User talk:66.130.253.101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bandai Namco Entertainment[edit]

I know full well the "In Use" template that was on the article does not give me ownership of the page. I'm not a moron. Namcokid47 (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your Message[edit]

I don't act as if I'm the owner of the page. I go by what I know to be true and what isn't right - the TV Show you listed was removed because it didn't air on YTV; in 2008 there was a history of YTV's overall programming - what they aired when they started in 1988, they listed their TV Shows they have aired throughout and this wasn't on the list. They didn't list shows that they have been airing since 2008 as this was past their time. Please do not accuse me of "acting as if I own the page"; this can be considered harassment. Thank you. TheBlackKitty (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not only you've removed content without leaving of any edit summary, but you also totally disregarded the edit summary had I left. You should have given a reason for you content removal.

I didn't disregard the edit summary. I stated there should be references. TheBlackKitty (talk) 20:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did remove content without leaving any edit summary and yes, you did disregarded my edit edit summary. Also, it wasn't you who stated that there should be references added. It was another user who undid your unexplained content removal that requested for references to be added.[1] So don't come on my talk page acting all innocent as if you did nothing wrong.

List of Nintendo Entertainment System games article[edit]

Hi! Can you help me with the List of Nintendo Entertainment System games article, please? I've been trying to add "In 2015, it officially got localized on the Wii U's Virtual Console as EarthBound Beginnings." in the note list but it keeps giving me an error message. I've tried titling it "Mother1", "Mother", "EarthBoundBeginnings", "EarthboundBeginnings" and "EarthBound" and it still gives me the same error message. 2605:E000:121D:8BF5:21C1:C4BF:DEC9:ECB7 (talk) 23:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated links[edit]

Just to let you know, 66.130.253.101, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (arcade game), please use:

[[ViacomCBS|Viacom]] or just [[ViacomCBS]]

See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! PI Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 20:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Romartus Imperator. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of small shopping centres in Montreal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Romartus Imperator (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Captain Skyhawk[edit]

Hello, In relation to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Nintendo_Entertainment_System_games&oldid=959809568 you are correct, it was Nintendo that published the game. Any PAL-A games which came with a black sticker seal were Nintendo-published games. Or if they came with a nintendo-branded sleeve. or if they use the 'nes-xx-GBR' code — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megamansec (talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Redirects[edit]

Hello,

Please do not change a redirect to an empty page. If you do so again, it will be reverted. Do not change the target of a redirect until after an alternative article is written, not before. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

66.130.253.101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I reported to WP:ANEW a user who clearly violated 3RR by edit warring on Sands Atlantic City.[2] She performed four reverts in 8 minutes for a reason that wasn't even an WP:3RRNO exception while I only performed three. As a retaliation for my ANEW report, she reported me to AIV + two administrators to have me blocked by gratuitously labelling my edits as "unproductive". And one of the two administrators bought her story without really looking any further than the registered user is right and the IP user is wrong. This is an unjustified block and one those many cases on Wikipedia where registered users are given advantage over unregistered ones. My edits are not unproductive and I use edit summaries the vast majority of the time, exactly to prevent my edits for being labelled as vandalism. This edit to attempt having the blocking administrator involved on my ANEW report is the proof that user fabricated this story because she feels threatened by the 3RR report. I do not feel that I should be treated differently just because I chose to not to create an account while the other user who is the real edit warrior gets a free pass because she has an account.

Decline reason:

Edit warring is unproductive. While 3RR is a bright line, you can be determined to be edit warring with fewer reverts. There is no "anti-IP user" animus here. What happens to others is not relevant to your block, as only you can control what you do. I am declining your request as I see no indication here of contrition or that the disruption will stop. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Galeries d'Anjou, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Galeries d'Anjou, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:66.130.253.101&oldid=1055159288"