User:Chetvorno/work10

Illustration of heading confusion

Talk:LC circuit#"Second order" LC circuit?

Heading 1 (2nd level)

It's clear that headings 2-6 are inside Heading 1 as the headings have different typefaces, but that is all that's clear. The font sizes of headings 2-6 are almost the same, so its hard to see how they are nested:

Heading 2 (3rd level)

Its clear that this is inside Heading 1

Heading 3 (4th level)

This heading is a subheading of Heading 2, but the font sizes are close so the reader needs sharp eyes to tell (without looking at the TOC)

Heading 4 (5th level)

This is inside Heading 3, but how would anyone know? The difference in font sizes is virtually imperceptible.

Heading 5 (4th level)

This is inside Heading 2 but not Heading 3 or 4. Do you think you could tell in a real article?

I'm going to space the next section apart from the others, as it would be in a real article full of text:

Heading 6

Okay, here's the test. Without looking at the TOC, which heading is this inside of?

For Music of Bulgaria

One of the most distinctive features of Balkan folk music is the complexity of its rhythms in comparison to Western music. Although it uses meters common in Western music such as ²
₄, ³
₄, and ⁴
₄, Bulgarian music also includes meters with 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 beats per measure. Unlike Western music in which the accented or "stressed" beats occur at regular intervals in the measure, as in duple or triple meter, the stresses can occur asymmetrically in the measure, dividing the measure into different length subunits. These meters are often called "asymmetric meters".

For example, the popular dance lesnoto, widespread throughout Bulgaria, is done to music which has a meter of 7 beats, with emphasis on the first, fourth, and sixth beats: BEAT, beat, beat, BEAT, beat, BEAT, beat. Using the convention that each accented beat begins a rhythmic unit, the measure can be divided into three groups, a "slow" unit of 3 beats and two "quick" units of 2 beats, often written 3-2-2 or "slow-quick-quick".

Different folk dance families use different combinations of these rhythmic "units". Some examples are: rachenitsa (7 beats divided: 2-2-3), paidushko (5 beats: 2-3), eleno mome (7 beats: 2-2-1-2), daychovo (9 beats: 2-2-2-3), kopanitsa (11 beats: 2-2-3-2-2), and bucimis (15 beats: 2-2-2-2-3-2-2).

However, this division into "quick" and "slow" beats does not capture the full subtleties of Balkan rhythms. In addition to the primary stressed beats, other beats in the measure may have secondary stresses, and the rhythm stress pattern may change subtlely during the course of the music.

For Wikiproject Electronics

The article Wireless power transfer has been a battleground for years due to extremely persistent efforts to insert an alternate theory that around 1900 Nikola Tesla transmitted electric power around the world using something called a Zenneck wave. This has been mentioned previously on this page: Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_44#World_Wireless_System The conflict is heating up again. Would be very helpful to have editors take a good long look at the recent Talk page discussion and express their opinion. Hope to have some editors watchlist this page and participate in future discussions, as there is little chance that it will end anytime soon. Thanks. --Chetvorno^TALK 03:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

For Talk:Triode

• "On October 25th,...De Forest of the USA made his application for American patent of triode..." Okamura, History of Electron Tubes, p.97. "De Forest's triode was also called an Audion..." p.325 [Okamura continues to refer to De Forest's 1907 Audion as a triode many times.]
• "De Forest invented the three-electrode valve or vacuum tube triode." Sarkar, History of Wireless, p.100. "This triode device he [De Forest] termed the "Audion"." (p.325) "In the same year, Lee De Forest, the so-called Father of Radio, invented the transmission grid triode..." (p.335) Calling it a Three-Electrode Audion (patent issued on February 18, 1908), de Forest referred to it as a “device for amplifiing feeble electric currents”
• "Without wishing to detract from the importance of the diode, it was the Audion - or triode - that revolutionized wireless..." Wood, History of International Broadcasting, p.9
• "The year 1907 saw the invention, by Lee De Forest, of the first electronic device capable of amplification; the triode vacuum tube." Lee, Microwave Engineering, p.11
• "...in 1906 - only three days, in fact, before he resigned from the company - he [De Forest] had conceived the first triode vacuum tube and given orders for its manufacture." Aitken, The Continuous Wave, Technology and American Radio, p.195. "The first public display of the triode audion was at a lecture before the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences on 14 March 1907" {p.222) [The text uses the term "triode audion" to distinguish De Forest's tube with the third electrode inside the tube from his earlier tubes with the third electrode outside, which were described on earlier pages.]
• "In 1907-1908 American inventor Lee De Forest inserted a third electrode between the cathode and the plate. De Forest called his device the "Audion" but it is now called the triode" Nahin, The Science of Radio, p.106
• "The history of inventions is almost always clouded with claims and counterclaims and embellished with legend... So it is with the case of the thermionic triode, which Lee De Forest invented in 1906 as a detector of wireless-telegraph signals." Robert Chipman, "De Forest and the Triode Detector", Scientific American, March 1965, p.93
• "In 1907, he [De Forest] patented a much more promising detector which he called the Audion... It was a thermionic grid triode vacuum tube..." Lee De Forest, Encyclopedia Britannica online
• "Yet De Forest's trade name would disappear; in later years the Audion would be known as the "triode" because of its 3 internal elements" Morton & Gabriel, Electronics: Life Story of a Technology, p.8
• "De Forest... applied for a patent on October 25, 1906 for a "three-electrode valve..." He called his device the Audion. Thus the triode was created and the electronic era started..." Huurdmann, The Worldwide History of Telecommunications, p.226
• "In 1906-1907 De Forest introduced a third electrode, the grid... This triode, which De Forest called the "audion", not only rectified but also amplified the signal from the aerial. These early handmade valves contained a fair amount of gas and so varied in their working characteristics. H. J. Round... and Robert Lieben... developed similar "soft" triodes. Heilbron, The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science, p.819
• "The audion was also called the triode" Hong,Wireless: From Marconi's Black Box to the Audion, p.223

For Mirror

Mirror image

Images of objects in a mirror M are not reversed left-to-right (arrow X and its reflection X' point in the same direction) or top-to-bottom (arrow Y and Y' point in same direction), but front-to-back, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the mirror (arrow Z and Z' point in opposite directions)

In geometric optics the rule governing the operation of mirrors is Snell's "law of reflection", which states that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. This means that a ray of light striking (incident on) a mirror will create a reflected ray which makes an equal but opposite angle with the surface normal, the line perpendicular to the mirror surface. The result of this is that light rays reflecting off a plane mirror from an object located in front of it create a virtual image of the object, reversed in the direction of the surface normal, which appears to be located an equal distance behind the mirror.

The law of reflection derives in electromagnetics from the boundary conditions of an electromagnetic wave incident on the mirror's conductive surface. Since the reflecting surface of a mirror is made of metal which is an electrical conductor, the electric field inside the metal is zero. Therefore the tangential component of the electric field $E_{t}$ at the surface of the metal must also be zero. Since $E_{t}$ is the sum of the tangential components of the incident $E_{ti}$ and reflected $E_{tr}$ waves must sum to zero and therefore must be equal and opposite: $E_{tr}=-E_{ti}$.

Another way to prove Snell's law is by using Fermat's principle of least time in optics. This states that a light ray always takes the path which minimizes its travel time. In mirror reflection, in which the entire path of the light is in a medium (air) with a constant index of refraction, this is the path of minimum geometric length. Of all the possible paths a light ray could take from point A to point B by reflecting off a mirror surface, the shortest one is the one which obeys Snell's law; that is, in which the angle of the ray striking the mirror is equal to the angle of the ray leaving the mirror.

Mirror image reversal

A viewer V is comparing an object seen directly (A) and its image I in a mirror M. In order to see the same side of the cat in the mirror he must rotate the statue to face the mirror (B). This rotation about a vertical axis causes the left-right reversal of the image. In the original object A the cat is raising its right paw, while in the image I it is raising its left paw.

Alternatively, if the viewer A is between the object O and the mirror M, he must turn his head (B) to see the image I in the mirror. The result is the same as above, the rotation causes the cat statue's raised right paw to appear as its left paw in the image I. If the viewer A instead bent over and viewed the image between his legs, the image would not have left and right reversed, but top and bottom.

The image of an object in a mirror appears to be reversed laterally but not vertically; the left and right side of the image are reversed compared to the original object, but the top and bottom are not reversed. For example the image of a person in a mirror will appear to have his left and right hand reversed, but not his head and feet. The reason for this has been debated since ancient times; the first (erroneous) explanation was put forward by the philosopher Plato in the 4th century BCE in the dialog Timaeus, and Lucretius and Immanuel Kant

The issue was not fully resolved until 1997 by psychologist Richard L. Gregory in his book Mirrors of the Mind. See diagram, right. As Martin Gardner pointed out, a mirror does not actually reverse left and right any more than it reverses top and bottom. It reverses "forward" and "backward"; that is, in the image seen in the mirror the parts of the object appear reversed in the direction perpendicular to the mirror surface. Therefore an image seen in a mirror "faces" in a direction opposite to the object that created it. As a consequence, in order to compare an object with its reflection in a mirror, the object has to be turned to face the mirror. Alternatively, if the object is on the opposite side of the observer from the mirror (lower diagram, right), the observer himself must turn his head to face the mirror. Human beings tend to rotate things, as well as turn their own bodies, about a vertical axis; it is this rotation that causes the left-right reversal in the image. To turn an object to face in the opposite direction, it can also be rotated about a horizontal axis (turned upside down); if this method of reversing the object is used instead, the image will have top and bottom reversed, not left and right. This demonstrates that it is the type of rotation, not the mirror itself, that causes left-right reversal.

The reversal of a viewer's own image in a mirror stems from the same effect. To compare himself to his image in a mirror, a person must imagine walking behind the mirror and turning to face it, outward, in the same position as the image. Since humans turn about a vertical axis, this turn reverses his left and right sides, compared to the image he sees in the mirror.

For Transmission line

In electrical engineering, a transmission line can be any structure designed to conduct and guide electromagnetic waves with minimal power loss, but the term is more commonly used to mean a specialized cable or conductor designed to conduct radio frequency alternating current.

Transmission lines are used for purposes such as feed lines connecting radio transmitters and receivers with their antennas, distributing cable television signals, trunklines routing calls between telephone switching centres, computer network connections and high speed computer data buses. Common types of two-conductor transmission line include coaxial cable, parallel wire line, stripline, and twisted pair. RF engineers commonly use short pieces of transmission line, usually in the form of printed planar transmission lines, arranged in certain patterns to build circuits such as filters. These circuits, known as distributed-element circuits, are an alternative to traditional circuits using discrete capacitors and inductors.

Transmission line must be used for wires and cables carrying alternating current which are long enough that the wave nature of the currents must be taken into account. The higher the frequency of the signals, the shorter the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves traveling through the line. Transmission line techniques must be used when the frequency of the current is high enough that the length of the conductors is a significant fraction of a wavelength. At audio frequencies, below 20 kHz, the wavelength is greater than 15 km, so only cables kilometers long must be designed as transmission lines. The main use of transmission lines is in the radio frequency (RF) range, above 20 kHz. At microwave frequencies, above 1 GHz, even short conductors a few centimeters long have significant phase shifts, so all circuit wiring must be designed as transmission lines. Also at microwave frequencies, the two-conductor types of transmission line mentioned above begin to have excessive power losses, and waveguide is often used instead. Although waveguide can be considered a type of transmission line, it functions differently from two conductor lines, and will not be covered in this article; see waveguide (radio frequency).

For Wikipedia talk:Make technical articles understandable

Sorry, I didn't mean to call you out. I have a great deal of respect for your expertise and what you do. And I agree to a great extent with what you say above. I often get irritated with the way science journalists and popularizers "explain" advanced topics like quantum mechanics. But beginners have to start somewhere. You say "But that is not, in my view, the proper goal of an encyclopedia". Whether you call it "popularizing" or "explaining", as you pointed out different people require different levels of exposure to complex concepts. There is usually a great deal that can be said about a complex topic without getting into the details.

Your field is kind of unusual in that there is often no application or tangible example in everyday life to illustrate a pure mathematical concept. I certainly agree that makes it harder. But for almost all other STEM fields this limitation doesn't apply.

There is a great desire among ordinary people to understand technical subjects. A lot of the readers coming to our pages are high school dropouts, elementary school students, ballet majors, construction workers, and single mothers trying to get through community college. There are many more of this level reader on WP than scientists or mathematicians; and a case could be made that they need Wikipedia more. Often all a nontechnical reader wants is the simplest definition of the subject in plain language. Maybe they can't understand the subject itself, but they can understand about it, and that may be all they need.

For most technical articles, all it would take to serve this demographic is a paragraph in the introduction, and maybe a diagram. But often (and I'm not referring to math articles, I don't edit them a lot) our technical articles do a terrible job of this, as shown by my links above. Many technical introductions show no sign of any effort to be comprehensible to the majority of readers. Not because they can't, but because the writers just don't want to bother. The proposed language would encourage editors to see it as their job to serve the larger WP readership, not just those in their fields.

For Talk:Atomic clock

Why atomic clocks are so accurate:

• All clocks are based on resonance; the timekeeper in every clock is a resonator (harmonic oscillator), a physical object which vibrates with a precise resonant frequency determined by its physical characteristics, and resists vibrating at other frequencies. In a pendulum clock this is a pendulum, in a quartz watch this is a quartz crystal tuning fork. The resonant frequency of the resonator depends on its size and shape and stiffness. So the accuracy of these clocks are limited by accuracy with which the resonator can be kept the same size and shape. Ordinary physical objects expand and contract and change stiffness with temperature and other environmental changes, limiting the accuracy of these clocks.

In atomic clocks the resonator is electrons in atoms which vibrate during an atomic transition, changing atomic energy levels in the atom. When an electron is exposed to an electromagnetic wave at the precise transition frequency, it absorbs energy and transitions to the higher energy level. When it falls back to the lower energy level, it emits an electromagnetic wave of the precise transition freqeuncy. This frequency can be used as a time standard. The frequency depends on the mass and electric charge of the electron and the nucleus. As far as we know, all atomic particles of a given type are exactly the same, so all atoms of a substance with the same number of protons, neutrons and electrons have exactly the same transition frequency. Thus atomic transitions serve as a universal primary time standard.

• A fundamental limit to the accuracy of any clock is the resonance width of the resonator. In atomic clocks this is called the line width. The resonant frequency of a resonator is not infinitely "sharp", it does not oscillate at a single frequency but randomly within a narrow band of frequencies, its resonance width $\Delta f$. The timekeeping precision of an oscillator is proportional to a dimensionless parameter called its Q_factor equal to its resonant frequency $f_{\text{0}}$ divided by its resonance width $Q=f_{\text{0}}/\Delta f$. The $Q$ of a resonator depends on how fast it loses energy, how damped it is; it is equal to $2\pi$ times the energy stored in the resonator divided by the energy it loses to damping each cycle. In atomic clocks this is the lifetime of the excited state. The $Q$ of quartz crystals in quartz clocks is about 10⁵-10⁶. A major reason for the accuracy of atomic clocks is that the undisturbed Q of atoms is very high, ~10¹³. But to achieve this high Q the atom must remain undisturbed by collisions with other atoms. Therefore in most atomic clocks the timekeeping atoms are in the form of a low pressure gas.

• Exposing the atom to a continuous microwave signal disturbs them. So cesium clocks use the Ramsay method: the atoms are initially put into their excited state by the microwaves by passing them through a microwave cavity, then are allowed to drift through the tube undisturbed to the other end, where they are interrogated by the microwaves in another microwave cavity. The slower the atoms move through the tube, the longer they spend in measurement, and the more accurate the time. Cesium is used partly because its atoms are heavy, and so move slowly.

• The accuracy of an atomic clock is also limited by how precisely the frequency can be measured; in other words how closely the quartz oscillator can be locked to the atomic transition frequency. The oscillator can only be synchronized to the atomic frequency to within a certain fraction of a cycle, so the accuracy is proportional to the number of oscillations (cycles) that the atom makes while it is being measured in the clock. This is equal to the product of the frequency of the atomic transition (the number of cycles per second), multiplied by the drift time. So one way to increase the accuracy of an atomic clock is to increase the drift time. This technique is used in the cesium fountain by projecting the atoms upward in a fountain in a vertical vacuum chamber, and then interrogating them when they fall back down. The other way to increase the cycles is by increasing the frequency, using an atomic transition with a higher frequency. Researchers are attempting to develop optical clocks, based on atomic transitions in the visible light range of the electromagnetic spectrum, about 1000 times the frequency of present clocks.
• Another limit to accuracy is thermal motion of the atoms. When an atom emits an electromagnetic wave, if it is moving with respect to the receiver, due to the Doppler effect the frequency of the received wave will be different; it will be higher if the atom is moving toward the receiver and lower if the atom is moving away. So a gas of atoms moving with random thermal motion will not emit a single sharp frequency but a band of frequencies, causing inaccuracy. At room temperature the thermal motions of the atoms are very fast. So in more accurate atomic clocks, the atoms are cooled to cryogenic temperatures, slowing them down, so the Doppler frequency spread is smaller.

• In the most accurate clocks such as the cesium fountain, the atoms are cooled by a technique called laser cooling. Laser beams are directed into the gas of atoms, at a frequency slightly below an atomic transition frequency of the atoms (a spectral line). If an atom is not moving, or moving away from the laser, it doesn't interact with the laser light. But if an atom is moving toward the laser, the Doppler shift will increase the frequency of the laser light, so it is within the transition frequency of the atom. The atom will absorb a light photon. The momentum of the photon, directed opposite to the atom's motion, will slow it down. By using lasers directed into the gas from several directions, atoms moving in any direction can be slowed, reducing the thermal motion of the atoms, cooling them.

For Talk:Electromagnetic radiation

• "The electromagnetic wave propagates in a direction given by the cross product of E and H. Starting with the fingers in the E-field direction, and curling them in the H-field direction, means the thumb will point in the propagation direction" Stuart Wentworth, Applied Electromagnetics, p. 307
• "...S [the Poynting vector] gives the direction of travel of the wave. ... S must be perpendicular to the plane of E and B, in a direction determined by the right hand rule." Halliday and Resnick, p. 870
• "The Poynting vector is important because it aligns the three vectors of an electromagnetic wave: the electric field, the magnetic field, and the direction of propagation. ... Their relative arrangement is determined by the right hand rule of the cross product E x B" The Physics Hypertextbook, Electromagnetic waves
• "The electric field, magnetic field, and direction of travel of the wave have directions given by a right hand rule." General Physics II, Ch. 25, p.7

For Electric motor

PolychromePlatypus in a recent unsourced edit to the Armature section, removed the term Lorentz force as the motive force in a motor, changing the sentence

Electric current passing through the wire causes the magnetic field from the field magnet to exert a force (Lorentz force) on it, turning the rotor

to

Electric current passing through the wire creating a magnetic field that interacts with the magnetic field of the stator to exert a force turning the rotor, which delivers the mechanical output

among other edits. In his edit comment he says "A Lorentz force is a relic of independent electric and magnetic forces unified by Maxwell over a century ago. ... Dragging in relics like a Lorentz force adds *nothing*" I think the previous wording should be restored.

I think the Lorentz force should be credited as the source of the torque in most motors. It is certainly not a relic; the Lorentz force law: $\mathbf {F} =q\mathbf {E} +q\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B}$, the law of the classic electromagnetic force on a charge, is taught today in every college physics and electromagnetics course, and most sources use it to explain motors:

• "The majority of electrical machines (motors and generators) sold today are still based on the Lorentz force..." Electrical Machines, Electropaedia website
• "In one form of electric motor, a DC current flows through a coil that is free to rotate between the poles of a fixed magnet. The Lorentz force on the charges moving in the coil produces a torque, so the coil is made to rotate." Griffiths,3rd Ed, p. 319
• "The Lorentz force is the driving force of any electric motor you are using", Makarov, Ludwig 2016 Practical Electrical Engineering, p.VII-315
• "In a motor a current-carrying coil in a magnetic field... experiences a torque that causes it to turn. Any coil carrying a current can feel a force in a magnetic field, the force is the Lorentz force on the moving charges" Davis, Studying the Sciences - Physics, p. 582
• "This force, called the Lorentz force... is why any electric motor works" Nightengale, Spencer, A Kitchen Course in Electricity and Magnetism, p. 93
• "...the technically so important machines for converting electrical energy to mechanical energy are based solely on the Lorentz force" Pohl's Introduction to Physics

Physically, any motor with armature conductors (the vast majority) can be described as being turned by the Lorentz force. This excludes most synchronous motors which have a magnetized iron rotor to which the second

Wireless mic

Radar Airport surveillance radar marine radar

Weather radar

For Two-way radio

History

Transmission of voice by radio waves was made possible with the invention of amplitude modulation by Reginald Fessenden and others around 1904. One of the first notable trials of "two way radio" was Lee De Forest's installation of arc radiotelephones on ships of the US Navy's Great White Fleet for its 1907 around the world cruise.

Talk

Agree the history section is completely erroneous. The Britannica cite is from an article on Motorola, which manufactured commercial mobile radios in the 1930s, but they were nowhere near the first. The first use of radio was two-way radiotelegraph communication around 1900. Two-way voice radio was achieved around 1904 by the invention of amplitude modulation, by Reginald Fessenden, Lee De Forest and others. One of the first notable trials was in 1907 when De Forest equipped the US Navy Great White Fleet with arc radiotelephones for their around the world cruise. The development of the triode vacuum tube 1907 - 1914 was what really made radiotelephony practical, and military two-way radio sets were developed during WW1. After the war the technology was applied to civilian uses, installed in police cars. Walkie-talkies weren't invented till WW2. I'll probably rewrite the history section, when I get some time.

For Webopedia

Webopedia.com is an online computer science and information technology dictionary based in Nashville, TN, USA. Founded in 1996, it is currently owned by Nashville web marketing company TechnologyAdvice. It's searchable database has about 4000 entries and is organized into hierarchical categories.

For Talk:War of the Currents

Stanley is an important contributor to the transformer. He created the design used for many years by Westinghouse, and their first parallel-wired transformer system. ([Reed, p.5-6). His Great Barrington system went head-to-head with an Edison DC system and skunked it, an important win in the War of the Currents.(Klooster, p.306)(Welch & Lamphier, p.9) But as you say he didn't invent the transformer, and ZBD were apparently making parallel AC power systems in 1985, a year before Westinghouse. I guess I would support adding the phrase "in America" to the sentence: "William Stanley used the Gaulard-Gibbs design and designs from the ZBD Transformer to develop the first practical transformer." --Chetvorno^TALK 01:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)