User talk:Retired User 21082022/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your GA nomination of Nayak (2001 Hindi film)[edit]

The article Nayak (2001 Hindi film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nayak (2001 Hindi film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Armaan (2003 film)[edit]

The article Armaan (2003 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armaan (2003 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need help[edit]

Hello sir. I'm Sahajitbro. I have been always influenced by the way you edit film articles in Wikipedia and that's why I would like to request you to improve and enhance the article Deewana (1992 film) by adding information in critical reception part, facts and movie reviews. I would be highly obliged if you can assist me in doing so. Looking forward for your participation. Sahajitbro (talk) 09:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deewana (1992)[edit]

Sir I'm again requesting you to contribute towards the article Deewana (1992 film) and help it emerge as a good and really informative article. I would be highly obliged if you do so. Looking forward for your active participation. Thank you! Sahajitbro (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahajitbro: Sorry, but I cannot. Never watch the film, but I will contribute as much as I can. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir if you can add critic reviews for the film. That would be enough. 🙏 Sahajitbro (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magazines for reference[edit]

Sir, can you share with me some magazines from web archives which can be used to provide valuable information for the article Deewana (1992 film) as you have used in Mr. India (1987 film) article? I would be highly obliged. Sahajitbro (talk) 07:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of King of Bollywood (book)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article King of Bollywood (book) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 18:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of King of Bollywood (book)[edit]

The article King of Bollywood (book) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:King of Bollywood (book) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]


Thank you for your contributions to Indian-cinema pages on Wikipedia! Your work is appreciated and inspiring. Kind regards, PinkElixir (talk) 19:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

I nominated an article that you started for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Meena Kumari (book). SL93 (talk) 21:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dil Chahta Hai[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dil Chahta Hai you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dil Chahta Hai[edit]

The article Dil Chahta Hai you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dil Chahta Hai for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dil Chahta Hai[edit]

The article Dil Chahta Hai you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dil Chahta Hai for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alam Ara[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alam Ara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alam Ara[edit]

The article Alam Ara you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alam Ara for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alam Ara[edit]

The article Alam Ara you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alam Ara for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Meena Kumari (book)[edit]

On 6 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meena Kumari (book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a book detailing the short life of Indian actress Meena Kumari was published just seven months after her death in 1972? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meena Kumari (book). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Meena Kumari (book)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deewana[edit]

Can you add some information in the production part of the film with close reference to Anupama Chopra's book about Shah Rukh Khan? Sahajitbro (talk) 06:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baghban (2003 film) copyedit[edit]


Your GA nomination of Baghban (2003 film)[edit]

The article Baghban (2003 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Baghban (2003 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed[edit]

Hello. I need a help. Can you please provide me the reader for this book on web archive so that I can enhance the article of Divya Bharti– https://books.google.co.in/books?redir_esc=y&id=4zAqAAAAYAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Deewana

Thanks in advance. Sahajitbro (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Conversations with Waheeda Rehman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 12:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Conversations with Waheeda Rehman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Conversations with Waheeda Rehman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification[edit]

Hi, Nicholas. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Devdas (2002 Hindi film) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 24. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gangaajal[edit]


Your GA nomination of Gangaajal[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gangaajal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gangaajal[edit]

The article Gangaajal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gangaajal for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gangaajal[edit]

The article Gangaajal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gangaajal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
You have recently worked on Gangaajal and helped make it a GA; wonderful editing on this film and a shout out for your editing related to Indian cinema in general. Cheers. DTM (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kangana Ranaut ‘s profile[edit]

Hello , can you help with addition of recent pictures of Kangana Ranaut in the profile in 2021 , especially from recent promotions of film thalaivii and update her Wikipedia page photo from 2021 promotions of thalaivii . Wikispilled (talk) 08:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saad Mujtaba[edit]

Can you please get him blocked because of his continuous content blanking? I can't, and he refuses to talk. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

U Me Aur Hum copyedit[edit]


Mohabbatein[edit]

Thanks for reverting me - I'm honestly not quite sure what the heck happened on my edit. I'm guessing I somehow was editing an older version of the article. No clue, but thank you for fixing that. Ravensfire (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U Me Aur Hum[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U Me Aur Hum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U Me Aur Hum[edit]

The article U Me Aur Hum you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U Me Aur Hum for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U Me Aur Hum[edit]

The article U Me Aur Hum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:U Me Aur Hum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam[edit]

I needed to work on the article Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam and the production section about development, cast, sets, locations, and so on. But I needed sources which are considered to be reliable. Could you please help. 223.184.125.116 (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@223.184.125.116: Sorry, I cannot. I am too lazy now. I do want to work on the film in the future, but I have not watched it yet. You can see my other articles like Dil Chahta Hai or Mohabbatein for examples, or using web.archive.org. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, Nicholas Michael Halim! The list you nominated, Yash Chopra filmography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nomination for Deewana[edit]

Hello. I would like to request you to nominate Deewana (1992 film for GA. Please go through the article once before doing so.

Thanks in Advance. Sahajitbro (talk) 11:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahajitbro: The "Sequel" section needs an expansion (see Mr. India for example). Make sure that you cite reliable sources (like newspapers or magazines) and not websites (at least that the author has a Wikipedia article; also see Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force). The principal photography part has only a sentence; you can add the crew there like what I did in Mujhse Dosti Karoge!. Don't forget to expand the "Plot" section too! —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meena Kumari birth year[edit]

Meena Kumari was born on 1st August 1932, it's written in every links & every videos regarding her life. So please, don't revart my editing. Sabarno Moitra (talk) 12:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabarno Moitra: The article is about the book not the video you watched. Mehta clearly mentions a note like that. You can check it yourself. Do you have the book? No, she was not even born in 1932. She was actually born in the next year. There is a Filmfare issue that covers the first Filmfare Awards from 1954. The magazine mentions that 1933 was the year she was born. That's why Mehta put that note; in the same book, he has said that he could not access some old magazine issues because they are not available. Also, don't you think the videos (probably those from YouTube) about Meena Kumari actually copy from Wikipedia? Have you done a fact-checking? See Filmfare 2 April 1954 issue! Its preview is available online on Magzter. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also mentioned about some more sources. In Vinod Mehta's "Biography of Meena Kumari", it's mentioned 1932, as her birth year, as well as, in many links (not videos) it's also mentioned 1932. Sabarno Moitra (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabarno Moitra: Yes, he mentions 1932 as her birth year and it is followed by a note to clarify that mistake. If you have a 2013 edition of the book, you will understand what I said. What do the links have to do with the Wikipedia article? That article is about a biography of Meena Kumari. I followed what the book says and what I thought is important. The note is important to be mentioned because it is a mistake Mehta himself has admitted. What links that say her birth year was 1932? Is it Pinkvilla? Is it Bollywood Life? They are unreliable. Mind you, the Wikipedia article is about the book not those unreliable links. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should accept where I have corrected in the first paragraph, in the other paragraph, it will remain the same. Sabarno Moitra (talk) 12:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabarno Moitra: What the heck? No. That is what he said in 1972. He said in 1972 that 1932 was the year she was born but in 2013 he clarified that it was 1933 not 1932. A note is really important there. Older sources of hers are more reliable because they are nearer to the years when she was alive. If it says 1933, then it is 1933 not 1932. Mehta himself has clarified his mistake and what do you want now? Meena Kumari was born in 1933. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have given example of filmfare magazine, but you most probably, don't know that, filmfare magazine may be wrong. I have always studied about the yesteryear actors / actress. Every time, I have seen (even upto 2018), the year of her birth is 1932. So I'm sure, this must be correct. Sabarno Moitra (talk) 13:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First, that book says 1933. Second, check [1] out. That links will lead you to an encyclopaedia. It must be reliable and it says 1933. If you still think that you are right, add a note in the lead of the Meena Kumari article (not the book one) using this template ({{efn|}}). For example: "Vinod Mehta mistakenly mentioned 1932 as her birth year." --—Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 13:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sabarno Moitra: By the way, where's your proof? —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 13:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have already mentioned about links but you have not accepted. So what can I do? Whatever I will show, you will not accept. Sabarno Moitra (talk) 13:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabarno Moitra: What link? You don't give me any. Where's the links? Can I check it? —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 13:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to check, then search it, I have also searched myself. Sabarno Moitra (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabarno Moitra: What an unwise behaviour. If you believe you are right, then show me your proofs. Leave my page now. You just wasted my time. If you cannot make any constructive edits, then please stay away from Wikipedia. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mullum Malarum has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam[edit]


Your GA nomination of Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Nicholas Michael Halim! The list you nominated, List of accolades received by Koi... Mil Gaya, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam[edit]

The article Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam[edit]

The article Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sahib Bibi Aur Ghulam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding removal of cast column of Nayak (2001 Hindi film)[edit]

Please don't remove the cast column of Nayak (2001 Hindi film) as it has been added some actors name which has been missed out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.242.66.199 (talk) 05:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@150.242.66.199: Don't add cast member without sources and don't remove the sources I already put there. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source of adding addition cast list but why did you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.242.66.199 (talk) 12:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hema Malini: Beyond the Dream Girl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I expected that this would happen, huh? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohabbatein&oldid=prev&diff=1054618335&diffmode=source We are the Great (talk) 03:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hema Malini: Beyond the Dream Girl you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hema Malini: Beyond the Dream Girl for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 19:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of Vishwatma[edit]

Hi. I would like to request you kindly look into the article Vishwatma and try to expand it with good and reliable sources. Thanks in advance. :) Sahajitbro (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added how the movie became a cult classic with sources. Kindly explain why did you remove it? We are the Great (talk) 23:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining. We are the Great (talk) 02:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]