User talk:Marxwasright

Welcome!

Hello, Marxwasright, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Toe To Toe, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TrulyBlue (talk) 11:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Toe To Toe[edit]

A tag has been placed on Toe To Toe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 11:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Toe To Toe. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Students for Palestine[edit]

Have noticed you editing the Students for Palestine page quite a lot. Can I please refer you to the talk page for some discussion on ways to cleanup the article.

Stinger9894 (talk) 13:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please see the talk page for the SFP article. I've nominated it for deletion however am willing to debate certain parts of the article as is. There is a large proportion that is unencyclopedic (meaning that it should not be in an encyclopedia) and from unreliable and biased sources. Cheers SirThomasMitchell (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marxwasright,[edit]

I just noticed your edit summary here. Although the edit was fine, the edit summary is concerning - please remember, past all the media hype and sensationalist bullshit there are real people behind the names. Our WP:BLP policy is rather crucial and must be kept in mind at all times. I don't want you to be offended, but may I suggest you step back from editing articles related to rugby league incidents? Your personal opinions and beliefs may be impairing your ability to follow our neutral point of view and biographies of living persons policies.

This is not a binding request by any means, it is more of a helpful nudge. I don't want to see the situation escalate here and i'm taking a bold approach following your recent edit patterns and that edit summary. Best wishes, Matty (talk) 08:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tony Zappia (Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks CEO)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tony Zappia (Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks CEO), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Person of dubious notability. Page seemingly created just because of current controversy, probably be better noted on Sharks 2009 season page?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattlore (talk) 09:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Tony Zappia (football administrator)[edit]

I have nominated Tony Zappia (football administrator), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Zappia (football administrator). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mattinbgn\^talk 13:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Kuhn[edit]

A tag has been placed on Rick Kuhn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bmg916^Speak 12:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Rick Kuhn[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Rick Kuhn. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marxwasright I received a request from Anthony Main the secretary of the Socialist Party Australia. Anthony has provided sufficient references to the article Socialist Party Australia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_Australia He does not understand why the article is in dispute. Clearly references 2,3 and 4 are valid and therefore do not deserve the first “The Socialist Party has been involved in several campaigns[1][neutrality disputed]” Perhaps you have not read the recent references Anthony has given you. Please get back to me ASAP. Thank you

John Gowland Sorry I have not created a new tag for this. New to editing.

Apologies again I do not know how to start a new discussion on this issue.

References 2.3.4 and 5 all substantiate the claim that the Socialist Party has been “involved in several campaigns”. Have you selected any of these references/links, they all establish very clearly and objectively some using Government or Police documents. So why do you insist on disputing “several campaigns[1][neutrality disputed]” You must admit you need to remove this dispute? There is overwhelming evidence that the Socialist Party is “involved in several campaigns”. I think we need to involve more editors in this dispute, how do I go about this?

John Gowland —Preceding unsigned comment added by John gowland (talk • contribs) 10:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

heroin reform.[citation needed]

Here is a reference to support this claim of involvement in Heroin reform. http://www.mail-archive.com/leftlink@vicnet.net.au/msg03905.html

For the moment we can remove “as well as supporters in most other states.[neutrality disputed]”

John Gowland —Preceding unsigned comment added by John gowland (talk • contribs) 11:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok remove the about and the heroin reference then the entry will look clean. And we can find better sources for the references for the heroin issue. Whilst you may think this left link is a media outlet for the sp, it is not. I had not heard of it prior to a few days ago. It looks like and archive of left interventions. In fact the left link, I think, is a valid primary source but you can remove it. John Gowland ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by John gowland (talk • contribs) 11:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 16:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tom Bramble[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tom Bramble. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Bramble. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your work on Socialist Alternative (Australia)[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		For referencing every single notable member of Socialist Alternative (Australia). -- Lear's Fool (talk \| contribs) 12:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the War Coalition[edit]

Hi, I reversed your page move as there is no need. The primary page is Stop the War Coalition. The hat note suffices for Stop the War Coalition (Australia) and the disambiguation page is bnow named Stop the War Coalition (disambiguation), all as per WP:Disambiguation#Disambiguation page or disambiguation links?. Cheers. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revolutionary Socialist Party (Australia)[edit]

The article Revolutionary Socialist Party (Australia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unregistered minor party, no independent claim to notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frickeg (talk) 04:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs of Rudd and RSP[edit]

Hi - just letting you know that I've nominated both Van Thanh Rudd and the Revolutionary Socialist Party (Australia) for deletion. The AfDs are here for Rudd and here for the RSP. I respect the work you've done here but ultimately it doesn't change my view that they fail WP:N. Thanks. Frickeg (talk) 03:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bush is coming.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bush is coming.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Communist Party[edit]

Hello. Thanks for starting the Egyptian Communist Party article. However, the history of Egyptian communism is a bit more complicated. The party founded in 1921 is the same as the Egyptian Socialist Party (which changed name to Egyptian Communist Party in 1922). That group didnt last, though. In the 1940s there were many different groups, that spent 18 years merging and splitting. Category:Communist parties in Egypt has some more. [1] has a listing of 40 (!) different communist organizations in Egypt between 1921 and 1962. On January 8, 1958 the Egyptian Communist Party was founded through the merger of the United Egyptian Communist Party and the Workers and Peasants Communist Party. This party dissolved in 1965. In 1975 those who had opposed the dissolution of the Communist Party refounded the party, I moved that article to Egyptian Communist Party. --Soman (talk) 02:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatroller[edit]

Hi Marxwasright, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Sadads (talk) 09:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you are obviously one of our more trusted content developers, I would like to invite you to help the New Pages Patrollers take a bite out of the patrolling backlog at Special:NewPages. It's really a great opportunity to figure out why all of our policies exist and what it means to write new articles on Wikipedia. If you don't help, no worries, but keep up the content creation and Happy editing! Sadads (talk) 09:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal Abbas.jpg[edit]

I was wondering if you could give you opinion on the picture nomination to be a featured picture. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Criminal behavior inspired by films[edit]

Category:Criminal behavior inspired by films, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rymatz (talk) 17:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherry Wolf (activist)[edit]

The article Sherry Wolf (activist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY - Nothing meeting WP:GNG in WP:RS

WP:LINKFARM WP:SPIP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PeterWesco (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherry Wolf (activist)[edit]

The article Sherry Wolf (activist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable as per GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 02:29, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nasty (The Young Ones), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain and Junta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liz Ross[edit]

The article Liz Ross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BLPNOTE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LordFixit (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Hogg[edit]

The article Ali Hogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BLPNOTE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LordFixit (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hiroshima day 06.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hiroshima day 06.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Workers Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Students for Palestine for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Students for Palestine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Students for Palestine (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherry Wolf (activist) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Wolf (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Wolf (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Sherry Wolf (activist) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Wolf (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Wolf (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Students for Palestine logo.png[edit]

The file File:Students for Palestine logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stop the war coalition.jpg[edit]

The file File:Stop the war coalition.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]