User talk:JIP/Archive 36

Chartreuse
Chartreuse
Color coordinates
Hex triplet	#80FF00
sRGBB (r, g, b)	(128, 255, 0)
HSV (h, s, v)	(90°, 100%, 100%)
CIELChuv (L, C, h)	(90, 123, 119°)
Source	[citation needed]
ISCC–NBS descriptor	Vivid yellowish green
	B: Normalized to [0–255] (byte);

User talk:JarlaxleArtemis (cont from User talk:TTN)[edit]

I'm pretty sure this better belongs here instead of User talk:TTN, but I'll continue.

Given what you recently did with JarlaxleArtemis and WhenDatHotlineBling, I think this applies to all permabanned users, especially WMF-banned ones:

User talk:Timothy Usher
User talk:Jaredgk2008
User talk:Til Eulenspiegel
User talk:Codex Sinaiticus
User talk:Hasive (recieved notices after WMF ban)
User talk:Kompowiec2
User talk:Tokota
User talk:Cruks
User talk:Wikinger
User talk:Dijxtra2
User talk:Meco (still keeps getting notices years after WMF ban)
User talk:Russavia (broken redirect due to sock notice)
User talk:INeverCry
User talk:Rodhullandemu (not sure why notices should go to an arbcom-banned user with TPA revoked)
User talk:Billy Hathorn (community banned from WP and, given his articles are being deleted years after his ban, WP:DENY applies to those AFD notices given cer tain block evasion issues)

Best, ミラ P 00:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking if you could protect all of those UTPs given the precedent with the first two. I just removed all the notices from three of them since none of them can edit at all. ミラ P 19:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been a bit busy. I have just permanently protected all of the above talk pages. JIP | Talk 22:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The full-protection of banned users' UTPs is a protective action. Now can you full-protect User talk:Cow cleaner 5000, User talk:Fangusu, User talk:John Kwiecinski, User talk:My Royal Young, User talk:Nipponese Dog Calvero, User talk:Mishae, User talk:Biografer, User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel. All of them (except the last three, who are community-banned) are listed at WP:LTA, so you might wanna do everyone else there. ミラ P 17:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also these users banned by ArbCom: User talk:Edgar181 (plus socks - I'll global them later), User talk:Eric Corbett (again, plus socks), User talk:Here come the Suns, User talk:Icewhiz, User talk:Jytdog, User talk:Sk8erPrince, User talk:The Devil's Advocate, and User talk:Zawl (third time, plus socks). Although not all of them are tagged "cannot edit own talk page", they must still email ArbCom to appeal their bans, so full-protecting their UTPs won't hinder them from a future return to WP. Don't know about Od Mishehu since they were desysoped by Arbcom but indeffed by an indie CU. ミラ P 19:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further, these three oversight-blocked users: User talk:Jerichson1979, User talk:Jocksterdug, User talk:Wumbolo. Again, must email ArbCom to appeal block. ミラ P 19:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And who could forget the Jimbo-banned User talk:MutterErde? ミラ P 19:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. I'll deal with these probably tomorrow. It's way past my bedtime now. JIP | Talk 01:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. This is for you. I left it on because I'm only giving it to you, but you can disable the nocat function. Best, ミラ P 03:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed your locking Biografer (talk · contribs · count)'s Talk page, apparently as part of a mass effort to do this with "permanently banned" users/accounts. Although there may be precedent for doing this on a very limited basis, I don't think this is standard practice or justifiable. We rarely lock user Talk pages for any reason. I believe you should undo your actions.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Bbb23, and I was initially concerned this was a compromised administrator account and almost ran a check until I saw in your logs that you had done this previously. I don't think there's any policy reason to do this, and think it should be reverted. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And with all due respect to Miraclepine, they are not an administrator, and I have no clue why they are pushing this. Nor is their reason about "precedent" convincing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
JIP, I have unprotected Eric Corbett (talk · contribs · count)'s Talk page, not just because there's no basis for your having protected it, but, practically speaking, such a move will cause a needless uproar among a certain segment of the community.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23, Black Kite, Gerda Arendt, and TonyBallioni: And JIP is now deprotecting the pages. ミラ P 17:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KS Koolitus[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KS Koolitus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

banned?[edit]

You protected the talk pages of blocked editors, why? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because I was asked to. See User:Miraclepine's message on this talk page. JIP | Talk 16:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt, Bbb23, and TonyBallioni: Should be fine as long as they can't edit their own UTP or have to email ArbCom to be able to edit again. Precedent: [1] [2] [3] ミラ P 16:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we sometimes protect talk pages of blocked users if there's a good reason (gravedancing, edit warring, etc.) but this is the exception to the rule, not the norm. There is no precedent for en masse full protection of user talk pages of blocked users. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(ec 2*, reply to the former) That's too difficult for me to understand, sorry. I know talk pages of banned users that I not protected, thank goodness, and think protection could be an answer to disruption, but not out of the blue.

~~Tony, talk pages are not for monologues but telling a user something.~~ --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: "Telling a user something"? Billy Hathorn was still receiving AFD notices years after his ban and concerns of block evasion have been raised in some of them. Also Levivich had to undo their PROD notices because they were giving them to a banned user. ミラ P 16:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Gerda, I'm having a bit of difficulty parsing what you're saying, but I think we agree(?). If there's disruption, a user talk can be protected, but we don't do it for no reason and out of the blue. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: The pages are protected for a reason: because there's no use editing them if they can't edit there at all. Also WP:DENY [4] [5]. ミラ P 17:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are not for monologues but telling a user something, - I feel limited by these blocks, and why do they say "banned" when the users are blocked?? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: We have Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Blocks to show that blocks enforce bans. ミラ P 17:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Different from other editors, IMO protecting Eric's talk will affect FA content. Many FAs are not watched by enough editors, while Eric's talk page is. When I have a question about, for example edits at Samuel Johnson and I don't have the sources, a post to Eric's talk page is the most effective way to find another editor to help. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SandyGeorgia: Thanks. While User talk:Eric Corbett is now unprotected, I wonder if User talk:Abuwtiyuw 666 and User talk:Dr Horncastle can be protected since they are still CU-confirmed sockpuppets of an ArbCom banned user. ミラ P 17:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So what? Are you under the impression that we routinely protect banned user's talkpages? Black Kite (talk) 17:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now undone all the talk page protections I made today. Please, continue this discussion somewhere else, unless you want to address me directly. This is cluttering up my talk page and causing unnecessary e-mail notifications. JIP | Talk 17:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like the clutter or emails (turn the notifications off then) then it's a shame you didn't do your homework first. Cassianto^Talk 17:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23, Black Kite, Cassianto, Gerda Arendt, Levivich, SandyGeorgia, and TonyBallioni: Now continued at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Full-protection_of_banned_users'_talk_pages. ミラ P 17:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please do not use Revision deletion to remove simple notifications from the user talk pages of blocked or banned editors. These edits don't really meet the criteria for revision deletions. They aren't disruptive, offensive, violating copyright or doing any harm at all. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saturn in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Plastron (disambiguation)[edit]

Hello, JIP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Plastron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"(*)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect (*). Since you had some involvement with the (*) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atto Abbas[edit]

I have Put more verified references on Atto Abbas article please allow creation check it its in atto abbas draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.248.13.25 (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have put more verified sources please check it first and accept it Its in Atto Abbas draft please check before deciding check all the references — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.248.13.25 (talk) 02:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Slug-O-Cola" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slug-O-Cola. Since you had some involvement with the Slug-O-Cola redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tietoasema[edit]

The article Tietoasema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable company, sourced only to its own website since 2007.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 04:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Furman[edit]

I've made an attempt to improve the wording, but really that paragraph needs a citation, as do a lot of the other paragraphs. At the moment the article reads rather as if it was written by a friend of Furman's who wanted to bolster him up a bit. Would you be able to find some better references? Deb (talk) 07:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brainstorm (board game)[edit]

The article Brainstorm (board game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since January 2014

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 04:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Donald Duck universe characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vindicator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restore and replace a deleted Talk page[edit]

Hi, JIP, last year, you proposed splitting Dinobot from Dinobots here: Special:Diff/920056183. At some point I was going to try and TNT the Dinobots article here: Draft:Dinobots, but somewhere along the way, it got moved to mains space, got a new talk page, and then moved back to draft space. Is it possible to restore the old Talk:Dinobots page and replace the nearly blank one at Draft talk:Dinobots so that it makes a little more sense? When it was in main space, the deleting admin restored the history of the article, but not the Talk page. Thanks, 2pou (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now restored the old Talk:Dinobots page and moved it to Draft talk:Dinobots. Now the situation is the same as before except that the contents of Draft talk:Dinobots have been replaced with those of Talk:Dinobots. JIP | Talk 12:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah Young (pornographic actress) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Young (pornographic actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Young (pornographic actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish language question[edit]

Hi there, could you help me to figure out a few Finnish words here [6]? I know what poyka, feelia, and kala moyakka are but I can't figure Ooksi kooksi coolama vee out. I was brought up on the Iron Range in Northern Minnesota and there were quite a few Finnish kids in high school. I doubt that any of them could speak the language as it was no longer spoken in most homes (though I'd guess that their parents could still speak it) but I remember a few words or phrases would be heard from time to time. I remember something like those words being said in fun and have since wondered if it meant "one, two, three". Can you help me? Gandydancer (talk) 13:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Finnish words in that ode are so badly mangled they're barely recognisable. I think "ooksi kooksi coolama" could be a heavily mangled version of "yksi kaksi kolme" which means "one two three". However, if the "cool" in "coolama" is supposed to be pronounced like the English word "cool" then "coolama" sounds more like "kulma", meaning "angle" or "corner". JIP | Talk 13:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

...........perhaps someday when i visit Helsinki. OtuNwachinemere (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transformers (board game)[edit]

The article Transformers (board game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GhostsNGoblins Screenshot.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GhostsNGoblins Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nokia C5-00.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nokia C5-00.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 5 ft and 1520 mm gauge railways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amiga Games Database[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amiga Games Database requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GamerPro64 02:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amiga Games Database for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amiga Games Database is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amiga Games Database (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GamerPro64 03:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Creating List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Creating List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Single malt Scotch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glen Grant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Size[edit]

I think I've become jaded, but I felt that answering (yes) your last question at Wikipedia:Help desk#"Edit size" in XTools Edit Counter might give some kiddie a bad idea. :| —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 19:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of band name etymologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Umlaut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chartreuse[edit]

In your opinion, how come the colors you deleted don't qualify as chartreuse? Is it just the name? I ask because their hue color said otherwise. ThunderBrine (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article chartreuse (color) says "vivid yellowish green" and shows the nine shades of the colour shown on the infobox on the right. However, the old version of shades of chartreuse listed no less than nineteen shades, some of which are a far cry from "vivid yellowish green". How is, for example, nyanza or avocado a "vivid yellowish green"? The former looks quite pale and the latter looks quite dark. "Green" is the catch-all category of these shades, "chartreuse" is a specific instance of green. JIP | Talk 00:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chartreuse was used as a catch-all term to to refer to colors between 75 and 105. You can say that orange is a specific instance of red, or magenta is a specific instance of blue. Becuase of that reasoning, Rose, Magenta, Orange and Yellow should be listed with the reds, Yellow Chartreuse, Spring, and Cyan should be listed with the greens, and Cyan, Azure, Violet, and Magenta should be listed with the blues. The point is I tried to classify those colors with their group through mathematical objectivity the same as any other color. It would be inconsistent not to.ThunderBrine (talk) 00:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Domus Litonii[edit]

On 21 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Domus Litonii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Domus Litonii is the only remaining 19th-century residential building in the entire centre of Helsinki? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Domus Litonii. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Domus Litonii), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metro Cross Screenshot.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metro Cross Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]