Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in the Birmingham Metropolitan Area, West Midlands

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[University of Birmingham#Edgbaston¬ campus|University of Birmingham’s main campus]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of tallest bridges in the world which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of tallest buildings and structures in Birmingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page size[edit]

With 217,522 bytes of markup, this page is now far too big, and needs to be subdivided. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

217,000 Bytes isn't so much, there's no urgency to subdivide the page when there are several pages close to or over 500,000. N1TH Music (talk) 06:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This list is now at 386 KB. I think it's a bit of a problem not only for this list but also the other pages that are this big or larger. This page feels harder to navigate because there's a lot of scrolling to get to the actual lists. In the spirit of Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, I'd recommend dropping the lists of approved, proposed, emergent, and unbuilt buildings. Likewise, I'd delete prose talking about future buildings or just listing buildings that are also on the actual list. Some of the skyline photos which only have one tall building can also be consolidated into the list or the articles on those buildings. -- Beland (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Omitted towers[edit]

An explanatory footnote says that "the suburban tower blocks located across the region have been omitted from this section". Is that because they are below 35 meters high? If not, that seems rather arbitrary. -- Beland (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]