User:Silence/Archive0013

...

This is the Talk page of zeppelin manufacturer and 'big steel' tycoon User:Silence. Feel free to leave a comment.

• Archive I: July 2004 to September 2005. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive II: October 2005. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive III: November 2005. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive IIII: December 2005. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive V: January 2006. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive VI: February 2006. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive VII: March 2006. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive VIII: April 2006. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive VIIII: May 2006 to December 2006. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive VV: January 2007. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive VVIIIIV: February 2007 to July 2007. Nothing important happened in this one.
• Archive IIIVXXXLCCCCDM: August 2007 to August 2009. In this one I edited Łobżany.
• Archive IIXV: September 2010 to September 2015. Nothing important happened in this one.

Quelle chimère est-ce donc que l’homme?

Quelle nouveauté, quel monstre, quel chaos, quel sujet de contradiction, quel prodige!
Juge de toutes choses, imbécile de ver de terre, dépositaire du vrai, cloaque d'incertitude et d'erreur, gloire et rebut de l'univers.

―Blaise Pascal

Quelle vanité que la peinture qui attire l'admiration par la ressemblance des choses dont on n'admire point les originaux.

―Blaise Pascal

S'il se vante, je l'abaisse ;

s'il s'abaisse, je le vante,
et le contredits toujours,
jusqu'à ce qu'il comprenne,
qu'il est un monstre incompréhensible.

―Blaise Pascal

Sartre

Thought your comments on Sartre were very good... should we try to adjust the article?Triistan (talk) 00:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Assistance??

Hi Silence...enjoy reading some of your critical feedback. Was hoping I might be able to get some of your feedback and editorial assistance on Conservation Biology. Thanks!! Thompsma (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Wiki strategy

If you want to make sweeping changes the easy way...without confrontation...stress free ...then create a new article. This strategy has been done before and it does work. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Of course, you know this! I just read your user page. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I began an extremely rough attempt at this at User:Silence/Introduction to evolution. However, clearly much more work is needed, and sadly my time is limited. My intention was to simply de-list Introduction to evolution for its current faults, then begin the radical revisions, and re-FA it once its new form gets approved. This would allow more experimentation and creative brainstorming, without leaving faults on an FA article which we have not decided on the best solution for yet. However, if you really think I should simply begin the massive changes now, I will attempt it... be careful what you wish for. :] -Silence (talk) 21:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Moral support for 'Introduction to Evolution'

Hi,

I had reverted your deletion/edit in good faith but seeing your body of work and the arguments against the course of action I proposed, I reverted the undo myself.

I just wanted to give you my vote of support for the large and difficult task. All the best to you in this endeavour of yours.

AshLin (talk) 10:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Unable to edit

Can you tell me why I cant edit now after 4 days and 10 edits? I cant edit semi-protect pages, are you or an admin can help out? Is it cause of filter log? Vazgen4 (talk) 20:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

I made a request to allow editing in semi-protect pages, somebody told me of Tor Network? I dont use that, I use regular connections. So what is this filter log, is this why? Vazgen4 (talk) 20:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Akha image (technical)

Hey Silence, any idea why such a small image is 368 KB? It is a burden on those with slower connections. Rivertorch (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

When I cropped the image from File:Akha couple.JPG a while back, I saved it as a .png just as a caution against losing any quality. That explains the large size. Feel free to resave as .jpg, that will greatly reduce the file size. -Silence (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Changes.

Hi, thought you might like to know this is the new account of me, Flashflash; --Scythre^Talk_Contribs 17:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Mystery move

You moved K2 (mountain) to K2. Why is that? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 00:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Pretty simple: There was no page for K2. K2 redirected to K2 (mountain). Which is the same as simply calling the page 'K2', but longer and more circuitous. Either K2 (mountain) needed to be moved to K2, or K2 (disambiguation) needed to be moved to K2; I opted with the former choice, both because it was closer to the existing situation and because K2 (the mountain) seemed to be the most important entry on the dab page anyway (second-tallest mountain on Earth > obscure Japanese noise music bands and Italian TV channels). Furthermore, there are multiple mountains called "K2" (see Mount K2), so the name "K2 (mountain)", if it warranted a page, would actually have to be a dab page itself! (Fortunately, we can cover this just fine in the existing dab page.) -Silence (talk) 00:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

But wouldn't it be better to move K2 to K2 (mountain) and move K2 (disambiguation) to K2, and then have a notice on K2 (mountain) that said,

This page is about the South Asian mountain. For the mountain in Alberta, see Mount K2.

I think K2 (mountain) is more specific and less confusing than K2. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

I am moving K2 back to K2 (mountain) (unless you have a good reason not to. If you do, write me a message.). --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 18:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Now we have an even bigger problem! When I moved the page, I accidentally created separate pages for K2 and K2 (mountain). Both are identical, besides the name. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

3RR

You've hit the limit, please let other people deal with this ill-mannered person. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Mediation Request Over Lead Image on Human

A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Human has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Human and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.

Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.

If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (click here for details).

Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.

Thank you, KgKris (talk)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Human#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediate —Preceding unsigned comment added by KgKris (talk • contribs) 21:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Human. For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 23:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Edit warring on Talk:Human

Silence, this is getting old in a hurry. Either the page needs semi-protection or the IP range involved needs to be blocked. I requested the former an hour ago with no response yet. It seems like simple vandalism to me, but if you feel too involved to use your tools, could you maybe nudge a totally uninvolved admin? I'm going offline for a while very soon, and my watchlist is getting filled up with this junk. Rivertorch (talk) 11:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Its been dealt with. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Slowly but surely :) Rivertorch (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

But I speak too soon. They're baaaaaack. Rivertorch (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I edited your page, just for the lolz, hope you like it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.13.9.40 (talk) 07:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

I do, thank you very kindly. :) And my apologies to the above users I haven't responded to, I've been fighting off human flu for the past week. -Silence (talk) 17:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Chicken soup Rivertorch (talk)

Greetings

Greetings and salutations! I'm a completely unintresting induvidial, even if i seem pseudo intellect and can spell really hard words i'm really 13 years old and spellchecked all the words in google. I wish to have a intellectual discussion with you because you seem very intellectual. (It sure is starting to get a lot of intellectual here.) But don't let me withhold you from improtant tasks such as rescuing fair maidens from trees and defeating promiscuous black knights

Loves and hugs, Benny The Boxer. (I'm not a real boxer, i just like to give a cool first impression on people)

p.s It would be cool if you popped my talkpage virginity. d.s --BennyTheBoxer (talk) 13:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Introduction to evolution

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Introduction to evolution. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introduction to evolution (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Introduction to evolution

I guess you will notice in due course, but I thought I would alert you: your great changes to Introduction to evolution are being rolled back by some well intentioned editors. Johnuniq (talk) 06:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

SAIU Survey

Hey Silence, Can you take down the SAIU survey at User:Silence/Survey? Its purpose has been served and is long over, and I really don't like such personal information being publicly exposed on the internet for no purpose. Sincerely, Jared —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.159.131.174 (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita.

Text 123

They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas.

Text 124

These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava".

Text 125

Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished.

Text 126

Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening.

Text 127

By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava.

Text 128

No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava.

Text 129

Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava.

Text 130

One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down.

Text 131

Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone.

Text 132

Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish.

Text 133

Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise.

Text 134

Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself.

Text 135

By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas.

Text 136

By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu.

Text 137

Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories

Text 138

I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants.

Text 139

A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya.

Text 140

Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life.

Text 141

Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew.

Text 142

Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha!

Text 143

O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy?

Text 144

Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life.

Text 145

Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place?

Text 146

Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart.

Text 147

I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts.

Text 148

The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.82.156 (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nontheism

See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.

Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard (talk) 22:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Template:Close relationships

I agree with your comments re that template. Would you be willing to work with me to clean that template up, in accord with some of the other intelligent suggestions made there? -Stevertigo (w | t | e) 04:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Roman myth (trade)2

A tag has been placed on Template:Roman myth (trade)2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Food for thought humans

Hey ∅,

From the dearth of recent posts here, I assume you're busy. If you have a few minutes (or hours!) to spare, please take a look at this seemingly interminable discussion. Maybe you'll want to offer an opinion, maybe not, but I suspect you might have some insight into one or more policy-based strategies for sorting things out.

Cheers,
Rivertorch (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

P.S. My fears about the Akha picture apparently were unfounded. Aside from the occasional complaint (usually vaguely racist in nature), there has been no real contentiousness thus far. I live and learn.

In fairness, we were all mistaken about the reaction to the change. I was as pessimistic as anyone else about whether it would be an uphill battle to preserve the image. But sometimes taking a risk has surprising results. :) I'm guessing the lack of controversy is mainly due to the apathy of visitors and the debate-exhaustion of regulars. One could also interpret it as confirming my claim that Wikipedia users expect 'example' photographs (rather than all-encompassing symbols) on species pages. And third, although there are some minor problems I myself have always had with the image (no visible feet/shoes or human settlements), the image is pretty. :) Vibrant greens go a surprisingly long way. :p -Silence (talk) 23:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation

In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted. HuskyHuskie (talk) 19:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Children's Museum backstage pass

The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. ---LoriLee (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Abortion article titles

Well, sorry to tell you this, but you've missed the first party, which was really a bust, but if you're really interested, there's another one going on down the hall right now, and it's big enough that it actually is in two rooms. You're welcome to stop by, if you'd like. HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:11, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure how interested I am. 'Pro-life' is a hypothetical daughter article for 'Opposition to the legality of abortion,' since the two domains do not precisely overlap; but since nearly all content relevant to 'pro-life' can be covered in the parent, there's no need for the actual daughter. All that's need is to eliminate the factually inaccurate, misleading, and biased term 'Legalization,' which is clearly being mis-applied by someone who's over-analogizing its usage in contexts where something illegal is under debate. -Silence (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians interested in music

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians interested in music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JamesAlan1986 20:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for this: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=b0BJ0XyqO9IC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9#v=onepage&q&f=false It was very interesting. Chrisrus (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=64246940 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Silence,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar ([[User talk:Jaobar|talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.34.167 (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sacra Via (band)

The article Sacra Via (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable unsigned band with only one album. Fails notability guidelines for bands.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Paul McCartney FAC

The Paul McCartney article has now been thoroughly copyedited top-to-bottom by numerous editors including User:Lfstevens, a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. If you can find the time in your busy schedule, please consider stopping by and taking a look, and hopefully, !voting. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 04:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

You are awesome

Just for the sake of complimenting someone, you are awesome like the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.156.158.11 (talk) 06:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Similar interests - call on me. Not always there, but try. Happened to notice "Platonic Idealism" - difficult ed. Been there. Redheylin (talk) 08:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Socratic Barnstar
		In (very) belated recognition of your patience in explaining why yours was the better argument at Human, you are hereby awarded this glittery trinket with the spooky-looking face in the middle. (I thought about giving you a Voyager plaque, but . . .) I hope you'll find the time and the will to contribute more to Wikipedia in the future. Rivertorch (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

My belief

I have learned for myself that secular humanism is not true, and is self-refuting. I believe in God and religion. Do you believe I'm an idiot in your eyes? Be honest, and answer me through this e-mail: ohsaywhatistruth@gmail.com

Thank you! 128.187.97.25 (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Atheismimplicitexplicit2.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Artificial general intelligence

I've closed your RM and moved the page; the article needs some work, though, to be coherent. I hate when technical terms have fuzzy definitions; it is so confusing. I hadn't even realized that "strong AI" meant something other than computationalism. Even now with this move, it is a bit confusing: does AGI mean human-like or human-level? Does it matter/does anyone care? I'm having trouble with some of the links to the new dab page, too; some articles use the term "Strong AI" in situations where it is hard to tell if it means computationalism, AGI(as in >= human-level), or both. Anyway, I would sure appreciate it if you could take a look at the article. Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 19:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Atheismimplicitexplicit2.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atheismimplicitexplicit2.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Required for ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Superintelligence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• expected machines "that can carry out most human professions at least as well as a typical human" (assuming no [[global catastrophic risks|global catastrophe]] with 10% confidence is 2024 (mean 2034,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Friendly AI

This article has been shaping up nicely since its deletion nomination last April. The Transhumanist 00:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

One milestone passed?

Kurzweil forcasted a computer exceeding the physical capacity of the human brain by 2010. If I remember right, he estimated human calculations per second at 10 quadrillion (peta). The Tianhe-2 supercomputer clocks in at 33.86-petaflops, over 3 times the human estimate.

What ramifications for the TS and friendly AI does this and the apparent race for AI have? Is the TS ahead of schedule? The Transhumanist 00:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Silence! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 02:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)