User talk:Arpvr

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Arpvr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 21 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Brahmin page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Madhwas with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste across wiki articles[edit]

Please do not randomly cut and paste sections from one wiki article into another, as you did from Madhvacharya to Brahmin. Please see wikipedia's content guidelines and policies, and what wikipedia is not. Welcome to wikipedia, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Madhwas page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted some of your edits because you are not providing any reliable source. Please take the time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Verifiability. Also, you must take the time to write in proper English. "Janaki was born in Madhwa Brahmin Family" sounds like she was born in a city called "Madhwa Brahmin Family". Regards, Biwom (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Madhwa Brahmins) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Madhwa Brahmins, Arpvr!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading your new article about Madhwa Brahmins. I can see that you put a lot of work into it. Job well-done.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

April 2016[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of Telugu castes does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Brahmin Gotras has been accepted[edit]

List of Brahmin Gotras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333 -blue 14:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Arpvr, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to List of Brahmin Gotras has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 18:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Telugu castes without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to . Lunar dynasty, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MahenSingha (Talk) 18:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bahiroji Pingale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moropant Pingle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao. clpo13_(talk) 23:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Panyam Vuppu Bheemasena Rao. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of Notable Brahmins[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Notable Brahmins. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Brahmins. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Brahmins – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Brahmin Gotras for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Brahmin Gotras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Brahmin Gotras until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 18:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Please can you be careful when using edit summaries. eg: this one says you added some text but in fact you deleted far more than you added. At best, it confuses people; at worst, it misrepresents what you have done. - Sitush (talk) 13:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please take note of the information above. I've just had to stub Madhwa Brahmins because you created the article with a huge unattributed copy/paste from the get-go, using material from Deshatha Brahmin, and I'm really unsure re: your subsequent additions per my edit summary. You had previously been warned of this on 22 February 2016, ie: prior to you creating this particular article. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

I've also had to redirect your List of Notable Brahmins because it was basically a copy of an old version of List of Brahmins, perhaps copy/pasted from some mirror of Wikipedia or simply from the article history. You've had a lot of other issues, as is reflected by the numerous comments and warnings on this page, so I feel it prudent to advise you of the special measures that are available to administrators when dealing with this topic area. Tread carefully, please, and if in doubt then ask first. - Sitush (talk) 14:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Good Editing P.V.Abhinav Ranganath Rao (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panyam Vuppu Keshava Chandra for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panyam Vuppu Keshava Chandra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panyam Vuppu Keshava Chandra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 06:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pv.abhinav[edit]

You and Pv.abhinav (talk · contribs) appear to edit pretty much exactly the same articles. Do you know each other? Are you the same person? Are you familiar with WP:SOCK? - Sitush (talk) 12:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC) No we don't each other[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with P.V.Bheemasena Rao. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at P.V.Bheemasena Rao. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Panyam Vuppu Keshava Chandra. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 01:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Arpvr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CherylHew ✽ ✉ 01:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term Disruptive editing, specifically using Wikipedia to promote a particular family, prior blocks and warnings don't seem to have had any effect. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 02:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arpvr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not use my account for any vandalism please excus me for once , Thanks

Decline reason:

Request unblock at your main account, which appears to be User:Pv.abhinav. Talk page access revoked for this one. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.