User talk:x42bn6

root@wikipedia-en:/homes/x42bn6/public_html/talk - Console

×

root@wikipedia-en:/homes/x42bn6/public_html/talk$ about
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Discussions with me

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 - I will reply to your own talk page unless you request it.

 - Archives: None at the moment

 - Purge this page

 - Leave me a new message

Use arrow keys to scroll and select links, or press 'q' to exit: q

root@wikipedia-en:/homes/x42bn6/public_html/talk$

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, X42bn6, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my talk page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language.

Happy editing!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you were quick to use the reference desk for one of your questions. There's also the handy help desk too - you can get there if you type WP:HD in the search box. Lots of Wikipedia pages have abbreviations. Also, to use the user talk pages, you can click on the little plus sign (+) next to the "edit this page" link. This automatically makes a new heading, and is very convenient to use. Happy editing! :-) --HappyCamper 11:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!

I saw your entry on the New Users page, especially your note about American English. Make sure you read over the national varieties of English policy. -- Essjay · Talk 08:13, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

That's not what I meant, I swear! I didn't mean to imply you couldn't use American English; I just wanted to give you the heads up about the way Wikipedia deals with the diversity of "versions." There have been "edit wars" over using one way or the other and new users can easily get "bitten" by other users if they make changes without realizing that there's a policy. (It wouldn't be the first time someone innocently changed "center" to "centre" or "honor" to "honour.") Rencently, there was a flare up over "gasoline" v. "petrol"; I wouldn't want you to wander into the middle of something like that unprepared. Just trying to keep the "vicious" users at bay by giving you the heads up; I feel like the lion tamer! "Back you bitter oldies! He's new! Back I say!"

I hope you enjoy the wiki, and if you have any questions, let me know. :-> -- Essjay · Talk 09:07, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

I just saw your one of comments recently, and I wanted to stop by and say another welcome to the Wikipedia community, and also have a Happy 17th Birthday! =) --Andylkl ^(talk) July 2, 2005 03:47 (UTC)

Reverting[edit]

Hi there. I saw your summary at the Carrie Underwood article, and I've noticed that you said that you didn't know how to revert. Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version is the link that will show you how to revert articles to previous versions. I hope this will be of great help to you! Regards, --Gramaic | Talk 07:46, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

point of inflexion[edit]

I replied on my talk page. Oleg Alexandrov 15:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

nudity and speedy deletion[edit]

Hello. A picture containing nudity clearly does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. If you want that image deleted, follow the proper image for deletion process. Some related pages that you may want to read over include:

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors - where it states that pornography related articles may contain nudity
Wikipedia:Deletion policy - all aspects of the deletion policy
Wikipedia:Content disclaimer - the general disclaimer of content

-- JamesTeterenko 15:31, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

American Samoa[edit]

Thanks for the heads up on the U.S. Congressional Delegations from American Samoa. This wasn't never meant to be an article, per se; but they were meant as Templates for the Congressional member articles floating around . - Hoshie | Support the Chagossians! 08:44, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adaminaby[edit]

Thanks. I was doing several at the same time and I must have hit this one by mistake. CambridgeBayWeather 09:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hopen directing to Smøla[edit]

Hi there, You were asking why I blanked out the redirecting of Hopen to Smøla. It's simply because they have nothing to do with each other!
Smøla is as described correctly in Wikipedia a municipality far away from Svalbard and the Hopen redirecting to it.

I think there might be a confusion with Hopen Brygge, which is part of Smøla.

Best regards. /John.

-- ** ADDED LATER ** --

Hmm. OK, I suppose it is in a way correct to redirect it as Hopen is ALSO indeed a part of Smøla. Sorry for what I wrote earlier. The reason I blanked it out in the first place was that I stumbled upon it when reading about the 3 islands of Svalbard and Hopen there linked directly to Smøla through that redirect.

So, there is are obviously two places in Norway that can be refered to as Hopen, and I therefore I still don't think there should be an automatic redirect to Smøla.

Best regards, /John.

Redirect[edit]

No need to tell me of something like that...and I really can tell the difference between a banana and a chemical. Trust me. :) If you look at the edit history, you'll see the original entry was near nonsense. Redirects have the advantages of being both cheap and preventing red links. - Lucky 6.9 07:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle River[edit]

You put the cleanup tag on Eagle River, Alaska, and I'm a native of there, so I could help you out. I just don't quite know what to add. DevastatorIIC 20:53, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Tony Award for Best Book of a Musical[edit]

My message about the bolding was directed at people who might want to de-bold the list of winners. I wanted the winners in bold so that I could add the nominees later in unbold--if someone unbolded the winners just because the nominees weren't added yet, it would be more difficult for me to re-bold when I added the nominees! So don't look at the top of the list (where nominees haven't been added yet), look at the bottom of the list where there are nominees. Some bold is certainly needed so that the winner stands out; I'm not really sure whether the winning writer should be bold as well. In terms of emphasis, I think both the name of the play and the name of the writer deserve emphasis; this award is given to the writer's contribution to the play, not to the play as a whole. It doesn't really matter to me, so I'll yield to your judgement in the matter. If you think one line out of four in bold is too much, I won't object. What does need to be changed, in my opinion, is the winner being on a separate line from the year. That I'm changing back, because it's important to do that to make the winner stand out--that way, it's easier for the eye just to pick out the winners from year to year with the indentation. If there's any other formatting thoughts you have, feel free to post at Talk:Tony Award for Best Book of a Musical and we can discuss it there.Kevin M Marshall 04:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

English spelling[edit]

I noticed your comment on Talk:Main Page that said Wikipedia is written in American English except for certain cases. This is not the policy. For the English Wikipedia, there is no preference among the major national varieties of English. Though articles that focus on a topic specific to a particular English-speaking country should generally conform to the spelling of that country. Evil Monkey∴Hello 04:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rick_W._Vanover[edit]

Thanks for pointing out the deletion of this article. I am new to Wikipedia (I mean editing it, not reading) and is getting a feel of things. Will be careful next time..

PeaSea

selfref template[edit]

Thanks for fixing {{selfref}}, but do you know why the editors included that <hidden> part with the {{main}} and See also in the first place? (And this has been a recent addition as well). —jiy (talk) 02:09, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I meant <noinclude> oops. I understand why it would be used for things like categorizing the template into say Category:Wikipedia maintenance, but shouldn't comments, rationale, usage instructions, etc. go in the template's talk page? Actually, it seems User:Zondor has been applying this convention of including meta-info within the template for several templates. I'm not sure if he's doing this alone or if there is some discussion behind it? Personally I find it confusing. —jiy (talk) 02:42, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "minor edit" tag[edit]

Greetings, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I notice you left a comment several paragraphs long at Talk:Proof that 0.999... equals 1. You tagged the comment as a "minor edit", which is not what you want. A typical minor edit corrects spelling or punctuation. Busy editors can hide all minor edits from their Watchlist if they choose; they would never be aware of your comment. Since all your edits are tagged minor, it's likely that you selected that option in your Preferences under the Editing tab. Either choice is fine of default is fine, but you still need to decide for each edit whether it is minor. For your protection, I would recommend not using "minor" as default, because it's a mere nuisance if a truly minor edit is not so tagged, but it is considered bad behavior to tag some major edits as minor.

There is no need to reply, but if you wish you can do so here. Happy editing. --KSmrq^T 08:26, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I leave that by default is because the majority of my edits are minor. :) x42bn6 Talk 08:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Rick Vanover"[edit]

Rick vanover does not give 36000 google hits. With quotes it gives 83 hits, which is definitely a lot less. (my name in quotes gives 15 hits and I haven't authored a book. Any I support the deletion of the article.. PeaSea

The ratio test[edit]

You are right. I replaced the text with what is in your sandbox. With one exception, I like the period (.) inside of the math tags. Otherwise, if it is outside, it can look a bit misaligned, and sometimes it even goes to a new line. Thank you for your patience. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page, to keep all discussion in one place. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:01, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I replied again. on my talk page. :) Let me know when you get that article done. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Method of differences[edit]

Hi. I know the method of differences under the name telescoping series, and we already have an article under the latter name. I know, it's very annoying, isn't it? I put a merge tag on your article, but afterwards I thought that it would be nicer to tell you personally. So here you are. Would you mind looking if you can combine the articles? I especially like your discussion on how it does not always work. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. I did not recognize the method as telescoping series when X42bn6 mentioned it to me before writing the article. Yes, I guess the two will need to be merged now. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template choice[edit]

I've changed it again to {{lowercase-user}}, lol. There's a category as well. Hopefully if the software ever changes to allow lowercase titles, that will allow users who want their name changed to quickly do so. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 16:45, Jan. 30, 2006

Regarding Digimon and Digimon: Digital Monsters (anime)[edit]

I'm not quite sure what you're referring to. The most recent change I've done to the Digimon page is changing the vocal credits for the 02, Tamers, and Frontier ED songs. Digimon: Digital Monsters (anime) is not on my watchlist, so I don't edit anything on it. Soulsteelgray 02:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Loewemon[edit]

I know it's a bit mad to say this - and I know you've no real reason to believe me, as I'm just some guy you've bumped into on Wikipedia - but while Frontier was airing in the US, I was in regular contact with the dub director, Mary Elizabeth McGlynn, to gain information on voice actors and such things for my [website]. She confirmed that "Loewemon" spelling for me as the one used in the show's scripts, but since the character's name never appeared onscreen, and since Bandai called him "Loweemon," that spelling never really entered popular use with fans. - Chris McFeely 30th December 2005

Technically, they are the same thing mind, as oe is a way of writing ö without the umlaut. Oh, and PS.. while I'm also just another random person on the internet, I can vouch for Chris' veracity on matters concerning the Digimon dub Shiroi Hane 03:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Digimon Systems Update[edit]

I'm trying to get some stuff done over at the digimon wikiproject, and have reorganized the project page. I also added a To-do list. In hoping we can collaborate. Circeus 17:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True Love[edit]

Your edit to True Love introduced piping to the disambiguation page. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) prescribes not using piping on disambigaution pages. Thanks, --Commander Keane 09:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?[edit]

What are you talking about? If it is about Template:Announcements/Community bulletin board, if you look at the edit history, you'll notice the multiple exclamation marks were there before I added the link to the PR release. If not, then I honestly have no idea what you are talking about; I can't remember the last time I even used an exclamation mark on Wikipedia. -- llywrch 02:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We all make mistakes. If you still feel guilty, edit a random article. ;-) llywrch 03:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ratio test[edit]

Well, f is usually associated with a function, while a, b, c, are usually associated with either constants or cconstant coefficients (that change with n if its a_n etc). So I changed it to f to make it ever so slightly clearer that the ratio test takes the nth *function* of the summation series, rather than a coefficient or constant. Fresheneesz 10:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester United[edit]

Yeh sorry I realised I'd been doing something wrong after a while so I posted on the talk page, because I wasnt sure. My apologies. What does it mean to pipe links? Philc _T+C 11:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, I think youve misunderstood what I was doing, I was unpiping all the Manchester United links that linked to Manchester United F.C., partly because as far as I am aware the club is named Manchester United and not Manchester Untied F.C., as it changed its name. I posted on the talk page about this though, because no-one else seems to have mentioned it, so it might not be true. Philc _T+C

Sorry[edit]

I'm sorry if you think I'm too new to be an adminship but I've been being a Wikipedian since December, 2003. I just didn't have an account. I know all about Wikipedia. I have interviewed many Wikipedians and have even made friends with a few. I WAS a perfect adminship nominee. An old nominee, General Eisenhower 17:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Aquilamon; Dinobeemon; MasterVeedramon; Kyubimon; Dave Wittenberg; BlackImperialdramon; Digimon World; Chuchidarumon; Kenichi Suzumura; ExVeemon; Harimogemon; Mary Elizabeth McGlynn; Babydramon; Joshua Seth; Chiaki J. Konaka; Alice McCoy (Digimon); Witchmon; Vademon X; Yuka Imai

Cleanup: Nohemon; Hwarang; Quetzalmon
Merge: Goldramon; Amon (Digimon); Digimon World 2003
Add Sources: Rika Nonaka; Navigational database; Gennaro Gattuso
Wikify: Kirk Thornton; CATIA; Larry Carlton
Expand: Hagwon; Norton Radstock; Nanietta Bacco

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Smith[edit]

thank you for your feedback on my edits of the article for the footballer 'Alan Smith', and although out of respect for your work i have not changed what you wrote there, i feel the need to point out that i disagree with your appraisal of my contribution. firstly, i wrote that all incidents involving friction between smith and leeds united supporters were 'alleged' which is different from saying that they definately occured. in addition, as a leeds united supporter and someone who is in constant contact with many other leeds supporters, i can say definitely that alan smith DID offend many leeds fans by moving to manchester united, and that he did not finish the season by kissing the badge, but rather cursed at leeds fans during his final away game. west yorkshire police also advised against smith appearing in the testimonial for former leeds player Lucas Radebe in 2005 because they were unable to guarantee the security of the match if Smith took part. this is clear evidence that Smith's relationship with Leeds supporters is tarnished beyond repair, following his comments and actions immediately prior to his departure from the club. this negative apsect of his reputation has been completely glossed over in the article on Smith's career, however, and i feel that this is fundamentally wrong, and that it is not in the best interests of wikipedia accuracy to ignore these extremely negative aspects of his character. as you are a more senior editor, however, i leave it to your discration to decide what is right. thank you - perry w.b. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pxw324 (talk • contribs)

Mega Digimon[edit]

My uncle might not be called a reliable source but Bandai New York has an article about it on their information website but good luck finding the website funny boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by April2 (talk • contribs)

I'm assuming you can keep this person (↑) in check? I'll be going off. Circeus 02:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your contributions![edit]

As a member of the kindness campaign, and on behalf of all the Wikipedians out there, I'd like to thank you for your tireless contributions to Wikipedia with this cookie. Feel free to add it to your user page or similar, and tell the world :) --Draicone ^(talk) 10:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Triceramon X; AncientVolcamon; Minomon; MetalGarurumon X; AncientKazemon; Pegasusmon; AncientGreymon; Chibomon; Piddomon; Salamon; Babydramon; Digimon World 2; Raidramon; Pucchiemon; RedVeggiemon; AeroVeedramon; Taichi Yagami; Octomon; AncientGarurumon

Cleanup: Crystalmon; Digimon Adventure 02; Main Street Electrical Parade
Merge: Owned; KingSukamon; Digimon World 2003
Add Sources: David James (footballer, born 1970); Ron Logan; Sive
Wikify: Kirk Thornton; Chouriki Sentai Ohranger; Gianluca Vialli
Expand: Ian Rush; Kublai Khan; Quebec route 321

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Not vandalism[edit]

You are of course totally right, I think I slipped that one in a moment of distraction. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up though. Take care --Xasf 08:26, 11 August 2006 (GMT+3)

Digimon articles[edit]

Hey, i noticed on your userpage that your "Current Crusade" is to "Standardise all Digimon articles. Not yet started. List of Digimon#A."

You may be interested to take a look at this project page (and it's talk page) where a few of us are trying to reorganized all the -mon articles on Wikipedia. It's a big task (considering how many digimon articles there are) so any help would be appreciated ^_^ -`/aksha 07:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Salamon; Piddomon; Leafmon; DemiVeemon; Raidramon; Floribert N'Galula; How Late Do U Have 2BB4UR Absent?; Nyokimon; Dario G; AncientGreymon; Paul McShane; Selkirk F.C.; YukimiBotamon; Valkyrimon; Pururumon; DemiMeramon; Chibomon; Pegasusmon; Poromon

Cleanup: Lake Highlands High School; Takato Matsuki; Garden Village F.C.
Merge: Tokomon; Tokomon X; IMG Soccer Academy
Add Sources: Shaun Ellis; Denis Irwin; Catenaccio
Wikify: Mehdi Mahdavikia; James "Buster" Douglas; Moving Pictures (band)
Expand: Morecambe F.C.; Ian Rush; Kimi ga Nozomu Eien

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne Rooney reversion[edit]

Just wanted to say sorry I missed the added nicknames when I reverted a POV edit on the wayne rooney page, I should have checked the last few previous edits. Many thanks for sorting it out RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester United F.C.#Sokongan[edit]

Please see my respons on your edits at Malay's Kedai Kopi. :) &mdash Polar 16:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Help desk question[edit]

Hi. I've made an edit to your help desk answer regarding a user's edit. As I'm sure you're aware of, WP:BLP encourages us to avoid unsourced negative info about living persons, and we could avoid repeating such comments inadvertently. Just a note. Thanks for helping out at the desk. Cheers. Xiner (talk, email) 03:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Françoise Chandernagor[edit]

Thanks for the clean up, it needed it, and I hope to learn from it. Is external link a reference? <Yoradler5 15:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

Re: Your comment[edit]

I know no one "owns" a page, but I should get credit for making one if I started it in the first place. -- Silva Storm

But surely you must get some "personal satisfaction" in knowing that you began a page for something that turns out to be quite popular? -- Silva Storm

Barnstar[edit]

Thanks! The guy had some nerve, so I was only too happy to minimise the damage he was causing. - Dudesleeper · Talk 00:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

why'd you remove my question from aiv page? It's a legit admin question. Rlevse 00:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. no problem.Rlevse 00:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

x42bn6[edit]

Your username is more like a password. I suppose that after a while I'll be able to keyboard it without checking it over and over. I also suppose that it's not without significant meaning, why else? ;-) --hydnjo talk 08:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Oops, fixed username. --hydnjo talk 19:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just so you know[edit]

you are threating me and me and Craxy were doning nothing please stop threating and we have the freedom if a black man was to beat you up because you did first thats called self defence and should not be accused of vilonce this is not a threat or mad note this is simpley telling you to please repeat PLEASE stop threating me and my homie im only mad at Kyltym because of his rude aggenst Blacks and Hispanic note —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Butterrum (talk • contribs) 04:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

sir i do not like or love and will not take racisum he should be warned as well and tell that guy that is saying im racist to please back off i was only using self defence and will not take this i dont not like the fact 100 people are warning me for nothing he should be warn ~Jesus loves remeber that~ and freedom is beatiful

yes i do bealvie your claims of me being cool but nop that is not what started this this is a new issue i am curtly angered by the fact of him saying he hates Blacks and Hispanics and he shall also be warned

i demand to talk to the owner of wikipedia all the adfmin are curropted and seem to follow one person--Butterrum 10:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been throwing around accusations of racism, personal attacks, and corruption for some time (and is probably lucky not to have been blocked for them); when asked for evidence, he simply repeats the accusations at louder volume. I've tried to find any evidence for his accusations, but have failed. Judging by his writing, it may be that his reading skills have misled him as to what other editors are saying (though that might be assuming good faith one step too far). Have a look at my Talk page for a taste. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GTA gang-wars[edit]

Yeah, I semi-protected one page and have been trying to persuade people to be nice to one another and concentrate on putting type to page, rather than getting caught up in feuds. Probably best this is dealt with by multiple admins, so it can be seen as impersonal. TimVickers 04:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Love at first sight[edit]

You misunderstand me. I am not one to deny that love at first sight exists, or that couples fortunate enough to be blessed with it find courtship unnecessary. However, in its earlier version, the article implied that it was enough for one person to fall in love from first sight for the courtship ritual to be abandoned. As I am sure You'll agree, this is not the case. I simply wanted clarity. --132.69.234.73 20:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:John O'Shea (footballer)[edit]

I remove some lines at the discussion page for John Francis O'Shea page (the footballer), that had no reliable source. Other persons had replied to the material and therefor I removed that also making the discussion page for John Francis O'Shea blank. I can't see any wrongdoing. Infact if any person can put a comment on a articles discussion page with remarks to sexual preferences with no reliable source I might be tempted to put one here and I will complain if you remove it due to lack of source material. "Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.243.177.248 (talk • contribs).

Re: Canvassing[edit]

Thank you for your message and your concern. Actually, I did not consider myself in any danger of running afoul of the canvassing guideline, as it allows for friendly notification of a limited number of familiar, like-minded individuals. All of the people who have been notified have been previously involved in some capacity in the most recent, style-related discussions connected with the Clamp group and its work, with the two most vocal supporters of stylized typography in these matters - pfahlstrom and Kyaa the Catlord, I believe the later voiced the respective canvassing concerns - already being present at the table. Regards - Cyrus XIII 23:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Hi X42bn6. Thank you for your support in my RfA. Rest assured that I heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime.

Now, let me smother you. Xiner (talk, email) 13:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well[edit]

what im talking about is all the admintors are leting a single person get away with some stuff a user was dealted and he didnt state why he deated him or blocked him at all and this certain user is sort of controlling aidmin to come here say that i cant spell then leave or even let me write anything and i already listed the resion for my stuff all the admin i know are to curropt or is/are sockpuppets--Butterrum 16:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry[edit]

I just want to apologize for all of this nonsense I'm dealing with; I'm doing my best not to egg him on, but it seems like it's not doing any good, and more and more people, perhaps unnecessarily, are getting involved. Something that was a simple content dispute between 2 editors 4 months ago has become something much worse. I just wish to apologize for all of the stress this may have caused you. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 18:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but I didn't want any other people dealing with this "jackass-edness" I had to deal with for more that 3 months. It's pretty annoying and I'd rather no one else have to deal with it. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your bent[edit]

im geting clean admin to take a look at this problem he threaten me and your not even doing anything about ti he swore to thyis is called Fraud you chould be stripped of your rank as a admin so i got a few clean one to scope this out and deal with certin users that are bending admin --Butterrum 02:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

because i need help i need tusted help because i hate that theres curroted users and people geting blocked because of crazyness and that im blame for sock puppeting i dont need your help if your the one thats making it even more worse--Butterrum 14:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry & Immaturity[edit]

Both Craxy and Butterrum have been getting in on the sockpuppeting craze; I don't have any concrete evidence but I'm sure it's them; check my talk page. Man, this is annoying.... ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 15:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind; Mel Etis (I hope I spelled that right) has handled it. Thanks anyway. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 15:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need. It's been taken care of: Mel Etitis blocked him, along with a sockpuppet of Butterrum's. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 23:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag deletion problem[edit]

Thanks for the intervention on Talk:Pallywood. Regarding the deleted tag, I can't restore it due to 3RR - could you please sort it out? -- ChrisO 01:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unless it is in bad faith[edit]

unless it is in bad faith - and this is not bad faith. see POV pushing discussion

as for the rest of your argument, i believe that people who have some expertiese on the topic have shown why it is indeed notable - you can examine the article for starters, and i believe i've included some still missing information in my linked reply (i.e. "jenin, jenin" + pierre rehov, full length ducumentry, response). Jaakobou 03:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the wikipedia without a face[edit]

well i dont know if i should trust you anymore after all you did suspect me of sockpuppeting and helped that user Klyptzm out and made up lame and fake excuses to get me blocked without proof of me being a sock puppeting or helping others many users have been blocked from wikipedia becuaser of the gta article and they trace to KLP he makes fuin of how i type man this should be taken care of if i owned wikipedia id stop the rage and battle started by that kid there is no justice in this place no more just corrupted and the bent all frauding therre way out of troble and geting people blocked i dont wanna list a complant because i know your just gonna tell Klp again and start this mess all over like u said you have a thick skin--Butterrum 14:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes i do wanna file a commplant and i looked at the edits i made on its page theres nothing wrong with him and see he blamed me for somthing witfch he hid he wrote this witch i retreved from your page Both Craxy and Butterrum have been getting in on the sockpuppeting craze; I don't have any concrete evidence but I'm sure it's them; check my talk page. Man, this is annoying.... what is that then huh you helped him --Butterrum 14:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thats because he was harrasing me first always saying on a Sean mc Sean charater and junk or Craxy he blocked a kid because he said he was a sock puppet lots of people are being blocked because of him and i wanna end this YOU GOTTA HELP ME this is going on for tio long and what dose that haev to do with anything--Butterrum 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok but you gotta help me an other user lost there account and they were blamed for sock puppeting WITHOUT PROOF and now im being blamed i have to say yes thats me for everything to stay out of troble im paranoid here i dont know who to trust at all anymore the only people i trusted arer blocked they had proof on Klyptzm to but scien there blocked i cant get any proof besides ones that your gonna say is useless he broke the 3RR rule but no 1 did anything i did it before and i got blocked for it nahh i dont think this is a excelpida i think this is GRand Theft Auto Wikipedia--Butterrum 14:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

but why is Liberty City's Miguel, ptpGTA and GTAXI all got blocked and when i checked it said these words BLOCKED for SOCKPUPPETING then it said the suposovly owner Craxy i think this is becominhg stupid and sorry i didnt know whaqt 3RR was i thought it was short for reverting well ok ill stop till we finally find out what is what--Butterrum 15:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:List of gangs...[edit]

That's just the thing: it is resolved; Butterrum will never agree on something that isn't going his way. I've, along with other users, have told him why he's wrong, yet he still persists to add those incorrect edits to the article. You've told me to stop reverting the article until that dispute is resolve; crap, you might as well tell me to wait until forever, because that's exactly how long it's going to take. Go take a look at the talk page archives to see what I mean. I had to archive the page 2 times due to his unnecessary stubborness. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 21:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, we'll see, man, we'll see.... ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 22:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:DotA[edit]

It will be allowed to add dota.brainmarket.ru to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DotA in case if i will add all listed in article types of DotA maps to my download section? I can extend content of my site to cover all DotAs not only Allstars. Regards, Rrrichi.

North Buffalo[edit]

Please see the discussion on the Talk:North Buffalo, New York page regarding your change of the name.
T.C. 03:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure if I followed your instructions correctly. I tagged North Buffalo, Buffalo, New York for speedy deletion, but it did not get blown away yet. Maybe I just need to be patient, but could you take a look to make sure that I did it right?

T.C. 02:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, North Buffalo, Buffalo, New York got turned down for speedy deletion. What should I do now?

T.C. 01:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say, thanks for the help, expecially as I know you didn't completely agree with my idea here. I was thinking about creating articles for all of the different neighborhoods just so that all of the names would be defined already. If I just put a title into those articles do you think that they would just be deleted right away?

T.C. 03:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help desk help.[edit]

Now most of the alt codes work :) but I still cant get the smileys :(. Thanks again for your help, Razorclaw • 20070419161452

Thanks for assist with DeVry article[edit]

Thank you for the assist with the DeVry article! I like the new layout and phrasing on the site -- I think you found the compromise that myself and the other major current editor of the page weren't able to find on our own. I'm happy to see other editors jump in and work on the page, whereas before it was being very much driven by one user's vision of the article. OtterZero 17:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)OtterZero[reply]

Thanks for fixing the logo. You're doing some great work on the DeVry article - keep it up! Vagary 22:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjit Fernando[edit]

Good job on the BLP pruning. Looks like we got it right before it got under lock and key. :-D --Iamunknown 00:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

regarding the DeVry issues[edit]

Thanks for catching my unsigned warning notices on Codeplowed's talk page. I wasn't sure if those are intended to be signed or not, but I think you're right, it's better with a signature.

I also saw that you removed the latest rant that he added on the DeVry talk page. I know the Wikiguides permit removing un-civil content, but I wonder in this situation if it might be better to leave it in place and instead use strike-text tags and then add a comment about why it was struck.

The only reason I suggest that is I have a feeling this is going to be an administrator case pretty soon and it might be less confusing that way.

Just a suggestion - You're within your rights and the policies to choose either method.

Have a good day... --Parzival418 22:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Received & understood your message on my talk page. Do you want to let this go for a while and monitor the page as you have been, or are you considering WP:AIV or WP:RFC/U? I'm not directly involved in editing the article and just came to help from seeing the Wikiquette Alert, so I don't feel it's my place to start that kind of report. If you decide to proceed though, I would be willing to add third-party comments about what I observed. --Parzival418 22:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me about the misplaced warning on my user page, I've moved it to the talk page and replied.

I notice there is a problem with your user page too. It seems it was tagged for speedy deletion and now it is redlinked, though your talk page and contribs are still here. That might be a technical glitch unrelated to the ongoing issues, but I thought you should know so you can check it out.

Meanwhile, I also saw your continuing discussions with Codeplowed and that he again removed all the warnings from his talk page. I'm not going to do anything further on this unless he harrasses me directly. But if you decide to proceed with a report and need support, please let me know.

Good luck... --Parzival418 23:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got your note about remodeling your page. I noticed in your prior comment, you mentioned RfC. I've never done one of those myself, but I saw it done regarding someone else and as it turned out it was rejected. The main thing is to make sure you use the right one. Plain Wikipedia:Requests for comment is for articles and other stuff; for user issues you need Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. Instructions are at Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Request comment on users. RfC/U page has detailed proceudres. You need to have at least two editors certifying the problem with that user, and showing examples of how they tried to resolve it directly first. I think you have several others who would certify, but it's important if you do that method to get it set up in advance so it doesn't go stale. The certifying entries need to be made within 48 hours or they drop the request.

I wonder for this situation if it might be better to use Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, because those are less formal. This is all just casual advice though, I don't know for sure what's best. Once an administrator is invovled, they might not see it the same way as you do, so that's something to consider as well. --Parzival418 23:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seems like you know what you're doing with those procedures. Let me know if you need any help later. Have a good one. --Parzival418 23:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for informing me of the COIN report. There are some comments there now you might want to read. I'm not able to keep going with this though, it's been too much work for me already. At first things seemed to improve but the multiple talk page reversions and edits of others' comments is a real mess. If that were an article I really cared about, I think I would try to find an individual administrator to ask for help rather than continuing to post procedures. I don't know, unless things are really obvious the procedures can take a lot of time - you have to show evidence, lists of diffs, concise explanations so they can review it fast. Maybe you can just ignore the disruptive stuff and as long as several editors are improving the article, so what if the talk page is messy? Sorry I couldn't help further. Good luck! --Parzival418 03:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"And the personal attacks on myself are not so bad - I can handle it - I am more concerned about the others involved." - I agree with you on that, I feel the same way. As I said, I'm burned out on this one so I'm letting it go for now. But if you need someone to back you up on a report or something, let me know and I'll chime in. --Parzival418 03:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New development, someone posted an RFCU. You may wish to view or comment at: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Codeplowed --Parzival418 _Hello 22:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warming[edit]

You already has complained about my posting, therefore, continue just work to improve Wikipedia content, I just tell you that at the end of the day DeVry Inc. will be something but a University, Controversy is part of any entry DeVry as you have learned and perhaps do not want to see it, has multiple systemic problems. "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks, for instance, stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack." However, you have cross the line, and not probably we need arbitration, it is fine for me, but you deserve this warnings, that previously were stipulated in DeVry:Talk page in very civil manner, Template:Unsigned -->

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:DeVry University for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned

vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by --Veritas Longa 22:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

last warning[edit]

This is your last warning. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

User:NE2[edit]

You don't understand. I have been having a problem with this user and as much as I try to have good faith for him, nothing I do works. He has problems with other users too, as seen on his talk page and his archives. I feel like giving upon him, but I won't. He needs to learn that if e continues, he'll get blocked for trolling, and one user gone doesn't make no difference. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs) 23:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why put a 1px + and "Stop hand" image[edit]

If you read the content of this div, you will see that I used this means (normal text, talk) for more than one month, which lead to endless talk. Encouraging to stop revert and to start a WP:RfC mediation, and encouraging to work on user:Yug/Stroke order, all was declined. Then, in impasse, the image, and the div were really need, but I still encouraged a RfC. EB open a Administrator/Incident.

I'm admin on Wiki-fr and Commons, I don't like endless talk and big opposition, but I have no other way when EB came and revert (!!! exactly what I think is abusive) my warning div, which highlight EB previous mistakes.

Since, this 1px line's edition war has become the primary point of contention because it's the only think he have to get me blocked, and "win". This will de facto means he was right on all the line (not read the talk page but hasty reverts, ask my blockage). This is, I think, what he want to show now : that he didn't any mistake. --Yug (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other thing more fun, I look for contributers who want help me and my English, on Stroke order/Temp. If you are interesting, please notice me. Yug (talk) 13:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-compassion[edit]

There may be copyvio problems with this article. See my comment at Wikipedia:Help desk#Article rename? before spending a lot of time on it. PrimeHunter 22:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here a two sentences with a Google hit:[1] and [2]. Many of the references are probably not searchable with Google. I don't know how well you know the subjcet (I know nothing), but a creation like this with six self-references and own website might also have WP:NPOV problems. PrimeHunter 22:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If some of the article is ok, then maybe a rewrite could solve copyvio and npov problems. I don't know the field. You could ask people at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology to take a look. PrimeHunter 23:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

) hey there :P

Removing log entries of edits to user page[edit]

Woaw, long title. Anyway, is it possible to remove a couple of entries in the log of edits of my userpage? thanks. Storm talon 09:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 11:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Oversight. THF 11:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: That doesn't exactly remove the entries. It simply hides them (from non-oversights). x42bn6 Talk Mess 11:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help.Storm talon 06:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image problem?[edit]

hi, thanks for answering my question...but i still have some problems about it. can you please take a look here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_contributors%27_help_page#Image_problem

Thanks, and hey! are you a chinese? 你看得懂中文字嗎? 如果是就好極了:-)

Winniee852 07:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hi!! i've made my reply here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_contributors%27_help_page#Image_problem

thank you for your kindness! you know what, you're just like my cousins, they moved to england where they were born, and i can hardly talk with them becuase my english sucks!=D Thanks again!

Winniee852 12:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bug Fixing[edit]

Hiya, thanks for the heads up - it might be useful to put in the edit summary that you are bug fixing though; an edit summary "test" on a regularly vandalised article will attract RC patrollers who will revert on sight. Cheers! Pedro | Chat 07:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

It'd be more helpful if I could get some input on this though. I've already put it up once, but as usual it just faded into the archive.--Crossmr 15:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure what was wrong with the link and how you checked his block log, but according to: [3]. He has 8 blocks for uncivil behaviour.--Crossmr 14:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MJis4Freaks[edit]

No that warning was for the first time he vandalised my page, Im complaining now about the second occurance as well as him comments on the michael jackson talk page, Let me no. Realist2 10:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great, its just wierd there isn`t a blocked message on his user page, how are less experienced users like myself ment to no any action has been taken? Realist2 10:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, thats for messaging him, it does seem odd there is no banned sign put up, I always ashumed that was the norm, thanx again, at least he`s blocked.Realist2 11:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your work with WP:HELPDESK. Good work! --Shark face 217 09:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That "edit war" (undeclared conflict?) on AN/I[edit]

Great job and thanks for stepping in and handling that. You rawk. - Philippe | Talk 04:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

level 3 headers[edit]

No problem, when I first restored the headers I hadn't yet looked at the edit history to see why they were changed. Once I checked the page history I realized that I had caused confusion when the next person posted their question with a level 3 header also. --69.118.235.97 17:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Digimon[edit]

I brought this up before (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Digimon#Fair use + lists) but didn't get much of an idea.

That is a direct quote from you, pending our current position at the project. I find that you yourself are partially to blame, I actually replied to the comment you posted. Yet you never replied back with a rebuttel, so there was not much we could do at the time. I'm not trying to be rude, but I believe the way this has gone and been done has been really unfair. Trainra 12:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, it is done. Fair or not you/we technically need to figure out what to make of the situation rather then try to find "blame". Forgive me if I misunderstood the point of that paragraph though. ODK 00:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lists Reply[edit]

If you want to ramble on about Digimon Lists, talk to me about the future of them. The past is done and whether you did involve yourself or not is a Moot point. Oy, just give it a rest already. ODK 17:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was apparent over a week ago, so why does it really matter now of all times? ODK 13:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious[edit]

When you added new section by posting at Sambure's talkpage: here. Why did my post get replaced? Dekisugi (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 15:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I suspected that so. Don't worry, I reposted again. Dekisugi (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

latex[edit]

[4] is what I get. It doesn't seem to want to go to the right... Randomblue (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with uploading the latex picture is that the background color of the box is not the same as the white background. Randomblue (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Reference tags[edit]

Hi! Just let you know I first added the Reference correctly but for for some reason my first edit wasn't registered. Probably my fault but anyway thanks for the reminder - Linczone^Talk^/^Watch 16:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why I wanted help[edit]

Click on the link to my talk page and you will see.Sometimes somethings (talk) 04:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for taking the time to sort out the time line. Should have assumed good faith all along. Sorry for wasting so much board. --soulscanner (talk) 01:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

for your help in fixing the broken link in a reference note...

it is much appreciated!

jb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Projectx (talk • contribs) 02:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Youth Offending Team Glossary[edit]

I think Deb lost her rag with me, despite strenuous attempts to satisfy an inexplicable desire to wipe me out.

I am astonished at this conduct - although old enough to know that I shoudn't be.--SJB (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Youth Offending Team Glossary[edit]

Deletion Review for Youth Offending Team Glossary[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Youth Offending Team Glossary. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. SJB (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Re;[5]

Thanks for checking the issue with the VBS:Malware-gen. Much appreciated.--Hu12 (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Committed identities[edit]

Thanks for the info. That helps. Richiar (talk) 06:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Weird edits by Akradecki[edit]

About the weird edits that Edibility was reporting, it's just two vanity bios that got userfied in a non-standard way. No harm done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for trying to answer my question and i sent a message to Henrik who created the wiki hits page and he told me the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Henrik#Most_visited_User_page I wasn't at all surprised to see the Clown there. Just one other thing i hope you can help me with. Do you have any idea what the most popular picture on wikipedia is, as in the most number of users who have it on their page. Say for example look at the users for this pic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:010105_fireworks2.jpg Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 12:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2[edit]

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your help with my signature. I had already found a way to shorten it and it looks identical to yours, but yours looks much less messy. I think I'll use it. Thanks for the help! Moo Chat 00:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cats[edit]

Thanks! I just didn't have my brain in gear on that one! —SlamDiego_←T 15:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deathcamps.org[edit]

Thanks for your response. I ask because I've written what would be a start class article on a rather notable Nazi, and accordingly I planned to use these references (among others) for benign, constructive purposes. Do you have any suggestions what I can do? I'd be lying if I said I wasn't quite disappointed, it feels like all my efforts have amounted to nothing. Cheers. WilliamH (talk) 10:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm, I did stumble across that and some of those discussions. ~~I'll try the whitelist option.~~ Thanks for articulating it to me, it's made it a lot easier. Thanks for your help once again. WilliamH (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the Holocaust Research Project is not a reliable source, and the deathcamps/death-camps content/copyright dispute is still continuing, so I'll avoid any Wikidrama and remove any references to them as Wikipedia is obviously not the place for content disputes. Cheers. WilliamH (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested that this is the article that came from the fruits of my labour and your help. I've put forward a hook from it to DYK, so thanks once again. WilliamH (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your help about my question about namespace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarplayer001 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Yeah, I realized that after I'd posted. I've since blanked, will post a speedy delete request. Best, umrguy 42 23:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - extra thanks for the cross-post. (They're right, you know... no good deed ever goes unpunished ;D). umrguy 42 23:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Submisve and Aggressive[edit]

I need the term fro Submissive and Aggressive they mean the same but in different ways, explain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.196.115 (talk) 03:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I'm sorry that our first interaction has to be under these circumstances, I truly am. However, I wanted you to know that I am quite aware of the civility and no personal attack policies at Wikipedia, and I truly follow them to the best of my abilities. In this particular case, I was not uncivil, and made no personal attack. Bstone was being a jerk towards me, I don't know if Bstone is a jerk, I hope not, but he/she was acting like one, and made me feel quite unwanted and uncomfortable. It's not a good feeling to have.

Those comments weren't about the project, they were about Bstone. As I tried to explain to Bstone twice, but Bstone mocked me and belittled me for my efforts. It really didn't feel good to be treated like that, especially considering I went out of my way to try to help Bstone. Then to have Bstone lodge a complaint about me, bringing up previous faulty blocks that Bstone obviously didn't take the time to investigate...well... that just sucks. I hope you see where I am coming from, and please be assured that I am quite supportive and quite a follower of Civility, and I feel that I was attacked and treated poorly for no reason. I've been calm throughout, believe me, there wasn't a need for you to tell me to calm down, let alone twice. ;) For me to be reprimanded for being treated poorly just isn't right nor fair. Beam 03:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, you sure are helpful. :D Beam 03:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all I can say is that Beam's comments above clearly demonstrate a lack of Assuming Good Faith, Civility and No Personal Attacks. Sorry, but I'll just have to ignore him and, hopefully, he will do the same for me. Bstone (talk) 04:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fellow has called me a jerk, in clear violation of WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA and believes I am acting in bad faith to him. I think he needs to apologize to me, tho I will be fine if he just leaves me alone. Sans that, he may need to be blocked or take a wikibreak for violation of these three policies. Bstone (talk) 04:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mediation, X42. It is welcome and appreciated. In reality, this user quite simply misunderstood and, then, failed to assume good faith. I was not dismissing him, but rather asking him (in a very civil, kind way) to refer all discussion about the proposal to the project talk page. At that location I would be happy to engage him in discussion. Since he didn't get his way, and took it emotionally, he then violated WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. Frankly, I am happy to ignore him and go on. Perhaps he might agree to the same. I am, however, unwilling to entertain more of his drama for this evening as it is indeed time to retire. Good night, sir. Bstone (talk) 05:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate it when I goto someone's talk page and see shit talked against me. Just for the record, I didn't call him a jerk, he was just acting like one. And I didn't misunderstand him (for the 10th time) I completely understood him. And I didn't violate any of those policies. But he is right that your mediation was pretty nifty. Beam 23:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Box Thingy at the Top of your Talk Page[edit]

Can I steal it? Beam 23:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I fixed your concern. Beam 17:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the code and I don't even know how to steal it :( Beam 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fasach Nua[edit]

I am quite ignorant about Wikipedia:Requests for comment. What is the recommended approach for starting a new request for comment ?

Should I just blank the existing page ? That doesn't seem appropriate.

Any advice/help welcome.

Aaron carass (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll give that a try.

Aaron carass (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments on the RFC. It is insightful to see how others view this issue. I am on the fence about the edits in question; I do, however, believe that the manner in which the edits was done was really disruptive and counter productive from a time and energy point of view. Aaron carass (talk) 00:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't endorsed your comments as I cannot endorse "There is no excuse for being disruptive", I think a certain ammount of disruption was needed to get this issue on the agenda. I did my best to keep this on the low end of disruption, enough to stimulate the issue, without causinng too much hastle. I had raised the issue in a polite manor several times in WP:FOOTY and it was repeatidly ignored. I think your summary is 99% correct Fasach Nua (talk) 12:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On another note, this seems to be doing some good, [6], [7] and there seems to be an ongoing sensible discussion at WP:FOOTY. You are right abuot my approach that "...people jump on this and use it against him/her", so I am not contributing to thread at WP:FOOTY, as it will be too much of a distraction to some people and they will focus on attacking me, rather than dealing with the real underlying issue. Fasach Nua (talk) 13:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translated page template[edit]

I had a loooong discussion about this with PrimeHunter here, and in the end I concluded that I will continue placing the Translated Page message on the Article page, not the Talk page. But thanks for your concern.--Goodmorningworld (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a reader too, and I know that I would appreciate it if people put a message on an article page stating that I am reading a translation instead of a unique text in a particular language. Your question, "How does this help the reader", could just as well be asked of a book whose title page says, The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco, transl. by William Weaver. According to your logic, the name of the author does not belong there. Most readers of Eco, however, would disagree.

For a while, the message also served another purpose for me, namely of covering my rear. Until today, I had not had the time to verify each and every statement in the German article. Now I have, and I am comfortable that the information is accurate. But in the future, I will use the Template again for that purpose.

You wrote,

"If someone wishes to see the editors who contributed to the article, there's a history button - we do not need to have templates which tell users that such a button exists on the articles themselves."

Irrelevant, it's not about the editors of de:Bethmann family, but to alert readers to the existence of Bethmann (Familie).

You wrote,

Readers should not need to know where the article has come from.

Why not let the market decide? Leave the box on the article for a year, and see what responses it gets. Respectfully,--Goodmorningworld (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for alerting me to the Translation/Ref template. That seems like a good template to transition to. As of now, however, the article is not quite there yet.--Goodmorningworld (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to take advantage of X42bn6's much greater experience[edit]

In April 2008 you posted to my talk page, formally welcoming me to Wikipedia, and said in part, "If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question." Smugly, I thought I wouldn't be making any demands on those overworked volunteers, since I'd already been using markup on Wikia for years. But actually I do have a question.

Last week, I poked my head out from under my safe little gnoming force field for the very first time, and was just in time to see this start up. [8] [9] [10] My question, therefore: am I likely to find something like that every time I examine an article closely? Are Wikipedia editors now such a large and varied population, and is the spotlight of a top-10 google ranking so dazzling, that reasoned discussion must always be conducted against a backdrop of real estate speculation? Xeriphas1994 (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC) (If you reply, please do so here to keep the thread in one piece, thanks.)[reply]

I have indeed read that policy page, and I might even have heard about such principles before that, but they appear to address disputes only indirectly. It says that all edits should be viewed as attempts to improve the encyclopedia. It does not say anything about how often the attempts succeed. Some editors feel that the encyclopedia would be improved with a picture of their penis on the main page. Other editors are more like User:Katefan0 (before my time, but I've read about her). In between is an unbroken continuum.

In the specific case I linked above, even before the checkuser result, disinterested observers (most of them admins, I believe) seemed to emerge from the woodwork to rationally discuss what was happening. Quite frankly I am having difficulty reconciling that with the length of the list you put on my talk page. Did I just have beginner's luck? Xeriphas1994 (talk) 17:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if my explanation was unclear. I was merely saying that the number of articles on Wikipedia appears to be growing faster than the number of editors who edit a lot. It seems reasonable to assume that the latter can't completely keep track of the former. Therefore, if I try to improve an article, and I don't deliberately pick one with a lot of traffic due to current real-world events, I am likely to be entering a backwoods area. Problems (the list you made on my talk page) are everywhere, due to the high profile of Wikipedia as a whole, but constructive contributors cannot be, so I always edit at my own risk. Is that a logical conclusion? Xeriphas1994 (talk) 21:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so patient with me. I promise, my next couple of edits will be about content. I guess I just needed to know whether my common sense matched somebody's years of experience, in order to make an informed decision about how addicted to get. :> Best of luck with whatever you're working on here. Xeriphas1994 (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:message[edit]

sorry, and thank you Chineseeagle123 (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to ZuluPapa's outing complaint[edit]

"Pete" is not identifying information, and the other user states that, "It won't be difficult to discover my identity and I've no interest in hiding it."

This is just another attempt by ZuluPapa to use every wiki-legal and procedural means to prevent me from working on the Jetsunma Ahkon Lhamo article, rather than focusing on the content. We've been through this several times. Now, ZuluPapa attempted an outing of me a few months back: ZuluPapa's attempt at outing. It didn't bother me much because it's not me. But should I have reported it? Longchenpa (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Headings[edit]

Thanks for letting me know!Ltwin (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Cool (aesthetic); TRON (encoding); Black & Blue; Rohan Ricketts; The Machine Gunners; Granby Zoo; St. Louis Gunners; Mark Davies; Christopher Wreh; Kung Fu Panda; Compression artifact; Marriageable age; Roger Johnson (footballer); Peter Brackley; Jacques Lemaire; Macaroni Penguin; Wanderers Stadium; Beyond the Sea (film); National Computer Security Center

Cleanup: Digital World; ROSE Online; Strider Hiryu
Merge: Characteristic equation; Ai and Mako; Shotgun wedding
Add Sources: Cyberathlete Amateur League; Good ol' boy; Creedence Clearwater Revival
Wikify: Maury Yeston; Darren Currie; Spiritual gift
Expand: Bob McNab; Zinedine Zidane; Eugene R. Black

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XHTML thingy[edit]

Wikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009[edit]

From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fr:Utilisateur:Dodoïste/Wikipédia:Demandes de médiation[edit]

Hi there, I'm from the English Wikipedia and was curious about this edit: [11]. Is this the actual mediation page on the French Wikipedia, or does it simply need its interwiki links removed? So as not to confuse the bot.

Pardon me for speaking in English, because my French isn't great. x42bn6 discuter déchets 30 mars 2009 à 18:02 (CEST)

I attempted to create a Mediation Committee on the french Wikipedia, but many Wikipedians thought it was not a good idea. So these pages were moved in my user namepace, and I forgot to remove the interwikis. It should be fixed now. Thanks ! :-) Dodoïste (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009[edit]

From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
Special report: Community weighs license update
News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009[edit]

Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
WikiProject report: WikiProject China
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution[edit]

Nice that you want to use that picture, I'm pleased when I see that a picture of mine is useful. I'm happy with a "Photo: Hans A. Rosbach" and an indication of the license. If you have the possibility to link to the source that might help others locate it. It would be nice to see the result, please give me a hint. Haros (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009[edit]

License update: Licensing vote begins
News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009[edit]

Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 05:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009[edit]

News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009[edit]

From the editor: Writers needed
Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009[edit]

License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009[edit]

From the editor: Browsing the archives
Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009[edit]

Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009[edit]

Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009[edit]

News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009[edit]

From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009[edit]

News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009[edit]

Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009[edit]

From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jetsunma Ahkon Lhamo article you were involved with briefly last year[edit]

Hi. I'm going through and cleaning up the mess I made of Jetsunma's article. I wasn't straight with you guys, though my spin-doctoring against Jetsunma was pretty obvious to the Wiki community I'm sure. I did not have scholarly integrity in how I wrote the article about Jetsunma, cherry-picking negative information to put together as negative a picture as possible -- even more negative than the most critical materials out there. I knew what to use because I was one of the main sources on the book, The Buddha From Brooklyn, which is major conflict of interest as well (especially since I didn't admit my involvement and presented myself as an outside party and then used that book extensively for the article). In fact, my real name is Michelle Grissom, formerly known as Ani Dechen, and am actually a student who broke with Jetsunma in 1996. I was one of the main reasons the book was so slanted against Jetsunma. I was not honest in that book either, slanting information exactly the same way I did here on Wikipedia: I used things that weren't really a problem for me because I knew they would upset non-Buddhists. Describing a confrontation where -- after 8 years of my rebelling against the monastic community and my breaking my monastic vows -- she yelled at me and swatted me once, I called it a "beating," simply because the police term for any kind physical contact is battery. I swept my own behavior that led to this under the rug. Jetsunma has been divorced several times, to men who either were or later became her students, and I used that in the article to make her look like she was sleeping her way through her students. I also used the generosity of her students as a way to paint her as being very greedy, even though she's never even asked for a salary, and blamed her for the ongoing struggle to build a monastery, even though the main reason the monastery hasn't been built is that the land bought for it doesn't perk. I've taken all the spin-doctoring out of the article and I am very, very sorry I abused Wiki for my own personal vendetta. Longchenpa (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009[edit]

From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009[edit]

Opinion essay: White Barbarian
Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009[edit]

New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009[edit]

From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
Dispatches: Sounds
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009[edit]

News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009[edit]

Interview: Interview with John Blossom
News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009[edit]

Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup

Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia

Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report

Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway

Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall

News and notes: Strategic planning, November conference, brief news and milestones

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009[edit]

Fundraiser: Controversial "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser to start 10 November

New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol

German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists

Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris

Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November

Book review: Review of Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures: Cybercultures in Online Learning

News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more

In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more

Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009[edit]

Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins

Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award

Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing

News and notes: Kiswahili contest, new advisory board members, Foundation-l and more

In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more

Sister projects: Wiktionary interview

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009[edit]

Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts

Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24

Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues

News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more

In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009[edit]

Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll

News and notes: 35k donated, WikiProject for Wikipedia-Books, 2M rated articles, and more

In the news: Reports of Wikipedia's demise, prescriptions for its ills, and more

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009[edit]

From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost

Editorial: A digital restoration

Election report: ArbCom election in full swing

Interview: Interview with David G. Post

News and notes: Wikipedia's death report premature, fundraiser, usability, new CSD, noms, and more

In the news: Ron Livingston sues vandal, disclosure of IP address ordered, brief headlines

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009[edit]

Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections

News and notes: Mapping geotagged articles language, import sources enabled, and more

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009[edit]

Election report: ArbCom election result announced

News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more

In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009[edit]

News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news

In the news: Criticism from climate change sceptic, decade in review

Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010[edit]

News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more

In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010[edit]

From the editor: Call for writers

2009 in review: 2009 in Review

Books: New Book namespace created

News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more

In the news: Wikipedia in British schools, Hitler's Downfall meme, and more

Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010[edit]

News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more

In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more

WikiProject report: Where are they now?

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010[edit]

BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar

Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century

News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more

In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?

WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010[edit]

From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy

Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community

News and notes: New CTO, Britain Loves Wikipedia, Telefónica partnership, Multimedia and more

In the news: Wikipedia on CDs, BBC uses Wikipedia content, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs

Sister projects: Sister project roundup

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010[edit]

News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more

In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more

Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009

WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010[edit]

News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more

In the news: Labor squeeze revisited, journalist consultations, philosophy bungles, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010[edit]

News and notes: $2 Million donation, cybersquatting, comScore statistics and more

In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010[edit]

Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed

News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more

In the news: Idealizing the Star Spangled Banner, Curious Announcement, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010[edit]

News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones

In the news: Pentagon shooter used Wikipedia, soon iPhone OS will too

WikiProject report: WikiProject Java

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010[edit]

News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs

In the news: Studies on collaboration and student usage, Main Page drives traffic to Time.com

Dispatches: GA Sweeps end

WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010[edit]

Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts

News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page

In the news: Campaign for video, costs of crowdsourcing, iPhone app, brief headlines

WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010[edit]

News and notes: Usability rollout, downtime, admin phishing, Wikimania scholarships and more

In the news: Overdue correction, Critical Point of View conference, brief headlines

Sister projects: A handful of happenings

WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010[edit]

News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos

In the news: Wikipedia influences drug terminology, brief headlines

WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup

Features and admins: This week in approvals

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010[edit]

Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images

News and notes: Studying German flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case

In the news: SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject

WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010[edit]

News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits

In the news: Study of featured article quality, Facebook's integration of Wikipedia, and more!

WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010[edit]

From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars

Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders

News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!

In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!

Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest

WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010[edit]

Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia

News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news

In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010[edit]

From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted

Commons deletions: Porn madness

Book review: Dan O'Sullivan's Wikipedia: a new community of practice?

Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide

News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All

In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010[edit]

News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum

In the news: In the news

WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010[edit]

News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining

WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010[edit]

Photography: Making money with free photos

News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news

WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010[edit]

From the team: Changes to the Signpost

News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more

In the news: Cancer coverage, cognitive surplus, Wikipedia monarchy, and more

Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable

WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010[edit]

News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news

In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010[edit]

Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons

News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more

In the news: Wikipedia better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject U2

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010[edit]

Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content

News and notes: 2010–15 plan, Smithsonian outreach, Teaching Wikipedia, brief news

In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?

Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative

WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010[edit]

News and notes: WMF expansion, community hires, award for MediaWiki, admin recall

In the news: Accidentally anonymized donation, democratized learning and more

Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk

WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature

Features and admins: This week's highlights

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010[edit]

UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups

News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative

In the news: Foundation plans, David Barton, dangerous occasional glitches

Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village

WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010[edit]

News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia

In the news: Wikimania, Former Wikimedia employee looks back, Editing controversial articles

Vandalism: Vandalism edits fool media and a government, become object of bets

WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010[edit]

News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news

In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade

WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek

Features and admins: The best of the week

Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010[edit]

News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports

In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed

WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Major MediaWiki release, password security, vulnerable MediaWiki installations, and more

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010[edit]

News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee

In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more

Admin stats: RfA drought worsens in 2010—wikigeneration gulf emerging

Sister projects: Strategic Planning update

WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010[edit]

News and notes: Book publisher apologizes for plagiarizing photos by Wikipedians, brief news

Spam attacks: Large scale vandalism revealed to be "study" by university researcher

In the news: Supportive communication and missing incentives on Wikipedia, and more

WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010[edit]

News and notes: Pending changes poll, Public policy classes, Payment schemes debate, and more

In the news: Zionist editing courses, newspaper denies editing candidate, net neutrality

WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010[edit]

News and notes: Most linked websites on Wikipedia, New York Wiki-Conference, and more

In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more

WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities

Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000

Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?

Technology report: Reusability of MediaWiki code, Google Summer of Code: Interwiki transclusion, and more

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010[edit]

News and notes: Pending changes analyzed, Foundation report, Main page bias, brief news

In the news: WikiLeaks and Wikipedia; Google–WP collaboration to translate health information

Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky

Dispatches: Tools, part 1: References, external links, categories and size

WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force

Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th

Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more

Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010[edit]

News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes

In the news: Public Policy Initiative, Houellebecq plagiarism?, Article revisions as book

Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment

Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration

WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab

Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010[edit]

From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost

News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes

In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia

WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains

Features and admins: The best of the week

Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories

Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010[edit]

News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more

In the news: Wikimedia moves into India, critical conference, Vandalism detection contest

WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010[edit]

News and notes: German chapter remodeled to meet Foundation requirements, and more

In the news: Spanish police pursues BLP vandals, Jimbo interviewed, advice for experts and spammers

Book review: Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, by Joseph Reagle

WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes

Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010[edit]

News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more

In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution

Features and admins: Big week for ships and music

Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010[edit]

News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief

WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics

Features and admins: A week for marine creatures

Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review

Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months

Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010[edit]

News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced

In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news

WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror

Features and admins: The best of the week

ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?

Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:22, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010[edit]

News and notes: Foundation's finances, geodata milestone, interim counsel, museum conference

In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric

WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey

Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails

Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days

Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010[edit]

Fundraiser: November 15 launch, emphasis on banner optimization and community involvement

News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity

In the news: WP prose praised, Public Policy update, education debate, WP documentary

WikiProject report: WikiProject California

Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science

Election report: The countdown begins

Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010[edit]

News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership

In the news: How big can Wikipedia pictures get?; fundraising season

WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon

Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains

Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process

Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010[edit]

News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations

In the news: Jimbo Wales interviewed and parodied; Wikipedia in politics

Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder

WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football

Features and admins: The best of the week

Election report: Candidates still stepping forward

Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010[edit]

News and notes: Backlog drive; youth and confidence among Wikipedians, brief news

In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report

Interview: Interview with Johanna Niesyto and Nathaniel Tkacz from "Critical Point of View"

WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays

Features and admins: The best of the week

Election report: Voting in full swing

Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010[edit]

News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive

In the news: Amazon "shopping-enabling" Wikipedia; Al Jazeera interview; be like Wikipedia

GLAM-WIKI London: British Museum hosts two days of talks between Wikimedia and the cultural sector

WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak

WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup

Features and admins: Birds and insects

Arbitration report: New case: World War II

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010[edit]

News and notes: Wikipedia articles expert-reviewed by Encyclopedia of Life, and more

In the news: Confusion about Wikileaks continues, Wikipedia vs. Britannica in India, and more

Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.

WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae

Features and admins: The best of the week

Election report: The community has spoken

Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010[edit]

News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief

In the news: Faulty story urges for advertising on Wikipedia; brief news

Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland

Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?

WikiProject report: Majestic Titans

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010[edit]

Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting

News and notes: Director of Technical Operations hired; South Korean mayor sues; brief news

In the news: Designing Wikipedia and the origin of page histories; brief news

WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)

Features and admins: The best of the week

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011[edit]

2010 in review: Review of the year

News and notes: Record fundraiser celebrated and debated; Board-appointed Trustees; brief news

In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news

WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux

Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year

Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2011[edit]

News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news

In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project

WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways

Features and admins: Featured topic of the year

Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011[edit]

News and notes: Anniversary celebrations; Foundation reports; local language problems; brief news

In the news: Anniversary coverage continues; Thai government translates Wikipedia; brief news

Sister projects: Upcoming steward elections, and a retrospective on stewards' work in 2010

WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket

Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons

Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case

Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011[edit]

News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news

In the news: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited; Wikipedia still failing to fail; brief news

WikiXDC: Wikipedians celebrate anniversary with US National Archives in Washington, D.C.

WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more

Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2011[edit]

News and notes: Executive Director travels; DMCA takedowns; fellowship clarifications; brief news

In the news: Facebook hack; gender gap; What is the Wikipedia "community"?; brief news

The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books

WikiProject report: WikiWarriors

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011[edit]

News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief

In the news: Wikipedia controversies about Mormon topics examined; brief news

Gender gap: Widespread discussions about the low participation of women in Wikipedia

WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011[edit]

News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news

In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news

Accreditation: Gaining accreditation as Wikimedia photographers at sports events

WikiProject report: Articles for Creation

Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought

Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011[edit]

News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news

In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news

Versailles: Six-month residence in the Palace of Versailles for a Wikimedian

WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2011[edit]

News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news

In the news: Egypt and Jordan likely candidates for Wikimedia office; Sanger interview; brief news

Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times

WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases

Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 March 2011[edit]

News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news

In the news: "Truth in Numbers?" interview; 94% women; Google algorithm update; brief news

Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community

WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 March 2011[edit]

News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news

In the news: Paying US$1,000 to correct a Wikipedia error; brief news

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem

Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news

Editcountitis: Report on Editcountitis. 27% of all edits have been done by just 4,000 editors

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011[edit]

News and notes: NPG copyright irony; Citizendium's finances; Credo accounts donated; brief news

In the news: Ward Cunningham's rich child; Indian donations; data mining Wikipedia; brief news

WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine

Features and admins: Best of the week

Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases

Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 March 2011[edit]

News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news

In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news

WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify

Features and admins: Featured list milestone

Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?

Technology report: UploadWizard release; code review – should MediaWiki move to Git?; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 April 2011[edit]

News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news

In the news: Academic contributions; Jimmy Wales weighs in on murder trial controversy; brief news

Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?

WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 April 2011[edit]

News and notes: Editor retention; Malayalam loves Wikimedia; Wikimedia reports; brief news

In the news: What if experts just want to get their links into Wikipedia?; brief news

Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed

WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?

Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 April 2011[edit]

News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news

In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news

WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2011[edit]

News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news

In the news: Low-hanging fruit and sustainability; Qwiki on iPad; sceptic critic; brief news

WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 May 2011[edit]

News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news

In the news: Wikipedia users name "superinjunction celebrities"; brief news

WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case

Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 May 2011[edit]

News and notes: More research on newbie editors; Baidu plagiarism; bin Laden coverage; brief news

In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news

WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games

Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back

Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?

Technology report: MediaWiki 1.16.5, 1.17b1; 1.18 branched; UploadWizard the default; Berlin Hackathon; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2011[edit]

News and notes: Geographical distribution of Wikipedia edits; Sue Gardner interviewed; brief news

In the news: Education minister's speech copied from Wikipedia; Jimmy Wales interviewed; brief news

WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute

Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 May 2011[edit]

News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news

In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news

WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 May 2011[edit]

News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news

In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news

WikiProject report: The Royal Railway

Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism

Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired

Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 June 2011[edit]

Board elections: Time to vote

News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news

In the news: 60% of doctors use Wikipedia; growing in India; brief news

Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes

WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 June 2011[edit]

News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news

In the news: Revere, Palin and Colbert generate activity; British Wikipedia "cleanser"; brief news

WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft

Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page

Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case

Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 June 2011[edit]

News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news

In the news: Wikipedia could become trusted medical resource; neologism controversy; news in brief

WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet

Technology report: Engineering department restructured; "break MediaWiki and be reverted"; news in brief

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 June 2011[edit]

News and notes: ArbCom database theft; WikiLove to roll out on the English Wikipedia; brief news

In the news: Russian president uploads to Wikimedia Commons; brief news

WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 July 2011[edit]

News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news

In the news: WikiLove roll-out; €25,000 in damages for being removed from Wikipedia; brief news

WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject

Featured content: Two newly promoted portals

Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin

Technology report: June report: Virginia datacenter, parser, user profiles; WikiLove 1.0; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 July 2011[edit]

From the editor: Stepping down

Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap

News and notes: Wikipedians' surfing habits explored, Sloan Foundation renews $3M grant

In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting

WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close

Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2011[edit]

News and notes: WMF Annual plan; Article Feedback tool; university outreach; brief news

In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news

WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!

Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual

Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder

Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2011[edit]

Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen

News and notes: Oral citations; the state of global development; a gentler Huggle; brief news

In the news: Open access clash with copyright; rising reader satisfaction; the wiki-correlates of geopolitical instability; brief news

Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research

WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion

Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 August 2011[edit]

News and notes: Wikimania; why Board of Trustees elections attract few votes; brief news

In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news

Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team

WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia

Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town

Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case

Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 August 2011[edit]

Wikimania: Seventh annual Wikimedia conference concluded in Haifa, Israel

News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay

In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news

WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close

Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2011[edit]

Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix

News and notes: Chapter funding and what skeptics and Latter Day Saints have in common

In the news: Wikipedia a "sausage fest", Chicago Wikipedians ("the people you've probably plagiarized"), and other silly season stories

WikiProject report: The Oregonians

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress

Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011[edit]

News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens

In the news: Journalist regrets not checking citation, PR firms issue advice on how to "survive" Wikipedia (but U.S. Congressman caught red-handed)

WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation

Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography

Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration

Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011[edit]

News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results

In the news: Wikipedia praised for disaster news coverage, scolded for left-wing bias; brief news

Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety

Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire

WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Four existing cases

Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011[edit]

News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive

In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia like "apples and chairs"; should anyone who's anyone get an article?; and why fighting and barriers to editing may be useful after all

WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport

Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Featured content: The best of the week

Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care

Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle

Technology report: Pencils down in Google Summer of Code, August analysed and integrated HTTPS support in action

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011[edit]

News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked

In the news: 9/11 coverage, Wikimedia hypothetically rebranded and Wikipedia golf 2.0

WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics

Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures

Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications

Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live

Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011[edit]

From the editor: Changes to The Signpost

News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised

In the news: Wikipedia: yesterday's news? Calls for women, doctors, and scholars of humanities; Wales makes Wikimedia work "look easy"

Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork

WikiProject report: Back to school

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case

Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word

Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011[edit]

Opinion essay: The global mission, the image filter and the "German question"

Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews

News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content

In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references

WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: "Broadly construed" explained, voting begins on Senkaku Islands case, invitation to comment on CU/OS candidates

Technology report: 1.18 deployment on track, "mythical" Git migration scheduled, editor decline statistics improved

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011[edit]

News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy

In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts

WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand

Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan

Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011[edit]

Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians

News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised

In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist

WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People

Featured content: The weird and the disgusting

Arbitration report: Senkaku Islands closes; administrators authorized to place articles on discretionary sanctions

Technology report: 1.18 deployment and HTTPS switchover completed, but developer help now needed with new projects

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011[edit]

News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized

In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out

WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP

Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic

Arbitration report: Case requests on ethnic strife and a WikiProject declined, Abortion case stalls but topic bans look to be lightened on amendment

Technology report: WMDE renew investment in Toolserver, first offsite backup programme of Wikimedia begun

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 October 2011[edit]

From the editors: A call for contributors

Opinion essay: There is a deadline

Interview: Contracting for the Foundation

In the news: Are Wikipedians reluctant journalists?; Wikipedia:The Musical

WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case

Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2011[edit]

Opinion essay: The monster under the rug

Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified

News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest

In the news: Citizendium on the rocks, Shankbone celebrated, and the week in vandalism

Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful

WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined

Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011[edit]

Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot

News and notes: Wikimedia Norway awarded, Halloween on the Main Page, Wikimedia UK recognised

In the news: The Economist assays the encyclopaedia's challenges, Jimbo speaks on net future, and an inclusionist alternative emerges.

Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC

WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science

Featured content: Slow week for Featured content

Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week

Technology report: Full steam ahead on Visual Editor, the avoidance of lock-breaking and 1.18b1 release

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011[edit]

News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released

In the news: Fundraising vs ads redux, WikiConference India nigh, a world lit up with articles

WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India

Featured content: Writing featured content: Advice from Sturmvogel 66; Sports, sports, sports!

Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding

Technology report: Coding Challenge results; Wikimedians to wait and see if Athena really does represent "wisdom, courage and inspiration"

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011[edit]

News and notes: Last-minute candidates for ArbCom, the Sue Gardner European Tour hits London

In the news: Indian wikiconference heralds expansion, fundraiser in Silicon Valley major donor coup, import of Wikipedia reconsidered

Discussion report: Much ado about censorship

WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections

Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2011[edit]

News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar

In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars

Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation

WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Voting underway in the elections, finally a final decision on Abortion, scant movement on requests

Technology report: Foundation appears correct to back improved smartphone support; and how a Reddit slip meant no-one could read anything for thirty minutes

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 December 2011[edit]

News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins

In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge

Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship

WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...

Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!

Arbitration report: Elections due to finish this week, little activity on Betacommand 3, Abortion case amended

Technology report: Incremental dumps help mirrors, full screen search helps mobile visitors, and two MediaWiki releases help external sites

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2011[edit]

Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa

News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community

In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed

WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia

Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment

Arbitration report: Betacommand 3 workshop revived, two cases set for acceptance and the ArbCom elections finish on a whimper

Technology report: Trials and tribulations of image rotation, Article Feedback version 5, and new diff colours

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 December 2011[edit]

News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics

In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?

Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions

WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics

Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content

Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators

Technology report: Visual editor demo launched, hailed as "most important change to our user experience ... ever"; but elsewhere over-hasty deployments criticised

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 05:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 December 2011[edit]

Opinion essay: Openness versus quality: why we're doing it wrong, and how to fix it

Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data

News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news

WikiProject report: The Tree of Life

Featured content: Going through the roster with Killervogel5 and a plethora of featured content

Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales

Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 04:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 January 2012[edit]

Interview: The Gardner interview

News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays

WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III

Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future

Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 January 2012[edit]

Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold

News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang

In the news: Wikipedia ends annual fundraising drive; Monmouthpedia launches

WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz

Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review

Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3

Technology report: December in more detail; and why the MediaWiki codebase was "slushed" this week

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 05:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative[edit]

Hi X42bn6,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012[edit]

Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18

Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?

News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files

WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer

Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content

Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near

Technology report: ArticleFeedback moves into new trial phase; and how MediaWiki integrates with Facebook, IPv6, and PostgreSQL explored

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 January 2012[edit]

News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership

In the news: World watched as Wikipedia shut down for SOPA blackout

WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto

Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week

Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications

Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 January 2012[edit]

News and notes: Update on Global Development, Wikipedia Day NYC is a success, JFK audio on Commons

In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau

Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases

WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology

Featured content: Featured content soaring this week

Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases

Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 04:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 February 2012[edit]

News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors

In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned

Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts

WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones

Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff

Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure

Technology report: October's coding challenge: results now in; progress on 1.19 steady; and why for a while interwiki links were no more

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2012[edit]

Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters

News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department

In the news: Scholars and spindoctors contend with the emergent wikiorder

In focus: Skirmishes in the 'great sectarian war of the Internet'

WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Betacommand 3 closed, proposed decision in Civility enforcement, AUSC candidates announced

Technology report: January sees prototype new geodata API; but February looks to be a testing time for top developers

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 04:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2012[edit]

Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers

News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering

Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states

WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Civility enforcement closed, proposed decision in TimidGuy, two cases remain open

Technology report: Major strands of development cycle coalesce as 1.19 is deployed to first wikis

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2012[edit]

News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming

Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative

Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention

WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction

Featured content: By plane, by ship, and by stagecoach: Featured content goes trekking this week

Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open

Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 02:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 March 2012[edit]

News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history

In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing

Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion

WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles

Featured content: Best of the week

Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open

Technology report: With the 1.19 deployment now (mostly) complete, developers consider possible "mini" deployment later in the month

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 March 2012[edit]

Interview: Liaising with the Education Program

Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters

Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators

News and notes: Sue Gardner tackles the funds, and the terms of use update nears implementation

In the news: Britannica runs out of print as Jimmy Wales anointed UK transparency tsar

Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue

WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History

Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman

Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case

Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education

Technology report: Git learning curve steep but not insurmountable, plus a diff style we can all agree on?

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 12:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 March 2012[edit]

News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts

Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again

WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas

Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!

Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting

Technology report: Bugmeister to leave at end of May, but developers keen to "chart" a path ahead

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 March 2012[edit]

News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring

WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music

Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week

Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed

Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature

Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.

Technology report: A busy week: Git switchover, mobile site upgraded, and still time for three security releases

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 April 2012[edit]

Interview: An introduction to movement roles

Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal

News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief

WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost

Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week

Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case

Technology report: Somewhere amongst the endless discussions about Gerrit lie details of hackathons, performance blips explained and more

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 08:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 April 2012[edit]

Wikidata: The next big thing? An interview with Wikidata

Interview: Funds, fiduciaries, and the Foundation: the complex dynamics of scaling

News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee

WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut

Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week

Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases

Technology report: Next Wikimedia deployment already in the pipeline and details of recent performance improvements

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 April 2012[edit]

Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List

Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren

News and notes: French language outreach, WikiTravel debate, and HighBeam reloaded

Discussion report: The future of pending changes

WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera

Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals

Arbitration report: Evidence submissions begin in Rich Farmbrough case, proposed decision in R&I Review

Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20wmf01 hits first WMF wiki, understanding 20% time, and why this report cannot yet be a draft

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 April 2012[edit]

Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"

News and notes: Help-space revamp, WikiTravel RfC, and Justin Knapp scores a million edits

WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files

Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content

Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review

Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 12:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 April 2012[edit]

Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth

News and notes: Showdown as featured article writer openly solicits commercial opportunities

Recent research: Barnstars work; Wiktionary assessed; cleanup tags counted; finding expert admins; discussion peaks; Wikipedia citations in academic publications; and more

Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default

WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps

Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings

Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases

Technology report: What Git means for end users, design controversies and pertinent poll results

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 05:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 May 2012[edit]

Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes

News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013

In the news: What does Wikipedia call an expert; and untruths in biographies ... again.

WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages

Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?

Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases

Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 01:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2012[edit]

Special report: Wikimedia and the "seismic shift" towards open-access research publication

News and notes: Finance debate drags on as editor survey finds Wikipedia too bureaucratic

WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse

Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week

Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure

Technology report: Cross-wiki watchlist controversy; and is "go file a bug" really a useful response?

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 May 2012[edit]

From the editor: New editor-in-chief

News and notes: Two new Wikimedia fellows to boost strategies for tackling major issues

WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....

Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week

Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending

Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 04:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2012[edit]

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends

Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph

WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology

Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese

Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits

Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 09:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 June 2012[edit]

Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women

News and notes: Editors want most funding for technical areas, while widespread ignorance of WMF board elections and chapters persists; voting still live on Commons best picture

Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change

WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts

Featured content: On the lochs

Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban

Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 June 2012[edit]

Special report: Springer's misappropriation of Wikimedia content "the tip of the iceberg"

News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI

WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit

Featured content: The cake is a pi

Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases

Technology report: To support or not to support IPv6, and why knowing when this report was last updated might be getting easier

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 June 2012[edit]

Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?

News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association

Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations

WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia

Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"

Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 03:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 June 2012[edit]

Op-ed: A call for editorial input in developing new Creative Commons licensing

News and notes: "Mystical" Picture of the Year; run-up to Wikimania DC; RfA reform 2012

In the news: Wales enters extradition battle; Wikipedia's political bias

Recent research: Edit war patterns, deleters vs. the 1%, never used cleanup tags, authorship inequality, higher quality from central users, and mapping the wikimediasphere

WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics

Featured content: A good week for the Williams

Arbitration report: Three open cases

Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012[edit]

Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism

Op-ed: Representing knowledge – metadata, data and linked data

News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool

In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?

Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations

WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport

Featured content: Heads up

Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools

Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012[edit]

Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo

News and notes: Russian Wikipedia blackout; WMF tools; Wikitravel proposal revisited

WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football

Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'

Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration

Technology report: Optimism over LastModified and MoodBar, but change in clock time causes downtime

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012[edit]

Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair

News and notes: WMF enacts reforms at Wikimania; main page redesign; 4 millionth article milestone

WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling

Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations

Wikimania: Young chapter shows experience beyond its years

Featured content: Taking flight

Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June

Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012[edit]

Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike

From the editor: Signpost developments

News and notes: Chapter head speaks about the aftermath of Russian Wikipedia shutdown

WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics

Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans

Op-ed: The future of PR on Wikipedia

Featured content: When is an island not an island?

Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012[edit]

Recent research: Conflict dynamics, collaboration and emotions; digitization vs. copyright; WikiProject field notes; quality of medical articles; role of readers; Best Wiki Paper Award

News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP

WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing

Featured content: One of a kind

Technology report: Talking performance with CT Woo and Green Semantic MediaWiki with Nischay Nahata

Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 August 2012[edit]

Op-ed: The Athena Project: being bold

News and notes: FDC portal launched

Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases

Featured content: Casliber's words take root

Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity

WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 11:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 August 2012[edit]

Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden

News and notes: Bangla-language survey suggests the challenges for small Wikipedias

Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration

Featured content: On the road again

Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit

WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution

Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 12:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012[edit]

Op-ed: Wikimedians are rightfully wary

News and notes: Core content competition in full swing; Wikinews fork taken offline

In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia

Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.

Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension

WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012[edit]

News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide

Recent research: New influence graph visualizations; NPOV and history; 'low-hanging fruit'

Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?

Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten

WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who

Discussion report: Sidebar and main page alterations; Recent Deaths; Education Program extension

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 September 2012[edit]

News and notes: World's largest photo competition kicks off; WMF legal fees proposal

Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?

Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror

Op-ed: Dispute resolution – where we're at, what we're doing well, and what needs fixing

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 September 2012[edit]

From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes

Op-ed: Fixing Wikipedia's help pages one key to editor retention

In the media: Author criticizes Wikipedia article; Wales attacks UK government proposal

Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'

WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi

Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial

News and notes: Researchers find that Simple English Wikipedia has "lost its focus"

Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...

Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 06:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 September 2012[edit]

From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook

WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force

Featured content: Go into the light

News and notes: Tens of thousands of monuments loved; members of new funding body announced

Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 17:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012[edit]

In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention

Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012

WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011

News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal

Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times

Featured content: Dead as...

Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 18:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012[edit]

Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales

News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners

Featured content: Mooned

Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty

WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 22:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012[edit]

News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance

WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography

Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk

Technology report: The ups and downs of September and October, plus extension code review analysis

Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012[edit]

Op-ed: AdminCom: A proposal for changing the way we select admins

In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page

Featured content: Second star to the left

News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks

Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost

WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012[edit]

Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective

Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule

Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced

Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution

News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science

WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?

Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012[edit]

News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs

WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History

Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live

Featured content: On the road again

Recent research: WP governance informal; community as social network; efficiency of recruitment and content production; Rorschach news

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 10:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012[edit]

Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end

News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments

In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?

Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks

Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads

Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka

WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 02:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012[edit]

News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate

Featured content: The table has turned

Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly

WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012[edit]

News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in

WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles

Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"

Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect

Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 01:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012[edit]

News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain

Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons

Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation

Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries

WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 10:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012[edit]

News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner

Featured content: The play's the thing

Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables

Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability

WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012[edit]

News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's

Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell

Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual

WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 21:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012[edit]

News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results

WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany

Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes

Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook

Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass

Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012[edit]

News and notes: Debates on Meta sparking along—grants, new entities, and conflicts of interest

WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire

Featured content: Battlecruiser operational

Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012[edit]

From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum

In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter

Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes

Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy

Interview: Interview with Brion Vibber, the WMF's first employee

Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review

WikiProject report: New Year, New York

Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013[edit]

Op-ed: Meta, where innovative ideas die

WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year

News and notes: 2012—the big year

Featured content: Featured content in review

Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013[edit]

Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat

News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme

WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy

Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality

Special report: Loss of an Internet genius

Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012

Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months

Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013[edit]

News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward

WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics

Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review

Arbitration report: Doncram case continues

Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013[edit]

In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention

Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics

WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess

Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests

News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate

Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012

Arbitration report: Doncram continues

Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013[edit]

Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles

News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance

WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun

Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes

In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry

Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 01:30, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013[edit]

Op-ed: An article is a construct – hoaxes and Wikipedia

Featured content: A lousy week

WikiProject report: Just the Facts

In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute

News and notes: UK chapter governance review marks the end of a controversial year

Discussion report: WebCite proposal

Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013[edit]

WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines

Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit

In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press

Featured content: Featured content gets schooled

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 February 2013[edit]

In the media: Ex-WMF trustee creates "Wikipedia Corporate Index" for PR agency

Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers

News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year

Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization

Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'

WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload

Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013[edit]

Op-ed: We must do more to turn readers into editors

News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm

Featured content: Slow week for featured content

WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 March 2013[edit]

From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger

News and notes: Finance committee updates

Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes

Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns

WikiProject report: Setting a precedent

Technology report: Article Feedback reversal

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 March 2013[edit]

News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee

WikiProject report: Making music

Interview: Meeting in the middle: Wikipedia and libraries

Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm

Arbitration report: Richard case closes

Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:29, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013[edit]

WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh

Featured content: One and a half soursops

Arbitration report: Two open cases

News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews

Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?

Recent research: "Ignore all rules" in deletions; anonymity and groupthink; how readers react when shown talk pages

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013[edit]

Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?

WikiProject report: Special: FAQs

Featured content: What the ?

News and notes: Grants given for Wikipedia Library, six others; April Fool's Day ructions

Arbitration report: Three open cases

Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013[edit]

Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry

WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes

News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer

Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History

Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry

Technology report: Testing week

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013[edit]

Op-ed: How do we fix RfA inactivity?

WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa

News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops

Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013[edit]

In the media: Wikipedia inaccurate, says Florence; New Wikipedia app for breaking news

WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention

News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag

Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea

Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban

Technology report: A flurry of deployments

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013[edit]

News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp

In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax

Featured content: Wiki loves video games

WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball

Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles

Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases

Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more

Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013[edit]

News and notes: Candidates nominating for Foundation elections; Looking ahead to Wikimania 2014

Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy

Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!

In the media: New Wikipedia for Schools edition; Anders Behring Breivik's Wikipedia contributions

WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013[edit]

News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list

WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts

Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map

In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?

Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 May 2013[edit]

Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment

WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome

News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles

In the media: Qworty incident continues

Featured content: Up in the air

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 08:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013[edit]

News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions

In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing

Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money

WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates

Featured content: Life of 2π

Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?

Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013[edit]

From the editor: Signpost developments

Featured content: A week of portraits

Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report

News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?

In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia

WikiProject report: Operation Normandy

Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013[edit]

News and notes: How Wikimedia affiliates are spending $8.4 million; PRISM scandal

Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange

In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"

Op-ed: The tragedy of Wikipedia's commons

Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more

Traffic report: Who holds the throne?

Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History

WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, X42bn6. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates[edit]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeVry-University-Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeVry-University-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]