User talk:Blofit

OK?[edit]

True or no? Blofit (talk) 16:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Debito Arudou. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 18:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VQuakr (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Biographies of living persons noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard regarding a BLP issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Debito Arudou. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blofit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: not sure why VQuakr is so adamant at suppressing the information publicly available at the San Bernardino voter website,meg.rov.sbcounty.gov , with the input "Beamer" "4961" publicly available, and "01/13/1965" publicly available at the Wiki entry. Mr. Beamer registered to vote in America. Why is this critical piece not allowed in the Wiki entry?

Decline reason:

Encyclopedia articles should be based on secondary sources. That means published sources. I suggest you carefully read Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary,_secondary_and_tertiary_sources. PhilKnight (talk) 15:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blofit (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75871 [edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]