User talk:Web kai2000/October 2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No Mercy 2006[edit]

Do you know what happened at No Mercy to have the WWE apologising about William Regal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by sonicKAI (talkcontribs)

I haven't seen it yet but looking from his Wikipedia article, I believe it's only what I can say as indecent exposure. >_> --Oakster (Talk) 17:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub expand[edit]

London Buses route 248. I noticed this stub has been created and there have been various prods for expanstion/deletion. I've cleaned it up a big, but you might want to expand. Mrsteviec 19:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses[edit]

Hi. I see you started this article but didn't finish it, so I did it up for you. If there's anything missing, feel free to add it.--sonicKAI 20:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I saw you finished 248, I´ll do 106 until 1984, after which I´m not much good. I enjoy doing the early London Bus stuff, but I´m not really up to date as I now live in Germany. Oh and by the way the image on the 106 is not quite right.. --IsarSteve 20:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Only one of East London's buses has it's name on it (it's currently being used on London Buses route 48) as they were all Stagecoach London. I'll add the gallery so you can see. --sonicKAI 20:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to do the 48 soon, in a previous life I worked as driver - driver/operator on the 48 as well as 38, 69, 55, 236, 230, 235, 206, 97A, 269, 2B, 11, 269 & N96--IsarSteve 21:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, but I'd advise not doing Night buses yet. I created a layout available at User:web_kai2000/London Buses route layout if you want to do those articles. One thing though: They have to be the current routes. --sonicKAI 21:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yep I know, I´ve added a previous route section to cover the old routes, see London Buses route 5, London Buses route 39 ....is that OK? --IsarSteve 21:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great. --sonicKAI 21:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]