User talk:Dawson
|
Jan 2006 - Apr 2006 |
I will respond to questions/comments here, unless you specify in your note that you would like me to respond somewhere else instead.
Hypsiglena torquata / jani[edit]
Hi, is this Hypsiglena torquata or Hypsiglena jani? The image is currently used for both species, like here for Hypsiglena jani and here for Hypsiglena torquata. I cant id this snake because they are so much alike. Greetz, -B kimmel (talk) 16:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- It is most definitely a jani, I caught it myself in Edwards county, Texas which doesn't overlap ranges with any other species of Hypsiglena to my knowledge. I think the confusion stems from the fact that jani used to be considered a subspecies of Hypsiglena torquata, but was only recently reclassified as its own species and most of the literature, including Wikipedia, but especially print sources, simply haven't caught up yet. Dawson (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goat blanket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Added an image of yours[edit]
I added one of your images to Common_kusimanse#In_captivity. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Hartman Prehistoric Garden.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Hartman Prehistoric Garden.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 21:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
* Southern limit of the distribution of the green anaconda[edit]
Good evening:
Please allow me to share an article with you. Maybe you will find it interesting:
http://www.naturapop.com/home/southern-limit-of-the-distribution-of-the-green-anaconda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.2.207.74 (talk) 00:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
New updated data on Geographic Range of the Green Anaconda ("Eunected murinus"), this time in English (the previous reference is outdated and in Spanish)[edit]
New updated data on Geographic Range of the Green Anaconda ("Eunected murinus"), this time in English (the previous reference is outdated and in Spanish):
http://www.naturapop.com/home/southern-limit-of-the-distribution-of-the-green-anaconda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.2.207.74 (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Rousettus aegyptiacus[edit]
Hi, do you know that your photo showing the head of Rousettus aegyptiacus was used for creating a postage stamps from Guinea 2009, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.27.200.11 (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Photo usage 2[edit]
Hi, I'm working on an educational videogame with which I'm trying to build a bridge between animal awareness and Pokemon fans among others. It started out as something small and I talked to you before but it's getting bigger and more professional and I wanted to make sure I still have your permission. It's regarding this picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eunectes_murinus2.jpg
And I would like your permission to use it under that license with the following attribution: LA Dawson, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Dawson
Also, because I want to make sure there's no misunderstanding, you are the original photographer correct? It sometimes happens that another person simply takes a picture from somebody else and uploads it to wikipedia with a license to distribute. That is why I'm asking.
There is more information on the game here, including a short video that tells a little bit about the background: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/238178285/animalalbum
I also have a demo version of the game available so you can see for yourself in what way the pictures are presented: http://dromedarydreams.com/index/demo/0-8
Please let me know if I have your permission, if the picture is yours and if you want a different attribution.
With kind regards, Sjors Jansen (all.animalalbum@gmail.com) Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 10:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- I am the original photographer, but since I uploaded the picture to Wikipedia in 2006 it has been "stolen" a thousand times for many other sites. You are welcome to use any of my photographs from Wikipedia for your game. They are all released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license, which allows pretty much any use, including commercial, with proper attribution, and that attribution is fine. The game looks great, and I'm always happy to contribute photography where animal education is concerned. If there's anything else I can help with, feel free to contact me. -Dawson (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! That's very helpful. I'll do my best to turn it into a great game! Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fredericton High School (crest).jpg[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Armstrong Audio for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armstrong Audio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ignore the Ants[edit]
The article Ignore the Ants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced since 2009, can't find any good sources other than Amazon, which doesn't even list a track listing
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / talk 20:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Happidog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Blatant advertising brochure sourced only to the company itself. It is full of unsupported assertions and speculations. I can't find anything by searching about this topic except unrelated dog memes.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reyk YO! 14:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Happidog[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Happidog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2600:6C4E:580:A:C596:AD91:AB84:C8BD (talk) 01:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Savage Laboratories for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage Laboratories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilledMammal (talk) 07:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Contemporary Herpetology for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary Herpetology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Joy Dawson for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Dawson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Jesse Reeves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Khayman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Santiago (The Vampire Chronicles) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Heads up[edit]
Hello, you created the Smoky Dawson way back in March 2006 ... I think it's only fair that I let you know about this discussion about a rather egregious error that you added to it, that persisted until I just now ... sixteen years later! Graham87 12:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Solid Gold (pet food) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solid Gold (pet food) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.