Talk:PCD (album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PCD (album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Album sales UK=[edit]

it sold 1.2 million album in the uk and if you want to see link look here [1] it sold 574,000 in 2005 and [2]533,000 in 2006! get your facts straight people

PCD2: Fired Up ???????[edit]

Where is this PCD2.... confirmed as thir next cd. this is untrue information, so i removed it. also, it sounds more like a movie not a cd. provide a link and i'll but back on thir page.

Beep remix?[edit]

The Beep remix with Snoop Dogg is currently listed as the final track (after the International bonus tracks), is this correct? Does any edition of PCD include this remix? --Design 13:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Album[edit]

If you mean the Buttons remix, a new version of the album was released in the UK (maybe other countries) with a bonus CD, featuring the Buttons remix with Snoop Dogg. However, not on the the original one. Hope this helps! Plus, I don't think their are any dance tracks on this album, so I don't know why Dance is featured in the genres.

Edit War[edit]

Please don't edit war, particularly with threats against the other side. I've temporarily blockedd the page. Sort it out here. Adam Cuerden ^talk 11:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to sort out. The page is okay how it looks right now. - Noboyo, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

The genre should fit in with the bands article, and as it is it dosent. Noboyo is pathetic and edits just to start edit wars. JJH1992 23:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm neither pathetic nor do i edit just to start edit wars (I've been here for 1 1/2 years now!) ... 5 different genres just don't define the sound of an album - and JJH1992's use of < br > blemishs the infobox. Noboyo, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

There are four different genres, and the genres fit in with the genres on all PCD articles:

Pop R&B Hip Hop Dance

< br > makes the infobox look tidy, the commas and lists make it look terrible. There was an edit war a while ago and the genres as they appear above were selected. I too have been here for around (1-2) years and I think that you are pathetic. JJH1992 18:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I think both of you need to calm down. You're at each other's throats over a minor formatting issue in an infobox, after all. Why not use WP:RFC to ask other people's opinions, and agree to be governed by, say, a poll, or other productive way to move forward? Adam Cuerden ^talk 18:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, lets calm down and focus on the real heart of the issue. Is this just a formatting issue or is there disagreement over the genres as well? Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review!

You know, I've always been politely and correct (I didn't send messages like "Noboyo, leave alone now or I will request you be blocked"), yeah, I'm cool with every senseful change, but .... I just don't see any sense behind JJH1992 changes since they don't orient by other wikipedia pages. It's no personal matter, I'd do the same with every other user. - Noboyo

I just think this article should fit in with the bands article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJH1992 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It says this album was a "critical and commercial success", but there's only one review and it's average, and the link beside this statement links to some unrelated article...Leemorrison 17:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not a critical success[edit]

I changed "was a critical and commercial success" to "was a commercial success" because it wasn't actually a critical success. It had no major reviews, and its minor ones were mixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by QuirkyAndSuch (talk • contribs) 04:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

9 Singles[edit]

There is no possible way that this album had 9 physical singles released. 5 notable singles were: released. 1.Don't Cha 2.Stickwitu 3.Beep 4.Buttons 5.Wait A Minute ~that's it. "Sway" was only a promo

single released in 2004, "Right Now" was only a single released for an NBA Game, and the rest do not have any reliable or correct sources. It seems as if they were just put there, or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.88.22 (talk) 07:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on PCD (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.ifpi.gr/chart04.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ifpi.no/sok/lst_trofeer_sok.asp?type=artist

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on PCD (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]