User talk:Neuralia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Neuralia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Gastric_bypass_surgery. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 19:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes to you!

Tony (talk) 02:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tony & Wywin !!

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eva Neer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Black (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James I. Ausman) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating James I. Ausman, Neuralia!

Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Dan653. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Draft:James I. Ausman, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dan653 (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. You have new messages at Dan653's talk page.
Message added 01:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Blank it again, the only reason I undid it was because there was no G7 tag on the article or explanation in the summary, my bad. Dan653 (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jose F. Caro.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jose F. Caro.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan 2: Evidence of Permision (email) to use file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jose_F._Caro.jpg was just forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as indicated. Thank you

link=User talk:<Dan653>

Hello, Neuralia. You have new messages at [[User talk:<Dan653>|User talk:<Dan653>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Neuralia (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:James I. Ausman.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:James I. Ausman.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Helen M. Blau.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Helen M. Blau.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Surgical_neurology_international#Re Tone and Writing like Advert[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Surgical_neurology_international#Re Tone and Writing like Advert. Jguard18 ^{Critique Me} 01:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Surgical neurology international[edit]

The article Surgical neurology international has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 05:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Surgical neurology international for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surgical neurology international is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surgical neurology international until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance required[edit]

Dear Neuralia, Researching a proposal for a new entry for Surgical Neurology International, I found you had attempted to create an entry for it but it was rejected by several editors. I don't know exactly why they were so critical of the entry. SNI is a notable journal and I think you were correct in trying to establish a Wikipedia entry for it. I have obtained permission from one of the Wikipedia administrators to re-submit a new "draft" entry for SNI. I suspect I may need your help. I think you were too much of a gentleman, because if you had looked at the contributions of journals created by the principal editor who rejected your proposal, you would have found that most of his journal creations do not pass the standards that he demanded of your submission. Since you already have experience with this entry, I thought perhaps you could help me in the approval process on the talk pages. The administrator has been very nice and I think we may even get his support. But I also suspect that the trio that assailed you may return for another round, as I believe this is a turf battle. Feel free to come to my talk page to follow this development and render me the assistance I may need. If the struggle becomes intense, I'm prepared to demonstrate how most of the entries made by one of the aforementioned editors are faulty because of lack of "verifiable secondary sources," guilty of the same offenses you were accused of. If I can render you assistance in the future with an entry, let me know.LeBassRobespierre (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neuralia, all I ask is that you study both the SNI Draft page and its Talk Page and render your opinion, whatever it is, about the new entry for SNI. You have more experience than most on this specific entry. Specifically about Notability of this journal, abiding by guidelines, and fair treatment for all — Nothing more!

SNI Draft Talk Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Surgical_Neurology_International SNI Draft Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Surgical_Neurology_International

You never know when you might need assistance from others!LeBassRobespierre (talk) 10:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

link=User talk:<LeBassRobespierre>

Hello, Neuralia. You have new messages at [[User talk:<LeBassRobespierre>|User talk:<LeBassRobespierre>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LeBassRobespierre, I just provided a favourable opinion in the Draft talk:Surgical Neurology International. I did it because I think it is fair, not so much thinking about my eventual need for other's assistance. Good luck. Neuralia (talk) 12:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you so much for your work for Wikipedia. You deserve this Special Barnstar of appreciation for your pursuit of justice! LeBassRobespierre (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did here, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Randykitty (talk) 18:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh how frightening !![edit]

How do you call such executioners? Are they your subordinates Randikitty? And what do they do to ill-judging editors who do not even offer apologies for their missdeeds.? When you said I was not being serious were you not making a personal disqualification? So maybe you can consider blocking your own self as an editor. Neuralia (talk) 19:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Esparza[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Jose Esparza, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Jose esparza. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UNINTENTIONAL DUPLICATION: mistake corrected Error was taken care of by blanking Jose esparza and leaving Jose Esparza. Our sincere apologies.

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Esparza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equine encephalitis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your José Esparza entry[edit]

Excellent entry, Neuralia! I have also left a note at the Talk page for José Esparza. Oops! And Thanks for the Original Barnstar! -- LeBassRobespierre (talk) 20:34, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lorenzo Mendoza Fleury Science Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universidad de Los Andes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Maternity by Jose F. Caro.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Maternity by Jose F. Caro.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 13:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note taken, action under way[edit]

Thank you for the above piece of advice, User:Rohnjones Neuralia (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Neuralia (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do check out WP:DCM for ways of handling other's persons photos. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Permission to use File ((Maternity by Jose F. Caro.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Permission to use File ((Maternity by Jose F. Caro.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This email is part of the confidential process at OTRS and should not be published here without the permission of the sender.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Green Giant (talk) 13:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pierre De Meyts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Receptor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the valuable adice, receptor has been disambiguated in Pierre De Meyts article

Neuralia (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Blackbox revisited by Pierre De Meyts, alias Chuck.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Blackbox revisited by Pierre De Meyts, alias Chuck.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul R. Cunningham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dean and Trauma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:José G. Esparza-Bracho.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:José G. Esparza-Bracho.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Momentary editing exercise[edit]

Hi Neuralia, I noticed you created that "draft". There is a better way to do exercises -- every editor has a "sandbox", which you can find in a link at the top of the page. The purpose of the sandbox is to use for testing and exercises without creating junk that clutters Wikipedia. Best regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Momentary editing exercise[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. You have new messages at User:Looie496.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Looie496, thanks for the advice. Do you know how often sandboxes are cleared by the system? I have cleared Draft:Momentary editing exercise already as suggested. Neuralia (talk) 19:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Neuralia (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jacobo Penzo[edit]

Did you get your question answered about the foreign language cites?Naraht (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vladimir Volegov[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Vladimir Volegov, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tuttartpitturasculturapoesiamusica.com/2011/07/vladimir-volegov-russia.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:ThomasDodd 400x400.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ThomasDodd 400x400.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Dream[edit]

Hi, I think you need to use a different name for this image ! GrahamHardy (talk) 21:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sapientia by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sapientia by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dream Within A Dream.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Dream Within A Dream.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hope by Thomas Dodd.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Hope by Thomas Dodd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Alirio Palacios page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Photorealism page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allan Gorman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR[edit]

You should have received an email from me with a link to a registration form for JSTOR - can you please either complete the form, or email me if you did not receive it? Please be aware that because of the large waitlist, not responding could lead to your slot being passed on to another editor. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ping. Please respond in the next week if you still wish to have an account. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir, I do want to have an account. Thanks & Happy New Year.

Great, but you really do need to fill out the form, otherwise JSTOR won't be able to set up your account. If you didn't receive it, I can re-send, just let me know. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please send me the form again by email icontrera@yahoo.com and/or nivancontreras@gmail.com . I don´t have a record of having received such a form. Cheers

Neuralia (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sent to both. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I filled out the two fields required in the googleform. Await further events. Neuralia (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jan A. Nelson: notable?[edit]

After reverting your addition of the redlinked Jan A. Nelson article to Fremont, Nebraska, I looked at your contribution history and found your draft of the article.

Unless there are stronger sources than the ones you've cited so far, I don't believe that Nelson meets Wikipedia's notability standards. The standards call for:

Significant coverage in
Reliable sources that are
Independent of the subject.

None of the sources that I see in your references section appears to meet these three standards. We've got things like Microsoft and LinkedIn, which are not independent; like YouTube and Wordpress sources, which are neither reliable nor independent; and like an IBDB page and oldfriends.com, which don't provide significant coverage.

I don't want to discourage you from contributing to WP, but neither do I want to see you spend a lot of time and effort on an article that's at a high risk of being deleted. I haven't made a serious effort to find out whether Nelson actually meets notability standards; but if the article was posted and then nominated for deletion, and I couldn't find any sources stronger than those in the current references list, I'd have to !vote for deletion.

Could I suggest that you try to find sources that meet the notability guidelines before proceeding further with this draft? If you could find something like a reasonably long (more than a few paragraphs) profile in a technology magazine independent of Microsoft, or in an independent art journal, then it'd probably be worth continuing to work on this article. Otherwise, however, it might be better for you to spend your time and effort on a subject whose notability is less questionable.

I hope you don't think that I'm trying to dissuade you from contributing to the encyclopedia. The opposite is true: the amount of research that you've apparently put into this article suggests that you might well be a valuable contributor. For exactly that reason, I'd hate to see you suffer the disappointment of working hard on an article only to have it deleted for failure to meet notability standards. — Ammodramus (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ammodramus, thanks very much for your generous advice. Obviously I.ll have to rethink the whole issue. Best regards.

Neuralia (talk) 11:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Christine Swann concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christine Swann, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tempus ad Requiem V by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Tempus ad Requiem V by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no proper licence, its a 3D work of Art, its definetely not "oil on canvas". So the uploader has lost any credit in view of his/her other statements --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christine Swann[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christine Swann".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TWL HighBeam check-in[edit]

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. 20:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niels Birbaumer (June 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This has been clearly copied from another source - it needs formatting and sources adding

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niels Birbaumer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Neuralia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear people , I don´t recall to have ever made any edits

having to do with Draft:Niels_Birbaumer . There must be a mistake somewhere. Neuralia (talk) 12:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Jan Nelson[edit]

Draft:Jan Nelson, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jan Nelson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Jan Nelson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to deletion

Neuralia (talk) 18:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blame The Monkey[edit]

Hello. A tag has been placed on Blame The Monkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rahul^{Text me} 19:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blame The Monkey

added a link pointing to Post processing

Elia Locardi

added a link pointing to National Geographic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brent Funderburk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brent Funderburk for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Funderburk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Funderburk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Neuralia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Albemarle Gallery copyright concern[edit]

Your initial revision of the above draft was copied from http://www.albemarlegallery.com/, a copyright web page. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki, not even temporarily. Do your edits before you save the page, or use an external editor please. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The copyrighted text was only used as a guide, thanks Diannaa

Neuralia (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but I was obliged to go back and do revision deletion to it up. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your draft article, Draft:Niels Birbaumer[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Niels Birbaumer".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albemarle Gallery for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albemarle Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albemarle Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mauricio Goihman Yahr[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mauricio Goihman Yahr".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 11:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David Kordansky Gallery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:David Kordansky Gallery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent Funderburk (August 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Brent Funderburk instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brent Funderburk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brent Funderburk concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brent Funderburk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brent Funderburk[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brent Funderburk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Stev´nn Hall[edit]

Hello, Neuralia,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stev´nn Hall should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stev´nn Hall .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jan Anders Nelson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Anders Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Anders Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gonzalo Calzada[edit]

Hello, Neuralia,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Gonzalo Calzada! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Victor Wang (painter)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Victor Wang (painter).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lopifalko}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lopifalko (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stev´nn Hall[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Stev´nn Hall.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladimir Volegov[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vladimir Volegov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Vladimir Volegov, Russian visual artist.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Vladimir Volegov, Russian visual artist.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Neuralia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Neuralia/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Smit (sculptor) (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear how he passes WP:NARTIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong, thank you for your revision. With a view to improving the submission, coould you please indicate which of the 26 references provided are not "reliable" or not "secondary"? Perhaps some of the 26 could be kept for a revised version of the article? Thank you.

Neuralia (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was more that I couldn't see how he passed WP:NARTIST ...

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Which of these do you think he passes? Theroadislong (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, in that case could you please reword your decliner to show its real reasons. i.e., WP:NARTIST criteria (rather than references not being secondary or reliable)? I would like to invite other editors to contribute and this may help address further contributions adequately. Thank you.Neuralia (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The decline template can't be modified which is why I added it as a comment. Theroadislong (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong, After careful consideration of your note (Not clear how he passes WP:NARTIST) I have now added info in the header section to sustain that the artist´s work is a "significant monument/part of a significant exhibition" as required by WP:NARTIST. I trust this will satisfy your criteria. Thank you for your teachings.Neuralia (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fstoppers[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fstoppers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arlon Bayliss has been accepted[edit]

Arlon Bayliss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ Alex Noble - talk 10:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio Vidal-Puig (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Antonio Vidal-Puig instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonio Vidal-Puig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Antonio Vidal-Puig, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Kaláb (April 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jan Kaláb instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Kaláb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jan Kaláb, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor)[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anton Smit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did a little editing so this wouldn't get deleted. DGG ( talk ) 17:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Craggs (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Craggs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Craggs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Krautgartner has been accepted[edit]

Kevin Krautgartner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lopifalko (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	good works Rahulsoman^{talk - contribs} 23:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rahulsoman, thanks for the Barnstar, I am not sure what it is for, though; could you please make it clear for me? At the moment I am expecting the approval/rejection of my Draft:Scott Waldman which was revised by DGG without a decision. Whatever you can do about moving this submission to mainspace if applicable will be appreciated.Neuralia (talk) 00:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Scott_Waldman looks good, but unfortunately iam no one related to edit or review an article. Im sure DGG will definitely accept it, if we see his views about professors and academic persons its clear. So have a great time here... Rahulsoman^{talk - contribs} 01:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rahulsoman, so you didn´t say what the Barnstar was for, right? Thanks.Neuralia (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chris Craggs has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chris Craggs. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 15:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waldman[edit]

see my note on the hlep desk. And next time you ewrite for the English WP, if its a person in a English languagecompany, try to use English sources. DGG ( talk ) 10:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Waldman has been accepted[edit]

Scott Waldman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James Rushforth[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Rushforth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Tartaglia (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

::Don't use jargon: "help launch " , "help found", " seminal","began his research path ", "start, build, and initially manage"-- a trio like that is Dept of Defense jargon.

Don't use vague terms. The word "several" is meaningless. "described important molecular connections"

we don't say " A brief account of Tartaglia's career is visible on his Bloomberg profile.", but just link to it, or give it as an external link.

Give his whole career chronologically,

Avoid wordiness not "Tartaglia´s further research went on to clone and characterize a number of other genes important in obesity and diabetes" but He also characterized the X, Y and Z genes. wwithooth a link to the papers. The coauthors will be found in the link, not the article. don't say

you may not make therapeutic predictions "dy, expected to constitute a novel target for anti-obesity therapy in humans.[18]" is unacceptable

If you want to talk about citations, do it objectively, in a lsit of most cited papers.

" this discovery was announced on the front page of the New York Times " is over-enthusiastic for any work lesser in stature than Nobel-prize level.

scientific papers are cited with a formal citation, as in ref 14 not just to the database like pubchem as in ref 24, or 12

bizjournals, etc. are places to publish PR

a MIT magazine dsecribing its own peoples work is PR, not 3rd party journalism.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Louis Tartaglia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Louis Tartaglia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I forgot to mention that it is also necessary to reduce use of the subject's and company's name. he (or she or it or they or the firm) make good substitutes when there's no ambiguity. I fixed most of this and accepted.

I now expect you will check your other work for these points. Looking at your work on artists, remember that describing the style must be based on a published source. Try to avoid adjectives like "important" (etc.). The article should make this evident by its contents. Don't for example say "represented in the art collections of notable institutions like X Y and Z" but "represented in the art collections of X Y and Z""

It's great to have a non-COI person working in this area, but , considering the extent of COI editing in Wikipedia , you might want to add on article talk pages a statement that you do not have conflict of interest. (or, should it be the case, that you have a nonmonetary conflict of interest) It should stop people asking about it. DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signing[edit]

Please rember to sign your comments on talk pages with your username and the date. You can do this by tying four ~ marks like this: ~~~~ DGG ( talk ) 17:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Tartaglia has been accepted[edit]

Louis Tartaglia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kzatja Loher[edit]

It seems possible from the wording that some of this article may have been translated or copied from some external source, probably a non-English source;

"Within a lustrum from her debut" is not a typical English phrasing or common English word in general context, and

"she is found exhibiting" is normal in some languages, but in English it would normally be "she exhibited in" or "she had exhibited in"

Also in that article, Gallerysite turns out not to be a publication called Gallerysite but the site of the galery which was exhibiting her work--the various fields in cite web should be able to clarify it--and remember that for a commercial gallery this is not an independent site, its what the artist or her publicist or the gallery's publicist chooses to write in order to sell her work. Don't go by the way many articles on contemporary artists are written--most of them have extensive COI which will take the good volunteers in the field many years to cleanup. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these suggestions which have been happily adopted.Neuralia (talk) 18:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silvan Loher (November 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

try removing adjectives, non idiomatic phrases like "His music has equally been performed in...", critical generalities ascribed to unreliable sources, and wordiness "Along his career he has collaborated with several musical institutions, groups and ensembles, including ...." should be "He has collaborated with ...." Are there reviews of his recording?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Silvan Loher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Silvan Loher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Katja Loher[edit]

Hi, Italian language article reviewed as requested. Please, read it again. Utente:Neuralia/Sandbox Duval (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Duval

Concern regarding Draft:Chris Craggs[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chris Craggs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Katja Loher[edit]

Hi, the article in Chinese has been revised as requested. Please check it out here: zh:User:Neuralia/sandbox. Bear in mind that it's better utilising the Chinese title 卡蒂雅·洛涵 in place of Katja Loher.

Uriel1022 (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Uriel1022. The page is now published.

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Craggs[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chris Craggs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! サシャセベン (タク|コヌタリビュシャンス) 15:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silvan Loher has been accepted[edit]

Silvan Loher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

I'm not certain about this, so do not be surprised if someone lists it for deletion; my current view is changing from the former, "I won't approve unless I'm prepared to defend it", to "I'll approve if there's a decent chance, and then the community can decide about it.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Gorski[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tim Gorski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Gorski (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timothy Gorski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Timothy Gorski, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Timothy Gorski has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timothy Gorski. Thanks! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. So, as I understand, in your view none of the 29 sources cited has value for the purpose? The case seems pretty terrible thenNeuralia (talk) 12:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Locardi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Naomi Locardi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 12:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksNeuralia (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Gorski has been accepted[edit]

Tim Gorski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nightenbelle (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tim Gorski[edit]

Hello, Neuralia,

Thank you for creating Tim Gorski.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Nightenbelle}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nightenbelle (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of fellows of IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society[edit]

A tag has been placed on List of fellows of IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whiteguru (talk) 21:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Timothy Gorski[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timothy Gorski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naomi Locardi[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naomi Locardi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In suggested back in Dember that you merge it with merge with Elia Locardi. DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Neuroscience/Verification & Referencing[edit]

id like to improve the article Neuroscience so recently I sent it for peer review. one of the problems found is that there are many unsourced sentences and paragraphs.

I would like help in finding sources for the unsourced parts of the article.

I'm requesting that you look over the article and try to find sources for anything that needs sourcing and delete the parts that cant be verified.

-thank you

RJJ4y7 (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aroha Parish[edit]

A now-blocked vandal, Aroha Parish (talk · contribs) reverted an edit of yours on User:Neuralia/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Please feel free to restore your edits as needed. My apology for that disruption! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 13:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor)[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anton Smit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Whitehot (magazine) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitehot (magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehot (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Netherzone (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Gaynor has been accepted[edit]

Richard Gaynor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

=Suggestions[edit]

You're doing excellent work, as I hope you realize. So, since I'm one of the admins most frequently reviewing scientific bios, I hope you won't mind if I offer further suggestions. They're just suggestions, aimed at having some consistency in style.

I'm making some adjustments--I'm in the middle on this article. What I'm trying to do is deemphasize he parts that are less important--memberships on committees don't really count for much--chairmanships do; being an editor in chief is noteworthy, but not other editorial positions. Peer-reviewed primary research articles count to show notability as a researcher, but not really reviews.In listing the most cited articles, give numbers, preferably from google scholar, because everyone has access to that. And, as a matter of style, don't repeat too much in the introductory paragraph.

When someone has an academic career followed by a management career or public service career, it's usually best to clear separate the two. There'salways a problem in articles on executives, or just what to give them credit for. It's not necessarily correct that they really have main responsibility for the developments that happen while they are in charge; it is sometimes best to say something like, While they were president of the company, it .... For pharmaceuticals,, when we say they led the devlopment of ...., it can be unclear just what is meant: did they come up with the concept, or did they just greenlight the staff's?

But you don't have to send them to draft any more. They're basically OK. You might want to recheck some of the earlier ones in view of what I've suggested. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DGG, many thanks for your comments and advice. I still would appreciate your assistance to preliminarily judge if, in your opinion, page Draft:Manuel Álvarez-Uría can be moved to mainspace without risking undesired disapproving tags. Your help here will be greatly appreciated. Regards, signed Neuralia Neuralia (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neuralia (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just accepted it. Thanks for reminding me. DGG ( talk ) 07:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neuralia. You have new messages at Wywin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neuralia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 200.82.174.66. Neuralia (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed p2p proxy. Please visit the help page for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your contributed article, Neuralia/sandbox9[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Neuralia/sandbox9. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Paula Caligiuri. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Paula Caligiuri. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 12:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural agility, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digitalization. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Álvarez-Uría has been accepted[edit]

Manuel Álvarez-Uría, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James I. Ausman for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James I. Ausman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James I. Ausman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

valereee (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT[edit]

Hallo, when you created A Fortress in Brooklyn (now moved to the shorter title), you included {{DEFAULTSORT:A Fortress in Brooklyn: Race, Real Estate, and the Making of Hasidic Williamsburg}}. But the point of "DEFAULTSORT" is to specify the sorting order, and if you were looking for this book in an A-Z list I imagine that you would look under "F" not "A". I've fixed this, just thought it worth pointing out. There are two main uses for DEFAULTSORT - making sure that "Harry Potter" files under P not H (ie as "Potter, Harry"), and cases like this one where a title starts with The/An/A or foreign equivalents. PamD 07:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. PamD Neuralia (talk) 10:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmy Wright (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jimmy Wright (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 07:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jimmy Wright (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Jimmy Wright (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neuralia/sandbox/books6[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Neuralia/sandbox/books6, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Neuralia

Thank you for creating La Lupa (Swiss singer).

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 18:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Neuralia

Thank you for creating La Lupa (Swiss singer).

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 18:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victor Wang for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victor Wang, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Wang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello Neuralia. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kimberly Eddleston, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Neuralia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Neuralia|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – Joe (talk) 09:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Dear Joe, you are absolutely mistaken on this impression of yours, although I recognize I may have made a mistake when judjing the merits of this particular article. Best wishes in your important role as a Wikipedia regulations watcher. ~~~~ Neuralia (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kimberly Eddleston has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kimberly Eddleston. Thanks! – Joe (talk) 09:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Beacom[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Beacom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kimberly Eddleston has been accepted[edit]

Kimberly Eddleston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexei Kharitonenkov (January 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

Looks good, but needs a bit more on what people have been saying about his works - see WP:NPROF. The Works section could this do with a little expansion (e.g., anyone agree/disagree with what his findings are etc etc, the impact of his works), but other than that, almost ready to be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexei Kharitonenkov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the review and suggestions, which I hope to deal with quite soon. Best. @Neuralia Neuralia (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexei Kharitonenkov has been accepted[edit]

Alexei Kharitonenkov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Beacom[edit]

Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Beacom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Newfield has been accepted[edit]

Christopher Newfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Pollak (December 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet e.g. WP:NARTIST in terms of achievements, not WP:NBASIC in terms of independent reliable sources with WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Pollak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hello Neuralia. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Chris Klein (visual artist), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Neuralia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Neuralia|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your edits added details not stated in the sources cited. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, in response to the above, I hereby declare that I am not being financially compensated for my edits on Wikipedia. Neuralia (talk) 10:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]