User talk:BuddyBoy600

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, BuddyBoy600, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 01:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Charles River Museum of Industry. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 01:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of NES Test Station[edit]

I have nominated NES Test Station, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NES Test Station. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bullwinkle's Corner[edit]

I have nominated Bullwinkle's Corner, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullwinkle's Corner. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. DFS454 (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Aesop And Son[edit]

I have nominated Aesop And Son, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aesop And Son. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Valley2city 19:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

by the way, as a personal note, though I don't think there needs to be separate articles for the various segments of the show, I think the The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show article needs improvement on the summaries in the section "Supporting features" and because you seem to have expertise about the show I think it would be a great place to start. Have a great day. Valley2city 19:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

::Just an update, I decided that since there was no discussion being generated that if there is no objection the article will be deleted in 5 days. The details are in the message below. Thanks. Valley2city 18:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aesop And Son, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This new article has very little content and would need to be completely rewritten to be viable. There is a section in the article The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show which could instead use expansion. This seems uncontroversial and therefore I am prodding it.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Valley2city 18:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not 100% sure on that. User:BuddyBoy600

Alright, since you raised an objection I have put it back to Articles for Deletion where a discussion can be generated. Sorry about that. I welcome your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aesop And Son. Valley2city 20:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Store 24[edit]

A tag has been placed on Store 24 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Frehley ^Space ^Ace 01:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cinemax[edit]

There's no such thing as "HBO Cinemax". HBO and Cinemax are now available separately and are 2 completely different multiplexes of channels, and HBO original shows don't air on Cinemax and vice-versa. I reverted your move. TomCat4680 (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:241367-hi large.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:241367-hi large.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Marsjoking.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Marsjoking.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Marsupilami title.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Marsupilami title.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:241367-hi large.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:241367-hi large.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:MGM Cartoon Logo 60s.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:MGM Cartoon Logo 60s.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:MGM Cartoon Logo 60s.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:MGM Cartoon Logo 60s.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:MGM Cartoon 1963 (Regular version).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MGM Cartoon 1963 (Regular version).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 00:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Logo-new.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Logo-new.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 20:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:NESTestStationFront.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NESTestStationFront.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Marsupilami title.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Marsupilami title.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads[edit]

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh. I hope that does not happen. -User:BuddyBoy600

File copyright problem with File:Marsujoking.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Marsujoking.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 21:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:241367-hi large.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:241367-hi large.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BuddyBoy600 (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop. BTW, I quit uploading image. User:BuddyBoy600

Speedy deletion of Categories: Blocked Wikipedia users[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. As the article namespace is for encyclopedic content and not tests, the page you made will soon be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 23:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I got the idea from Disney Wiki. -User:BuddyBoy600

Even when you call it Category:Blocked Wikipedia users, we do not want it. I cannot quote a decision off-hand but I get the feeling that, if discussed, the decision would be to delete it. We want to leave as little trace of vandalism as possible. This is part of a general deny recognition policy. I suggest you do not put any more users into this category. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome! -User:BuddyBoy600

That is four tildes ~~~~ not three. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:NESTestStationFront.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NESTestStationFront.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

alan young[edit]

I noticed that you edited that Alan Young died yesterday, I'm a big fan of his and I was wondering where you heard this tragic event as I haven't heard this anywhere else. Redekopmark (talk) 04:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's still very much alive.

~~LDEJRuff~~ ^{(see what I've contributed)} 6:00, 09 June 09 (EDT)

Speedy deletion of Gary Lassin[edit]

A tag has been placed on Gary Lassin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 03:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit to Marsupilami[edit]

Can I get a reason for you reverting my edit? I think it is relevant that in making and marketing the cartoon, Disney did not follow its deal with Marsu Productions and that Marsu sued and won as a consequence. I removed the line about "The episodes can be seen recently on Youtube" because, per WP:ELNEVER, "Knowingly directing others to material that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement", though I can agree it may not apply since there is not a direct link to any infringing videos. Kcowolf (talk) 21:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How could Marsu Productions sued Disney for? It think it's because The Disney version of Marsupilami can speak, And The Non-Disney version of Marsupilami only says HOUBA! And nothing else. User:BuddyBoy600

Read the source:

"Under the Agreement... Disney was required (1) to make thirteen half-hour animated films featuring Marsupilami by December 31, 1993;(2) to employ its "best efforts" to secure a television network commitment to air the half-hour animated films; and (3) to aggressively expand the market for Marsupilami by entering into licensing agreements with third parties to merchandise Marsupilami products.

Contrary to the terms of the Agreement, Disney did not produce the thirteen half-hour animated films or use its "best efforts" to secure a commitment from a television network to air the animated films. Instead, in February 1991, Disney convinced Marsu to accept a "roll-out" strategy that contemplated a slower and more incremental release of Marsupilami animations by producing a number of six to eight minute "shorts" rather than thirteen half-hour animated films. Disney told Marsu that the roll-out strategy was the only way to get television networks to air Marsupilami animations. But while convincing Marsu to accept the roll-out strategy, Disney never revealed that no Disney official had ever asked any television network to air half-hour Marsupilami animations."

(185 F3d 932 Marsu Bv v. The Walt Disney Company)

In other words, Disney agreed to make 30 minute episodes and only did 6-8 minute episodes, and they didn't do enough to promote the show, and as a result, Marsu won the lawsuit. If you want to revert edits that have sources like that, please discuss them first. Thanks. Kcowolf (talk) 03:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The MacNeil-Lehrer NewsHour[edit]

Why did you move this without asking first? Page moves should only be made when they're not controversial, especially in the case of TV shows, where the current name should usually be used. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted my information on Marsu suing Disney again[edit]

I noticed you again reverted my addition of the information about Marsu suing Disney to Marsupilami. I think it's relevant to the information about the Disney animation, and the information is backed up by a reliable source. I would appreciate an explanation. I mentioned on the talk page that I was willing discus whether that section should be added and in what form; it would be polite for you to at least explain on the talk page why you removed it and offer to discuss it. Kcowolf (talk) 08:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see now that you did mention that you think "Squeal of Fortune" from Sesame Street. Could you clarify what you mean by this, and how it relates to whether or not the information about the lawsuit should be in the article? Kcowolf (talk) 08:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello BuddyBoy600! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Steve Mackall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of characters in Sesame Street, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Christine (talk) 12:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MGM Cartoon 1963 (Regular version).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MGM Cartoon 1963 (Regular version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Mackall[edit]

The article Steve Mackall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only two roles. Sources are IMDb and a directory listing. No non-trivial sources or biographical info found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Mackall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Mackall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Mackall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Wild Willy's"[edit]

A page you created, Wild Willy's, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 23:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Disney Group[edit]

Hello BuddyBoy600. You're making a mistake in Radio Disney Group article. Radio Disney Group will continue to exist after November 26 (until it is sold the last radio station) and only will lose the affiliations. In addition, your edits may suggest that RDG is a shell company or an inexistent company that "currently" owns various stations. Greetings and good luck!

PD: Your edits were not reverted because first I want to see if we can come to a midpoint.

--Mega-buses (discusión / Talk) 21:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see --BuddyBoy600

Disambiguation link notification for October 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sesame Street Muppets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Hunt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sesame Street Muppets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Winner 42. Your recent edit to the page Ken Weatherwax appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WUBG[edit]

Hello, I would recommend that before changing the names of the articles on radio stations (that changed the callsign), see in the FCC database. Why? Because you had moved the article "WRDZ-FM" to "WUBG-FM" yesterday, and today license just appeared on the FCC database as "WUBG" and not as "WUBG-FM". The next, check the page before renaming the article about a radio or TV station. Best regards! --Mega-buses (discusión / Talk) 19:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you. And BTW, I found out WMKI just went off the air as well. I think the FCC approved the sale to Salem Media Group. And I am going to miss Radio Disney in Boston. BuddyBoy600

Proposed deletion of James Clark (British criminal)[edit]

The article James Clark (British criminal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

G10 borderline, fails WP:BLPCRIME

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TL22 (talk) 01:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Clark (British criminal) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Clark (British criminal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Clark (British criminal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TL22 (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of programs broadcast by Sprout. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 04:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Figureskatingfan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Sesame Street Muppets, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs from Sesame Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Jacobs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Charles River Museum of Industry (emblem).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charles River Museum of Industry (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Martin (Criminal)[edit]

The article Mike Martin (Criminal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be WP:1EVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Kittery Premium Outlets. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving[edit]

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 61.9 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kittery Premium Outlets[edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kittery Premium Outlets should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittery Premium Outlets .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 03:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tip[edit]

Don't wrongly and baselessly accuse people of vandalism or threaten them. Make sure you've at least got the right person before spewing accusations and threats at them. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that! ~BuddyBoy600 (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toys R Us[edit]

Hello BuddyBoy600. You're making a big mistake in Toys "R" Us article. Toys "R" Us will continue to exist and only will lose the USA and UK operations. If this belief continues, I'm afraid I'll have to get administrators involved. I've just had enough of this problem. Sorry. Josh0108 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh0108 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know how you feel, But here is what the source reads: reports that all Canandian stores are close, and Vancouver Straight reports that all 1,795 Toys R Us stores are closing worldwide. BuddyBoy600 (BuddyBoy600) 12:36 16, April 2018 (UTC)

Currently, It was announced that Mastermind Toys may expand and replace most Toys R Us stores in Canada (Including The Mall at Vaughan Mills location). BuddyBoy600 (talk) 9:03, 22, April 2018 (EST)

The article makes no such statement at all. There's statements suggesting that they're surviving and expanding, but nothing reflects your claim or sentimentality. ViperSnake151 Talk 22:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:BuddyBoy600/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:BuddyBoy600/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 03:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BuddyBoy600! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Discuss 03:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 22:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at the introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Interqwark ^{talk contribs} 23:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. BuddyBoy600 (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2018.

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sesame Street Muppets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Cerf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Sesame Street Muppets, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop adding unsourced info to this list. I suggest that you go out and look for sources about the content you want to add before adding it. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BuddyBoy600, please stop your disruptive editing at this list. It's a featured list, and is well-sourced with entries that correspond to its sources. Your additions are bringing down the quality of the list. I won't engage in an edit war with you, but if you continue to persist, I will bring you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (ANI), which could result in you being blocked. I hope that we can come to some kind of resolution. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. But those are minor characters on Sesame Street. BuddyBoy600 (Talk Page) 19:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the point. I'm not even going to bother referring to the policy about reliable sources. We cannot add any content without them. Yes, they may be minor, but it's against WP policy to add characters we've seen on the show just because we've seen them. Thanks for desisting, though. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sesame Street Muppets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Cerf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fun-World[edit]

The article Fun-World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sesame Street recurring segments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page At the Movies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Fraudcast News[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fraudcast News, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Norman Calloway" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Norman Calloway. Since you had some involvement with the Norman Calloway redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:15, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. An edit that you recently made to Template:New York City TV seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lord & Taylor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.253.101 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Max moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Toy Max, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tink! Tonk!: Tonk in the land of the Buddy Bots moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tink! Tonk!: Tonk in the land of the Buddy Bots, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs from Sesame Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Snell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liberty City Anime Con[edit]

The article Liberty City Anime Con has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esw01407 (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liberty City Anime Con for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liberty City Anime Con is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Esw01407 (talk) 03:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Toy Max[edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toy Max".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Store, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frozen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tink! Tonk!: Tonk in the land of the Buddy Bots[edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tink! Tonk!: Tonk in the land of the Buddy Bots, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tink! Tonk!: Tonk in the land of the Buddy Bots[edit]

Hello, BuddyBoy600. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tink! Tonk!: Tonk in the land of the Buddy Bots".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent add to List of Apple IIGS Games article[edit]

Hi BuddyBoy600. Thanks for your add of "Where in Europe is Carmen Sandiego?" on the article List of Apple IIGS games. I've been involved in many projects preserving Apple IIGS software over the years, and had absolutely no idea this particular IIGS-specific port may exist (I was about to dismiss your entry, until I saw you posted a video link of it on YouTube; or at least what appears to be the actual game in-play. However on second viewing it appears suspiciously like a mock-up. A simulation of what a IIGS version could have looked like). I've since removed your add from the list, but if I've misinterpreted what is actually a REAL copy of the game, could you please provide more information, such as where a downloadable copy could be found for archival purposes? Thanks--Apple2gs (talk) 05:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suffolk Downs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Target and Revere.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pears Before Swine (band) songs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pears Before Swine (band) songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Piñata Farms[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Piñata Farms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. [placed on behalf of IP editor who nominated the article] Espresso Addict (talk) 07:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American companies disestablished in 2022[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:American companies disestablished in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:18, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Figureskatingfan. Your recent edit(s) to the page Sesame Street appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American companies disestablished in 2022[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:American companies disestablished in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 17:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palisades Center[edit]

Hi. Your edit to Palisades Center was reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. You've been editing here since 2008, so you are expected to adhere to these policies and guidelines, just as the rest of the editing community. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Money (That's What I Want), you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Sorry. ~User:BuddyBoy600 (tslk) 20:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop marking all of your edits as minor[edit]

Carefully read WP:MINOR. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Inappropriately marking an edit as minor is deceptive and rude to other editors. Sundayclose (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Willy’s[edit]

Proposed deletion of Wild Willy's[edit]

The article Wild Willy's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a non-notable restaurant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seasider53 (talk) 13:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]