User talk:Spike Wilbury/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 9 |
Finers Stephens Innocent
Hi Spike Wilbury - I've been doing some work on the Mark Stephens (solicitor) article, and I've stumbled across some sources that could be used to create and article for Finers Stephens Innocent, I was about to begin creating that article when I saw that it previously been created and deleted on the grounds of blatent advertising. I'm going to start working on a userspace draft over the next few days, but I thought I should give you a heads up seeing as you were the editor that placed the db notice previously. The draft (in exceptionally early stages at the moment) is at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Darigan/Finers_Stephens_Innocent
Could I invite you to review it when it has a bit more meat? Cheers Darigan (talk) 14:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
On deletion of Lorenzo Iorio page
Hello, dear Spike Wilbury. Now, I think, all is backed with reliable secondary sources. I also included how other peers evaluated Iorio's works and several institutional databases listing his papers. Please, if you have other suggestions, comments, you're welcome. Thank you. Michoball (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Van Halen
Wikipedia:WikiProject Van Halen, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Van Halen and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Van Halen during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
The article Asrama Ibnu Sina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability not demonstrated
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fayenatic (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Phoenix Wiknic is ready to go
Phoenix Wiknic is ready to go (pending a few minor tweaks)--Jax 0677 (talk) 23:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Arizona
It was recently suggested that WikiProject Arizona, to which you are a member, may be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there haven't been much active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. I have begun a discussion on the projects talk page to see how the members of the project feel about this suggestion. Another user has added the project to the WPUS template and I added it to the list of supported projects in the WPUS main project page but before I take any further action I wanted to contact each of the active members for their input. --Kumioko (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)