User talk:Caribbean H.Q./ Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arthur Abraham

Hi there Caribbean, hope you're doing well. As you may have noticed, me and another user have recently gotten into a "flag war". You are one of the people who can stop this. According to that user, if either of the admins (you or east718) were to change the flag he would stop changing it back, thus ending this flag war. I am hoping you can go and change the flag so that you can put a stop to this, because it looks like east718 is having health problems and isn't around.

Thanks in advance,

Garo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garo925 (talkcontribs) 21:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Since, my adopter User:Diligent Terrier is offline since September 30, then I desire to be adopted by a non-Filipino adopter. Cheers.--Florentino floro (talk) 09:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC) {{adoptme|20081118075340}}

DMC

Awesome! I'm on indefinate hiatus myself, only editing here and there, not like I used to...I have RL responsibilities now, so they took priority. Good times, good times. Quatreryukami (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Héctor Lavoe

Hi, CHQ! A user recently added what appears to be a valid ref regarding Héctor Lavoe's bisexuality to that article. I see in the history that you nominated it for FA, so I wondered if you knew enough about the subject as to whether that is correct? I'll watch here for your reply. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

None of the other biographies mention that as a reason for his drug abuse, they only cite tragedy. Since the reference being used only makes a brief mention about it, I would like to see other references supporting that as well. - Caribbean~H.Q. 17:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm inclined to take the cat off until and unless something more solid is found. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan to me, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Comment

Sixto Escobar sounds fine to me. I had some people look over Puerto Rican scientists and inventors for a possible "FL", but I am not going to persue it. Even though I have trimmed it down a bit, my only concern is that it serves as an educational article which may serve to motivate our youth to seek a higher level of education and I am fine with it as it is. Frankly, the "FA" and "FL" process for me is discouraging. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Feliz Dia de Gracia

Just dropping by to wish you un "Feliz Dia del Pavo" (smile). Let me know when you've done your thing with "Sixto Escobar", entonces le metere mano. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Sixto Escobar

O.K., I will my thing with the article. I finished doing a complete overhaul of the Irish immigration to Puerto Rico which was among my first in the series. Take a look at it. I don't think you could find anything better in the web. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

  • O.K., I think it is ready to go. One thing, add where the house which was converted into a museum is located. The one in Barceloneta where he was born in or the one in San Juan where he was raised in. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Interesting news

Hey my brother, here is some news that you may want to print in the next edition of our new-letter:

My DYK hook for Ivan Castro (soldier) drew 71,300 page views while it was featured on the Main Page. That's an all-time DYK record for most page views! The list of all-time top DYK page views can be seen here, and your Castro article is now #1: Wikipedia:DYKBEST#All-time best of DYK. Not bad, right? Tony the Marine (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

List of current world boxing champions

Hi! Just wanted to tell me that formerly blocked user "Vintagekits" finally succeeded in driving me so far that I will quit! Good luck with the updates... claudevsq (talk) 05:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Engaging you in rational discussion has driven you away from Wikipedia? You are acting like a child. All you have you to is look at your edits and the manner that you have conducted yourself during discussions (or your lack there of) to see you have been acting like a spoilt brat.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey campeon

If you like you can post a "cute" picture of my granddaughter eating her first "Piragua" in Puerto Rico for the newsletter. I have it in the Piragua article: Piragua. You know something, maybe you should add a "Did you know - Puerto Rico" section in the newsletter. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Me alegro saber que todavia estas aqui


Wishing you a
"Feliz Navidad and a Happy new Year"
Tony the Marine (talk)

Thanks for your bold edits. The POV obsession of Portorricensis needs to stop. Feliz Navidad para ti y tu familia. --Jmundo (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

unitarian greetings

Feliz Navidad

Wishing you the very best for the season. Guettarda (talk) 06:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Puerto Rican cuisine

Anon user User:67.142.130.21 reverted without explanation some of your explained reverts. I reverted back to your version. Do let me know how it goes. Its incredible we have to edit war even in what should be uncontroversial articles...

Felij Navidaj, y propsero aÑo (si, grande) nuevo, pa ti y los tuyos! Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

New user User:Saygy69 is continuing the same pattern, and seems to be a sock or at least a meatpuppet. I left a welcome message and a comment in the user talk page. I am at 3RR territory already, and the user won't comment. Just a heads up. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

numismatics not my forte

Pero pa' lante, I can wikignome. I am more into vexillology and political parties, but I am not afraid of the currency stuff. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Excellent idea... do we snowball/iar or do we start a merger/rename process? I think it has snowball all over it, but just raising it.--Cerejota (talk) 23:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Doin it nao ;) Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


I think phase one is done. Please check. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 00:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

I hear you, maybe three boxes? Because the article does cover the current currency... you know? Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Maybe i'll redo the boxes to combine and simplify... BTW I am out in my masochistic exercise of trying to bring neutrality to the I-P articles. I will fail as always, but someone is got to get between those two... I'll get tomorrow to the article. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Short note

My time will be a little limited, but I will work with on our projects. I spent Christmas in the hospital with my wife, ella tiene "doble Pulmonia" y todavia esta en el hospital. Even so, I will work with you as always.

One of the things that really makes me happy is that we have intellectuals such as Jmundo and Cerejota working here with us.

You are right about Isabel Gonzalez. I wrote the story because I became fascinated with the fact that this young female jibara (our "Rosa Parks") who did not know how to speak English, had the "cojones" and courage to take on the United States Government, yet the story of her struggles fell into the cracks of history. I believe that it is our destiny to make sure that she is not forgotten. Have you read the story of Felix Arenas Gaspar, the only Puerto Rican to be awarded Spains Medal of Honor? Tony the Marine (talk) 02:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Peer review limits

The guidelines for Wikipedia:Peer review ask that editors nominate no more than one article per day (and four total at any one time). While the rules say that one of the requests can be removed, I will let it slide since this is the first time. Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 05:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

In all honesty, I wasn't aware of this guideline, my last multi-nomination was well over a year ago. Regards. - Caribbean~H.Q. 20:43, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Felicidades

Hey man! Thanks for the well wishes! I've been pretty out of it recently, focusing on my family (got a newborn son a few months back), and work has been surprisingly increasing despite the economic times. Good to hear from you, keep up the great work you do! Saludos, - Mtmelendez (Talk) 14:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2009 to Caribbean HQ

Thanks for your help in the last year 2008! I hope you have a great year! Pedro ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ (talk) 00:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your message. You are welcome. anything, just let me know. Tu hermano, Pedro ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ (talk) 15:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

List of current world boxing champion

Happy new year! Don't worry, I'll keep an eye on it. Denniscmc constantly reverts my edits for the moment... Pacquiao officially vacated his lightweight belt in order to fight Hatton in June, and after Vázquez was named "Champion Emeritus" (which means he was stripped off his SBW title), Nishioka became the full champ. GreyJ, a BoxRec admin, confirmed me these facts. Also, you know I sometimes call the ABC's to get information. You know how I work, you know me for years, so... See the history and please tell Denniscmc not to revert my edits, please. It is not my fault that the WBC updates its page only once per month. Why doesn't he call them? Greetings, claudevsq (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Your question about Pacquiao: He is definitely going to fight Hatton on May 2nd at junior welter for Hatton's Ring belt. claudevsq (talk) 11:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Salvador Melendez Bruna

According to Finding Aid to the Letters and Documents Relating to the History of Puerto Rico, 1660-1881, Salvador Melendez is listed as Salvador Melendez Bruna. As Salvador Melendez Bruna, on May 5, 1881, he sent a letter to Governor of Cádiz, relating to Benito Jurado's petition to return to Spain, on August 19, 1814, he sent a circular to the mayor of Puerto Rico relating to paper money and on April 12, 1815, a Transcript of letter relating to Vieques Island. [1]. According to another source, in 1816, Salvador Meléndez Bruna limited the cutting of wood in Puerto Rico for the use in Spanish ships and building. This was done as a consequence of the colonial wars of independence and illegal trade of timber[2]. The University of California, Berkeley Bancroft Library has in it's possession a letter written to Salvador Meléndez Bruna about the war in Venezuela. [3]

What I believe is that the "historical documentation" is right and that without a doubt his name was Salvador Melendez Bruna. Soemtimes, an author of a book (pre-computer age) may for some unknown reason get a name wrong: hence Salvador Melendez Ruiz and as time passes people will continue to use the wrong name and even source it. However, I would go with what is on the historical documentation of the governor. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

BoomboomB.jpg

Was that image really copyvio? I checked its deletion log and your only comment was "blatant copyright violation" but without any other explanation. Also, what made you say the pics on Ratanachai Sor Vorapin were promotional? 210.4.123.128 (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Um, blantant as in "the user that uploaded them didn't take them and claimed that "fans in the internet" provided them without any evidence for its source or author"? - Caribbean~H.Q. 10:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
In that case, things like that should be added to possibly unfree images rather than just removed right away. 124.106.201.246 (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Ahem, "If a file is unquestionably copied from another website and no assertion of permission or fair use is made, the image may be speedy deleted under criterion I9" – WP:PUI. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

List of Puerto Ricans

I was thinking that we could apply that particular style (Sports) to the "long sections". Glad that you liked it. Tony the Marine (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

currencies

ANDA PAL CARA**!!! Put it in so I cannom for FA!!! :O --Cerejota (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

yeah just put it in and I'll get to it, you can see am still busy fighting against both sides (I haven't been able to do a lot of RC!) ;) Dale que es GA seguro --Cerejota (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • It is a wonderful article. I saw a couple of minor copyedit things that I can take care of tomorrow morning, Sera la primera cosa que hare. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Great article! It didn't need much, but the way it is I think think that Cerejota is right, it should go all the way to "FA". I learned a lot. You know something, one of the things that I treasure the most are my "Puerto Rican" coins in my coin collection. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
There is one thing that I forgot to mention. In the section "Reemergence of paper money", the second sentence reads like this: In 1865, the Spanish Civil Code was imposed in Puerto Rico. As it is, the reader can get a little lost, especially if they do not know what the "Spanish Civil Code" was. I believe that a short explanation should be placed as to what was the "Spanish Civil Code" and how it influenced the reemergence of paper money or the currency of Puerto Rico. That's about it. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I just verified this for DYK. Yes, this is a great article. Thank you for bringing it to Wikipedia -- I really loved it! Ecoleetage (talk) 03:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I would still like to see an explanation of what did the "Spanish Civil Code" have to do with the reemergence of paper money or the currency of Puerto Rico. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Another GA

"Jewish immigration to Puerto Rico" made the cut (smile). Tony the Marine (talk) 23:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Hablando de todo un poco

You know what? I have researched the situation on our flag and have come to the conclussion that for some unknown reason (I bet it has to do with politics) our government (PR) never established a code or regulation as to the exact "tones" of color to be officially used on our flag. I mean they state that three bands are to be "red", two "white", the star "white" and the triangle "blue", but there is no specific constitutional regulation which states what tone of "blue" or "red" are to be used. Interesting isn't it? I have suggested the following rewrite for the intro. of the "Flag of Puerto Rico" article: Proposed intoduction. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Posting both variations of the flag, as I suggested, will work fine in the "Flag of Puerto Rico" article, but I agree with you that for an article like "Puerto Rico" it may not work unless both versions are shown and a revert of File:Flag_of_Puerto_Rico.svg may be an "in-between" solution. The "big" problem here is that we are always going to have a war-editing problem and since there isn't an official "tone" code, those who change the flag are not technically vandalizing. Maybe a solution will be to present the problem and ask for a consensus as to what "tone" of blue will be used and abide by it here in Wikipedia. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Currencies of Puerto Rico

Updated DYK query On January 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Currencies of Puerto Rico, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 04:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

IBO world champions

Hello! Just wanted to ask you if you can have a look at the history of the list of IBO world champions. Vintagekits has been replacing a lot of flags today, and I just wanted you to see if it's OK! Me, personally, I would prefer him to add a secondary flag instead of replacing the 'GBR' flags through others. Thank you, claudevsq (talk) 17:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Try fucking discussing the issue then!--Vintagekits (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
And more.--Vintagekits (talk) 18:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Just like Caribbean, Maya Levy and me, we all agreed upon the same thing... There was even one more discussion, I think... claudevsq (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Please produce this discussion.--Vintagekits (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Please search for it... I think it's in the archives... Anyway, I won't care of the list of IBO world champions in the future. Do the updates yourself if you want... I've had enough of this... claudevsq (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
It's point 18, "Nationalities"... But that's not the one I thought about. I can't find it anymore, but it doesn't matter... As I said before, I've done my last edit to the list of IBO world champions... Could we end this for now? Thanks. claudevsq (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
This concerns me, mostly because it may continue even beyond this small conflict. I think that we should seek a consensus from the community as a whole, hence WP:AN/I might be the better place to get the proper attention. This could go in circles between members of WP:BOXING. What must be done is finally deciding (by concensus) if we follow Boxrec or classify the boxers by the commission that is found in their birthplace, i.e. like they do in the Olympics. - Caribbean~H.Q. 21:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
You're right... I'll start the discussion at WP:BOXING. We should follow BoxRec... See you at WP:BOXING (discussion) for your final comment on this... Thank you! claudevsq (talk) 04:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

...has been nominated for good article reassessment. The reassessment discussion can be found here. Thanks, Geometry guy 20:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

E-Mail

Te mande un e-mail. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Quack

User:Republikaner does quack, as do a number of editors that I have been able to get salt-deleted articles out of. I fear their might by some kind of organized sock and meat puppetry around "pro-statehood" issues. Kind of reminds me of that one Pipiolo who wouldn't let it drop... Hey, I am absent on my other crap, but I watch out for mi gente ;)--Cerejota (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Just in case

Sorry if I offended you with the "research" remark, which I just read and sounded pretty off-pitch. Non-offensive at all. But, hey, I don't know if you've used it, but [scholar.google.com Google Scholar] is really good for finding reliable sources for educational material, especially historic ones, like the flag. One quick search of "Dark blue Puerto Rico flag" and voila! ;) Raaggio 02:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

One just for you! Will add to it later - whats he like? Will he beat Nicky Cook?--Vintagekits (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Roman Martinez.jpg - I got more where that came from. --Vintagekits (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Tasty - very tasty.--Vintagekits (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Puerto Rico National Guard

Nice! Even though I am almost 100% sure that Antulio Segarra had nothing to do with the guard, check and see if he did and if there is an image of him in the book. Oh yeah, you know how much I enjoy writting about unknown "Boricuas" (like Isabel Gonzalez) who had the cojones to stand up for their believes, check out my latest article: Manuel Olivieri Sanchez. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rico

Since we aren't in agreement: Talk:Puerto Rican Campaign#Puerto Rico in the infobox. Thanks. --Durero (talk) 14:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Do you speak spanish?

I can speak and write in perfect Spanish. As a matter of fact, it is even better than my English. - Caribbean~H.Q. 03:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Muy gracioso lo de la "Madre patria"... En cuanto al tema de la bandera, no te preocupes que ya está solucionado. Jmundo ya ha aceptado que los bibliotecarios censuradores de la Wiki en español son todopoderosos... ([4], [5]) La conclusión es que en cada país en el que aparece por algo la enseña puertorriqueña se le pone un azul distinto y que no hay nada que aclare cuál es exactamente el correcto... --Durero (talk) 19:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
P.D. Perdona por el uso de la ironía, pero prefiero esa arma a los insultos: [6], [7]...
En el caribe, "joder" tiene un uso mas común de lo que crees, el insulto se considera más tenue que en otras culturas. En este proyecto, intentamos buscar un punto medio en cuanto al color de la bandera (mediante un consenso, iniciado por mi persona) y este fue un éxito. Quizás, si los bibliotecarios de es. fueran menos censuradores estuvieran abiertos al dialogo, Enciclopedia Libre nunca hubiera existido. - Caribbean~H.Q. 20:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Puedo comprender que "joder" tenga distintas acepciones y que para un puertorriqueño sea otra cosa, pero comprende tú que hay que tener cuidado con ciertas expresiones que pueden ser malinterpretadas (y sabes perfectamente lo que es "joder" fuera de Puerto Rico). Así, cuando yo hablo, por ejemplo, con un argentino no se me ocurriría hablar de "conchas" (como moluscos) ya que podría interpretarlo como "coños". Lo que sí que no me puedes negar es que deja de comer tanta mierda no tiene muchas lecturas posibles... --Durero (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
No estoy diciendo que su selección de palabras haya sido la correcta, pero definitivamente no ameritaba brincar a un "block" directamente. Te sorprendería ver cuántos usuarios, e incluso "administradores", han usado la palabra "fuck" en sus rabietas y solo han recibido una advertencia. En otra nota, probablemente no lo esperabas, pero "comer mierda" es una forma ofensiva de describir a la arrogancia. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Tú lo has dicho: "ofensiva". --Durero (talk) 12:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

No peleen. Raaggio 23:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rican Campaign

Caribbean H.Q., after studying the situation from every point of view, I have come to a conclusion in regard to the infox discussion which I believe may be a just one. Please check it out and express if you agree. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Otra nota, I am unprotecting "Puerto Rican cuisine". Portorricensis has agreed to source any changes. If he breaks the agreement, metele mano. I' ll be doing other things, so I won't be able to be "pendiente del articulo" for now. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Caribbean HQ, I am not going to put up with the "user's" nonsense anymore in the "Puerto Rican Campaign". I would appreciate if you could give a last comment on the issue before I bring the issue to an end. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I want to apologize for my actions during the Puerto Rican Campaign situation. My intentions were to act as mediator and instead became frustrated with Durero. I would be totally unfair if I do not give credit to his valid observations. Even though we at times got off the main topic which was the contents of the inbox, I believe that the final addition (caption) to the infobox is justifable and will help clear any misunderstandings. By Durero pointing this out in the first place, I think we will be able to aviod future edit warring on this particular topic in the future. Gracias a todos, Tony the Marine (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Alfredo Escalera Jr.

I notice you have deleted an article on the above boxer. However you provided no opportunity for discussion on whether this was appropriate. In your comments regarding the deletion you say the following "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion: Not notable yet, participation in "The Contender" was in reality limited to just two fights, nothing remarkable outside of that". In response to this I'd like to make the following points which I hope you will take into account.

1. The fact is that this boxer was in the Contender which is a reality show of interest to many boxing fans. A lot of the boxers taking part in this tournament are not known outside the boxing world and this is a good opportunity to introduce them. 2. All other contestants in the series of the contender 1, 2 and 3 have profiles on wikepedia so with that in mind why would escalera not meet guidelines for inclusion? Notjamesbond (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Precedent, my friend. Participation in an widely distributed reality show doesn't assert significance on its own. This is his only claim for fame, no remarkable amateur achievements, not even a regional title fight, so far he has been nothing more than a journeyman. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
According to the precedent you have cited there was at least the opportunity for debate! You have arbitrarily deleted an article with no option for discussion. Just because you feel the boxer concerned is a journeyman does not mean that other people feel the same way. In deleting this article you have imposed your own opinion on a subject upon which there will be many different points of view, surely this is against the spirit of the site.Notjamesbond (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The "the spirit of the site" is "anyone can edit", not really relevant here. I don't feel the boxer is a journeyman, his career is the definition of a journeyman, he is already 28 and has even fight for a regional championship. Other failed boxers can establish notability due to some degree of success (i.e. Héctor Camacho Jr.) yet, Escalera doesn't. You can call my decision "arbitrary" or whatever, but you can take a jab at DRV, where you can try to establish notability only based on a failed run in a reality show. Good luck with that. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
There is also the matter of having courtesy for other users. The fact remains that you have followed a process for speedy deletion which is not appropriate in this case. Rather you should have tagged the article for deletion which would have prompted a debate on the appropriateness of the article. In no way does the article meet the criteria for speedy deletion! It is not non-encyclopedic, it does not infringe any copyright, it is not an advertisement and it was certinaly not vandalism. As the article fits into none of those categories, speedy deletion surely does not apply. Your personal opinion on the legacy of the boxer's record is not a reason to summarily delete this article. The very conversation we are having now proves that there are at least two schools of thought on this which deserve discussion in the appropriate forum and following the appropriate guidelines. Notjamesbond (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Non-notability is part of the speedy deletion criteria, see CSD#A7. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 00:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

That is an impressive throwback, I may take a look at it later. - Caribbean~H.Q. 19:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Luis Muñoz Rivera

Have you nominated Luis Muñoz Rivera for GA yet? I just did an overview of the last section and everything seems in order and ready to go. Real life situations have held me back a little and that is why I have taken so long in my editing. Here is an interesting person: Carlos Vélez Rieckehoff. Let me know which other articles I should check out for GA. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Advina

Adivina quien esta jodiendo orta vez? Check out who is questioning the "GA" status of "Black history in Puerto Rico" in the talk page:Talk:Black history in Puerto Rico? Tony the Marine (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Ya me las tiene hinchas el tipejo... I am raising the issue in Project talk.--Cerejota (talk) 03:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Charlie Zellenoff

When and why was this deleted?--Vintagekits (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


Talkback

Hello, Caribbean H.Q.. You have new messages at Cerejota's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cerejota (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


Talkback

Hello, Caribbean H.Q.. You have new messages at Cerejota's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cerejota (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

response and comment

I responded on the other guy in my talk page.

BTW, if you want, look at the "Pin" I added in WP:PUR... I know you have a self-made one, so you might want the "official" one :P--Cerejota (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


Talkback

Hello, Caribbean H.Q.. You have new messages at Cerejota's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cerejota (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Caribbean H.Q.. You have new messages at Addshore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 22:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive editor

Hi, Caribbean.

Could you help us with a very disruptive editor at D.R.-related articles, please?

For months the user has been inventing all sorts of information about D.R.: everything from the total national population, to provincial flags, coats of arms, and nicknames — even invented a province!

The user is at it again, despite a final warning last week on one of his/her user pages (User talk:MRDU08). Among the several usernames and IPs from which s/he edits are Santiago3.0, MRDU09, MRDU08, and 24.190.178.193.

Please, have a look. S/he was active today (just an hour ago). SamEV (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


Thank you very much! ¡Muchísimas gracias! SamEV (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


Talkback

Hello, Caribbean H.Q.. You have new messages at Cerejota's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cerejota (talk) 23:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Gracias

Thanks for posting in my talk page. I don't know how you can handle the amount of nonsense from editors in the PR's articles. Who knew that even for non-boricuas the flag of Puerto Rico was such a passionate topic. Congratulation on the good article status of PR currency and Luis Muñoz Rivera. By the way, using Huggle I been seeing that vandalism is sort of active in Roberto Clemente, but maybe I'm overacting as a boricua. Saludos, --J.Mundo (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Que pasa?

Que pasa mi amigo (smile)? You didn't tell me that Luis Muñoz Rivera made "GA". Congradulations! I'll continue with Sor soon. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Man, I just checked and found out that Luis Muñoz Rivera is still not a "GA". I let myself go by Jmundo's congrat (smile). Tony the Marine (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


Why do you delete my edit on MIguel Cotto?

Cotto lost his undefeated record, got battered, and lost his world title to Margarito. Then in his next bout Margarito was found to have a plaster-like substance underneath his wraps. It needs to be said - I know that Margarito wasn't found to have the plaster-like substance in his fight with Cotto - but still it needs to be said.

I just feel frustrated because I spent ages trying to get the wording right, even though it was a really small edit, then you just delete it, say it needs to be rephrased, whilst refraining from saying what it needs to be rephrased *to*. I mean I am happy to change it but now I have to make the point of coming back next week to see if you have found the time to tell me what you feel is appropriate when I have 16 other things I need to do in my life. Why didn't just say what you wanted or why you felt it needed to be deleted when you said "it needs to be rephrased"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.70.38 (talkcontribs)

A few points, never begin with "However, the validity of this result has been called into question when...", that violates WP:WEASEL. You need to be specific as to who called it into question, something like "In January 2009, members of the media [if you can provide a concrete example, that's better] questioned the validity..." that way the entire sentence won't seem like original research. Then, after explaining how Margarito cheated, you should include Cotto's reaction to the situation, to make the sentence seem relevant. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Flag of Puerto Rico

Yeah, I went and nominated the article because I told myself, "You know this article looks real good" and plus my Hispanics in the United States Marine Corps was promoted. I am noy into FA's and GA's, but I think that the F of PR and Hispanics in the United States Navy have a better then average chance. I will add the new flag soon, right now I am putting inthe finishing touches on my new article "Rafael Perez Perry". Tony the Marine (talk) 03:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

  • I'm going to be working on the table of the municipal flags. I was wondering if you could fix some of references. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Cambio de nombre

Me equivoque en el nombre de una pagina que hice reciente y no se cual es el proceso para que cabien el nombre, me puedes ayudar? Automotivado (talk) 21:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Chupacabras

You know what, I was looking at both images and I think that both will be deleted because of copyright issues. Why don't you or someone that you know draw an exact copy of the one that you uploaded? That would take care of the issue. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

  • I had that same problem once when I draw an image of one of outr heros. The only thing that they asked me was to provide an explaination on how I came to the conclusion that the person which I draw may have looked like that. I other words, if you draw a picture and you don't want it to be considered "original" research, you must note what it was that made you come to your conclusion that the Chupacabras which you drew looked like that. I noticed that the image has been placed for deletion. I placed the other image for deletion on the same grounds. See: Deletion Thread, Tony the Marine (talk) 06:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Here is an example of what I am talking about:Amezquita. Tony the Marine (talk) 08:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Why ???

Why you deleted the Godless (Music Band) article? Must be really stupid to know you did it becouse is a satanic band from your country! There are lots everywhere! PUT IT BACK! There are lots of reference everywhere in the net and zines etc. Is not right to delete this.

I couldn't care less about their religious affiliation, the band failed to comply with the notability standards and the article was a recreation, two of the speedy deletion criteria. - Caribbean~H.Q. 10:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

CMTC

To tell you the truth I have no idea what "CMTC" stands for. I never heard of it. What do I think of Number-one Hits of 2009 (Puerto Rico) and Puerto Rico Top 40? Unsourced + promotional = Deletion, that is what I think. I am having trouble with my computer, so I want to thank you for your help in the Flags of Puerto Rico. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rican passport

Caribbean, I have tried to find this out in a few places but it was confusing so I thought I would come and ask you. Do Puerto Rican's travel on a Puerto Rican or US passport or is it some kind of hybrid US passport? regards --Vintagekits (talk) 10:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

thanks.--Vintagekits (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

List formating help

Have a look at this. Do you know how do I put and upwards and a downwards arrow in the red a green boxes?--Vintagekits (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

PPR

Do you know what the flag of the PPR looked like? Did it have the logo of the "coqui" like the one found here: Puerto Ricans for Puerto Rico Party? If you know or find out what it looked like, let me know and I will create an image like I did for the other political parties. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Ya lo hice

File:MacheteroFlag.jpg
File:PPR2.JPG

I did it! How do they look? Tony the Marine (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Requesting assessment

Hey Caribbean H.Q. I'm requesting an assessment for the Arcángel (singer) article and I thought it would be best to have a Wikipedia administrator assess and rate the article for quality and importance. I've completely changed the article within a matter of almost 3 days (from this version to this one. My goal is to try and get this article to Good article status, and hopefully someday get it to featured status. If you could be able to rate it that would be great! Thanks! :) (I already placed the Project Puerto Rico template on its talk page) El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 23:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I kinda figured that. That wasn't supposed to stay there, but was more temporary for while I was working on the article. I've used a different reference on that note. Do you think it could be nominated as a Good article? He IS a young artist and I wasn't even sure if it would be rated something as high as a "B". El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 00:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
After I've done so, how do I nominate it? El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 00:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

PR Champs

It is done. I made some minor rephrases here and there, plus I did a complete spell check. Let's see what happens now. One of the things that caught my attention and that I found interesting was Nero Chen. He would have been a Chinese Boricua since "Chen" is a Chinese surname. Let's see what additional information we can dig up on him.Tony the Marine (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

  • I already found out. "Nero Chen" was a nickname. He was a black Puerto Rican who was proud of being a Boricua and lived in New York. I'll tell you some more about him in awhile. Right, now I'm writing to my sister about my friend Joe Acaba who in two days will be the first Puerto Rican in space. Loss Boricuas estamos en todas partes (sonrisa). Tony the Marine (talk) 02:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I found out about Joe Acaba when he was still an astronaut candidate and made friends with him. We have interacted and he even sent my granddaughter Isabel an autographed picture and some astronaut stuff. One of the things that we have in common and that bonded our friendship was that he too was a Marine. After Joe passed the NASA training and became officially an astronaut, I got in touch with Kenneth McClintock, who you know is also a good friend of mine, and told him because I wanted him to be the first to know, plus I recommended that the Puerto Rican Government honor him. Believe it or not no one in Puerto Rico knew about Acaba and when McClintock called the newspapers, he told them "I know something that you don't know". On March 2008, the Government sent for Acaba and honored him, Acaba even held a conference in "El Parque de las Ciencias" in Bayamon. I can't go to the launching because of the economic and Milly's, my wifes, health situation, but I think that Kenneth and his son Kevin will be there. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Felicidades

Felicidades on the FL., now my son can tell everyone that he is pictured on an FL List with Samuel Serrano (smile). Tony the Marine (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

List of Puerto Rican boxing world champions

Hello, Caribean HQ. It's nice to know that boxing article is a 'featured article' now. You are the responsible Wikipedian (and I think Tony the marine, no?) for the success of that page. Congratulations! If in the future you can also check (& improve) the others pages (Triple champs, Quadruple, etc) I created in the past will be an honor for me that you may convert them also in a 'featured article', of course, when you can, if you can. Congragulations again for your awesome editing. Pedro ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ (talk) 01:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Y lo aprecio de corazon. Very appreciated your help. Thanks you. Yes, only when you get the necessary time during the year or when you get the chance. You know "el toque de Midas"? Everything that Midas touched was converted in gold, no? according that ancient tale (cuento), well, every article that you touch-edit-improve will be at the end a featured article, hehe, my humble opinion. I hope u understood what I wanted to say. Gracias and take care. From time to time I will try to stop my real life work and try to improve the lists with anecdotes and other boxing miscellaneous regarding each champion. =) Pedro ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Luis Muñoz Marín‎ GA

Count me in, I will be in the lookout for the review. Saludos, --J.Mundo (talk) 06:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

  • I will add my "Tony touch" (smile) to both Luis Muñoz Marín and Isolina Ferré tomorrow. Tony the Marine (talk) 07:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Isolina Ferré is done, I did some minor rephrasing, copyediting and fixed some of the prose and spelling, pero ..... I'm sorry to the one thing has me completely confused which I did not understand: In the section "Work as a nun and Mother Superior", the sentence "Ferré remained in Cabo Rojo for six more years, until she reached the limit that a Mother Superior can work within the same mission." It doesn't make any sense to me, so what is it exactly that you are trying to say? I had someone else read it in my house and they couldn't understand it either. This is the only thing that we need to fix. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • O.K., I understand it now. I just made a small rephrase and it is done. Veremos a ver lo que pasa. Next, LMM. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Chat

I will work on LMM soon, my Hispanics in the United States Navy came up for "GA" review and I have to do some minor fixes. Did I tell you that my Hispanics in the United States Marine Corps made "GA"? That was a total surprise, it only took hours after the nomination. It is funny, but I don't mind helping others with their FA's and GA's, I just hate doing the articles that I wrote, maybe that makes me bi-polar (smile), pero que se va hacer, verdad? Tony the Marine (talk) 04:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

  • I want to share with you and every Boricua in Wikipedia that today March 19th, our "Boricua" astronaut Joseph M. Acaba, proudly displayed and placed the Puerto Rican Flag in the Discovery Shuttle and that he played "Que Bonita Bandera" while doing so. His pride in his heritage, makes me even prouder of mine. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. In the case of a category like this one, parent categories are provided automatically when you include a {{Cat class}} template.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 18:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: A nod to forever

Recently in my talk page I have been receiving very kind words which truly humble me. I thank everyone for those words, but I am only a small part of a wonderful group of Boricua Wikipedians who, regardless of their political or personal believes, have selfishly dedicated themselves to writing about the unbiased truth of the history and the amazing people of our wonderful and beautiful island. I thank God everyday that there are people like Joelr31, Caribbean H.Q., Pr4ever, Jmundo, Cerejota, Boricuaeddie, Mtmelendez and Demf just to mention a few, whose contributions are helping to create an awareness that despite the size of our island, we are a people that have a lot to be proud of. I firmly believe "Un pueblo que no conoce la verdadera historia de su pasado, no esta capcitada para elijir su futuro" and you can quote me on that. Gracias y que Dios los bendiga. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Democratic Party 2000 Platform

Democratic Party 2000 Platform

Puerto Rico has been under U.S. sovereignty for over a century and Puerto Ricans have been U.S. citizens since 1917, but the island’s ultimate status still has not been determined and its 3.9 million residents still do not have voting representation in their national government. These disenfranchised citizens – who have contributed greatly to our country in war and peace – are entitled to the permanent and fully democratic status of their choice. Democrats will continue to work in the White House and Congress to clarify the options and enable them to chose and to obtain such a status from among all realistic options. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seablade (talkcontribs) 05:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

And your point is? - Caribbean~H.Q. 06:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rican boxing Champions

Hi Caribbean! I just read your question on my father's page. I'm a boxing writer at [8]. El Vocero and the Puerto Rican Boxing commission generally accept as a world Champion anyone who has won a title, even if it was just the "KKK world boxing championship" (that's just a joke of mine but it's true). Most of the boxing world people accept only IBF, WBA, WBC AND WBO Champions as world Champions, and that, at times, begrudgingly. David Santos held an IBA title so generally speaking, he does not count. Santos once fought for the WBA and then for the IBF ones, but lost those two times. Kevin Kelley, on the other hand, won a WBC one, so he does generally speaking count as a world Champion. Kelley is Neuyorrican, and by pure coincidence, he discovered his Puerto Rican background the same month that it was discovered Luis Miguel was born in Puerto Rico!!

I know all the WB, IB, FBI's, banana's and PPP organizations in boxing are very confusing but the general rule is only IBF, WBC, WBA and WBO Champions are considered world Champions, and even then, fans still want all the titles to be unified so we can have one real, universal world Champion. It's like beans, you got like 50 different kinds or flavors, but that's how it is.

I hope this clarifies your question.

Thanks and God bless you! Antonio Freakylicious Martin 05:08, 05 April 2009 (UTC)

Cofresi

Wow, where did they get that from? Caramba, Cofresi picked the wrong line of work, he should have been a bartender instead and he would have made more money then he did as a pirate (sonrisa). Tony the Marine (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Please participate

The issue of weather it is proper to use or not, the flag of Puerto Rico in the article of the "Puerto Rico Campaign" infobox has come up. This one of those cases that I believe that it is important that others express their opinion in the Talk:Puerto Rican Campaign. Please participate. Tony the Marine (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Email

I sent you an email earlier today, but I forgot to mention that I will be away from my primary email account for a little while. I ask that if you choose to reply to that email, understand that I may not be able to respond to it for a few days. If you have a negative response, you can let me know on my talk page (but please keep the nature confidential!). bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Consensus

Thank you for participating the discussion involving the Flag icon of Puerto Rico. Now, I ask you to please participate in the following consensus. Thank you. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

What's the deal?

I fixed up the article Daddy Yankee a bit and added more information. Only to find now that you have reverted my edits and called my good faith edits lousy saying I added a bunch of unsourced material. They are not lousy and there are not a bunch of unsourced additions made. The only thing which is unsourced is his new fragrance which I am sure I can find a reference for right now when I look for one. I reverted your bad faith revert of me and if you still feel I am making "lousy" additions then please speak to me instead of blindly reverting my edits. CartelCacique (talk) 07:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Interesting take, considering that you have blindly undone my edits twice. Either way, I'm fammiliar with the guidelines and policies here, take some time to see the actual rundown in your talk page. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
I did not undo your edits and if you had not blindly reverted my edits you would be aware of this. I will now answer your "rundown":
  • 1. The opening paragraph does not need a reference and should not contain references.
  • 2. Los Homerun-es is a greatest hits album and should not be included in his studio albums.
  • 3. The header Non-Musical is a better and broader heading for the following paragraph. Take a look at 50 Cent.
  • 4. Established is not POV because he has established himself in a variety of fields. He has established his own record label, he has established his own fragrance, etc. Take a look at 50 Cent
  • 5. Reggaeton is more specific and more related than the broad links I removed. CartelCacique (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • My reply:
    • 1. No longer an issue.
    • 2. I know greatest hits albums are still included in the discography, see Daddy Yankee discography. But that is not what I was arguing.
    • 3. Just because you say it is unencyclopedic, does not mean you are right. I feel this is a better suited header than the one which was on before, which is the reason why I changed it.
    • 4. You say established is POV even though he has established his own cologne, his own record label and various other "Ventures". But let me point out your defense for point three had that exact wording and which is where I got the sentence from. See revision for clarity.
    • 5. I will give you this one, so you are free to revert my changes here. CartelCacique (talk) 07:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

My new article

I hope that you like my new article: Utuado Uprising. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Luis Muñoz Marín good article review

Hi there, I've reviewed Luis Muñoz Marín. You can see my comments here: Talk:Luis Muñoz Marín/GA1. Great job on the article, by the way! — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Hermano, thanks for your comments its easy to help when the article already is in good shape. --Jmundo 00:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Congrats on the good article ¡Felicidades! — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  01:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Puerto Rico Islanders

I was wondering if you could take a look at the Puerto Rico Islanders article to see what you think should be improved, Other than reference which I have y just haven't had the time to add yet. Automotivado (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Revolt series

I just finished the San Juan Uprising article which should compliment the Jayuya Uprising and Utuado Uprising artilces in my "Puerto Rican Nationalist Party Revolt of the 1950s" series. Look it over. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Isolina Ferré

Not to worry, I will do a micro review for grammar and prose today. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


  • O.K., mi amigo, it is done!. I left this message in the "talk" page: "I have revised the whole article for grammar errors and prose. I have taken care not only of the above mentione problems, but also of some other problems which I found while doing my revision, which in some cases required rephrasing. Take care."

I have one request. Please do not nominate Puerto Rican migration to New York. The article is good as it is even if we can make some improvements, but I cannot deal with the stress of the unrealistic scrutiny that is now going on, including with the images. With my last "GA", I just about had it, see: [9]. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I am going to protest the failed "GA" on the reviewers "talk" page and on the talk page of the "GA" nomination. I believe the reviewer too hasty and was wrong in failing the article without giving the editors an opportunity to correct any concerns after a second review. Before I do this I want your opinion and I want to know if you are planning on doing the same. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
    • O.K., I won't protest for now, because it may backfire on a re-nom. You re-nominate, but what I'm going to do is view and fix the additional stupid "quejas" that the unprofessional reviewer had before he/she failed the article without giving us an even chance to make the appropriate changes, and do the fixes. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Good, let's see how it'll go this time. I'll check into the article this week. I just finished two articles, one on Gilberto Jose Marxuach, (his daughter is my friend) and on Alberto A. Nido a WWII hero who fought for three different countries. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I cleaned out the Dead or Alive character articles awhile back and left this one at the time, but looking back at it I have some major qualms about it's notability and even the GA status. It was suggested I talk to the article's main contributor before doing anything, would that be you?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

The current status is good enough for GA, there is nothing more to say about the character and the grammar is fine. Some references quote the same source, but the fact that this was an multi-company crossover seemed to gather it enough attention within the specialized media, seemingly enough to fit within the degraded notability standards. It is an ancient GA, it pales in comparison to my most recent works, but since it has already reached its pinnacle, merging it seems like a waste. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I...actually have to disagree. The same references are being re-used in a row several times, giving the illusion of more references than there are (development looks like it has 3 when there's really only one). The Background section is hard to read for someone that might be unfamiliar with the Halo series too.
The biggest thing that gets me is the reception. The 1UP reference for reception seems more interested in the fact a female Spartan as a character is appearing rather than the character on the character's own merits, making it a very weak reference for Nicole. The other reference is from Xbox.com, which isn't a third party source in this case (Master Chief's their mascot, why wouldn't they say something positive?).
I get that there's probably nothing left to add, but what is there isn't GA quality, and doesn't look notable by today's standards. I'm not trying to be rude, just as direct as I can be.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Do as you wish, as stated before, this article is of subpar quality when compared to my other work. - Caribbean~H.Q. 17:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Question

Q: How common is it to see an officer that has received awards or decorations from more than one country?


A: Antonio Valero de Bernabe "The Puerto Rican Liberator" was the first Puerto Rican to serve for and be decorated by multiple countries. He served for Spain, Mexico and helped to liberate South America.

Yes, now it is, however it wasn't so during WW II. The situation was that the prior to WW II, Puerto Rico didn't have any private flying schools nor military flying schools. Felix Rigau Carrera wanted to become a pilot and joined the Army. Instead of receiving the pilot training that he wanted, he was assigned to Aviation Section, U.S. Signal Corps, U.S. Army. Rigau Carrera then went to private flying schools in Seattle, Washington and Minneapolis, Minnesota. He then served in France with the Armée de l'Air (French Army Air Force), after World War I, as a fighter pilot. Rigau Carrera was the first Puerto Rican to become a pilot.

Now, when World War II came about, many of our "Boricuas" wanted to serve in the U.S. Army Air Corps (predecessor of the US Air Force) and become pilots, but instead were assigned as crew members of bomber planes (prejudice? Maybe). Those who were determined to become pilots and could afford it, went to the U.S. and attended private (not military) flying schools. Even though they earned their pilot "wings", they were not accepted in the USAAF and instead were recruited by the Canadians. Among the many Boricuas who served as Bomber pilots or fighter pilots for the Royal Canadian Air Force and the British Royal Air Force were Mihiel Gilormini and Alberto A. Nido. When things got tough and the U.S. began to lose a lot of pilots in combat, they began to recruit Boricua fighter pilots and some of the men who were serving in the RAF transferred. It is amazing, but our pilots were among the pioneers of the United States Air Force when it was established in 1947 and among the few who served for and were decorated by three different countries during the war. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Urgent situation

I was told that this user: Special:Contributions/TJ13090 copied and pasted from the PR Campaign the Battles of Guanica/ Fajardo/Yauco as if they were his own creation. You and I went to a lot of trouble creating the sections in PR Campaign, to have someone come along and create articles as if it were their own work. This person is in violation of one of Wikipedias original rules which states that article's which are created must be a person's own original work and not somebody else's. This is plagiarism in it's pure form. I deleted his articles and made redirects. I left a message in the person's talk to this regard and since you have worked in the PR Campaign as hard as I did, I would appreciate if you also explained to the user the consequences of his actions. Gracias Tony the Marine (talk) 03:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Una idea

Hey mi hermano, how are those exams going? I was thinking about making an addition to the begining of the "Flag of Puerto Rico" article, not only because it solve some "Commonweatlh" problems in the future, but becasue it is the truth. I want you to look at it.

"The first flag of Puerto Rico was the "Revolutionary Flag of Lares". The flag, knitted by Mariana Bracetti, was divided in the middle by a white Latin cross, the two lower corners were red and the two upper corners were blue with a yellow star placed in the upper left blue corner. On the September 23, 1868, Puerto Ricans revolted against Spanish, seeking their independence, in what is known as "El Grito de Lares". The "Republic of Puerto Rico" was declared and Francisco Ramírez Medina was sworn in as Puerto Rico's first president. The flag which represented the republic was placed on the High Altar of the Parroquial Church of the town of Lares.

Currently ...." Tony the Marine (talk) 03:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I made a minor edit. I want to make sure that you agree with me with the fact that the Lares flag could be historically considered the first Puerto Rican flag. The Puerto Rican Committee in New York even used it (Juan de M. Terreforte was a veteran of El Grito de Lares) before the current design was presented and adopted by them. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Saludos

I am here to say hello. have a wonderful evening. Pedro ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Flag of Puerto Rico, Pt.2

I re-wrote the introduction and would like your opinion. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Sor Isolina

I finished three bios., went to the hospital and came out O.K., sat down on my computer and told myslef "Now, I'll look into the Sor Isolina Ferre artcle and do some work on it". Man, what a disappointing surprise! Failed twice by the same guy! I had to express my opinion on what I believe is an injustice. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Cotto VS Pacquiao

Hola, Caribbean. I am very agree with you. If they fight in less than 147 (142...) the fight will be some kind of even; who knows... Good morning to you in this beautiful morning of Saturday. Pedro ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ (talk) 10:57, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I am confused

You know, I am confused. The article of Enectali Figueroa has been nominated for deletion (AfD). I believe that the man is notable and figured that the article would not be deleted by "consensus". At first it was closed as "Speedy Keep" then the nominator complained and it was reinstated once more. A group whose credo is that A. Prof's. and people who have a limited amount of written work cannot be notable have jumped in. They refuse to accept the fact that Figueroa, is a pioneer in his field. Now, the deletionists have changed the rules as to state that "consensus" no longer matters and that what matters is their discussions and point of view. Have you looked at the deletion page? I hope that you can figure it out because I can't. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Lolita's boyfriend

Mi amigo, I thought that you would like to know that I wrote the bio. of Francisco Matos Paolí, Lolita's first boyfriend. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

"Copied from a website"

Allegations like "copied from a website" don't make good reasons for deletion, especially if those critics can't name any websites in particular. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.106.232 (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

O RLY? - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
This is actually a reference to those pics which were removed from articles Ratanachai Sor Vorapin and Rey Bautista. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.106.232 (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Those were attributed to "fans in the internet" by the author. I believe that we already discussed that[10]. - Caribbean~H.Q. 17:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:List of Puerto Rican boxing world champions

Excellent. Thank for letting me know. I read the whole thing and this proves what I have always believed. Our work here is making a difference. We are providing the world with a perception of our island that our own people don't even know. By the way, did you know that the article of Dr. Figueroa was deleted? Now, I question what's the use of having a AfD consenus if the community's votes do not count, I think that it is dangerous in the sense that no article is now secure. I'm not sweatng it because of articles such as Puerto Rican scientists and inventors are here. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

'Cause I forgot, and just so's you know...

Nicole (Dead or Alive) got delisted a while back, and the featured topic it was part of is under retention. I was planning on giving it a college try to get GA again but I'm not sure there is enough in the way of sources to address the issues. Would you be opposed to a merge? --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not particularly interested in its fate. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of Isolina Ferré

The article Isolina Ferré you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Isolina Ferré for things needed to be addressed. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Que pasa mi hermano?

Just dropping by to see how things are going? Are you taking exams? I haven't seen Jmundo around lately, have you? Tony the Marine (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Recinto de Ciencias Medicas?

As a friend I can only say that I am proud of you and that I hope that others follow your example. I have been involved in an interesting investigation with the family of Teofilo Marxuach. He was a member and officer of the Porto Rico Regiment in 1908. Since this was prior 1917, I wondered how he and the other eight original members who never resided in the United States and where Puerto Rican citizens, hence aliens, could be commissioned officers when military law clearly states that all officers in the US military must be US citizens. The issue fascinated all the historians that I asked and Rear Admiral Jay A. DeLoach and Colonel Hector Andres Negroni even joined me in the investigation. You see there were only two options, either these men resided in the US for 5 years in order to be Neutralized citizens (which they didn't) or by an Act of Congress. After weeks of investigation we found out that the act of congress which reorganized the regiment in 1908 also provided that these men all take new examinations and an Oath of Office which included an oath to US citizenship. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Raul Gonzalez VS Felix Trinidad

Y DOU YOU KEEP REMOVING IT?THEY ACTUALLY FOUGHT IT DOESNT BOTHER BY BEING THER. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andres 1994 (talkcontribs) 09:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

y did you keep removing the Raul Gonzlez VS Felix Trinidad.They actually fought it doesnt bother by bieng there —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andres 1994 (talkcontribs) 09:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Did some work on the footnotes. Hope you can take a look whenever you have some time.

Gracias andelantadas El Johnson (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks, sourced the paragraph you indicated, as for the country names, in the section you edited I had it the other way for aesthetics purposes since I thought it looked better with the flags, but if that is something that will impair the articles progression then I will leave it like you changed it. Ive been thinking of moving some of the picture to the left, but every time I try it just doesn't look very good, but I will keep on it.

Gracias por la ayuda. El Johnson (talk) 04:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

  • OK, moved some of the pictures to the left. El Johnson (talk) 18:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Changed the flags back to names. El Johnson (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Intentona de Yauco

My dear friends, you all have heard of El Grito de Lares, but have you ever heard of the Intentona de Yauco? Enjoy. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)