Talk:Sian Elias

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

New Zealand: Law Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand law task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Periods in Office[edit]

the whole first paragraph needs rewrite for clarity. i was thoroughly confused. 'she has held this office'. what office? oh, acting governor general. i can't do it because i don't know the details, but it wants doing.

much better, imho. thanks.Toyokuni3 (talk) 20:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She has never been acting governor general. There is no such position. As chief justice she has from time to time acted as "administrator of the government".119.224.13.116 (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

I've rolled back the recent edits - there seems to be a lot of POV in these edits, they were disjointed. --LJ Holden 05:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

The statement that "although no one in the legal profession disputes that Elias is up to the job" is colloquial, and very sweeping. It is also wrong - as a lawyer I have heard a number of lawyers say that she is not up to the job. I suggest deleting the sentence, as it adds nothing to the article.203.184.41.226 (talk) 10:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While this sentence is supported by the ref - I don't see the value in it, nor who appointed her. It feels like the reference is opening the door on possible bias in her appointment, but then tries to shut it down. Clarke43 (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-saster[edit]

I've just made a series of edits to try and repair my original mistake (overlooking a repeated citation). The problem is now solved, but there are quite a few meaningless edits involved. Please don't roll back. Timothy.conder (talk) 05:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sian Elias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513234624/http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/overview/rthon.html to http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/honours/overview/rthon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sian Elias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Freely licensed images[edit]

Can be found here; they are Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Schwede 66 07:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Concerning Link[edit]

I note the current page identifies her as a "moderate" and refers to the current supreme court as conservative-leaning. This doesn't really map on to how anyone I know thinks of it - I'm a law student in New Zealand, and frankly that looks like an effort to map American judicial politics onto a very different system. Elias is by far the most activist member of the court, but that's not really conservative or liberal in any sense.

The source for that claim is a hyperpartisan conspiracy blog. Reading the blurb they have for Elias makes the weirdness of the source obvious, and I quote: "Her strength as Chief Justice on the Court is that of an ‘enabler’, a personal tendency to look the other way when it comes to misconduct by her fellow judges. This tendency fosters allegiance but not much professional respect from her colleagues. It also conflicts with what the public expect in the way of integrity from their judges"

Given that, I have removed the line. It could potentially be replaced by a more nuanced discussion of her judicial philosophy, but it'd be hard to do that in a non-partisan way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.154.235 (talk) 09:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant link: http://www.kiwisfirst.com/judge-file-index/supreme-court-chief-justice-sian-elias/

The URL really gives away what kind of site this is, but a brief readthrough of the actual post will also give it away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.154.235 (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]