User talk:Element014

Need Help![edit]

Started a new article on my user page

I don't know if any of my references are any good in terms of what is considered reliable on Wiki. in additional sources or information would be helpful.

Thanks

Element014 (talk) 06:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'll move your prospective article to user:Element014/Studio014 Entertainment - then I'll explain more. 5 minutes... Chzz ► 06:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Main problem is, as previously, no reliable sources to assert notability, per WP:ORG. Studio14 is a primary source, the radio3 link isn't really a good assertion, and urbandictionary can be written by anyone.

You need to cite a newspaper, magazine, book, or something to meet the notability requirements - and you need to add inline references to verify the info. If they are not available, we can't check things, and therefore we can't have the article.

Good luck with it; ask for more help when you need it. Cheers, Chzz ► 06:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Element014 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was away, a person I work with was supporting my article, I wasn't sock puppeting

Decline reason:

So it sounds like you were meatpuppeting instead. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Missunderstanding, Meatpuppeting happened by accident. By "support" I meant contribute. I needed help writing the article, they participated in the AfD on their own accord.}}.

I absolutely did not ask for any help in the AfD disscussion. I needed help improving the article so that it would meet WP:BAND requirements. I knew I was going away and wouldn't be able to improve the article before it was deleted, therefore I asked for their help. The AfD was never a concern besides a good sourse of feed back on the article in order to improve it. As far as I know, that is not Meatpuppetry Element014 (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is related to Kinty500 (talk · contribs), who has been unblocked by Mangojuice (talk · contribs). I'll leave a note on Mangojuice's talk page since s/he'll likely know more. --auburnpilot talk 15:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to add, I think you have the information you need. Mango juice^talk 19:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this has been up a long time without action. Element: I'm going to unblock you. In the future, please if a situation like this ever comes up again, ask the person you're requesting help from to be up front about your request to them, so that things aren't deceptive to Wikipedians.. Mango juice^talk 16:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Belltower.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Belltower.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:ChildofMidnight/Sandbox/The Marquee Room[edit]

User:ChildofMidnight/Sandbox/The Marquee Room, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ChildofMidnight/Sandbox/The Marquee Room and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:ChildofMidnight/Sandbox/The Marquee Room during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:BlackLungs.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BlackLungs.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BlackLungs.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Studio014 Entertainment for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studio014 Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio014 Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bell Tower - albumart.png[edit]

The file File:Bell Tower - albumart.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]