User talk:Sarvagnya/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Devaneya Pavanar[edit]

Hi Brother,

Why did you removed some content from 'Devaneya Pavanar' article. Those contents are from the book "The Primary Classical Language of the World" and the research carried out by European Lingusitic Scholar 'Cald Well'. Please read this book and Cald Well's research to know about this. This book is nationalised by Government of India.

Why did you removed some External Links, those are Government Website Links.

Tamil Virtual University and The Centre of Excellence for Classical Tamil (CECT) are Indian and TN Government sites.

Tamil Nation is the site maintained by world Tamils, which is source of all Tamil related information.

Please don't remove those reliable informations from the article. Rajan 20:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your 3RR report[edit]

You can see the result at WP:AN3RR. I'm here to give you a warning. You, too, are edit warring. You haven't broken 3RR, but your edit warring is still harmful to Wikipedia. Please stop. Give reasons for your reverts; don't use automated rollbacks in content disputes. Discuss issues on talk pages. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 05:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: dashes[edit]

Hi Sarvagnya. Thanks for your offer to help out. But, I see that Sandy has fixed the dashes. You could help out with other issues though. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 07:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Hi, my RfA has been successful. Thanks a lot for your support. :) --soum (0_o) 10:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will write on Karnataka flora-fauna this weekend.Dineshkannambadi 15:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

userpage[edit]

Thanks for reverting the spammer.Bakaman 22:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Karnataka[edit]

We should add a "Temples" to the list on top along with Literature, architecture etc.Dineshkannambadi 00:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Organizations in Karnataka[edit]

I have seen that you had/have worked a lot on categorization / re-categorization on various Karnataka articles as well as sub-categories under Category:Karnataka. Do we have any category, for Organizations in Karnataka? Categories article like, Karnataka Rakshana Vedike would be easier, if we have one. By the way, I recently created Category:Beaches of Karnataka and Category:Dams in Karnataka. Please feel free to correct if sub-categorization has gone wrong any where. Thank you! - KNM Talk 00:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography of Rajkumar[edit]

Hello Sarvagnya,
Great job on compiling the filmography of aNNaavru! The table looks awesome. I see that, Blnguyen has moved it from Rajkumar(filmography) to Filmography of Rajkumar, which actually sounds perfect.
By the way, the list is a bit incomplete. There are only 199 movies mentioned, while the total should have been 207. For example, if you see Devatha Manushya, it is not coming as 200th movie, but it is. I have the complete list, and more details on each of the movie. Will work on it soon.
Also, I am thinking, is there any possibility of nominating this as a DYK. Thanks for creating the article! - KNM Talk 16:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The list is incomplete. But then the article was sitting in my sandbox for so long, I thought its better to first put it out there and then finish it. I was actually counting on you to complete the list. :) Sarvagnya 16:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For your info, Rajkumar article in Kannada wikipedia has loads of information, including a detailed filmography. Not to mention, it is a featured article there. We can get the missing information from there and translate it. See: here. - KNM Talk 16:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikithanks[edit]

Thank you for your valuable and constructive contributions, Sarvagnya. The tripadi on your userpage catches the spirit excellently. dab (𒁳) 07:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) Also, good to know that you liked even my amateurish translation. Sarvagnya 09:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil[edit]

The influence of Tamil on Skt is not trivial or small. Read Hart's book. About finding a feature on an inscription which is identified as Kannada is not an influence on Tamil language.--Aadal 23:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

society[edit]

I have replied here in Talk:Society of Rashtrakuta empire of ManyakhetaDineshkannambadi 23:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ngo Dinh Diem[edit]

I have requested an arbitration between Blnguyen and myself regarding the Buddhist matter. Since you agree with Blnguyen, I have included you as well. --VnTruth 01:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Society in xxx Empire-->One option is to rename it "Social life and customs". How does that sound? Though is could become lenghty. I guess Society was intended to include both.Dineshkannambadi 03:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the full text of the citation from KAN Sastri if it helps the discussion.

Literature in all Dravidian languages owes a great deal to Sanskrit, the magic wand whose touch raised each of the languages from a level of patois to that of a literary idiom and the influence they excercised on one another was also not inconsiderable . Basically, thay have all influenced each other, no language is exclusive.Dineshkannambadi 03:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on the subheadings in Political history of medieval Karnataka.

Are they suitable?Dineshkannambadi 14:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Political histroy of karnataka-->we need a map of Karnataka showing the locations of various regal capitals.Any ideas?Dineshkannambadi 14:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration[edit]

I am seeking to resolve our differences regarding the Ngo Dinh Diem article by arbitration. I left a message on your talk page earlier, but it's since been pointed out to me that I should have done a better job of highlighting it. So here it is again.--VnTruth 15:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A gentlemen user:Scheibenzahl wants to learn Kannada. He left a message on Kannada talk page. He is looking for source material. Can you guys help him.Dineshkannambadi 18:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have included image to {{Karnataka-stub}}. This stub was without any image, after the previous fair-use image was removed. Since you uploaded this into commons, would it be possible to append a rectangular border of Yellow, followed by Red? The Kannada/Karnataka flag colors.

Also, FYI, all the Templates are now listed under Templates section in Karnataka WikiProject page. Thanks, - KNM Talk 21:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sure. will do. and btw, i've several derivatives of dk's pics. most of which I've touched up for contrast, brightness etc.. will be uploading them soon. i've already uploaded some though some of them(this one particularly) havent come off very well and need some repairing. Sarvagnya 21:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I hope you have taken written approval from Dinesh, because he was the owner of the original versions. If not, please do take now. Also, please provide the extn as .jpg instead of .jpeg. By the way, I remember seeing .png format as a recommended format over .jpg. Not sure. You might need to check with experts on this item or post a message in village pump. Just a suggestion. Thanks, - KNM Talk 03:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ohh is it? I thought once you release it on gfdl, its like you're giving permission to anybody and everybody to do what they want with the pics. I'll check again, though. Sarvagnya 04:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kannad[edit]

Hi! As User:Dineshkannambadi has already mentioned, I want to learn Kannad. Do you know of any sites where I can get the material? Thanks in advance.--Scheibenzahl 14:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please reply on my talk page.--Scheibenzahl 14:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for your reply! No :( I don't know any south Indian languages, but I know Hindi.

Your AIV report[edit]

Do you have proof that these are all sockpuppets, before we block them indefinitely? Simply holding the same opinion on the same page is not irrefutable evidence. Besides which, sockpuppets are allowed, as long as they are not used to violate 3RR, avoid blocks, or vote. Straw man arguments on talk pages aren't such a big deal. Kafziel Talk 17:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry is obvious. Please take a look at their contribs. They are all busy blanking particular content and have all taken birth in the last few hours. One of them was warned for 3RR and immediately a new account appeared. And every new account reverts once or twice and then another account appears. After a couple of accounts they even tried claiming a consensus on the talk page. They have even blanked content on the talk page. Its obvious socking. Sarvagnya 17:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More even as we speak - Dharmatma (talk · contribs), 131.193.8.208 (talk · contribs) Sarvagnya 18:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

An article that you had shown interest in the past has been tagged to be peer reviewed. Your input will be appreciated. Really :-) I've seen your edits and I can take constructive criticism. Thanks RaveenS 13:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The article's been on my watchlist and I've followed its progress :). You really seem to have done a good job. Will take a closer look and comment soon. Thanks for dropping by. Sarvagnya 10:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Churumuri[edit]

Interesting article on Churumuri.com. Would appreciate if you can add some references. Thanks - KNM Talk 00:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yaa,Actually I am bit confused with the wiki conventions and other things. I will surely contac you if in case i need any help from your side.Thanks. Nrupatunga 06:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New article on Kayyara Kinyanna Rai[edit]

This is a new article created by me and I have opened up a topic for discussion here in the article's talk page regarding his name. I have seen your edits to the Unification of Karnataka article and I felt that you may want to contribute to the discussion. Inviting you to provide your inputs, Thanks -- Amarrg 06:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll take a look. Thanks for dropping by. btw.. you're doing a great job! Keep it up. Sarvagnya 07:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

i just was about close my laptop when i saw your message thank you for the Welcome i really appreciate you taking time to welcome me to the group oh by the way i have decided to stay.--Missionimpossible 03:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Lingayats/Veerashaivism[edit]

For your kind information, please do not delete articles related to Panchacharyas, and do not claim Basava has is the founder. We have sufficient information on Veerashaivism/Lingayatism existing long before.

Your welcom for Helthy discussion,

Veeresh Hiremath —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veereshhiremath (talkcontribs) 06:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Message from Veeresh[edit]

Dear Sarvgnya,

I have not spoilt anything, tried to correct the wrong things. In case of need we are ready to give you all the data, so say that. Origin of lingayatism, and also How old it was, It is not just found in 12th century. These are the seroius mistakes done on this site, for the history origin of the lingayatism/Veerashaivism. Just i am trying correct it.

Hope for a positive and constructive replies. Regards, Veeresh Hiremath —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veereshhiremath (talkcontribs) 06:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Note from Veeresh[edit]

Dear Sarvagnya, There is nothing like a vandalism, I am follower of both Panchacharyas and Basava. But most of the contents say that, basava is founder it is cent percent wrong and also it is bad as part of history, we refer articles written some third party, they even do not know about india/culture religion.

Thanks for your valuable effort, web site looks good. May be there are the things, those may be even true, needs proof and the things they have a proof but not th true.

I may need your valuable time for communication. As a religion/Dharma is a vast thing, as for proofs concerned, it seems that Hinduism again history of india is written by biased people. We will have a discussion, i need to add value to the information, at the same time, no one would be heart. We can have constructive ideas and hidden and suppressed truths come out early.

As i will be out of station for around 10-12 days, i will not be able to reach you frequently. Will talk to you, later. As i am new user to the site, please ignore previous mails and we will discuss it.

But I am 100% sure i have solid proofs to disprove the some of the things contributed to this site.

Thnks in advance, sparing time for me, Veeresh Hiremath

DYK nom on Bidriware[edit]

Hello,

Thanks for creating the article on Bidriware. Just for your information, I have nominated a DYK on this article, by having the following hook.

Thanks, - KNM Talk 21:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Let's wait and see. Sarvagnya 21:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits in Tamil related articles[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your edit such as this where you removed cited sources is vandalism.

Do not post BS in my talk page. Removing well established fact with cited source is vandalism. If you would like to complain to anyone, you are free to do. Praveen 20:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More reply to your misguided attempts to intimidate me here Praveen 20:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not post BS in my talk page. Go to relevant article talk page. We don't give a damn about your original research. Some more reply in my talk page Praveen 23:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]