User talk:Cloverleaf II/Archive 2014

The Godfather revision

Although some editors prefer to welcome newcomers with a plate of cookies, I believe fruit is a healthier option.

Hello. You have a new message at Gareth Griffith-Jones's talk page. – The Welsh Buzzard — 10:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Post script I can see you have been around WP for quite some time now, but have not been welcomed. So "Welcome to Wikipedia!" — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, much appreciated. I'm still figuring my way around here. Cloverleaf II (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I am always pleased to offer help, so don't be shy in asking. All the best! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 18:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm Solarra. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Alfa Romeo 149, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 13:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alfa Romeo 149 - Milano, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. KJ ^Discuss? 13:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Page

Hi CloverLeaf II, could you please review my post on the talk page (I posted after I saw what happened this morning with the FCA page). I think I provided some necessary clarification (FCA is just the successor to Fiat, not the product of a merger between Fiat and Chrysler!). My fault for not being on top of this. Thanks very much! Jaredclce (talk) 00:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Ferrari 400

Great job merging the 400 articles and expanding. I have a thought, btw: could we merge the 400 and 400i sections? They're not all that different and I reckon that the millimetric size differences are simply up to different sources. Would make for a more elegant article, and nothing would be lost. Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  21:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks. Now that you made me think about it, the different height for 400i and 412 could be due to the change in '83 from hydraulic to gas shocks for the levelling suspension, which I forgot to mention in the article... Anyway yes, merging these sections does absolutely make sense, and in fact it was my original intention. – Cloverleaf II (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)