User talk:49.178.176.58

Welcome![edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Harry Garside and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 05:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Aviram7. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ryan (surname), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 07:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Lee Rigby. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 06:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Murder of Lee Rigby, you may be blocked from editing. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 08:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)== Joanna Lumley ==[reply]

Not vandalised, get your head checked. These two were actually Islamists. They converted to Islam and they admitted that they were killing in the name of islam. So, like I said, get your head checked. Thank you.49.178.176.58 (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NPOV. We do not objectively describe people as "savages", no matter how serious their crimes. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 07:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THEY ARE Islamists. Can you not read the article? They admitted that they were Islamists. You will be blocked for editing. 49.178.176.58 (talk) 08:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the edit summary why another editor removed your source. The Sun is not regarded as a reliable source, so please stop adding references that point to The Sun. Equine-man (talk) 14:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Murder of Lee Rigby. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TLJ7863 (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TLJ7863, I have stated in plain English, they were Islamists. This is not unsourced or vandalism. They have admitted that they were Islamists. The sources also say that they are Islamists. 49.178.176.58 (talk) 10:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was unsourced, as many editors have said above. You attempted to use The Sun as a citation which is depricated and known to be unreliable per WP:THESUN. Please either cite a reliable source or leave the edit out and do not WP:EDITWAR. Thank you. TLJ7863 (talk) 11:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did not put the " Sun " source into the " Murder of Lee Rigby" article. Show me WHERE I've done so. That's right you can't. If you continue to make false accusations I will escalate the matter. Either show proof or leave the article alone.49.178.176.58 (talk) 12:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I misread something above. But you do need to include a citation to support the edit. Without one it can be removed without notice. TLJ7863 (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I've taken an article from the guardian .49.178.176.58 (talk) 12:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at British Aerospace 146 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2023 in aviation. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Egging[edit]

Thanks for adding Billy Hughes info to article on Egging. I've rephrased it slightly and added a couple of citations. But I've cut the mention of the Queensland University protest against Scott Morrison as it wasn't supported by the citation in that paragraph, and is probably tangential in any case to an article focused on egging. Meticulo (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kuznetsk Alatau. Justi yaya 12:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The information is already present in the article you fking w@nker.. 49.178.176.58 (talk) 12:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of trivial information[edit]

Further to your many recent edits, especially on aviation-related subjects, please read WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Information can be true and mentioned in sources, without necessarily being encyclopedic. Also, when your edits are reverted, please discuss them on the article's talk page before reinstating them, as explained in WP:BRD. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.