User talk:Chriscarlos

Welcome!

Hello, Chriscarlos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Issues[edit]

Please write here if you wish.

your request[edit]

No. I can't do that. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

use of signature[edit]

For some reason you didn't have a user page, which I just created for you.

When you are making comments, it is useful to use the signature button (third from the right at the top of the edit box) so that you both sign your name and enter the date of your comments. This make it much easier for other's to follow your entries.

If you don't want to use the button, just adding the following code to the end of your entry will do the same

--~~~~

--Jaxhere 17:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your comment re: afro latin american[edit]

I don't claim any ownership to this article, I've only lent some efforts towards cleaning it up and clarifying some aspects. Squeakbox would have to respond to your query. --Jaxhere 17:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jaxhere")

If you have comments about me please direct them directly to me. I deleted what I felt was off subject material and didnt deletye any links so I am not sure what you meant by that, SqueakBox 02:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your aggressiion[edit]

Your aggressive attitude is not how we do things in this collaborative project. Please co-operate and desist from labelling legitimate edits as vandalism, SqueakBox 15:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really learning very little about how aggressive I was, because I just am able to view a comment & cannot see any changes, past comments related to the changes, or what I wrote. The term aggression may be exaggerated, but since I can only see the reply, I don’t know how I can test my perception. Chriscarlos (talk) 07:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions to Afro Latin American talk[edit]

I've found some of the information you've added to the talk page quite enlightening for me, but the way you go about offering your suggestions, I think, causes some people to react negatively to your manner and therefore (unfortunately) they don't give your information the importance which it might otherwise deserve.

If you wish to make a positive contribution to this page, you might start by following the customary way of using a talk page (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines) -- if you don't I fear a lot of what you offer will simply pass unnoticed.

If you want some specific suggestions I'm willing to help, just ask on my talk page, I'll be happy to help. --JAXHERE | Talk 02:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your additions to the page. I don't know if I will get around to following all your links, I'd hope that you, or someone else might attach them to the relevant points which they support in the article, or if there aren't points which they support, then add them to the article always keeping a Neutral Point of View.

I don't agree with your view that anyone who works on an article needs to be an expert on it. I, for one, do not consider myself to be an expert on most of the things which I edit but I am an editor, and that doesn't need expertise at anything except editing which is organizing and clarifying text so that it reads well.

In fact, I believe, that with the colloborative approach which Wikipedia uses, very ignorant people could add useful material to any article because they know something and afterwards someone who is an expert could add some citation to support the fact, or else change it to be supported by some reliable source.

--JAXHERE | Talk 23:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afro-Latin American[edit]

I did not change anything, i simply reverted a vandal who changed the info. Haiti is 95% black and 5% mulatto and white. I have added a source for it on the Afro Latin American article.-- LaNicoya •Talk• 09:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afro Guatemalan[edit]

How to propose a merger

Hope this helps mate AnnaJGrant (talk) 06:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not exactly sure to be honest. I do not know much on the subject at all so i would be a really bad choice to come to for help on those articles for their content and accuracy. Might want to bring that up on the article(s) respective talk pages.

AnnaJGrant (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]