User talk:Lililolol

Your GA nomination of Shut Down (Blackpink song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shut Down (Blackpink song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MPGuy2824 -- MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shut Down (Blackpink song)

The article Shut Down (Blackpink song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shut Down (Blackpink song) and Talk:Shut Down (Blackpink song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MPGuy2824 -- MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shut Down (Blackpink song)

The article Shut Down (Blackpink song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shut Down (Blackpink song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Shut Down (Blackpink song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MPGuy2824 -- MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Born Pink

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born Pink you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Yeji (singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yeji (singer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeji (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Born Pink

The article Born Pink you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Born Pink and Talk:Born Pink/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Born Pink

The article Born Pink you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Born Pink for comments about the article, and Talk:Born Pink/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Twice – Alcohol Free cover (NetEase music) Single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twice – Alcohol Free cover (NetEase music) Single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queencard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attractiveness.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

File source problem with File:(G)I-dle – Super Lady (promotional poster).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:(G)I-dle – Super Lady (promotional poster).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from File:(G)I-dle – Super Lady (promotional poster).jpg. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

@Paper9oll Hello, regarding "Super Lady," I've included a promotional graphic in the infobox. According to Template:Infobox song#cover, it's acceptable to use an image that isn't the cover, such as a concept image. However, I might have chosen the wrong template. Additionally, even if the image is used as a concept image, it could still be considered promotional, correct? Lililolol (talk) 23:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Lililolol First misconception, infobox's documentation does not overwrites the actual policies that is at WP:NFCC and WP:NFC. Second misconception, your wrong understanding of "promotional", this is neither a "album cover" or "promotional's promotional poster". Additional, I'm not sure why in the first place, you even decided that it's okay to upload here when it's pretty obvious that such types of images is unacceptable for Wikipedia usage, simply just search around, you would already have gotten the answer which should have been the case prior to uploading, which I doubt this was even the case to begin with, other than what is seemingly just reading the infobox's documentation without reading the NFCC/NFC policies. Lastly, I have been watching Wikipedia:Files for discussion for few years already, I have never ever seen any examples similar to this images getting not deleted with rationale similar to yours. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 00:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

@Paper9oll I admit I didn't take the time to review WP:NFCC and WP:NFC. After seeing similar images labeled as concept or promotional on other pages led me to think it was fine to upload mine. However, I now recognize that such types of images are not suitable for Wikipedia usage. Lililolol (talk) 21:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Artist songs categories already filed under genre categories

Hi, just to let you know there's no need to add songs to a genre category if the artist songs category is already under that specific genre category. For example, Category:Paramore songs is already under Category:American pop punk songs, so there is no need to add Category:American pop punk songs to any of Paramore's song articles. Thanks. Hiddenstranger (talk) 00:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My Teenage Girl –Sam Same Different.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Teenage Girl –Sam Same Different.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fate ((G)I-dle song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fusion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Inaccurate edit summaries regarding article sourcing

Recently I've reverted two of your edits in which you indicated an article had a lack of sourcing in the edit summary, when in fact the articles in question already had 39 and 149 references respectively. As such, it's inappropriate to put an article-wide maintenance tag indicating a lack of sourcing, and frankly the edit summary is misleading. Please use section templates, or in-line templates, to indicate a lack of sourcing in a specific section of an otherwise well-sourced article. Please also take care to avoid over-citation -- not every statement requires an in-line source, only those likely to be challenged. Finally, please also take care when introducing translated content from other wikis. Machine-translated content is generally considered unacceptable, as are translations that introduce significant amounts of grammatical errors to an article. Thank you for your consideration. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 21:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

@Swatjester Hi, obviously, I didn't tag the entire article, only a section, which consists of lengthy paragraphs that needed to be sourced. Secondly, I didn't use machine translation for the article; I only used a grammar checker, which didn't indicate any grammatical errors. Like can you point out these significant grammatical errors? Lililolol (talk) 21:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Obviously right? Except, no. You did actually tag the entire article. This was the wrong template --you used {{More sources needed}} not {{More sources needed section}}. And secondly, the reason I strongly suspect you did in fact use machine translation are the *easily caught* grammatical errors you introduced like: The Mossad also inclined Nablus to the war on terror, and under the tenure of Meir Dagan , it was attributed the killing of senior terrorist figures abroad, including the killing of Imad Morenia , the military commander of Hezbollah, and Mahmoud al-Mabhouh , a senior member of Hamas . A sentence rife with extraneous spaces, nonsensical phrases like "inclined Nablus to the war on terror", and grammatically inaccurate passive voicing typical of machine translations like "it was attributed the killing of...". Not to mention nearly every reference to Mossad in your insertion says "The Mossad", which is incorrect (it's just "Mossad") but typical of a machine-translation. Nearly every sentence inserted into the article has some degree of error, much of it around spacing and punctuation, that adversely affects readability. To be honest, I don't really care whether you translated it by hand or machine service -- the result was of poor quality and not suitable for inclusion in the English language Wikipedia. It's disappointing that instead of taking this feedback as helpful advice to improve your editing, your initial response was to deny having made these mistakes. In any event, please do better in the future. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 22:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

@Swatjester Sorry about that. I intended to tag the section, but I accidentally used the wrong template, as you've said. That was my mistake, so I'm sorry :)

Also, contrary to what you may think, I wanted to explain, not deny what I did. Anyway, I apologize if it seemed otherwise and I'm open to any feedback you have so I can improve. If you have more feedback, please share. Lililolol (talk) 23:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)