

Hi, I realized you just deleted an article called "Draft: McInnes Cooper" it was on the works and we were gathering information to continue it, is there a way I can get it back? It would be inmensly usefull!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namita.rajani (talk • contribs) 18:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Not only was that written inappropriately for a Wikipedia article (..which allows it to lead work globally with the assistance of member law firms in several countries. Lex Mundi is the world leading network of independent law firms with in-depth experience in more than 100 countries worldwide), it was also a copyright violation from an external source. Beyond the first paragraph and a long list of "services" (which was also inappropriate) plus two rejections by reviewers, there's nothing particularly salvageable in the draft. You're welcome to start over if you wish. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Alternatively, if you enable email for your account, I can send you the contents. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

I have also enabled the the email with the same email account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namita.rajani (talk • contribs) 13:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

RW3 Page

Hi Froggy,

Please give me a recap on the RW3 page and it's deletion. I followed the same format as many technology providers on this website regarding list of services and features and made sure as to not spam/advertise. Working in the realm of the CPG industry we have been referenced as a top service provider and a leader in innovative mobile technology as referenced.

I felt that the information written by the third party kept to was written "in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery."

Looking forward to your response and working on the updated version of the page.

Cheers,

Techguy — Preceding unsigned comment added by TechGuy2015 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC) TechGuy2015 (talk) 02:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

we have been referenced as a top service provider You have a conflict of interest, so please follow the instructions here to create a draft for review. Your article was a brochure for your company, not an encyclopedia article. Before you proceed though, please make sure it meets the notability guidelines, or your draft will be rejected even if you manage to write it neutrally beyond a promotional-sounding unsourced list of products and offerings. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Joel Osteen

The category was removed again while it was being discussed at the BLP noticeboard. If you feel strongly about it, please read the references and decide if the category should be put back.

Recover deleted article

Good morning Mr. Frog,

I'm trying to recover an article that was deleted on December 14th, 2014 at 2:52 called "Draft: McInnes Cooper" I'm looking to retrieve it as soon as possible so we can fix some mistakes it has. Sorry to bother you and hope you can help me with this.

Namita — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namita.rajani (talk • contribs) 12:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Done §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

RW3 Article recovering the content

Hi Froggy,

Thanks for the notes. Can you send me the RW3 Technologies article with the links for reference for the third party to review.

Cheers,

TechGuy2015 (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Done §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Froggy have a great weekend! 64.20.237.230 (talk) 22:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm having trouble

It says for me to improve the article, but another user reverted my edit and said, "This is your last warning." What can I do? --Loser3572003 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loser3572003 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Blade (company) page, discussion and request

Hey @FreeRangeFrog:, I am currently redoing the Blade company page I attempted to create 2 months ago and implementing both your and @Vrac: suggestions and concerns. I'd appreciate it if you might be able to give the page a quick look over before our submissions, so that it is up to your neutrality standards. Thanks, I really appreciate you taking the time to work with me and get this article up to snuff.

You have a draft all set up, submit it if you think it's ready. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reyk -- Reyk (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Zoe Quinn

As I am currently topic-banned, I cannot add this reference myself, so it would be nice if you could: [4] — it provides support for the mentioned credits. Thanks. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

While I'm less worried about appearing to edit by proxy (which really wouldn't be the case) I'd rather just let the {{cn}} there and wait for someone else to source the information. I'm really not familiar with the subject and I have no idea if that is a reliable source in this case. My fix was really just technical and I have that article in my watchlist (like all the others related to the GG mess) purely for BLP/ARB reasons. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Randell

Hi, I replied to your comment on my Talk. Best, WeatherFug (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Osvaldo Mariscotti

Hello there, I'm writing regarding the deleted article "Osvaldo Mariscotti." The article got outdated shortly after being created, and certain contributors added content that could not be corroborated at the time. Almost a year after deletion, Mariscotti has made achieved some pretty notable milestones in his artistic career that deserve to be shared with the Wikipedia community. For that reason, I request permission to recreate the page for Osvaldo Mariscotti, including these numerous verifiable sources.

Regards, Marcelo Zimmler — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelozimmler (talk • contribs) 12:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

It was a "soft delete" so there's no need to request a deletion review, however given the fact that the article had copyright violation problems in the past and it was written in an inappropriate promotional tone, I'll ask you to start over and create a draft here, then have an unconnected editor approve it. Please make sure you go over the notability guidelines before you do, and make sure you can prove the subject is notable. Otherwise it will just be a waste of time. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Would you mind opining at Arbcom?

I haven't participated in BLPN recently, or much of Wikipedia in general, but I'm annoyed that editors have filed an arbitration request against Collect. That Arbcom has already screwed the pooch by accepting the request (and splitting it into 2 cases) is not surprising.

Like you, Collect knows the ins/outs of BLP editing better than most. My impression is that POV warriors want to rid Wikipedia of Collect because he uses BLP as a foil. Perhaps he is overzealous at times, but IMO he usually lands on the "correct" side of BLP application. If you wouldn't mind, could you review the "evidence" section and provide your opinion on the evidence talk page? Hope all is well. And grow wings or don't hop :) Two kinds of pork^Makin'_Bacon 03:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk back

Hello, FreeRangeFrog. You have new messages at User talk:The Herald/Talkback.
Message added 05:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Michael Bentwood

Hi FreeRangeFrog, is there anything that should be done about this Michael Bentwood thing? The user seems to be an SPA. Came in 2010, edited, then vanished. He left a rather long message on my talk, and when I told him that anything that didn't follow policy would be removed, he demanded to talk to my manager. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

P.S: I didn't notice this earlier, but he has stated that he will issue a County Court Summons to me if I remove the content again. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

@Rsrikanth05: Looks like the account is already blocked for clear legal threats, which is what should have happened. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Kenan vatic

Well I saw you put Kenan vatic up for a prod so I was going to move it to caps but then saw the creator made it twice (under Kenan Vatic) just wanted to point this out! Wgolf (talk) 03:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

@Wgolf: Deleted as tagged, thanks for letting me know. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Tasman Jude

Hey FreeRange,

I'm trying to update some of the Western Canadian music pages and saw that you deleted the page for Tasman Jude? Can you explain why? If someone started it I'd rather not start from scratch, and possibly have it deleted again.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealRupert (talk • contribs) 19:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

The article contained a single claim of importance, which is charting on iTunes. Not only was it unsourced (probably because charting on iTunes is not inherently notable) but it's also not a credible claim. The rest of the article was written as a fansite, thus the G11. If you want to start over I'd recommend doing it through AFC instead. Just make sure they meet WP:BAND. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Probably sock

• Sl0o0mball (talk · contribs)
• Sl0o0mThCake (talk · contribs). Babita arora 07:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

@Babitaarora: Probably but neither of those have any contributions and there's nothing we can do until they actually do something. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Wackslas' RfA

I noticed you closed Wacslas' RfA, but they made it again with the transclusions, which were fixed, but now the whole thing is messed up with no template or anything, it's here WP:Requests for adminship/Wackslas, and I don't know what to do about it. Kharkiv07^Talk 18:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, he didn't take the NOTNOW hint so now he'll really see what that's all about. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

But I mean the formatting is all off, the RfX template is broken, etc, any ideas? I mean clearly it's NOTNOW and/or Snowball, but I still figured I'd see what I could do about fixing it. Kharkiv07^Talk 18:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

It's not transcluded... I'm actually not sure what we do with a non-starter RFA page. Are they deleted? Closed? I guess let him figure it out? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of article "Maris Racal"

Good day frog!

I wish to re-create an article that was deleted last August 6, 2014 by you entitled "Maris Racal" Please advice how can I proceed with this Article. I can't move it to mainspace because of this warning "You cannot move a page to this location because the new title has been protected from creation." I'm just a newbie here and this is my first article hopefully. Your help will very much appreciated. Thank you in advance!--Inajane (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Inajane — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inajane (talk • contribs) 04:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Not until one of your two drafts actually gets accepted. There's a good reason that article was repeatedly deleted and protected. Once it is approved any of the reviewers can ask me or any other admin to unprotect. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Frog! my article Mariestella Racal has been accepted and I'm very happy :)

can you please unprotect the Maris Racal article so I can change my Title with that Name? Your assistance is very much appreciated. Please let me know if there is any changes that I should make.

Thank you! --Inajane (talk) 11:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

It was not "accepted", it was rejected and then moved by you to article space. I've nominated it for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Frog for your reply. Please let me know how to improve my article so it can be accepted.

Thank you so much for your assistance as always! --Inajane (talk) 07:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, for starters you need to prove that she meets WP:MUSICBIO. Four different AFC reviewers didn't think she does given what you had in your drafts. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi there Frog, Mariestella Racal is more of an actress for now, because of her projects and award. She is just starting as a singer, she already released her very own single. Please let me know if we can consider her as an actress which she has more contribution in that aspect. thanks again frog! :)--Inajane (talk) 11:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Another user making unsourced BLP's

Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Seidico Wgolf (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Here is another one or rather someone putting refs that don't work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula Wgolf (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Someone who has been around since 2006 who is adding unsourced blps

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Balerion Now this is crazy-has been around since 2006, you think he know better also! (Has over 2K edits also so its not like oh I didn't realize!) I sent a notice already. Wgolf (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for Neucoin

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Neucoin. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

I mis-clicked and reverted when I merely wanted to read. Thanks for fixing. I immediately tried to self-revert, but edit-conflicted with you. Thanks again!

Figured as much :) No problem. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

hoax?

where is the hoax? Legalplease (talk) 02:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please show me a single reference that proves "AJ Sepe" plays professional basketball in Greece, and I'll restore the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

A case of someone adding unsourced BLP's, but...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Itailevi907 This guy seems to have more of a poor level of the English language, I've put up wiki links to several of his pages and have added links from the Hebrew wikis-not sure what to tell him actually. Wgolf (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Warned them. Looks like a WP:CIR thing most likely. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The people they are adding do seem notable I will admit, I am trying to help the best I can with these. Wgolf (talk) 18:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, but they have to pace themselves. Also, that something exists in the Hebrew project doesn't mean it's automatically accepted here for inclusion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

He is still doing it-here are 2 articles I just put expand language tags on (I don't put BLP prods on those as they usually get reverted since there is another language.): Guy Zohar and Oshrat Kotler. (I do have to love is a tv wife-yes since you know that is something that automatically means you are notable lol) Wgolf (talk) 15:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if there's a Hebrew article about the person, no refs means BLPPROD. Also wow, looks like they created 7 more accounts.... §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I added a reference to Oshrat Kotler and removed the unsourced flag. She is clearly notable. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Well it has happened to be before multiple times where I'll get "don't you think the fact that it has a page in German (just a random language) with refs means this is not needed" (not the exact words but you get the point. Wgolf (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Nope, that's not acceptable. In that case, let them get a reference from that other language article and add it here. The onus is on the person attempting to remove the BLPPROD tag, not you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

My userpage

Thanks, Frog. It's the oddest thing, but when my userpage is edited, it doesn't appear on my watchlist. I've asked at the pump (where clearly the little compunerds simply didn't believe me), and I've tried unwatching and then re-watching the page, which does help, but only for a few hours. I suppose the next step would be to file a Bugzilla report, but I've kind of lost momentum. And when did a Bugzilla report actually get acted on? Never happened to me yet. My problems are probably too dull. Might as soon file with Bishzilla, shrug. But fortunately I've got helpful stalkers. Bishonen | talk 18:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC).

Yeah, I've noticed the same thing with mine. Also sometimes even with my talk page, I can see the notification but the change is not in the watchlist. Weird. Anyhoo, there's enough stalkers watching that so no biggies. Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things either §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Working_Fermentor_+_Freezer_combinations

I have removed the PROD tag from Working_Fermentor_+_Freezer_combinations, which you proposed for deletion.

I expect the table on this page to grow to dozens of entries from other contributors. Perhaps it would assuage your concern if each row of the table included some form of attribution, so that all contributed data points are confirmed as real-world observations?

I don't consider this page to be a How-To guide, since the data is not instructional in nature but rather is informative. By way of example, take the list of Arduino-compatible boards. Such boards are 'open source hardware' in that the creation of a new variant is not governed by a standards board or industry convention; anybody can create a new board + shield combination and propose its relevant uses. Or perhaps consider a list of Cryptids, most of which are unconfirmed and unattributed observations (and / or hoaxes).

In the same way, a new working combination of [fermentor + cooling chamber] is not governed by an industry or society like IEEE, but it is nonetheless useful for the at-large community to be aware of observed instances.

If you still think the article should be deleted, please feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielbcook (talk • contribs) 21:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

I did. I don't think that's an encyclopedic topic, but we'll let other editors reach a consensus on that. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Venus Concept

I previous created a page for Venus Concept, mentioned in the Syneron page, and you deleted. I believe that now I created an article with enciclopedic content, very short by the way. After this one I have intention to create pages for all major aesthetics companies that produce medical devices.

Could you authorize me to move on please?

Thanks, EstonianMan (talk) 21:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

@EstonianMan: The article was deleted because it did not make a basic assertion of importance. Beyond that, such a topic must also meet the notability guidelines, which are covered by WP:CORP. If you feel that's the case then consider creating a draft or using your sandbox to develop the article until it is not in danger of being speedily deleted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

@FreeRangeFrog: Thanks. I will work on a new version and submit for your review. EstonianMan (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@EstonianMan: I don't review articles. Please go through WP:AFC to submit your draft. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft Move

Hello, I want to move a misplaced draft, but it won't let me do so since "The name you requested already exists or is not valid" for some odd circumstances. Is it possible that anyone can move this draft for me? The title I want the draft to be is "Draft:Kellie Madison". Thank you. The Snowager-is awake 00:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@Snowager: What's the difference between that and Draft:Kellie Madison? If nothing else we can delete the misplaced one as a duplicate. The reason you can't move it is because it already exists. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:01, 9 April 2015

(UTC)

• Thanks, this duplicate draft confused me. I have tagged it for CSD. The Snowager-is awake 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Teri Jon

Okay so I just put up this blp prod for Teri Jon and upon looking it over-its not a BLP at all but has been marked as a living person since 2010-so I'm not sure what to do with the article now. Wgolf (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

PROD it? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Just make sure you do the homework first, if it's notable then improve it instead. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Put one up but not sure if I should of, dang it might be notable. Needs someone who knows what this is exactly. Wgolf (talk) 18:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

My user page Comment

Hi,

If you dont mind can you undo the protection on my user page, I prefer vandals wasting their time there where no ones going to be looking for anything useful than attacking the actual encyclopedia. Consider it a decoy if you will . Amortias (T)(C) 21:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Done. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the help of Siddhant Vats page.

Hello

I found out about the page yesterday via his ask.fm link and realized what utter bs this guy was writing. I researched him carefully, and edited the page accordingly. Just came back home to see it restored back but thanks for blocking both his PR guys.

EDIT 1: Two new accounts, mainly KumarAnimesh123 and Pronks123 or whatever are now reverting back my changes. This guy deactivated his ask.fm account after a article is written on him revealing the truth but his influential parents are taking personal action on it. can we protect a page from fake entries? And what can we do to do something about it offline too? (im new to wikipedia editing and forged articles, so i have no clue) <small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.56.230.129 (talk) 10:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

The article is fine the way it is now. The promotional language is gone, and the POV tag you placed was inappropriate because you didn't start a discussion about what the dispute was exactly. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:58, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thank you for your kind messages on the Admin notice board and fast reply to users! Keep up the great work! CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

jelly belly page

Removing Herman Rowland, Sr. from the development of the Jelly Belly® jelly bean is factually incorrect. As the archivist (historian) for the Jelly Belly Candy Company I monitor the factual information for the jelly belly wiki page. The development of the Jelly Belly® jelly bean was a collaboration between Herman Rowland, Sr. and David Klein. Also the character Mr. Jelly Belly was developed in 1983 as the Jelly Belly Candy Company website states and David Klein was not involved in the development of the character. Thus the sentence "David Klein was Mr. Jelly Belly until the trademark was purchased in October 1980," is misleading. ~~mnighbor

Did you not read the message I left on your talk page? I reverted your edit because of your continued use of registered trademark symbols, which you apparently have no problem with given the above. Please learn to respect our guidelines, or stop editing the article altogether. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Siddhant Vats

Hello FreeRange Frog,

You have been doing a great work for wikipedia by being an important contributor. It has recently come to my notice that there is a cyber war going against Mr. Siddhant Vats. There are group of teenagers from a website ask.fm who have tried putting Mr. Vats's online image down by writing forged and false things on blog. Hence, they also tried attempting to edit the wikipedia page of Mr. Siddhant. There have been over 45 news articles from the leading newspapers and blogs such as London Evening Standard, BBC and tech blogs including CNET about Mr. Siddhant's work. The Team of Mr. Siddhant has also approached the Ministry of I&T and the CBI (Cyber Cell) recently to track down these individuals and take appropriate legal actions.

If the need be, I can email you more articles about Androidly and Mr. Siddhant's work so that it may help you keep a neutral online page for him.

I am writing to you as you are a contributor of Wikipedia to be neutral and help us maintain a neutral wikipedia page for him.

Thanks for your time and effort to keep wikipedia a positive place.

(PS - Sending this again as the previous message had typing errors)

Ronks123 (talk) 09:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Neutrality is a primary concern with all articles, so that's what was done to this one as well. Also this is important in this context. Beyond that, I would recommend you don't edit the article directly at all, because you have a conflict of interest. Follow the instructions here instead to recommend changes. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi FreeRange Frog, Thanks again. Can you help us edit the article and add more relevant data and facts with proper citations and references? It would be of great help.

Ronks123 (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Everything you need to know is here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Uriel Miron

hi. you deleted the article about this artist. i have now written aprovement to release text and images of miron. could you recover it, please? ill send it to your email. Talmoryair (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

cant find the link to your mail here... Talmoryair (talk) 15:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

You pasted the subject's website into Wikipedia, which is not only not allowed but also inappropriate because it read like, well, his website. If you feel the subject is notable, please go here and submit a draft for review. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Credit Savvy

Hi FreeRangeFrog, and thanks for the words of encouragement. I'm happy to delete User:Alex_at_CreditSavvy/Credit_Savvy for now. I will continue to build it out offline and then get it reviewed due to potential COI. It was starting to appear in Google so it's best deleted until it's closer to being final. I'll keep the {{user sandbox}} in my toolbox ;) Thanks for all of your help. Alex at CreditSavvy (talk) 07:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

The latest in sockpuppetry by Vamsiraj

That didn't last long now did it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ashiqaligg There is another one that is still up also (a few more also from March 31st actually!) But yeah this is getting insane! Wgolf (talk) 15:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Greg Clark

Why did you delete Greg Clark? He is a current Member of the United Kingdom Parliament. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@Redrose64: My bad, that was a move over the wrong article. Restored and fixed. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't know if this is just a bug, but the talk page of Clarke has politics banners on dating from 2006. As far as I can tell, they are accidental, is there an issue if I remove them? Thanks for all the help, and sorry for the trouble, 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@1Potato2Potato3Potato4: If he's no longer actively involved in an ongoing election then you can just remove that. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Clarke with an e never has been as far as I am aware. Thanks, 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

That was still leftover from the move, but I fixed Clark now as well. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

I fixed it up properly, to get the page history back where it should have been. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz

The article Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reyk -- Reyk (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

User:Sanjit.khulal

This user page behaved oddly because he has a global user page set up, which is copied automatically from his user page on Meta if he has no local user page defined. You got rid of it by giving him a blank user page, but I have deleted that because he would presumably prefer the global page to show (though what he really wants is the Facebook-style page that RHaworth deleted}. JohnCD (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Ahhhh, I understand now. Never ran into that before. Thanks for the explanation. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

It could have been better publicised. I tripped over it when I deleted someone's user page on a U1 request, and was surprised to see the global version which immediately showed. So I rushed to check Meta:User:JohnCD, which is what anyone will now see who happens to look for me on any other WP, and was relieved to see it quite suitable. Meta:User:FreeRangeFrog looks OK, too. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Yeah, I immediately checked it out and copied over what was in my Commons userpage. Now it shows up everywhere. Very nice, but they definitely should have advertised it more. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

It's been like that since 23 February. See this notification. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

SATMAP Inc.

Hi, I have a few questions with regards to the deleted article SATMAP Inc. The first time I submitted it for review, it was mentioned that the top paragraph and the section under corporate relations to sound like an advertisement, and that the section on system features was far too technical for an article on Wikipedia. As such, we have edited the system features such that it is easier to understand by an average reader. The part that my group does not understand is that, since system features will only be understood best by the company itself, and the section is merely a description of the features by rephrasing, editing and summarising the different patents that are relevant, how would this section constitute as advertising? I understand that the guidelines require independent, third party sources. However, as mentioned earlier, no other sources would know exactly about the system features of the company, other than the company itself.

Another point would be, for the section under corporate relations, we only listed the different companies that the firm has partnered with, and briefly described how the firm works in a partnership with another firm, and I believe that this section could risk being flagged as an advertisement. This brings me to my second question: Would it be better if the whole article is changed to that on the system that the firm is based on, instead of an article based on the firm? Thank you in advance for your comments and advice. ABonheur (talk) 01:44, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

By the way, is it possible for my group to recover the deleted article to continue working on it? Thank you again. ABonheur (talk) 02:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

I reviewed some of the discussions you had with other editors regarding this. You first mistake was to assume that Wikipedia would accept an article about a company filled with detailed and promotional-sounding descriptions of their product, buzzwords like "first contact resolution rate", "linear combination includes the relative weighting of the two or more output variables" and "utilizes both existing data sources of partnered companies and its own external data from providers to avoid tier-based call routings" among many others, as well as liberal and wholly inappropriate use of trademark symbols. Your second mistake was to move the article out of draft by yourself, and then telling a more experienced editor that you knew what you were doing. And your third mistake was to use Wikipedia for a school assignment using a subject like this. Had you been creating an article about a species of butterfly then we obviously wouldn't be having this conversation, however opting for trying to pass a brochure about a commercial product under the guise of an encyclopedic article about a possibly non-notable company (which also affects whether the article is kept or not) and then ignoring our guidelines and policies because you had some kind of deadline was a really bad idea. I really can't tell you what to fix, because if you think you fixed it before then it's obvious you can't see what the problem is and nothing I say is going to help. Lots and lots of articles are written as part of class assignments, and we rarely have any problems with those because they tend to pick subjects that would never be susceptible to this type of problem. How about doing something else that actually improves the encyclopedia? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

@FreeRangeFrog: Hi, my apologies as my action of moving it out of the draft might have been rash. I had done so as I have seen a number of articles being moved out without issues and I thought it would be fine to do so. We have earlier chosen this topic, as we are restricted to topics related to IT, and we thought that such a topic would be easier to understand and research on as compared to other IT topics which may be far more technical. If I am able to rephrase the system features again, find a few more independent sources about the system features, and to reduce references to the firm, other than the fact that it is developed by the said firm, then would it be more appropriate? ABonheur (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

I can't stop you from recreating the article, but then I also can't assure you that it won't be deleted again if it resembles the previous version. That's why you might want to really go through a review this time. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

	Teahouse Barnstar
	It is always nice to see you hopping around the Teahouse. If only Mark Twain were still alive. He could write a brief but insightful essay about the Frog in the Teahouse. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Like My first Teahouse barnstar §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Ashish Narzy

Hello sir their was a page Ashish Narzy which was deleted by you because it was not well created so i Request you to allow to create wikipedia page of Ashish Narzy or you yourself create that again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MH150FE (talk • contribs) 13:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

If it had any chance at all to survive I'd restore it, but it really doesn't. See WP:MUSICBIO. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

DickLyon

Everyone has to be right once in a while (referring to the editor who brought the SPI). DickLyon's been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. Thought you should know. Dougweller (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

@Dougweller: Interesting, thank you. I wasn't overly involved in that really, but it also does not condone some of the rather exaggerated behavioral issues that lead to RGloucester's block. The removal of email access seems to be generating a bit of controversy but I don't see how it makes any difference. In any case here's hoping he comes back in top form. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Recreation of Ashish Narzy

Hello @FreeRangeFrog please allow us to create the page Ashish Narzy .i understand their was some mistake created by someone but allows others to create who know well . — Preceding unsigned comment added by MH150FE (talk • contribs) 01:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Please wait until someone not associated with the subject creates the article, and also it helps to wait until the subject you are writing about is actually notable. As I said above. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Angela Devi

I'm about as open minded and non-judgemental/non-hung up/non-biased against porn as it gets, but this article just needs to be put out of its misery. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Scalhotrod: Absolutely agree. I ran into it because of an IPs bad edits, and I was thinking about an AFD. You beat me to it. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

GMTA...! :) --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Bernard Tiphaine

He is notable, as the frWP artoc;e very cl;ear;y shows, but I am not clear if you were saying that merely having a VIAF record is an assertion of notability--especially as nowadays /VIAF records seem to refer to WP articles. DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@DGG: Sorry, I should have said importance, not notability. In the context of a speedy decline. And I know about VIAF pulling material from Wikipedia, so I do tend to check them. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Even so,, why is it an assertion of importance, unless you mean that it indicates a published book? He did in fact have a published book, but it can represent other things--such as even a self-published book. DGG ( talk ) 03:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@DGG: Nothing necessarily to do with published works, but because compared with 99% of the non-notable authors, actors, singers, businesspeople and the rapper du jour that show up on the new pages feed, to me at least a LOC authority record merits a second look and is an implied assertion of minimal importance (although obviously not notability) that can override an A7. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Heather Bresch

Hey FreeRange. Do you have a minute to review the discussion here and make whatever edits you feel are representative of the discussion (or just add to it if you feel more discussion is needed). It doesn't seem like it would make sense for me to suggest a specific prescriptive edit in a Request Edit, because consensus is not clear enough (and probably never will be). CorporateM (Talk) 17:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The context about the controversy section is that there's been quite a bit of discussion about whether it should have a dedicated section per WP:CRITICISM and whether it belongs under Early life or if it should be placed chronologically, as the controversy occurred 15 years after the rest of the Early life section, when she was appointed as COO. A couple of us were a bit peeved because the discussion was not leaning towards an Education section at all, when the editor that has been POV pushing unilaterally moved it there. However, given that there is no strong consensus about it in any direction, it's probably best to move on anyway. Thanks for chipping in! CorporateM (Talk) 15:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Calum McNab

Change to BLP Prod perhaps? No references. Cheers Flat Out let's discuss it 06:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Flat Out: Although IMDb is not a valid single source for a BLP, I have a feeling it would be contested on that basis. In any case, if the normal PROD doesn't work, it will go to AFD. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I didn't realise you were admin, sorry for telling you how to suck eggs :) Flat Out let's discuss it 05:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@Flat Out: I never suck eggs, it's bad for my skin. Frog treats however are welcome at any time §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

My user talk, User Talk:Joseph2302

You semi-protected my talkpage after some obscene editing (and other vandalism) from new editors. Whilst it was the correct decision at the time, could you now remove the protection? I don't expect my talkpage to be vandalised again soon, and new editors currently cannot contact me- this could be a problem since I do lots of new edit & new page patrolling. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: Done. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, FreeRangeFrog, thank you for setting autoconfirmed user protection on Intelligence quotient, an article that is already under ArbCom discretionary sanctions and which has needed extensive article improvement for a long time. I'm hoping to fix the long-standing sourcing problems and undue weight problems in that article, and you've just made it easier for me to do so. Feel free to look on and advise me as I edit the article. Keep up the good work. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

@WeijiBaikeBianji: It's just three days, and because there were at least two IPs inserting the same unsourced information. If any more disruption occurs we can escalate the protection. If you're going to be actively working on it I'll keep an eye out. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

The last substantive edit I made to that article was partially reverted, followed by pugnacious talk on the article talk page, by an I.P. editor who appears to fall under the WP:EVADE rule. (There have been a lot of ArbCom site bans connected to that topic.) So I had better prioritize working on that article (I'm working on several high-page-view articles at the moment, with "working" including looking up sources off-wiki) while the current protection is in place and see what happens. Thanks for your help. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 13:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Request for undeletion

Hi Frog, I see the request for undeletion for [[5]] was denied. I would like to make revisions and add additional links to the draft for resubmission. Thank you. Nyfan2007 (talk) 22:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

@Nyfan2007: Are you actually going to work on it or just abandon it for six more months? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. I am already working on it to improve it. Would appreciate any helpful hints an experienced writer such as yourself may have. Nyfan2007 (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Shaygan Kheradpir

It's been a long battle against the covertly sponsored sock network, but I think the page is almost ready for GAN; now that their most active sock account has been blocked, I think it should be easier to deal with other SPAs. I was wondering if you had a few minutes to hammer out a few remaining promotion-type issues in this discussion string. I think it would only take a few minutes at this point to get it GAN-ready.CorporateM (Talk) 14:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I'm hopeful that the sock network has given up and the article can go through GAN now. That article was exhausting me due to all the covert SPAs trying to make it look like I was the one pov pushing. Now I just have to figure out how to get the Heather Bresch page GAN ready ;-) CorporateM (Talk) 18:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz

The article Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mujaddid Ahmed Ijaz for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reyk -- Reyk (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Date error in OnLive citation

Hi FreeRangeFrog. I moved the OnLive article citation discussion to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. I don't want to make any other changes until the matter is resolved, but I wanted to point out that if you end up keeping the citation it has a date error. It is dated 2010-8-28. The article was actually published on 2012-8-28. I thought it was a non-controversial undo, so I didn't correct it. Thanks! Starkcasted (talk) 04:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Khorasan Institute of Higher Education

Dear free range frog, Could you please tell me why the page I created for "Khorasan Institute of Higher Education" was deleted? I'm research director in Khorasan Institute of Higher Education. Please see our links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eidiani/Khorasan_Institute_of_Higher_Education https://http://www.khorasan.ac.ir/ https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Khorasan_Institute_of_Higher_Education https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mostafa_Eidiani

Please change "wiki/User:Eidiani/Khorasan_Institute_of_Higher_Education" to "wiki/Khorasan_Institute_of_Higher_Education" Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.183.240.83 (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

The previous version was deleted because it was essentially an advertisement. You also have a conflict of interest and should not have created the article directly. I added a sandbox template at the top you can use to submit your draft for review. Note that it will have to meet the notability guidelines before it is accepted. Wikipedia is not a business directory. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

changes to page

You sent me an email saying I would be blocked because of my changes to Anirudh Kala . This currently refers to a person whereas my referred to a group of organisation working in the area of MOOC along with how he got the DMOZ award. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anirudhbsg (talk • contribs) 17:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hijacking an article like this is completely inappropriate. If you want to create a new article and assuming it meets the inclusion guidelines then you can do so here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Water to the Soul

Good day! I think that Water to the Soul was not deleted in accordance with consensus, which had not been reached. After people recommended that it be deleted, I added a great deal of information to the article indicating that "Innocent Child" received substantial airplay, which I vaguely remember hearing back in the day. Only one comment, indicating that the album article DID INDEED go beyond a track listing, was instated after the relisting. Please explain why the article was redirected. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

No.10 in airplay at KDWB in Minneapolis, Minnesota in June 1992,[3] was in rotation on Friday Night Videos at the same time,[4] ranked No.36 on Rick Dees Weekly Top 40[5] and was featured on Disc 8 of Windswept Pacific is nowhere near what WP:NSONGS requires. Articles about the album (!) or the group don't even exist (!!), and in my opinion the redirect to the singer was frankly not appropriate. The appropriate action should have been to delete it, but that was the consensus on the AFD, so that's what I did. If you feel this is incorrect, WP:DRV should be your next stop. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for Water to the Soul

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Water to the Soul. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jax 0677 (talk) 01:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of page A J Bell

Hello,

Please may we receive a full explanation as to why the A J Bell company page was deleted?

Thank you in advance. AJBICwiki (talk) 10:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

A J Bell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - Because it was written like a brochure for the company, by employees or paid operatives of the company. Please follow the instructions here if you wish to recreate, but make sure it meets the inclusion guidelines before you do. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of ALESSANDRO ESSENO

Hello, the composer Alessandro Esseno has released records with other record labels as reported by amazon. I do not understand then why the page was deleted. --Brainstorm76 (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

The article was deleted for the same reason it was deleted last time - it is written in a completely inappropriate, promotional way. Seriously, ... like snow crystals that musical compositions, the songs of "La legge del continuo mutamento" released in Febraury of 2015, testify the maturity and professional composer and pianist Alessandro Esseno. Awarded as the previous album, with a considerable number of downloads as well as sales, the album is a unique work in the instrumental succeeding in difficult to combine the "universality" and "usability" of listening to all latitudes. All other tracks are fractal, seashells, snowflakes precisely, forms evanescent hour hour sharp sound, but without reference to the usual piano, which seems never to have heard Esseno and so on. That's for the guys website, not Wikipedia. Anyway, I think he might be notable so I restored it to Draft:Alessandro Esseno where you can work on it until you feel it's ready, and then submit it for review using the banner at the top. If you submit while it still has all that advertisement hagiography-type material it will be rejected. You also need to improve sourcing and formatting and add more footnotes in the appropriate places. No one is going to write an article for you, you must do it yourself. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Why did you delete my work on sandbox?? :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusaGela25 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Alessandro Esseno page

Ok FreeRangeFrog. Thank you very much. --Brainstorm76 (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

DOB "Nandita Swetha"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jaaron95#DOB_of_Nandita Please refer this discussion for the Article Nandita Swetha regarding her DOB. I have provided him the valid DOB issued by govt of India.--202.164.152.163 (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)--202.164.152.163 (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

That's not acceptable. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. The DOB was originally removed because it was unsourced, now you want the "right" DOB to stay using a document we cannot verify and cannot accept as source. So no, unless you find a reliable secondary source the article should remain without a date of birth. Also, please log into your account, and be very careful with even the appearance of making legal threats. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Mr/Mrs/Miss Free Range Frog... This article needs a DOB. Because of having wrong DOB for long period of time the media started publishing wrong DOB of the Artist. Wiki is responsible for this inconvenience happened to her. here is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nandita_swetha_DOB.jpg# the proof for her original DOB. The number in the card is there in the govt records. If anyone wants to check the reality of that pls do it. Someone has created an article with wrong information long back. What was the reliable source wiki was following that time. The article was here for last somany years. Where were the ppl that time who takes initiative in editing it now. a This article has insulted the artist. And there is no point in depending on reliable source on one fine morning.--Seny P Arukattu (talk) 16:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please read WP:BLPPRIMARY again. Failing the existence of a reliable secondary source, the article should and will remain without a date of birth. You can send us all the photographs of all the birth certificates, drivers licenses and government issued IDs you want, and it won't make a difference. On the other hand of course, no incorrect DOB will be allowed into the article either, so there's that. If you continue down this path, your account will be blocked. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Here is the scan of proof. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nandita_swetha_DOB.jpg# --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Read WP:BLPPRIMARY again, and again until you understand it. And while you're at it, you might want to delete that file from Commons. I don't know how the subject feels about having that shared to the world. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

I saw that. But where were these people when there was a wrong DOB mentioned in that article fro years. And the artist was struggling and was unaware about the source of wrong DOB. What answer you have for the damage the artist has faced because of having a wrong article in WIKI..? --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't know but two wrongs don't make a right. Your attempt to insert a poorly sourced DOB to me is no better than someone who inserts a fake one - because we can't reliably verify either. As to the image you uploaded, I assume you own the copyright, so you might want to adjust the licensing on it to avoid it being deleted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

As per wiki if you do not follow any of the Govt issued proofs for DOB then what is the reliable source ..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seny P Arukattu (talk • contribs) 17:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

A secondary source, a book, magazine, website that is considered reliable per policy. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Wiki will depend on articles came in book even if its fake.. right..??--Seny P Arukattu (talk) 17:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

What do you think, you figure we'd accept a "fake" article to source the date of birth of a living person? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes exactly. I am not just thinking. I believe that you believe on fake articles. Otherwise this article would't have had a wrong dob for more that one year. It was mentioned 1986. Her parents has not even thought about their marriage that point of time..--Seny P Arukattu (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Look again - I was the one that originally removed the other DOB here back on March 23. There was no "fake" anything, it was just added without a source. Similarly to the date you added. So then ask yourself, why should we believe you, or any other random person who shows up to add a different date? Because you say you are friends with the subject and you have a low-quality image of an unverifiable government issued ID that any Photoshop rookie could whip up in about 30 minutes? THAT is why we require secondary sources, so we don't have to worry about that. So we can say "hey, this reliable source says so-and-so was born on such-and-such date, so we'll go with that". I'm not doubting your story or your good intentions, just enforcing our policies. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

how about this. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nandita_Swetha_3.jpg or will this also get deleted..?--Seny P Arukattu (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

No, that's perfectly fine. That's the license you should be using for all your similarly uploaded images. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks..--Seny P Arukattu (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

According to you if that copyright is perfect then why someone again removing the picture..? --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

I have no control over what happens in Commons, this is Wikipedia. In my opinion your license tag was appropriate if you are the owner of the photograph, so all you need to do is to make that case in the deletion discussion. It might also have to do with the fact that you uploaded it multiple times but again, that's in Commons, not here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your intervention on article on Dinesh Singh

Dear FreeRangeFrog, I would like to thank you for intervening to ensure the neutrality of the article. It seems that you have tagged that article as : "This article's factual accuracy is disputed." If you peruse the links to the newspaper reports, you will realize that none of the content that has been removed was factually incorrect. Let me know if there is any specific fact whose accuracy was contested by someone. Best, Annie

Please keep the discussion on the article's talk page. The tag is a reflection of that discussion, and it refers to the material you insist on adding. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks !! Sorry for posting this content to your talk page. I am new to editing on wikipedia so am learning as I go. Should I delete this from here and move it to the article's talk page or leave it as it is.

That's fine. Please sign your comments with four tildes ~~~~, or maybe just create an account. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, FreeRangeFrog. I have started signing my comments with four tildes. Also if you have some time, can you look at the revised content and see if it meets the guidelines of Wikipedia. Another editor has provided very helpful comments and I think that as a result the quality of the content has improved manifold from what it was earlier. Once you and other editor are fine with the content, let me know how can it be incorporated in the article. Best, Annie 67.71.166.98 (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

holiday

If you go on holiday, you should not do administrative things just before you go.

For Presumptive Nominee AFD, you wrongly say there's a consensus for keep when there is actually consensus for delete. One keep opinion is wishy washy and thinks of a possible merge and redirect. Please do not be bureaucratic and just reverse the decision not try to get me to go through appeal, ignore all rules.

As far as this, Davie vandalized and removed my valid comments so as to try to win the AFD. She used Twinkle improperly and, according to the Twinkle page, should be blocked. This is really bad behavior, using Twinkle to win a AFD. I recommend you fight for law and order and block this Davie for 3 days to prevent disruption, at which time she can contemplate proper Twinkle use. Deepavali 2014 (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC) see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FBrattleboro_Free_Folk_Festival_%282nd_nomination%29&type=revision&diff=660063825&oldid=660006392

You might want to read this a couple of times before you attempt to do another non-admin closure. As to the AFD I closed, you're welcome to open a deletion review if you wish. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

So are you saying that anyone, including me, can remove someone's afd vote just like Davie2010 did to me as long as I give a flimsy excuse???????Deepavali 2014 (talk) 03:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

It has been explained to you (as far as I can see) by at least three different people, including a message from that editor on your talk page. If you're not able to understand then please just stay away from AFDs. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

A user who seems to not get the point of page patrolling

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vgenapl I keep on finding these one line articles patrolled by him like stuff saying "Bob Smith was a great man" where he just puts the unreferenced tag. No speedy or blp prods for any of them just tags them. Not sure what to tell this guy though. Wgolf (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

I sent this to another admin also to see what they can do. Wgolf (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

About the article digital perpetuation marked for deletion

Hello FreeRangeFrog,

I am trying to figure out why this would be marked for deletion. In all things new such as the speed for technology today we will see changes in traditional concepts and new ones evolving.

The internet-of-things will impact and change business models and one of the most important going forward will be protecting digital data assets. Traditional recordkeeping and library, archive methodologies for 'preservation' do not cater and will not be suitable for digital data asset management. Whilst the concept and term of digital perpetuation is only just evolving one could same the same for a lot of new terms. Why is it that you have such a problem with this word and its objective for differentiation and clarification.

Even if you delete this the term will not go away. It is already out there in publication on professional website libraries and will be available in the Queensland archives shortly. Therefore whilst it is not prominent now like all new evolutions so is there the introduction to new terms of reference it takes time and one would had thought that the wikipedia was a progressive environment and keen to be seen to staying in touch technology and the changing global environment.

Thank you for your time. Linda Shave — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.192.215 (talk) 07:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Trying to use Wikipedia to promote your paper was not a good idea. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Alessandro Esseno new page

Hello FreeRangeFrog, I rewrote in my sandbox the page by removing the tone pov. What do you think about it? Thank you. --Brainstorm76 (talk) 15:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

The entire "The method of composition hypno-ancestral" section is completely inappropriate. I don't think you are the best person to work on this article honestly, you've been at it for a long time and still can't get it right. Anyway, I deleted the draft I restored for you since you are apparently not going to use it, and added a submit banner to your sandbox. Please submit for review by an AFC volunteer when you feel you're done, I honestly have no energy to review these types of articles. You might want to try the Teahouse and see if you can find a charitable soul there willing to help you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

About deleted article Taka Museum

Hi, FRF.
I was working on this article when you deleted it. I disagree with you about the speedy deletion reason - it looked pretty neutral to me, just of questionable notability. There is a newspaper article about it in the Dhaka Tribune that seems to assert some significance, if not notability.
I could recreate it myself, but that (a) may possibly be arcane violations of the small-print of of policies and guidelines about attribution, WP:COPYWITHIN and so on, (b) would also be the wrong thing to do.
I can move it into Draft: space, but it would probably be quicker if you just undeleted it and let me work on it. What do you think?--Shirt58 (talk) 09:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@Shirt58: It was a bit borderline spammy, what with the inclusion of the schedule and whatnot. But restored to Draft:Taka Museum, hopefully you can get it going. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Alessandro Esseno new page

Ok FreeRangeFrog. Thank You. --Brainstorm76 (talk) 10:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

David Jacobsen

I hit the blp prod tag by mistake it looks like. Wgolf (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Love Your Melon deletion

Hi FreeRangeFrog,

I'm just curious to hear your honest opinion on my Love Your Melon page that you deleted yesterday, and to hear why you think it is unambiguously promotional. Are all pages for organizations removed because they are promotional? What constitutes a non-promotional Wikipedia page for an organization? Just looking to learn, thanks for your input.

Bhynes2 (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The misplaced article on your talk page seems to have been the same as your current draft - just an advertisement for the organization (Love Your Melon beanies and hats are manufactured in the United States and made from all-natural fiber, 100% cotton) where it to be an actual article. It reads like a press release in my opinion. It does not even attempt to describe why it is notable enough to be included in the encyclopedia. I don't know if it is notable, but it will probably be rejected if at the very least you don't use more secondary sources independent of the subject. In cases where a misplaced draft seems to even have a whiff of notability I'd normally just move it, but honestly in this case I didn't think it was worth it. However it's now in the right location and I don't review articles, so that's up to the AFC folks. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

User who keeps on removing orphan tag

Clement K. Sylvester also seems like the logged off version keeps on removing the BLP prod-there was another case where the orphan tag was removed but forgot what page it was. Wait here it is Fred R. Kline. Yeah still a orphan but keeps on getting removed. Wgolf (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request

Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@BD2412: Thanks for the heads up. My !vote was around COMMONNAME, not Google results. I don't recall the last time I heard on TV or radio or online where she was referred to as HRC by the mainstream media. Not one. Thus my opinion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate your response. Cheers! bd2412 T 12:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Revive Deleted Page

Greetings,

I was working on a bio for Howard Kaminsky but left it so long that it was rightly deleted. I'd like to get back to it and my question is whether or not I can edit the old page or if I need to create a new one entirely. I'd like to make the required changes and make the writing better.

Thank you.

Elisebrandenburg (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@Elisebrandenburg: Are you referring to this: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Howard Kaminsky? It hasn't been deleted, but it will if you don't continue working on it. Draft submissions are deleted after 6 months of inactivity. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

My essay

Hello Froggy,

How are you doing? Could you please review this essay and leave a suggestion here or my talk page? Thanks in anticipation. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@Wikicology: I suppose it's fine as essays go, although the shortcut you have up top should point to the essay, not the main spam page. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

I really don't know how to point it to the essay. Can you offer some help? Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 00:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Well there's this, although you don't necessarily need a shortcut for an essay, you can just remove the one you have there. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done. Do you really think I deserve a barnstar from a distinguish admin like you for that essay? Lol!

Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 01:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Quin

Perhaps you were a little hasty in deleting this page. He was elected as the MP for Horsham (UK Parliament constituency) yesterday. Could you please reconsider? Edwardx (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Well, it's been recreated so I guess that's done. It would have been useful if you had made a note of the reason for the recreation in your summary during the creation, or notified the closing admin, or opened a deletion review or something, otherwise it just looks like a straight G4 deletion that requires no discussion whatsoever. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Useful yes, but not essential. It was a very short article, but the notability was clearly established and referenced. We all make mistakes - why not just put your hand up and move on? Edwardx (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

What is important is that the article is back up - beyond that, what is it exactly that you need? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:35, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't need anything, but it would have been nice if you had simply said sorry rather than what looks more like blaming me. Anyway, that how I see it, although I of course know that misunderstandings easily arise here on WP! Edwardx (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

And another one making unsourced BLP's

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kamil.Stolar just sent them a warning. Wgolf (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)