User talk:Onikiri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Philippe Auguste 18:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onikiri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 179.51.3.7. Thats the IP address I get in my PC web settings and also using WhatsmyIPAdress.com. Please. I dont think its fair. Onikiri (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That address is indeed blocked and you are not. What I recommend you do is apply for IP block exemption at WP:IPECPROXY. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


How to[edit]

As i said in my other message. To edit the character square used on the Saint Seiya articles you type in the search window: Template: Saint Seiya Characters ¨ Click this [1] --Refuteku 21:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop erasing names buddy. They have every right to be on that list. They will recure in future films. Danny7177 (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You gotta let Margot Robbie and Jared Leto and Chris Pine be on the list. Please. Joker will be in Suicide Squad 2, Joker vs Harley Quinn and Gotham City Sirens as is Harley Quinn. Steve Trevor had a cameo in BvS and he appeared in WW, and he will appear in future films. Come on you gotta be lenient. This is a free country. Danny7177 (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not up to us to do that. Wikipedia is not a fan page. We have not official confirmation they are returning. Once that happens, then they can be left in the article. Anyway, as it has been mentioned before, there's no need to be list them all. Jared Leto can stay as he is the only one who, vaguely, has in some way confirmed he will return. The others, until we have confirmation. Onikiri (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again[edit]

As i said in my other message. To edit the character square used on the Saint Seiya articles you type in the search window: Template: Saint Seiya Characters And if you want to find out the reason some characters where removed, you can look in the discussion of the List of Characters in Saint Seiya article. :)

And then, there was that small question again. If you have found that file about Masami Kurumada stopping the Tenkai Hen project. ^^ --Refuteku 20:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya[edit]

Hi there, i just wanted to know were you got the info about Toei changing Masami's script for the Saint Seiya Tenkai Hen movie? Refuteku

Wow, thanks for the info! I'm gonna spread this on the English talking websites now. Oh and if you ever get that link again i would be glad to see it. :D

Btw, you referred to a Pegasus Saint from the mythological times on Pegasus Seiya. I just wanted to make it clear that Masami Kurumada changed that Saint to Tenma. ^^ --Refuteku 10:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenma[edit]

In the prologue to Next Dimension Hades say a follow up to the line "i remember that face from the mythological times". He says "In the era of mythology? No, it was in one of my past lives..."

Most people would see this as Kurumada changed his mind, and chose the Pegasus Saint that hur Hades to be Tenma. As this would make it easier and more exciting for the Next Dimension plot. --Refuteku 10:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well seeing as the Lost Canvas has diverted from the Saint Seiya story too much already since it's first publication, i'd say it didn't matter so much. Still i'm very surpised the you liked the Pegasus Saint so much. =)

Specters[edit]

I saw that you removed alot of the Specters Stars info, which i added back again. Why did you remove the info? Also you changed Celestial to Divine, they are two different words. Plus the other star are called "Terrestrial", therefore "Celestial". --Refuteku 10:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I understand and agree with you about the Divine/Celestial naming, so i will go with Divine. =)

Though i see you did not understand my reason for putting the information about the different stars in their articles. The 108 Evil Stars originally comes from the Water Margin story, and thus i thought the viewer should have a slight understanding of them. --Refuteku 19:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • You can leave the refining to me, but for the pictures you should just look at how other people have done with their pictures. =)

btw, you did not answer on the second reply on Tenma i made.

Asterion[edit]

I knew someone was gonna ask, anyhow it seems you have not gotten your hands on the Deluxe Version of the manga that was released last year. Many images that where half is now whole. You can look at the image here [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Refuteku (talkcontribs) 06:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenkai Hen[edit]

Hi there again :) I'm just curious if you where able to find the file about Kurumada's opinions about the Tenkai Hen movie. --Refuteku 19:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya Characters[edit]

The box you made on every characters page is rather unnecessary. If you want to edit the template you just type "Template:Saint Seiya Characters" in the search field :)

Though if you look at the discussion on the Saint Seiya Characters article you will see that we came to an agreement to not use every character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Refuteku (talkcontribs) 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting without explanation[edit]

Hi Onikiri,

Please don't ever revert another user's edits without providing a clear explanation, either in the edit summary or (preferably) on the article's discussion page. If you don't take the time to explain your actions, you're more likely to be reverted.

I've restored User:NeilEvans's edit to Ulysses 31 — if you don't agree with him, discuss it here.

Regards, Sideshow Bob Roberts 01:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sphinx Pharaoh. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety 00:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there again :)[edit]

Since some people on wikipedia just desperately want to shorten some of the Saint Seiya character articles. I thought maybe you would like to have the character bios you've written on the only english talking Saint Seiya fansite and forum?

www.saintseiyafan.com

plus i took the liverty to delete some of the unnecesary stuff you had here, but you can revert them back of course :) --Refuteku (talk) 11:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

First of all, I havent put plot tag in the Pegasus Seiya article because the plot overview is short. Second, the article of a character athena has more story than development. I have edit that tag in the gold saints articles because of the same thing. Check GA articles and you will see how is the plot in those articles and you see that the development section (backgorund, outline, etc.) is bigger than the plot I have been working in the Lost Canvas article and deleted plot details that dont support the development. I wont edit any tag until we finish the talk. About Athena, I have tried to edit it many times but it was reverted without explanations.Tintor2 (talk) 03:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems you are never going to answer me and delete all the tags just saying that I have never worked there.Tintor2 (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my point is not about the creator of the articles, my point is the length of the plot overview that is longer than the character development. The plot section should only tell the main events not like the one of aries mu that explains the fights. If you dont mind I will reduce it and if the article looks short we can merge the Episode G section of characters to the gold saints. See you.Tintor2 (talk) 15:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer English since I am still learning and Im going to have some important tests. Apart from that do you know any english website that sells saint seiya toys to add info to reception? Once I heard about a gold (real gold) myth cloth of seiya but I dont remember the website. See you.Tintor2 (talk) 22:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I remember that in the news they even said the weight of the toy and I need official sites that sell these toys not fans ones to edit in the article(like Viz Media).Tintor2 (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Hyouga[edit]

Please stop adding that "Hyouga is more proper." Wikipedia does not use that Romanization system. Read up on WP:MOS-JA. More specifically, the "Body" section. "For transliterations from kanji and hiragana, long o and u are written with macrons as ō and ū respectively." おう is ō, not ou.—Loveはドコ? (talkcontribs) 05:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reincarnations in The Lost Canvas[edit]

Hi, there. Only Tenma(and Sasha, of course) are confirmed incarnations of the characters in the original manga. While it's very likely the others are incarnations, too, it's unconfirmed and only fan-speculation.Sirtao (talk) 14:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring at Cygnus Hyoga. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 19:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some questions[edit]

Do you know a more reliable source containing the conception information of Pegasus Seiya? It would better to use that. Also, this may be an idiot question, but is it cosmo or cosmos? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It would be better to add the reference in Template:Cite book style to add ISBN, year and page number (fansites like caballerosdelzodiaco.net is not a reliable source). Regards.--Tintor2 (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of minor Spectres[edit]

An editor has nominated List of minor Spectres, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Spectres and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya clean-up[edit]

See this discussion.--Tintor2 (talk) 01:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Onikiri I need help with something I think could help. Could you add a production section to Saint Seiya in which it is explained how Kurumada created the series? See this one I created as an example. Of course it needs to be sourced and the book or interview (reliable source) needs to have isbn or publisher. If not tell me all the data of the book and I ll turn the ref into citebook.

Also, the (1999) Kappa Magazine, number 80 (in Japanese), could you tell me the publisher or isbn to make more complete? Cheers^_^--Tintor2 (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Saint Seiya Wiki[edit]

Hi there! We at www.saintseiyafan.com are planning to add a Saint Seiya wiki to our site and i would very much like it if you could come there ^_^ --Refuteku (talk) 10:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is [3], but please try to have some references when adding info okies? --Refuteku (talk) 11:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding usourced material to this article, it should be noted that per WP:TRIVIA that collections of micellaneous information are discoraged, that section is not supposed to be a list of fictional appearances. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya merges[edit]

Please note that wikipedia is not a fansite, only the notable characters from the series and with relevance in the story can be mentioned. Please see that the characters I redirected have no importance in the anime/manga. Also, more characters will also need to be merged. The fact that a character can have an article just because its canon does not have sense and sounds like discrimination (no offense please). Regards.--Tintor2 (talk) 14:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oro[edit]

December 2008[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions to the Dhalsim article. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources that appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talkedits) 17:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiten translation[edit]

I think "Soaring Sky" and "Sky Soaring" are both acceptable translations of Hiten (飛天), although "Soaring Sky" is a bit more literal. Jonny2x4 (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orochi[edit]

The kanji used for "Orochi" have nothing to do with the pronunciation of the word. Or please explain how exactly the second kanji ended up being pronounced "rochi", here, according to you. I'd love to hear that. Just like I'd love for you to go and find me examples of "Orochi" being pronounced/spelled with a long "o" sound.

Please check your facts and spare me the "do you know Japanese, dude?". Yes, I do, and apparently better than you, I'm afraid.

(incidentally, regarding the Gōki article, Capcom also uses "kobushi" from time to time... they're not that consistent for that one either) Erigu (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NExt Dimension[edit]

Hi there!

I just wanted to ask you if you are any sure that Izo and OX are actually seeing a vision of Saori/Athena. Wouldn't it be better to wait for some action that confirms it? Because nothing from the chapter says they are seeing a vision. --Refuteku (talk) 23:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Yeah but the thing is that the Crateris Cloth is inside it's box... so how can they get a vision from it?--Refuteku (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fuuma no Kojirou[edit]

There was a large discussion on the talk page concerning the use of macrons. You effectively ignored that conversation. Particularly when given names are involved (Ryouta Murai spells his name in that fashion, instead of "Ryota Murai" or "Ryōta Murai").—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here. Erigu (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are being discussed at WP:ANI[edit]

Thread here.

You have been edit-warring at List of Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas characters. It appears that you have also been editing that article anonymously, and performed reverts with the IP accounts that, had they been from your main account, would have resulted in an automatic WP:3RR block. This is unacceptable - intentional or not - and continuing to game the system will result in this account being blocked. Furthermore, you rarely use article talk-pages. These are provided to enable discussion with other editors, and occasional comments in edit summaries are inadequate as a substitute. I would strongly encourage you to participate in discussing your edits rather than edit-warring (WP:BRD might be useful guidance here). EyeSerenetalk 13:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next Dimension chapter 20 date[edit]

heya, where did the date come from?

some spanish people is editing the date on the ND article a lot, so i just wanted to hear it from you sicne you wrote it first :) --Refuteku (talk) 10:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cloth (Saint Seiya) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic about a fictional concept that doesn't pass WP:NOTE. Based entirely on primary sources and original research. Also violates What Wikipedia is not.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 17:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Cloth (Saint Seiya), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloth (Saint Seiya). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Farix (t | c) 17:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi! I've noticed that your edits do not confirm to wikipedia's policies. Articles of Wikipedia must confirm to: Neutral point of view, No original research, No fringe theories, and Notability. Please read What Wikipedia is not to see what is accepted on Wikipedia. If you feel that the content you want to contribute does not follow the above guidelines, you may contribute on Wikinfo, which is like Wikipedia, but much more liberal. Thanks,


If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of saint seiya anime-only characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I just look this,... apparently they are infringing on us and not vice-versa Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of saint seiya anime-only characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arles/Ares[edit]

I don't mean to be a nag over something as little as this, but I figure it's better to talk rather than edit and counter-edit the article. The fact that the god's name is spelled in a certain way has very little to do with how the anime Pope's name should be romanized. (I'm pretty sure the anime people never said the god Ares was involved anyway.) The thing is: アーレス is Āresu in romaji, which can be romanized as Ares, Ales, Ahres or anything else along those lines. To write Arles, you'd have to spell it as Āruresu (or alternatively without the macron on the a) to account for that extra r. In kana, that would be アールレス or アルレス. It's not unheard of for different names in kana to have the same romanization (or for equal names to produce different romanizations), so you can add a note to that entry saying that the god's name is spelled differently, but Arles is incorrect.

Again, I don't know if an official romanization for that name was ever presented. Arles could be a result of "Engrish"... Cyn starchaser (talk) 21:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'm still new here on wikipedia so I'm not familiar with those past decisions. I'm not completely comfortable using a name that's almost certainly wrong, but it's been in use for a long time now so it's not such a big deal that it would warrant deletion. I insisted because the Episode G (which I know is not canon and should have no bearing on the Saint Seiya articles) character list makes a mention of Saga being referred to as Ares in the anime, but I'll just tweak that instead. Cyn starchaser (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SF characters[edit]

I did say, "On a separate note" in the edit summary, meaning that it was unrelated to your edit. There was no need to be all snarky. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 13:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette alert[edit]

Hello, Onikiri. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 108.69.80.43 (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Saint Seiya characters: merges/splits[edit]

Since you're one of the main contributors to this article, I was wondering if you knew if there were plans to merge the rest of the protagonists into the big list? It seems strange that everyone but Hyoga should have their own article when he has no less protagonism than the others, so either all should be merged (with the possible exception of Seiya) or none, I think. I'd also like to let you know that I've started a new section on the article's talk page to continue discussing ways to trim down the length of the article. Cyn starchaser (talk) 13:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you in July if the Saint Seiya character articles were to be merged and you said that yes, they were, and that it was a good thing to do so to avoid the useless info presently on those pages. Did something happen in the meanwhile? Cyn starchaser (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The ones to be merged were the secondary characters, not the protagonists. The list is already too long to be adding more merged characters. Even creating a list for the Bronze Saints wont do any good as they are the protagonists and their articles shouldnt be merged. Someone merged Cygnus a long time ago, but it wasnt going to be done. Although it can be done, I think that preserving the articles of the protagonists unmerged is the right way to go.Onikiri (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the merge should be done and there are several good reasons to do it. Now that the list has been split into several articles, it can handle the added length of the main character infos. Also, most of the articles on the protagonists are full of issues, including that of doubtful notability which could have them deleted one day (maintenance tags have been there for years to prove it). Third, Hyoga. For the sake of consistency, and to avoid letting across the view that he is less than the other protagonists to the reader unfamiliar with the series, we cannot have his article merged and the rest unmerged. All this has to be fixed somehow, if not by merging, then in some other way. And I agree that creating a list for Bronze Saints is not the way to go.

Another thing I would like to ask you is what is the logic of keeping a brief description of Seiya on the list but none for the others? Wikipedia requires that when you have a section that only contains a redirect to another article, there be a summary there of the info on that other article. Cyn starchaser (talk) 08:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seiya is the main character. The description is there for those non familiar with the manga or anime. But it can be deleted, as his article still exists. Cygnus for example, was never going to be merged, but someone simply ignored that. They can be merged, but as theyre the protagonists, I dont think it would be a good idea.Onikiri (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, we agree - those descriptions are necessary. Then why do you keep reverting them when I add them? Cyn starchaser (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because they still have their own articles. As protagonists, they shouldnt be merged. There was a time when even Tenshuusei Deadly Beetle Stand had his own article. Or Even Golem Rock, and these characters appear in two pages at most. Most characters didnt need their own article, but the protagonists do. Anyway, you can go to the Saint list and add their description there, but you shouldnt merge their articles. Onikiri (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Superman edits[edit]

As per your edit here, I wanted to ask if Superman explicitly states what you are citing - to whit, that "and Booster Gold, who after an initial icy relationship with the Man of Steel, grew to respect him". If that is your observation of the story, then we cannot use it. If someone reliable reviewed the story and said that, then that review would be what we need to cite, not the primary source of the comic itself.

Something else: your next edit, wherein you elaborate on how Superman pops up in films. It seems a little more evaluative - "in reference to the many troubles caused by his partner Robin". I thought I'd address this with you forst. You aren't altogether wrong in eitehr instance, but this is an encyclopedia, and we cannot cite your evaluations, Onikiri, Maybe you could find some sources that make those evaluations. Those we can keep. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 03:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Saint Seiya Omega, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Millieu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya Omega[edit]

Athanatophobos March 10th, 2012

Hello,

I don't understand why my news about Saint Seiya Omega was deleted. You said news coming from forums is the worst. But, my news comes from official site, not forum.

The forum, SaintSeiyaPedia, has just brought that information to us.

Regards.

P.-S. : sorry for my English, I'm French.

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Saint Seiya character techniques, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lushan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Saint Seiya Omega, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Millieu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to wikiFeed[edit]

Hello Onikiri,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! MarchionessGrey (talk) 20:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya Omega character list[edit]

Please note that I am editing the page to be properly in line with the formatting of all other anime pages on Wikipedia. This includes not having the Japanese and English names on two separate lines, not bolding things that are not important, and properly including the Japanese forms of the names as per the reliable sources.—Ryulong (琉竜) 08:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hepburn romanization states that "n'n" is not used anymore. There is no instance of a word having a sokuon before an N sound. The only time "n'" is used is if it's ンア, ンイ, ンウ, ンエ, ンオ, ンヤ, ンユ, or ンヨ. ンナ, ンニ, ンヌ, ンネ, ンノ are nna, nni, nnu, nne, nno. So do not use "In'nen"—Ryulong (琉竜) 20:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many changes implemented by you are unnecessary, so, some reverting will be made in the few days.Onikiri (talk) 03:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What changes are you talking about? I've made it so the articles is written like any other page on an anime. The Saint Seiya pages are in an awful state. The English and Japanese character names should not be separated (look at like the Bleach or Naruto character lists). Please do not revert them. The way the pages were set up was bad and I've made it better. Please see MOS:ANIME for the rules on writing these pages.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I will not revert it because you say it? The reverting will be made where changes are not needed. For example, katakana for the Saint's constellations: its been agreed for years that only kanji is used for consistence with all SS articles. Only constellations which have no transliteration in kanji use katakana. If your changes are good, they will be welcome, but if they don't help to improve, I am sorry, but reverting will be in order. I have been in charge of the SS articles for years, and I have a good criteria for what to keep and what to remove. Don't worry, as I said, if your changes are useful, they will be kept. Onikiri (talk) 02:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Katakana is needed because the Japanese text that is provided is in no way resembling the intended pronunciations. "天馬星座" is never read as "Pegasasu" in Japan except as part of Saint Seiya (it's always "Tenma-za"), so we need to show that those kanji are read as "Pegasasu" rather than "Tenma-za". The same thing goes for the several constellations that aren't written with kanji. You do not expect that "かじき座" should be read as "Dorado" because that says "Kajiki-za" and not "Dorado".
Any direct translations of characters' names are original research. It has no bearing on the actual program or the reader's understanding of such.
Also, you keep saying "Athena" is the character and her name is written with the same kanji for "Megami", which does not appear to be the case when I investigate elsewhere online.
And finally, you seem to refuse to refer to the main characters as anything other than "Kōga", "Sōma", and "Ryūhō" but you previously included information that the characters' names are written as "Kouga", "Souma", and "Ryuhou" in magazines in Japan. If this is the case, then that means those are the character's officially translated English names.
I am coming to these pages to bring them in line with WP:MOS-JA and general practice for when kanji and readings in no way match. Just because you've been working on the Saint Seiya pages for this long does not mean that you are right and I am wrong. Please keep this in mind, because I've just gone through and added all the katakana, again, and corrected your over usage of Hepburn romanization. The katakana provides more information and if I had the time I would add the information to the old Saint Seiya pages as well.—Ryulong (琉竜) 00:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You need to realize that these pages need to make sense to anyone. Not just the well versed Saint Seiya fan.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you're going to remove the katakana, just do that, because I fixed a lot of other errors on the page such as bad romanizations and bad formatting. Don't revert. And I've been a member of this site longer than you so don't say "There are others more experienced". And just because things have "been like that for ages" does not mean that it works at all.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going through a lot of the old character lists and finding that they are using the past tense. You never write about fiction in the past tense because that treats it like an actual event. I will just be fixing usage of Japanese text on these pages, so it would be best if you rewrote everything so it's in the present tense.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I have been editing on wikipedia for more than five years. I know what has to be reverted and what not, so, any changes you make, if revert is needed, it will be done. Onikiri (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I've been on Wikipedia for six years and I was an admin for three of those years. Don't tell me that I don't know what's right and wrong.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For one thing, you do not label an edit where 500 bits of text are changed as "minor". Leave the katakana in. It's what WP:MOS-JA says.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm going through all of the Saint Seiya character lists such that the katakana forms of the Saint titles are included because those kanji names do not match the Hepburn pronunciations.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Logging out to make that same revert you've been doing is also wrong.—Ryulong (琉竜) 09:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let me also state things again. Your personal opinion as to how these pages should be kept does not match the standard practice outside of your little garden of articles on Saint Seiya. Because the kanji and hiragana names used in the constellation titles of these characters do not match the pronunciations that Saint Seiya uses for them.
Also it appears that Seiya is the Sagittarius Saint in Omega, so that is another bit of information that you've been falsely including in the article that you've kept a strangle hold on for the past several months.—Ryulong (琉竜) 09:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Stop labeling your reverts as "Minor add" and stop editing while logged out.—Ryulong (琉竜) 00:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, would you stop throwing the baby out with the bathwater in regards to all my edits? You are the only one who says these edits are "unnecessary" when you are now in the minority in the consensus that's building.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop now. I edited the pages to fit in with WP:ANIME and WP:MOS-JA, as well as removing any original research. Just because you disagree with my use of katakana does not give you the right to keep reverting everything. I am trying to discuss things with you but you are just ignoring me entirely.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to my messages. Respóndeme. 答える. I know you can understand all of these languages.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not ignoring you, but youre the one trying to force your will in the articles. The SS articles have been all but abandoned by other users by years, I have been taking care of them for the last years. That's why no one's complaining about your changes, in your opinion. But I have already contacted the users that helped me years ago, and I am sure they won't be too pleased with the unneeded changes- So reverting is in order where needed. Good additions and material, very much welcome. Unneeded or superfluos changes, reverted Onikiri (talk) 06:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So this automatically makes you the one who makes the final decision on these pages? Sjones23, who reverted you as well, also believes that the content you have added and removed is entirely improper. The katakana spellings are necessary because you have items that aren't written in kanji that are being read completely differently than from what they are supposed to. And the literal translations of character names are what are superfluous and unnecessary. I have been adding content in good faith. You have been removing it because you don't like it and you know what is best for the pages and no one else does. I have been doing my best to give all the relevant information, which in this case involves the katakana forms of the constellation names because the reading is so drastically different from what is standard. I am here to help. And it seems whoever wrote the Episode.G page also believed that the katakana forms were important, as they were there when I made it in line with the proper formatting practices on the English Wikipedia. You need to seriously read the style guides instead of doing what you think is best because you were the only one to write these pages for several years.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:21, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad. Where reverting is needed, reverting will be madeOnikiri (talk) 02:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But reverting is not needed. You should not revert the pages, anymore. You are now in the minority, and the times have changed since you first started writing these up and now consensus does not hold for your preferred versions.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to see if a wider audience can help us settle things. I have posted on WP:DRN#Saint Seiya about the problems I feel are at heart here.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Saint Seiya Omega characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genbu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Saint Seiya". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 10:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting[edit]

When you participate in discussions on Wikipedia, it is preferred that you indent your comment if it is part of a thread. Please read WP:INDENT.—Ryulong (琉竜) 21:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indent your comments.—Ryulong (琉竜) 22:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Saint Seiya character techniques is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Saint Seiya character techniques until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Farix (t | c) 10:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Stop using uploaded photos as sources on articles. This violates WP:LINKVIO as we cannot link to illegally uploaded content. You can cite the book or magazine the scans come from but not the physical scans themselves. Also do not put the same link as a reference in two separate locatons. There is a way to use one reference more than once rather than just having it copied twice.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:47, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I used an image was long ago, when I was first writing the Omega article. I used one yesterday for the Poseidon appearance but I removed the info shortly after. I will use other references, and you should stop bossing me around, as I don't have to do what you say, you're now Wikipedia's owner.Onikiri (talk) 07:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm teaching you how Wikipedia is supposed to work.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, do your thing, I'll do mine. You already got what you wanted, we can work together. You obviously have nothing better to do than edit these things all day, but I do.Onikiri (talk) 07:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and about that "teaching you" thing...dude, there's a lot of better things out there to be doing than trying so hard to get a silly online encyclopedia to work so perfectly. So you can see your wikipedia is not almighty or clockwork-functioning as you may think, an example: I am sure you know about Green Lantern, right? Okay...check this: The character Galius Zed had his own article, he is a prominent character in the comics, with a long story, he's appeared in DC Comics animated series, in the animated films, he even was in the live-action movie...but, all of a sudden, his article got merged in the characters list. But there's also the character Flodo Span...a silly character that has appeared maybe 3 times in the comics, I am sure even his creator forgot about him...but he still has his own article...Get it? Even Cygnus and Dragon got merged, and they're prominent characters. Isn't that a bit contradictory? Isn't Wikipedia always working perfectly according to its guidelines? Not, me thinks...I can show you 500 more examples, you would be surprised. Not all works like clockwork in Wikipedia. It can function without strictly following its guidelines...with doing it reasonably well is enough. There's no need to take all that effort for things to go so by the book, as eventually, it will show that Wikipedia can work without strictly following those guidelines, and even if you do, someone will come eventually and change all that...so, relax, dude. The military balance of the world and its political climate doesn't depend on Wikipedia's inner workings xD I am sure you're young, enjoy life, it is beautiful, have fun, invest your energy in what is actually worth it, Wikipedia will still stand when you come back, even if a name is lacking the katakana x)Onikiri (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kirigi-film.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kirigi-film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Omega Gold Saint stuff[edit]

In the Japanese language, there is a separate word for the each astronomic constellation of the zodiac and the astrological sign, but they both mean the same thing in English. For example, both 蟹座 and 巨蟹宮 translate as "Cancer" in English, but the first one is for astronomy and the second one is for astrology (you would say "That's Kani-za in the sky" and "I am a Kyokaikyuu"). While it is true that it can be translated into something very long and complex to say something about a temple, this is the actual meaning of the kanji.—Ryulong (琉竜) 10:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside because I don't feel like making a new header, Stop using "Ryūhō" and "Kōga" in the text. You previously stated that they had their names written in English as "Ryuhou" and "Kouga" in an old revision of the character lists. Just use that form. It's easier.—Ryulong (琉竜) 10:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, stop using the Hepburn romanizations in English episode titles and summaries. Use "Koga", "Ryuhou", and "Souma". It's a lot easier unless you're just copy-pasting shit from other websites.—Ryulong (琉竜) 22:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you add references, please use the {{cite web}} template to properly document them. Also, if you're using the same reference for multiple items, use the name function to link them rather than having two identical links on the same page.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me where you're copying the episode titles from? Wherever it is seems to be adding unnecessary spaces after the full width exclamation points and using the Western comma instead of the CJK comma (、).—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually now I see that wherever it is it's wrong. You've been adding commas where they do not belong, and I just went through the entire list here and corrected everything that I found was incorrect. In the future, please use that link to get the new episode title as whenever you click it it will automatically bring you to the next episode (it redirects to #48 now but next week it will redirect to #49).—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you update the list, do not put spaces after the Japanese punctuation marks. The Japanese language does not use spaces at all. Just copy the episode titles directly from the Japanese website here (the "cur" link does not work so just click the link that says ストーリー).—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Onikiri, stop putting a space after 、 in Japanese. The Japanese language does not use spaces.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have been telling you this for months now, written Japanese does not have spaces after punctuation. Where are you copying the titles from that there's a space? I showed you where the proper place for episodes is.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Opossum, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rockpersonagem.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rockpersonagem.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Seiya - Saintia Shō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Sorry, but I don't quite understand your "romaji fix". Why wouldn't "daa" work for transcribing a "da" sound followed by a "a" sound? Erigu (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wonderwoman-filmbanner.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wonderwoman-filmbanner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Daniel guttfreund.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel guttfreund.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.danielguttfreundphd.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Onikiri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Standpersonagem.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Standpersonagem.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seiya-PoseidonHen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seiya-PoseidonHen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Onikiri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm R9tgokunks. I noticed that you recently removed content from Justice League (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance from the Help Desek. Thanks. -- Wilner (Speak to me) 07:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Onikiri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Birds of Prey film official logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Birds of Prey film official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Shurato-siddham2.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About The Batman[edit]

You keep removing The Batman from List of DC Extended Universe cast members because you say it isn't part of DC Extended Universe. But when I was searching for articles and news saying anything like that, I only found something that were from time before those articles where Matt Reeves claims that The Batman is part of the DECU but with less connections than other DCEU films. CAJH (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In short, I've only found "outdated" articles claiming that The Batman wouldn't belong to DCEU. As for any other reasons, although they aren't very much related to Wikipedia's policy, Robert Pattinson, Jeffrey Wright and Andy Serkis replacing Ben Affleck, J. K. Simmons and Jeremy Irons doesn't really prove anything because characters have changed actors within continuities even before DCEU and the changes have sometimes included skin color changing). As for Pattinson replacing Affleck, there could be an explanation that The Batman is set before the events of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. But since it is unconfirmed and would need a reliable source, anything about the setting of The Batman in DCEU timeline should be kept out from Wikipedia for now. But of course, we can try to debate about this with other Wikipedia users in Talk:The Batman (film). CAJH (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lois Lane (DC Animated Universe).jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lois Lane (DC Animated Universe).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saint-Shun-manga.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saint-Shun-manga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mafia vs. Ninja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barry. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cast.[edit]

Can you help me? RomanHawk7 (talk) 03:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Seiya: Next Dimension - Chapters not yet in tankōbon format[edit]

When you add chapters' info, use JST (Japan Standard Time) on release dates. --Feliciano12 (talk) 10:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of DC Extended Universe cast members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of DC Extended Universe cast members, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onikiri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 192.168.0.2 Please, any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Onikiri (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is not your Internet address. If you are sure you are not using a host/proxy, WhatIsMyIP will tell you your IP. If you don't wish to disclose this publicly, you can use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onikiri (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 192.168.0.2. Please, I am not using a proxy nor did I do anything against Wikipedia's rules. Onikiri (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Still not your Internet address. Please follow the instructions I gave you. Yamla (talk) 21:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2022[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Special:Diff/1091072528. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! —El Millo (talk) 01:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Athena (Saint Seiya) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athena (Saint Seiya) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athena (Saint Seiya) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Athena-Cloth.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Athena-Cloth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Athena-manga18.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Athena-manga18.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Athena-manga22.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Athena-manga22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Poseidon-defeat-anime.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Poseidon-defeat-anime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leon-belmont.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leon-belmont.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Richter-rondosotn.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Richter-rondosotn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]