User talk:VQuakr/Archives/2023
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Images
Though you have the page on your watchlist. Per curtesy, I'm just letting you know, I've added another option in the RFC you've started. GoodDay (talk) 21:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: please self-rv. The discussions are obviously related, but the decision on keep/don't keep the masthead is parallel not aligned with whether the headline should be included and changing the query midway through the discussion confuses things too much. VQuakr (talk) 23:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it be better to deal with 'two items' rather then just one? I doubt anybody would support both the masthead 'and' the front page, being included in the article. GoodDay (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: that does seem unlikely. Though there's plenty of "unlikely" (to be kind) behaviors being exhibited on that page, from all sides of the spectrum it seems. VQuakr (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've asked an administrator to review my addition of the NY Post front page option, to the RFC. Some editors agree with adding it, while other don't. GoodDay (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I already !voted. I still think it would have been cleaner to just start a thread about the cover; if there was clear consensus to incorporate it and that obsoleted the RFC, no big deal. But every decision needn't be laden with drama, right? VQuakr (talk) 04:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've asked an administrator to review my addition of the NY Post front page option, to the RFC. Some editors agree with adding it, while other don't. GoodDay (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: that does seem unlikely. Though there's plenty of "unlikely" (to be kind) behaviors being exhibited on that page, from all sides of the spectrum it seems. VQuakr (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it be better to deal with 'two items' rather then just one? I doubt anybody would support both the masthead 'and' the front page, being included in the article. GoodDay (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Editing news 2023 #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
- The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
- They are beginning a new project, Edit check.
Talk pages project
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.
An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
New Project: Edit Check
The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Disengage?
Hi VQuakr. For a little while now, you've been the only editor responding about Rittenhouse. I think if you disengage, we can let that discussion die a quiet death. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Firefangledfeathers: noted, thanks for the feedback. VQuakr (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Peace offer
Hey, I'm sorry we appear to have gotten off on the wrong foot. I genuinely feel like we've misunderstood each other. I certainly never meant to be anything but civil and contribute in good faith. Can we try and pull back from antagonizing each other? I certainly never meant to draw your ire and I'm finding this fight extremely unpleasant. Happy to withdraw my admin complaint if we can agree to assume good faith and stop fighting. Tambor de Tocino (talk) 08:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- That sounds agreeable. VQuakr (talk) 08:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Given the back and forth, reciprocal strikes of stuff that might be over the top seems overly complex. Suggest we sleep on it and see if we can move on? VQuakr (talk) 08:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Recent Edit on a BLP (where the edit goes to the main substance of entry)
Hopefully I have been able to initiate a 3O on your edit of the attached page earlier today. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Debito_Arudou&oldid=1153979278#Is_Mr._Beamer_a_US_citizen? It isn't clear how the primary source, which directly challenges the first paragraph of the BLP, is "libellous". I notice that you have previously gone in, along with specific other editors, and removed information about this BLP. You should at least be able to state what level of authentication is required to substantiate this fact and have it included in the entry. Blofit (talk) 00:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Blofit: this isn't a valid topic for WP:3O since there are more than two participants in the discussion. My advice is to edit an area unrelated to living persons for a while and forget all about this subject. But the answer to your question is at WP:BLPPRIMARY: a primary source will never be sufficient for the sort of musings you are making. Examples of generally reliable secondary sources can be found at WP:RSPSS (the green ones). VQuakr (talk) 00:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- It seems, right now, there are just two. Because the chain of edits has gone from one user suggesting Talk Page, and then two highly interested users on that Talk Page taking issue with the topic being raised. This is probably not sock puppeteering, but interested editors with their own off-site connection to the party, and an interest in not seeing changes or challenges. It is you though who shut the conversation there down.
- Primary source that is a government record has been used for this BLP. When he gave up American citizenship, it was one of the few that made it into the congressional record. The reason for the entry and BLP is this is someone who supposedly gave up the citizenship for purposes of civil rights activism in Japan, but is in fact no longer in Japan and no longer a US renouncer. The BLP unique quality may actually need the inclusion of material later than 2013 so the entry does not read like marketing material to build notoriety.
- There is too much last wordism surrounding any online discussion about this individual as a subject. People who see---really---nothing more than promoted a lawsuit and changes citizenship as the key fame points would wonder why it is so. 01:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC) Blofit (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Blofit, Throast, VQuakr, and Johnuniq is 4. Quit musing about other editors' motivations and exhibit an interest in some other topic. VQuakr (talk) 01:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Blofit, you're dangerously close to a WP:NOTHERE block. Stop this accusatory nonsense right now. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 10:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello VQuakr/Archives,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Notice of discussion at NPOVN
A matter with which you have recently been involved is under discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Bombing of Guernica. Cheers, Generalrelative (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello VQuakr/Archives,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Thanks a ton for your work cleaning up Paulina Alexis. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: aww shucks, thanks! VQuakr (talk) 02:31, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello VQuakr:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
November 2023
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours per page for pages within this topic. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Implementing consensus
Hiya, implementing consensus is not edit warring, please read the guidance, happy editing, Tom B (talk) 18:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tpbradbury: Hello! We simultaneously wrote on each other's talk pages. I suggest we choose either here or there for clarity. Preference? VQuakr (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the "I think it would be worthwhile to add a subsection to the history section to discuss these early "pre-assault" automatic rifles" remark, it helped to reach a consensus on adding info on Fyodorov's Avtomat as "WWI design" that predates Sturmgewehr in terms of history of assault rifles. In fact, the remark was of great help to avoid a lengthy "6.5x50SR - is it a rifle round or intermediate round?" debate. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)