User talk:Adabow/Archive 22

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 20

Screenshot

Hey, could you upload a music video screenshot for me please? Oz ^talk 21:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012 Move-to-Commons drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in the WikiProject Images and Media's March 2012 Moving files to commons drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 10,000 files so we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and move a file or two, or tell other users. Thanks so much!

Note: The drive officially starts in 12 years ago, but you can sign up now!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 07:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC).

MfD nomination of Portal:Usher

Portal:Usher, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Usher and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Usher during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox businessman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Infobox businessman. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Infobox businessman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

One Direction

hello you uploaded a bunch of one direction photos once from the Up All Night Tour i followed the link to see if there were more from Fiona .M and their are some more good ones but with all rights reserved tags could you upload more. i'm really bad at licensing and all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 22:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

One Direction articles

could you attend to the Gotta Be You (One Direction song) and One Thing (One Direction song) like with WMYB the pages need assistance (like samples i don't no how) i named by account after you cause you edit so good and I couldn't come up with a name AdabowtheSecond (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I am flattered! :D Sorry, I can't upload any samples right at this moment, as I am using my laptop. I will try to put them up in the next few days, though. GBY needs a lot of expanding; add critical commentary, in-depth commercial performance and any background info. Do you have the album? If so, add the personnel/credits like Love in This Club Part II#Credits. Keep up the good work! —Andrew_stalk 22:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't have the album, i can add some critical, commercial depth AdabowtheSecond (talk) 11:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive3

Please watch and contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive3.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:02, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I have just found another charted version (see the top of the other versions). If you can find any information to help fill it out a bit, please do.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help along the way

This user helped promote Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song) to featured article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for your efforts in the January 2012 MTC Drive! Cloudbound (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

DNA nanotechnology back at FAC

I wanted to let you know that DNA nanotechnology is up for a second FAC. Your comments on the first FAC were very helpful, and I've made extensive upgrades to the article since then. I'm hoping that you'll revisit the article for this second FAC. Thanks! Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 21:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for 8701

Hello, please go here if you would like to participate in the merging discussion. Thankyou. Rayman⁹⁵ ^(talk) 23:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

One Direction

I was wondering if you could add credits and personnel for these songs I still don't have the album much to my dismay could you add the recording studios like with What Makes You Beautiful.

Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geoff Maddock

The article Geoff Maddock has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Howdy

Long time no see! It looks like I'm back (partially). — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Request

Hello, I know you are not that active anymore but if you see this in time hoping you could vote at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/One Direction discography/archive1. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:06, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

GAN subtopic

Thanks for sorting out a GAN subtopic for John Fraser (botanist), I'd initially thought to put him in the sciences since he was a botanist, but the GAN subtopics listed there do not include botany. The next-closest subtopic was Horticulture and forestry, under Agriculture, food and drink, so that's where he landed, heh. — Sctechlaw (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas

May your Christmas sparkle with moments of love, laughter and goodwill,

May the year ahead be full of contentment and joy,

May the good times and treasures of the present become the golden memories of tomorrow,

Merry Christmas To U & Ur Family.

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:13, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for the GA pass on Project X, Merry Christmas! Darkwarriorblake (talk) 11:27, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

五代 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas from Novice7/Mags. Glad to see you're still active Andrew :) 五代 (talk) 13:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Hey, how's life buddy? 五代 (talk) 04:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy Christmas to you, Mags! I've had a pretty good year; I was dux of my school, and I'm excited to be starting university study next year! How are you? —Andrew_stalk 06:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Andrew! :) And, omg, school's top student! :O That's a great achievement *jealous*. Haha, kidding. I'm very happy for you :) Have you decided which course to select in uni? I'm doing pretty good too. Although I couldn't get into engineering college, I'm currently doing a Bachelors in Computers. After finishing it, I'd go for Engineering :) 五代 (talk) 12:56, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm doing a Bachelor of Science; my first year-papers will be in biology, chemistry, maths and statistics, and I have one last paper to choose which is probably going to be physics. My major isn't definite, but I'm leaning toward biochemistry. Is your degree focussing on the programming side of computers, or more on using them/application of computers? —Andrew_stalk 20:22, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Biochemistry is very good. One of my friends in Tamil Nadu opted for biochemistry, I think. My degree's called Bachelor of Computer Application (which is a part of BSC) and it has both theory and programming but the former is given more importance, I think. We have a semester system and my first semester is over. We had to program using C (a very old language and kinda boring). I can't wait to study .NET, Lisp and Java. I also wish to study JavaScript, CSS, and XML someday :) 五代 (talk) 04:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Name

I'm tired of being "theSecond" and using your original account name. As I have told you before, I named myself after you because I had a profound admiration for your work. Regardless I feel I should be more original so I'm changing it. Do you know how? How do you actually feel about my account name? —Adabowth eSecond 01:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

You can change your username fairly easily at WP:RENAME. I'm not really fussed about it; I don't feel "ripped off" or stolen from, but if you feel you want to be more creative and original then feel free also. :-) Adabow (talk) 04:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Already requested it, thanks nevertheless. Your generally a well known editor. I feel like I'm confusing and drawing unnecessary attention from an ensemble of editors. I once got called "Andrew" in an edit summary. I corrected the user. Thanks for being so sensible about my apparent lack of originality

. —Adabowth eSecond 05:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for File:Haane Manahi.jpg

RE your request for speedy deletion, I don't know if it is enough but I have added the webpage copyright information (http://natlib.govt.nz/about-this-site/copyright-and-privacy) for the government website from which this image was sourced to the its description field. Zawed (talk) 05:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

That licence only applies to Crown works published on the site ("Aside from collection items"). The photographer died in 1966 so the copyright won't expire until 2017, unless there is evidence that he waived copyright or released it under a free licence (which I doubt). Adabow (talk) 05:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. George Bull was an official photographer for the NZ Military Forces so the photo was taken in his official capacity - in which case ownership of his work would be with the Crown; perhaps I should have used the PD-NZ tag as I think maybe exception B would apply here? And to clarify, is the information at the bottom of the source page (under Using this Item) of the image insufficient for the requirements of Wikicommons? It obviously doesn't indicate what tag should be used which I guess is your concern? Cheers. Zawed (talk) 05:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

You may be right in saying that, because it was taken as part of the NZ Defence Force work it is PD in NZ (not sure, but sounds good), however the file must be PD in the US as well. In the US only items published before 1923 are PD. Adabow (talk) 06:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm left with the conclusion that the tag I have used for the image is appropriate; the photographer was employed by the Crown, so therefore his work is owned by the Crown (according to the 1994 Copyright Act). The Crown makes the work available on the natlib website with the CC 3.0 licence; should I amend the image description to better reflect that Bull was an official photographer and remove the speedy delete tag? Zawed (talk) 07:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Ohhh, I see now. Yes, that sounds good; good ahead. Sorry for the confusion. Adabow (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem - my knowledge around what is an appropriate licence for a particular image isn't the greatest so this debate has been useful in improving my understanding. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 07:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

List of roller coaster rankings FLC

I have addressed or commented on all your comments.--Astros4477 (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Your last remaining issue has been addressed.--Astros4477 (talk) 23:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

flc

Hello sir, would you you pls review Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive1, as I'm trying to take it to FA. Please, do because it would be a great help.—PKS:1142 · ^(TALK) 04:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

I'll take a look in the new year, after other reviewers' issues have all been addressed. It's on my watchlist! :) Adabow (talk) 05:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Let Yourself Go (Green Day song)/GA1

Thanks for the review. I noted that you gave me a time limit, however, I didn't had enough time to overcome the issues. I'm free for 2 days so I'll be fixing the issues by the end of this weekend. I'm sorry for the delay but can you please keep the review open for two more days? Thanks. TheSpecialUser ^TSU 02:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes of course, that's fine. I'll keep it open as long as you need, provided work continues. Adabow (talk) 04:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I think I've addressed the issues raised. Cheers! — Yash ^[talk] 12:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Robin

Hi Adabow, I'm not AdabowtheSecond anymore! My account name was officially changed at 00:01 UTC to 'Robin'. So far no regrets loving the change! Nevertheless I have always wondered what does "Adabow" mean, what is its significance? I understand if you don't want to tell me if it's personal. — Robin (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Uhh yeah it was a primary school nickname. I don't really get it myself anymore to be honest, haha. I should probably change my name sometime eh... Adabow (talk) 06:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

List of roller coaster rankings

Could you wrap up your comments for Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of roller coaster rankings/archive1? The last comment has been addressed. Thanks, --Astros4477 (talk) 18:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I have once again addressed all your comments.--Astros4477 (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey I addressed the rest of the Ultimate Roller Coaster ref issues!--Astros4477 (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Albertine deluxe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Albertine deluxe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)

This is a note to let the main editors of Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on February 14, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 14, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

"Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" is a song by American recording artist Beyoncé Knowles from her third studio album, I Am... Sasha Fierce (2008). It was the album's lead single alongside "If I Were a Boy", contrasting Knowles' persona as herself and her aggressive onstage alter ego Sasha Fierce. Inspired by her secret marriage to Jay-Z in April 2008, the song explores men's unwillingness to commit, a topic that motivated Knowles to write "Single Ladies". It is a dance-pop song with R&B, dancehall, disco and bounce influences. According to the lyrics, the female protagonist is in a club to celebrate after a recent end to a poor relationship; her former lover is also present. The song and the repeated refrain, "If you like it then you should have put a ring on it", are directed to him. Critics praised the song for its smooth production. "Single Ladies" won three Grammy Awards, including Song of the Year. It peaked at number one on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart. The accompanying music video was shot in black-and-white and features the J-Setting dance choreography inspired by "Mexican Breakfast", a 1969 routine choreographed by Bob Fosse. The award-winning video has been parodied and imitated around the world. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Super Bowl XLVII halftime show

Hurricane Beyonce caused a power failure! --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Metiria Turei and Russel Norman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Metiria Turei and Russel Norman.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Just a note to say that Adabow is here only sporadically, so I've flicked him an email to draw his attention to this (assuming that he's still got the same email as before). Schwede 66 06:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mike Ward.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mike Ward.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Name

For no particular reasons, I never got to thanking you for explaining Adabow's origin, so thank you. Regards — Robin (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

FAC comment

Hi. Would you care to comment at my nomination here for the article Song of Innocence? A support, oppose, or any other comment to start the process would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 02:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of number-one singles from the 2000s for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of number-one singles from the 2000s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one singles from the 2000s until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Love In This Club.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Love In This Club.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Honesty (Billy Joel song)

Actually the problem is that I don't have access to that website. The references were already in the article when I started editing it so I left them untouched. My love is love (talk) 22:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Love In This Club.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Love In This Club.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Usher videography may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).

Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)