User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 7

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal

Hello Bongwarrior/Archive 7, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you.

Tosh.0 Vandalism

Thanks, but I'd prefer to leave my talk page open to vandalism. No harm done if it's on a talk page, right? 8bit (talk) 05:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, Wikipedia is not a social networking site. It's been removed. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 16:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that

I guess stuff like that is what I get for leaving Wikipedia up when I leave the room.

--BrofistEpin (talk) 01:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

sued, court of law, trenton new jersey, yada yada...

why did you remove 'Isaac Riches' every bit of that page was true and if you dont believe this then I will see you in court , good day Catinthewind (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Just moved that from the top of the page for you. User's blocked, btw. HAND Tony Fox (arf!) 16:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Kudos

Love the username, have seen you a few times while reverting on huggle, just giving you props. petiatil ^{»user»speak} 09:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, fist bump fireworks to you as well. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, this may seem stupid, however I'm not sure what you mean by that. You don't have to answer that. petiatil ^{»user»speak} 08:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Not stupid at all, I was just being weird. It's a variation of the fist bump that I learned from a McDonald's commercial, in recognition of your contributions to Wikipedia. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Aha, clarification appreciated, and thank you. See you around. petiatil ^{»user»speak} 08:15, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

blocking unnecciserily

WHY DO YOU BLOCK PEOPLE FROM TRYING TO MAKE A REAL ACCTUALLY USEFUL PAGE!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhaxden (talk • contribs) 23:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

John Deere

Thanks for catching that I somehow didn't go back far enough! --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 00:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem, it looks like we both had the same idea (along with User:2ilovedogs). --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Request

Hey can you take a look at 412 unlimited and give me your opinion if CSD is warranted, I think so, and if you agree, could you complete it? Thanks. ––petiatil ^{»user»speak} 09:15, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

nevermind petiatil ^{»user»speak} 18:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me, kind sir

IT IS ON

RUN AT ME

HOW DARE YOU DELETE THE PAGE THAT I HAD POURED DAYS OF MY BLOOD SWEAT AND TEARS INTO THIS WAS MY LIFE LONG LABOUR AND I SHALL NOT SEE IT UNDONE

YOU HAVE MET YOUR MATCH ON THIS DAY

SIRRAH, I DEMAND SATISFACTION —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zelang (talk • contribs) 01:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Bravo!

Good catch on the vandal that was even reverting his report. Thanks for the assistance, as always.Gnowor^Talk2Me_{did wha?} 07:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, joke's on him, because I probably wouldn't have noticed him if he hadn't removed his report. Thanks to you, too. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

Can you could delete and salt The Janitors again? Thanks, CTJF83 chat 18:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Done, thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the salt :) CTJF83 chat 19:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for removing vandalism from my user page. -NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits) 14:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

User_talk:124.154.254.245

Our dear Alexis Bledel vandal doesn't seem to like you. -Duribald (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The negative comment has now been deleted. -Duribald (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Werner Arn

If User:Werner Arn is blocked, should User:Ich,_Werner_Arn also be blocked? I dont speak German but it seems a pretty obvious sock to me. —Soap— 19:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it sure seems that way. I've blocked the account, thanks for bringing it to my attention. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Fishy

Just fyi - something very coincidental with new user names... 7 02:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but it's probably just a harmless coincidence. We'll see what happens. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Probably right... just seemed awfully coincidental that two usernames similar to strong vandal fighters would be created in the same minute. 7 02:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Ijumfs't qfojt

Hey, I came acros this at around the same time you did. I thought about it for a few seconds, because I knew there was no way that was some random combination of letters. I ran it through a computer app, and I figured out that if you move every letter one to the right (I to H, j to i), it spells out "Hitler's penis". Please block this guy. Mønster av Arktisk Vinter Kvelden (talk) 02:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Done, good catch. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Sockfarm blocked

Those vandals swapping letters in corporate names were all a sockfarm of 16 or so. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 22:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, it sure looked like something was up. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

There were 26 accounts in total, listed here with their target articles (for some), if you're interested. It's strange what people do for lulz! -- Flyguy649 ^talk 16:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Wienermobile

It's hard to figure what causes vandals to zero in on particular articles. I want to mention that my double-revert was due to an assumption that the IP's mass deletion was vandalism. Actually, he was removing vandalism, and I managed to put it back. Hence reverting myself. I had best not do that in the future. :( Given all the recent messing-around with the article, I was not entirely sure what the last good version was, but I think you've pretty much got it. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem, you caught yourself and immediately fixed it. My edit was essentially meaningless :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't actually sure why you were changing the caps setting on "reflist", but I assumed you knew what you were doing. Or possibly trying to fix my "fix", except I beat you to it. :) P.S. I recall seeing the wienermobile back when I was a kid, long ago. It was a hoot. The TV ads had a little guy, maybe Billy Curtis. Good stuff. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

It was the second thing. I was busy hunting for the right revision, but I failed to notice you had fixed it yourself before making my edit. Good work by you, bad work by me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

No harm done anywhere. I think the vandals have been thwarted. But I'll be more careful with rollback in the future. No hot-dogging. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 07:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Damn

...that was fun! NawlinWiki (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Not sure "fun" is the word I'd use. By the way, congrats on the Saints. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Who Dat? NawlinWiki (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Alastair Campbell

Sorry, I didn't realise his page was already protected as I didn't see any lock symbol on it. Not one of the pages I'm familiar with I'm afraid, came across it quite accidentally on Huggle :) --5 albert square (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Nope, no need to apologize. Whatever it was, it was getting pretty nasty. I've since had to increase the protection, so thank you for taking it to RFPP. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI, also being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sock vandalism on Alastair Campbell. — Satori Son 16:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Inferior race

While following a discussion, I came upon this page, which you create-protected because it was being used as vandalism. Do you mind if I create it as a redirect to Master race (since the topics are related) and then reprotect it? I don't want to do it unilaterally for fear that it would seem to be wheel warring. Nyttend (talk) 20:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

By the way, please leave me a talkback. Nyttend (talk) 20:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure, go for it. Thanks for asking, but in this case I wouldn't have minded if you had just done it without checking with me. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome; just wanted to make sure :-) Indefinite full protection has been applied. Nyttend (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Need some help here, seen you have cleaned this up some.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/75th_Ranger_Regiment_%28United_States%29

Rameriz or whatever was never a Colonel of the Regiment.

I know, I was in the 75th and the current commander (and nothing after him since he's still in command) is Col. Michael E. Kurilla. RSOVRGR (talk) 02:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I've removed the entry, thank you for pointing that out. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

you deleted my page about Hunter Jackman

I'm Hunter Jackman. What the hell —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahhswitchlanes (talk • contribs) 04:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Acetylseryltyrosylseryliso...serine

An article that you have been involved in editing, Acetylseryltyrosylseryliso...serine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acetylseryltyrosylseryliso...serine. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Boghog (talk) 06:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

ILoveJennifer

Do you think ILoveJennifer (talk · contribs)'s edits need to be suppressed? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't think so. It's not a BLP. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Featured article review of Megadeth

I wanted to let you know I have nominated the Megadeth article for FA review, as it appears to depreciated since it was promoted to featured article. I believe that it does not pass several of the FA criteria (specifically 1(a), 1(c), 2(a), 3, and 4). Since you are or have been a contributor to this article, I wanted to inform you of this so that you are aware of the review and can improve the article. Let me know if you have any concerns. Thanks. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks....

... for your help de-vanalizing mole. I was having a hard time putting it back the way it was. Chrisrus (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Always happy to help, thanks to you too. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Willamette Lurker

This is real. This is a well known urban legend in the Willamette Valley, especially in high schools. It's just something everyone knows about, even though it's not mentioned in any published works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebadpoor5 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

All content in Wikipedia must be verifiable. It sounds interesting, but if there isn't any way to confirm it, then we really can't use it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:NOANUSES

Awesome! Now you get to write the policy page ;) -- Flyguy649 ^talk 05:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, that's actually not a bad idea. At the very least, it has to be a valid redirect to somewhere. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

article

why did u delete my article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chubs08 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I had to delete it because the subject does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

hii

I can you not speak to me like I am 5 please thank you thank you i demand an apology. --IAmATrayekf (talk) 18:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Socks you blocked earlier

I've added the two socks you blocked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lila Cheney 336. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 00:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Paige Hurd

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Paige Hurd. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paige Hurd. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Message relay service

Hello, Bongwarrior.

Please take a look at this message. I doubt it's addressed to me, though it might seem to be; I'm not an admin, and you're the admin named in the template.

Other than warning that user recently for vandalism I've never interacted with them. Thanks. SamEV (talk) 03:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Thank you. SamEV (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for unblocking me. Stt13 (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Race and ethnicity in the United States

Hi, Bongwarrior.

I'm having a problem right now with an editor there over edits made in the last 11 hours. I kept some of his/her changes in three reverts I've made. But the user removed sources from the lead, a section that I worked to source completely in recent weeks. I wrote to him/her ([1]) re: these issues and asking them to explain the changes, but received no response. I'm thinking of reverting again, but that would be my fourth revert, and I don't want to break 3RR. I'd like to know if my reverting in order to restore the sources would be exempt from 3RR. The user has been editing anonymously and also signed in as User:Therock40756, and I left a link to the abovementioned message and asked them to self-revert (to no avail, of course). Please take a look, Bongwarrior. Thank you. SamEV (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I'd leave it alone for now. I wouldn't consider any further reverts to be exempt - very few things are. It looks like AnomieBOT has restored the refs that were removed because they were being used elsewhere in the article, so the changes as of right now ([2]) look pretty minor to me. You're doing the right thing by trying to talk to them about it, so stay on that track for a while. There's not much that I can do about it at this point from an administrative standpoint, but I'm pretty hopeful that if you keep trying to communicate, this will resolve itself pretty quickly. Hope this helps, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:18, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

The bot did not restore the three refs at the end of the first paragraph in the lead.

And since all but a couple of the other changes are still bad, even if they're not as egregious as the removal of sources, in my opinion, and are still unexplained: what reason is there for me to let his/her version stand? And again, the user is not new, s/he's just choosing to be difficult.

So I can't promise that I won't revert tomorrow, since the burden is on him/her to explain, which they refuse to do.

Please ask him/her to discuss, too. I think it would help keep this from getting worse. Thanks. SamEV (talk) 06:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, Bongwarrior, the response from the user was yet another revert: [3]. No discussion, not even a custom edit summary. SamEV (talk) 04:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, he doesn't seem to want to talk about it. I'll try to keep an eye on the situation. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:Hila Levy full protection

Hello Bongwarrior, I would not mind if you removed the protection at all. I'll keep my eye on the article and if her former classmates act up again and vandalize the article, then I'll take care of it once more. Take Care, Tony the Marine (talk) 01:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar!

I'm mostly on a Wikibreak around now, but it seems like there's a lot of reasonable people managing UAA these days. rspεεr (talk) 08:46, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fight Fire With Fire

Hello Bongwarrior, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Fight Fire With Fire, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Allen4names. This has been done because the page is a foreign language article which has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia project (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Allen4names. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Allen4names (talk · contribs) 08:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Unprotected images on the main page

Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of disruptive edits, which earn warnings and blocks.

Example

Whack!

The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of experienced Wikipedians.

To whack a user with a wet trout, simply place {{trout}} on their talk page.

for letting File:Polistes sp wasp.jpg sit on the main page unprotected for 27 minutes. β^_command 01:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

It was cascade protected here. Was it unprotected the whole time on Commons then? I'll try to be more careful. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

cascade protection only affects images that are hosted on en.wp. if its on commons it does nothing. β^_command 22:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Keri Wagner page deleted

Yes Bongwarrior I would really like a copy of that page. It took like 2 ours to create and i can't even show my friend what would have been up there. My email is <redacted>. Please please please sent it to me there! Thanks

Hey I just wanted to double check that my page for Keri Wagner could be at least copied to me so i can show her what i wrote about her. My email is <redacted> Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allstar2302 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you soooo much bongwarrior!!! I really appreciate it. This is perfect!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allstar2302 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Zsfgseg

Is asking to speak to you about their block. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, this may be interesting: User:Zsfgseg2 --| Uncle Milty | talk | 00:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Dr. Goofjack

What does this log indicate? Is it as flakey as it appears to me? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Dr.+Goofjack

Thanks in advance... --| Uncle Milty | talk | 01:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, it's been taken care of. I guess I was correct to suspect it was odd. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 01:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Personal info posted in an article

Yup, me again...

I reverted this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kakashi&diff=358972403&oldid=357108507 and I understand it would be a good idea for someone to delete it from the archives.

Thanks for your help. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 02:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I've temporarily deleted the edits, pending oversight. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Firewalking

I did leave a reason in the edit page, I dont know why it didnt appear. The picture in question that I removed from the firewalking page is only shows one aspect of firewalking, a festival that happens once a year without adhering to any safety guidelines. It does not represent firewalking worldwide. Also carrying a child is dangerous and the child is too young to consent to be carried. I will continue to remove the picture if it re-appears —Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanliedetector (talk • contribs) 18:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough. I accept your reasoning, but if someone else comes along and restores the image, it would be wise not to edit war over it. Just talk about it, as you've done here. While you may say that the image isn't representative, another user may contend that it is, as well as being a free image in an article that currently has none. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uncle Dick

How is it vandalism when I made it out of good faith? DonnySutherton (talk) 16:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Your claim is so far off the mark that I find that hard to believe. Also, very few editors launch a sockpuppet investigation with their very first edit. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

I think that gut is a duck of somebody. DF76 (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I definitely hear quacking, but Uncle Dick isn't involved in it. —C.Fred (talk) 17:08, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

For reverting vandalism on my userpage, much appreciated Stephenb (Talk) 19:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

You probably already warned me by now about my edit at Ice Cube. Seems that pop-ups was a little late to revert. Wiooiw (talk) 03:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem, it happens. I figured it was just a mistake. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

New user

Hello. About User:Jwanx, is this name acceptable? I'm thinking of wanx and wanks. User:Evlekis (Евлекис) 04:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Possible violation, but not one I'd bother blocking, personally. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Zubaty

As an uninvolved admin, would you keep a watch on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Zubaty and remove comments such as this and this? I have warned Lew Loot (talk · contribs) for his/her personal attacks on FisherQueen. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on the situation. It shouldn't be too bad, it looks like it's almost over anyway. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I've skimmed through the debate and am tired of seeing personal attack after personal attack against FisherQueen by the anons and new users. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank You for clearing my page due to the "Vandalism", wasn't sure how to do it myself and I'm still trying to get a hang of everything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starbrightpink (talk • contribs) 06:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome, no problem at all. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you & Hello

Hello Bongwarrior,

Thank you for the tips...will definitely need more...sure to use them

Ashok Cherian Koshy (talk) 07:52, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Who do you think you are?

Excuse me but you had no right to delete Helicopter bear rescue. As it was prodded, it should have either had 7 days to be improved, or, as I suggested when I removed the prod, a concensus to be reached at Afd.--Golden octopus (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

[4]. It doesn't look like there's much improvement to be had. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Well, can I at least have a copy userfied for me please?--Golden octopus (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.--Golden octopus (talk) 19:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

NOOO!

YOU DELETED MY PAGE!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakers 2423 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Help

An editor, Juckfew (talk · contribs), has repeatedly removed large sections of information on the basis that it is unreferenced. -Reconsider ! 05:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

It looks like they've promised to re-add the referenced material. Let's see how that goes. I'm also wondering if the username is anything to be concerned about. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm that's highly dubious. There appears to be a secondary motive..and yes the username is concerning. -Reconsider ! 05:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Not a hoax.

The Alpha Gun is not a hoax. I have all the required patents and final drawings and cost sheets if you would like to view them. Please revert the deletion of this page.

Many thanks Professor Sam Gibbins —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam D Gibbins (talk • contribs) 18:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Does it even exist, or is it just a concept? I could conceptualize a machine that turns dog farts into chocolate chip cookies, but that doesn't necessarily mean that I would tell Wikipedia about it.

I'll be happy to restore a copy to your userpage if you'd like to continue working on it, but I don't think it's appropriate for the main encyclopedia right now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Apologize

Bongwarrior, i am deeply sorry about my recent edit about the Spitzer(bullet). I have used an aggregate of vulgar language and have acted in a demeanour looked down upon in society. Conclusively, I apologize immensely to Wikipedia and all who use it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.212.230 (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Hiya

Hey, BongWarrior. I did not block the IP after reverting this edit. I'm too new at this and didn't wanna overstep. I wanted you to know in the event you thought further action was necessary. See ya 'round Tiderolls 07:18, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Why didn't you block? If you didn't think a block was warranted, that's one thing. If you didn't block because you thought you'd be stepping on my toes, well funk that :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

HA! I didn't wanna intrude, that's part of it. I don't think the user is here to be constructive, but I feel too inexperienced at this point to make that call. At present, I'm limiting my blocks to the most egregious (yes, i had to look that one up) situations. Tiderolls 07:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

It's probably best to start off slow, but there's not much to it. Based on your previous work, you'll be just fine. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Happy Bongwarrior's Day!

User:Bongwarrior has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Bongwarrior's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Bongwarrior!

Peace,
Rlevse
19:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Cool, thanks very much. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey

Just saw a rollback on huggle that was initiated by you. Always good to see familiar faces on the vandalism circuit. Haha, cheers. petiatil ^{»User »Contribs} 06:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bongwarrior. You have new messages at Lear's Fool's talk page.
Message added 13:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 13:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Block of User:LiNaK37

I could find only one instance of vandalism under this user's name. Indef block (or any block) seems a bit harsh. Would you be willing to reverse your decision? -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 05:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, no chance. Either the racial epithet or the Tosh vandalism would deserve a block. This editor is guilty of both. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

I Apologize

my younger brother got onto my acount when i walked away frm my computer and made those edits, srry for his actions

sincerley, ironmandude —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironmandude (talk • contribs) 05:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Lucien Laviscount

Re this edit - point of order, but you have PRODded it before, which was removed by an IP editor. Whatever that editor's motives, it counts as a WP:CONTESTED prod, so it can't be re-PRODded, but must go to WP:AFD. Incidentally, if it does go to AfD, I shan't object to its deletion. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

It's a BLP PROD, or "sticky" PROD, and the rules are a little different than regular PRODs. It can only be removed after at least one reliable source has been added. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Evan Jovanovic

I am confused. Did you delete my article? catotac--Catotac (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Ouch

For this, I award you

		The Surreal Barnstar
		because I spent far more time than I should have trying to figure that one out, and now my head hurts. ~T P W 16:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, and sorry about your head. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Sigh

When did Wiki become so over the top, the edits I made hurt no one. Really, who in their right mind would look those two things up unless thinking it was Justin Bieber. It's not like I was saying Hitler killed the German's, or Wiki was made by robots. Everyone needs fun in their life, and they won't find it here, hence why this website is failing. Omnomnombeans (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC).

Ahrar Party (India)

Hi, please take a look at the article isn't it look like an advertisement?I had put tag to propose deletion two times, so that administrator can review it.but the author deleted it twice.Please give reply.$Max Viwe$ (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't consider that an advertisement. Also, please remember that PROD is a one-shot deal. Anyone, even the article's creator, is allowed to contest it. After an unsuccessful PROD, any further attempts at deletion should be made through AfD. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Vandal alert

Sorry to disturb you, but can you block 114.57.231.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). The address is being used by an Indonesian misinformation vandal whose MO is by constantly inserting misinformation into Digimon, movie studio, and American TV station articles and other related articles without a source. His current MO includes connecting Little League with several affiliate Televisa stations. Please act ASAP. Thank you. (I've already tried WP:AIV. But as you see, it's currently backlogged right now.) - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:23, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Gillard

I'm a bit confused by your change in protection. Three IP editors vandalised, and none of it went up. From what I can tell, the pending-changes system was working well. -Rrius (talk) 08:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

It was working in the sense that it was preventing vandalism from reaching the article. It was failing in the sense that editors still have to revert the vandalism, and there was entirely too much of it going on. Pending changes shouldn't be a replacement for regular protection methods, but it seems to be used that way in a lot of these trials. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Rrius, I was the editor who requested protection. Gillard became the PM on June 24. The page became a spam target on June 24. The PC as noted was doing its job, but there was too much of it and thus the need for semi-protection. I felt the request was justified. =)

It'll be cleared in a month and we can return it to PC to see if it's still a spam target, or if it's able to stay on PC for the other month of trial. If we still get spam hits on it, I'm afraid it might need to stay SPed. CycloneGU (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Off on a Tangent

Per my addendum suggestion on the requests page, wherefrom Off On A Tangent and another variation are blocked from creation...it might not hurt to block this variation as well. Right now I can create that one if I wanted to, and someone else may intentionally do so. CycloneGU (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm inclined to let this one slide. They haven't tried to use this variation yet, and it's not certain if they ever will. They may have given up, or it simply might not occur to them to try this particular letter combination. Although an article at that exact title was created and eventually deleted, it appears to be completely unrelated to the recent "hip hop sensation/boy band" articles. It's not that I think that protecting the title would be the wrong decision here; it's mostly a matter of opinion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Tip

Hey, I just wanted to let you know those are all proxies. 216.169.96.0/19 and 81.94.192.0/20 will block them. PS: I use robtex to find this out. You can also use this tool to find a better rangeblock. --Bsadowski1 06:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I don't usually do range blocks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Why do you block users with "offensive" names when yours is also offensive?

Your name is offensive to me. Perhaps you should be blocked because of it?

No?

Well why do you block others when their names are less offensive than yours? 130.56.93.43 (talk) 11:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

By all means, run for adminship, then go ahead and block me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Hibbing

Could you take a look at 96.241.238.23's edits to Hibbing, Minnesota. I'm tempted to roll them all back but i don't trust twinkle with that many reverts. I don't know how much of the info is good but he's turned the section into a joke, If it does get nuked it would look better if an admin did it. Thank you, Weetoddid (talk) 06:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I've manually removed the redlinks and done some other trimming. I don't think the IP means any harm, they just seem to be sort of new. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Offensive username

Like the last poster, I also find your name to be offensive, leading to my past vandalism of the page. So if you have a username promoting use of illegal drugs, what gives? Is this hypocrisy or something? BenderRobot (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

It may seem crazy, but the general consensus in several scattered discussions has been that my choice of username doesn't run afoul of the username policy. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Bongwarrior, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it it promotes the use of marijuana, which is illegal in Florida. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 00:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Wow, this would be funny if it weren't so sad. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 00:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Jeff, but I respectfully decline to seek a username change, for the reason that if my username was a violation, it wouldn't have survived four years and two RFCN discussions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Good lord. Speeding is illegal; would "tiresquealer" be offensive? Also, bongs are used for tobacco, which is still legal in every U.S. state (for now), and bongs are routinely sold legally (for tobacco purposes only) throughout the U.S. I realize these people are trolls and all, but can't they find something less idiot to troll about? -Rrius (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Jeff's a good editor, but I wonder wtf he is thinking with this. Shadowjams (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit war between User talk:202.156.14.100 and User talk:202.156.14.101

You're right, they appear to be battling eachother, and while I thought I saw indication that one of them was more correct than the other, it's hard to say, and the fact that they're so close together makes it even harder to distinguish. If two people are 1 bit away from eachother in an organization, and have done this for moths, what are the odds that either is unknowing about the other. I just find this whole back and forth between the two absurd. I wouldn't say that if they were within the same /16 or /24 range, but this is literally 1 bit apart. Seems a little coincidental. Shadowjams (talk) 07:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, it's more than coincidental, I'd be willing to wager. The AGF side of me is willing to believe that this is two people sitting next to each other in a computer lab or something, one with good intentions, the other one not so much. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Of course. Ugh... maybe an internet cafe. Without going in depth I don't see any extreme correlation between the two, except what is obvious from what was discussed before. Shadowjams (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Blanking user talk page when user baned

Hallo, I do not think you were wrong about user:173.168.3.124, take a look at WP:Blanking --Christian75 (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I didn't think I was wrong either, but I was. Declined unblock requests aren't supposed to be removed, but removing regular block notices, even active ones, doesn't appear to be prohibited. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I got confused by ban and block - sorry for that - and I have just seen that the subject has been discussed a lot of time before... Christian75 (talk) 09:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Incoherent ramblings of my own

I deeply would appreciate it if you let me write about Myles Kelly as he is a sort of hero at our school for saving another child from possible death from a fit, Myles plaed him in the recovery position when no one else was there and he rang an ambulance. I am writing this article because my principal and teacher asked me to, and though this page may mean nothing to you or many other web users, it means a lot to our school and myles' family that his act of heroism does not go unrecognised. Owler69 (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The article I deleted didn't mention any of that. All the same, while this individual sounds like a nice person, he doesn't appear to be notable yet. For the time being, it might be best to work on a draft of the article at your userpage. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Difficult revert

I know I should just take care of it, but the edit summary for this diff [5] highlights the need for someone more diplomatic than I. Could you deal with this? Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Some of the additions are probably good, albeit overly-detailed. Some sort of manual trimming should certainly be done. The larger question is whether the article should even exist. I've always thought middle school articles should be redirected to the relevant school district article, barring any sort of notability besides simply being a middle school. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. In the mean time, I've added a couple of tags that will notify the WP:SCHOOLS experts. I forget about the useful special-interest editor groups sometimes. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

deleted

can you send that page you deleted to me in text format? i didn't realize it would be deleted so fast. I thought there was a discussion going on between me and the other admin about the subject. DD skary (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Sure, it's been sent via email. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

thank you. just to be clear, i can put that on my user page right? DD skary (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't have any objections. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Igloo Malfunction

My apologies, but Igloo just went on the fritz, and I'm not sure what all happened. Ronk01 talk, 07:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem, it happens. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Tekin

Requesting unprotection on the Tekin page please, as I’d like to start an article on the name and it’s bearers.

Accounting4Taste is taking a break from Wikipedia so I thought I would ask you instead. Regards. JohnCengiz77 (talk) 16:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I want to reach out to you about your recent edits to the Pirates page. I was very tired when I wrote that paragraph, so thank you for fixing my amateurish errors. A million thanks. Also, please feel free to recruit me for any Pittsburgh or baseball-related projects. Thanks, Wm.C (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem, that's what Wikipedia's all about. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

User Jhende93 is at it again

I could use your help with user Jhende93. I believe you gave this user a temporary block on the 16th for vandalism. The user is vandalizing articles again, including articles about living people. Any help you could give would be appreciated. Thanks. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 03:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Handled for now, I think. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome for the info and thanks for the block. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 05:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Hii, --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 06:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

It's my privilege, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hesitant block

Hello! Apparently you blocked 76.242.178.185 for doing this on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. According to his block log, he has only done 1 edit today. Have I missed something here? /Hey Mid (contributions) 20:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

The editing style matched a certain user or group of users that have been a slight nuisance over the years. Such users are always subject to an immediate block when I encounter them, and I believe this to be common practice with other administrators as well. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I understand. The article the redirect redirected to (which is a red link) has been deleted many times. Maybe this is the same user/group of users as the user who vandalized WP:ANI? /Hey Mid (contributions) 20:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

FYI: User talk:Wolfpussy#Username block. –xeno^talk 19:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for fixing the vandalism to my user page...damn you are quick :) (and in the time it took me to write this you are on top of it on my talk page too, so thanks again!). Winston365 (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi there... the 2600 hz page was released prematurely. Thanks for being so on top of things and taking it down!

I am the creator of the project - can I repost it on the appropriate date to get it back up? The project is not actually public yet (though it is open source). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darren Schreiber (talk • contribs) 01:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Certainly you can. If you need a copy of the deleted text, just let me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

David Schwarz

I probably should have just done that to start with. It was a bit of a gag on the radio station that he works for that attracted all the vandalism. Thanks for the help. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

revdel?

[6] Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

thanks... you'd need to revdel SineBot (next edit) as well, otherwise it's useless. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Got it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

You still haven't done it ;). http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Protection_policy&oldid=377748525 is still visible. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Ugh. Thanks for pointing that out. I (intentionally) deleted the next edit, instead of Sinebot's edit. Since it wasn't showing up in the diffs anymore, I thought I was good. I guess I learned something about how revdelete works, and I promise to be more careful from now on. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Question.....

Good evening! :D I've been working on a part for an article and unfortunately myself and another author might have gotten a little ahead of ourselves in the midst of a disagreement. Particularly I think I might have goofed a bit. I'm trying to figure out if I should wait for someone to tell me I'm clear so I don't find myself blocked, or if I should simply refrain from reverting anymore for the time being? I would greatly appreciate your opinion. Thanks, -Amaraiel ^{Send Message} 02:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry about being blocked, but I'd still advise you to refrain from re-adding it for now. I've taken the liberty of reverting to the most recent "sane" version, which (incidentally) omits your addition and the recently-added Flock of Seagulls album. I have no problem with adding either of these back to the article, but I think it's best to let the situation settle for now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. Thank you. --Amaraiel ^{Send Message} 03:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Artic Dragonfish

It's a fish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashleysolly (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Please delete

Could you delete the page JAMMIN' DJs? It's been nominated for deletion and the creator hasn't shown much willingness to improve it. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

tb

Hello, Bongwarrior. You have new messages at Dank's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Dank (push to talk) 16:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Brandon Phillips

Hi Bongwarrior. Just a "heads up" I added some info to the Phillips entry, trying to present the whole Cards-Reds controversy in an acceptable neutral form with accompanying reference. Since it made national sports news for a couple days I figured it was worthy of inclusion in the article, but after looking through the recent article history (vandalism & POV problems) I can see why you changed the entry protection status. Anyhoo, this is just sort of a courtesy call, letting you know what I did. Best regards, Sector001 (talk) 18:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Incoming vandalism

Hey, I thought this might interest you, 4chan wants to vandalize pages: http://boards.4chan.org/v/res/69990275 This is their thread, you can see what they plan to do here, I don't have much Wikipedia experience so I'll sit back and watch you deal with them! 93.207.129.214 (talk) 20:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, I thought it might be something like that. It seems to be calming down now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Nice job! You're really popular over there now. Taroaldo (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Here we go again: http://boards.4chan.org/v/res/69995829 Madjura (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

And thanks again. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Impostor account

Thank you for blocking "Baseball Bugs, etc." which is an impostor account, obviously. It's either the work of the banned user "Ron liebman", as that kind of thing was his M.O. - or it's an impostor of an impostor. Not that it matters. It's easier to think of all the trolls as being effectively just one guy. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.....

.....for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Koo Koo Kachoo to you!--Jojhutton (talk) 00:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Help!

Hi! Are you still on line? Please block this user. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 08:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Done. I have no way of knowing if the IP's edits were good or not, so I'll have to trust your judgment on this one. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for trusting me and blocking the user. If you see Hepburn romanization#Hepburn romanization charts, you'd know it would support me. Happy editing! Oda Mari (talk) 08:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliz

Hi Bongwarrior, im actually the one who wrote an article about this Malaysian band and this article is under consider of being delete :( how will i improve this article so it wont be deleted..please help Wikiblizia (talk) 05:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Wikiblizia. My best advice to you would be to have a good look at WP:RS, and try to add as many good ones pertaining to the band as you can find. The relevant notability guideline for musicians is WP:MUSIC. Having released only one EP, I don't think that this band qualifies, although I'm not as up to date on the Malaysian music scene as I probably should be. Good luck. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Margaret Ayers AfD

Hi BW,
Just a note: I think you'll find that the Margaret Ayers the article refers to is a real person.
--Shirt58 (talk) 10:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm aware. But because the article's history consists entirely of various levels of BS, I don't think any of it can be trusted. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

My apologies - it of course goes without saying that you were aware of the actual person. That said, yep, I agree that the article should be deleted. It would appear that apparent SPAs like 52zz1314 and Tilitis182 have declared a much darker kind of shenanigans on Dr Ayers' article. While there are bits that could be salvaged, there's simply no "best last edit" to rolllback or revert to.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Fox News

You have semi protected this page, as there was no objection to my suggestion that we simply remove the bias many observors say Fox News is conservative will you remove the last 2 paragraph of a POV?Unicorn76 (talk) 23:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your account is autoconfirmed. You should be able to edit through any semiprotection, without any help from me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:23, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

you have an imposter lol

lol glad to see you blocked that account that was impersonating you user:BongwarriorisNOTfamilyfriendly, I'm the one who reporting him, username was a dead give away that this person only wanted to cause trouble for you, happy editing!--Lerdthenerd (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for keeping an eye on things (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome, it's what I do. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

FYI

See this; I thought I would let you know since you were the protecting admin. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Clive Cussler revision

Just to let you know you have informed me that my revision to an article was not constructive, if you check the revision history it was my article revision that you reverted back to. You may wish to inform the correct person of their improper use of editing

81.134.143.161 (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Blocked user

Hi. A user you blocked recently, GuidodB, complained to me on IRC that you don't seem to have seen his message on his user talk page, so I'm just relaying the request to look at it. Cheers --Filip (§) 11:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll have a look. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Portal:Contents

You recently protected this page to stop an edit war (which I confess I was involved in). Could you please also protect Template:Contents pages (header bar) and Template:Contents pages (footer box) for the same reason - Highfields (talk, contribs) 12:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

The link to one of the portal's subpages is missing. The consensus on the talk page is to keep the subpage listed - that is, there is no consensus established to remove it from the portal's main page. The essence of the edit war is that (Verbal) is ignoring multiple editors opposing his edits. Verbal's argument that the link didn't get discussed by the wider community when the page was created is invalid, since the link was added when the page was created, along with all the other initial links years ago. Though the page linked to had a different name back then. All of this is explained on the talk page. Please revert Portal:Contents to the last edit by Highfields, to reflect the current consensus on the talk page. Thank you. The Transhumanist 21:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, no can do. Although I can emphasize with what you are saying - heck, I might even agree with it - I don't think it would be a good idea for me to start choosing sides after having protected it. Wikipedia won't crumble if The Wrong Version™ is displayed for a short time while this thing hopefully cools down. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

What is the procedure for having the consensus on the talk page implemented? The Transhumanist 00:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Not sure exactly. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Since the page is protected, it definitely involves an admin. And as an admin, would you find out please? The Transhumanist 07:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

This would be my best guess, although I'm not sure that this particular situation would be uncontroversial enough to qualify. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

I think I found it. See Wikipedia:Protection policy. It says "Changes to a fully protected page should be proposed on the corresponding talk page, and carried out if they are uncontroversial or if there is consensus for them." We have consensus: Verbal has been clearly outvoted. He has been unilaterally defying everybody on that page. His argument is that no consensus was established before the link was added (it was added 5 years ago when the page was first created) and therefore he can ignore all votes against him. An admin needs to go to the talk page and interpret the current consensus. Please do so. See also Wikipedia:Protection policy#Content disputes. The Transhumanist 08:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm not going to change it. My best advice would be to wait for the protection to be lifted. If you can't wait that long, I've already suggested one alternative. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

The page protection is indefinite, so we can't just wait! However, TT is oversimplifying (why must everyone oversimplify?!?!) because at the very least, Fram, Arthur Rubin, and Karanacs, all believe that more discussion is necessary. (If i remember correctly - The issue is just giving me a headache this week, so I haven't checked what exactly they all said). Mutter. (Thanks for helping to stop the slowmo editwar though, Bongwarrior :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

The protection is set at indefinite, but it was never intended to stay indefinite. I'll remove it when a suitable period of time has elapsed. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Discussion on the talk page is underway on a specific proposal, and should resolve the issue one way or the other within the next few days. Thank you for freezing the conflict in the meantime. The Transhumanist 09:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Robert Schimmel

Are there some reliable reports here, AP are reporting it and quoting the subjects spokesperson, looks strong enough to me, what do you think about dropping the protection to semi? Off2riorob (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

No objections, of course. That was the plan all along. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of important article

you recently deleted my page DesecrationCrew, which was a page that i really needed. it was nominated for speedy deletion uner A7 (no indication of importance). i am a member of the group the article was about and i made the article to help us. i made it rather quickly, so i didnt put much information in the article, but i had the full intention of coming back and writing much more on the topic. could you please do what is in your power to let me have that page back and next time, i think it would be much betterif you warned someone before deleting a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Personhiyastuff (talk • contribs) 02:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi. It seems another admin has already declined your request. If you are still interested, let me know and I'll see about emailing you a copy. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

pea's formula of mathamatics

why did you delete this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.137.208 (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

It didn't appear to be a particularly noteworthy formula. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

An article

Hi, I have an article that talks about Darian Smith Jr. It has been previously deleted and I created a new one and I just wanted to let you know that it is referring to the previous one. This time I put {{hangon}}, and I am now going to add a description on why I think it shouldn't be deleted. Thanks

Darian Jr (talk)DsmithDarian Jr (talk)

Block duration

User: 212.85.5.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I believe you blocked this IP for an incorrect duration of time. This IP has been blocked 7 times with the latest one being 2 months, but you only blocked for the 31 hours. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

You are right that the duration was a mistake. I had blocked before I noticed the extensive block log. But after closer inspection, I decided that it wasn't a mistake worth fixing. The most recent block was a year ago, with zero edits from that time until today. A short block may (or may not) have the same effect as a longer one. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Popemobile

Sorry, for some reason it did not come up that you had already protected the article (I probably opened the page before you set the protection). I didn't intend to change your settings. Thanks for the quick action, I can see we were thinking along the same lines. --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem, just one of the quirks of the wiki software that there's no "protection conflict" warning, like you get with edit conflicts and blocking conflicts. The end result was pretty much the same, so no worries. "Great minds think alike" and such. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah, the end result is exactly the same. I just noticed that you reverted to my expiry. You didn't have to do that, but I appreciate that you did, and I almost always do the same thing in those situations. So thanks :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Editing versus Sandbox

You just deleted a very small "edit" i made called "my english teacher detests wikipedia". let me explain: I just signed up with wikipedia, and was merely testing out some features. I thought I was using this Sandbox feature to test out some HTML, so i typed something i thought was witty, for my own enjoyment while i learned how to use wikipedia. Sorry it appeared as vandalism, i just got my wings, i'm still learning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aewebb06 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome, no need to apologize. If you need help finding your way around, just let me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

66.30.29.132

Dear Bongwarrior,

I saw your very professional user talk note to 66.30.29.132, reverting the edit to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isthmus

I noticed it because I was investigating the note at the top of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archipelago by the same user.

I don't actually have a problem with the note at the top of Archipelago, I was just curious about your take on it.

Josh Moses (talk) 00:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

It's testing/vandalism. You don't have a problem with a user adding the disclaimer "WARNING: NOT AN TRUSTWORTH SITE"[7] to the top of an article? Whenever a user such as this tries to "prove" that the Wikipedia philosophy of open editing doesn't work, they usually only succeed in proving that it does :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

OK. I appreciate your diligence. Josh Moses (talk) 01:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

for getting that revert back to the right version... 7 05:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

unblockpl

unblock|cujz im triin 2 help fix wikipeida... and ur stuopping me... how about u pay attention 2 urself and stop killin g urself w/ drugs u looser. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.146.96 (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

It would appear that whatever block was issued to you has expired long ago. And thank you for your concern about my health, but you'll be relieved to know that marijuana, the only drug I currently use, has been directly responsible for approximately zero deaths since the dawn of history. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)