Talk:Miss Asia Pacific International

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Strange article history[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I can't quite work out what's going on here. Has this article twice been deleted before?

T4mb4y 22 (talk · contribs) appears to have notified the author of this article that it was nominated for deletion, but doesn't appear to be the one who tagged for deletion itself. This was in November 2016, before this current article existed.
Then there's Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific International, which resulted in deletion on 20 December 2014.

And now we have this new article from 31 December 2016. It must be different to the latter one, as that was deleted for lack of references. Could an admin please look at what was deleted before, how it compares to this, and whether it needs to be nuked, too? Schwede 66 17:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The latter one was deleted for lack of references but this iteration has them, so WP:G4 cannot be used to delete it. IMHO this subject probably is notable enough (and was so in 2014 when it was deleted without real discussion. I'm happy to undelete the old version if you want to work on it, just leave me a message. The previous iteration under this name just contained the title, thus it was correctly deleted under WP:A3. Regards So Why 20:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: Thanks for having a look. No further action is needed. I for one certainly aren't interested in the topic, so won't do any work on it. It just showed up in my NPP feed. Schwede 66 20:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From T4mb4y_22: Thank you Schwede66