Jump to content

User:DePiep/iso-t

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
USER: /home-E /subpg · /sbox-E · /1 2 3 4 5 6  · {{X32}} (E) /help* /news /s-E /x-E /xx-E /row-E  EXTERNAL: EL:w3c-css · TOOLS: WD: rgx101 PETSCAN  · wtech /tpu · commons
WIKI: special:ExpandT Prefix (T:list) #parse {{MAGIC}} H:notes · _TOC_ WikiBlame mw:Lua man (patterns, debug, α) · T:SFW/s (M:,../sandbox) · M:String · TFA /better signpost adnws · SPEEDY CFSD · alerts
/unicode: {{T:U+}} m:Uchar · U+abbr · {{ISO15924}} ff conv · {{ISO4217}} BOXES: /chembox /ChemData  · /drugbox T · TG · DEV: /CUR · /taxo · /chemlist · NBSP> < minus>−< NDASH>–< MDASH>—< NOT EQUAL>≠< DOTCIRCLE>◌<
ELEM: pv /elem · WT · ISO-T symbol-to-data · datarefs · :c:cat:PT · U:PTG · WP:PTG (t)
This box: view · edit
  This list: 

theoretical, notation[edit]


Our notation[edit]

Allow me to initiate a side question: how do we notate theoretical isotopes? For now, we could focus on the Big Table (and then spinoff into other places like articles, infoboxes). I myself have no knowledge about the physical backgrounds, so I'll follow your input in this.

The topic. NUBASE2020 § Number of isotopes listed notes 218+45=263 unobserved, estimated ones.

As research goes, after "2020" new research & isotopes appear (observated, theoretical), so we should accomodate such development. If there is a standard approach (in RL science) for isotope status, I'd like to learn. Say, level of theoretical status. And IIRC, there are also Trends in Neighboring Nuclei (TNN) § 3.1 and in AME is Trends from the Mass Surface (TMS). These are theoretical excercises to right? Note: on enwiki TNN and TMS have no entry not even a redirect target (-section).

I'll await your conclusions (above) on whether & when any theoretical isotope should be included at all in the big table.

Question: is a theoretical istope black/white? Or is there a grey area, tied to somewhat existing isotopes? See 31Ne: "Decay mode shown is energetically allowed, but has not been experimentally observed to occur in this nuclide."

References. always, IMO, non-NUBASE2020 data should be added in the big table, as a ref. Isotope-all data in column 1 (with the 123Xx ID); specific sources, say on half-life, can go in the specific column.

While refs NUBASE2020 and AME2020 can be added always (optionally as named). Can we adopt a standard in this? eg, "all data is from NUBASE2020, unless otherwise sourced"? (transition to 'NUBASE2024' data to be handled; experience says this happens at an isotope-by-isotope base, ie row by row). All sources appear as reference, not as table footnote.

In-table footnotes:

main isos[edit]

  • 2023.
User:ComplexRational/Isotopes#Main_isotopes_of_elements

Nuclear technology[edit]

isos in MED[edit]

{{Nuclear technology}}

Sections in Radiopharmaceutical

med imaging[edit]

  1. scintigraphy
  2. Bone scintigraphy
  3. Cholescintigraphy
  4. DMSA scan
  5. Dacryoscintigraphy
  6. Gallium scan
  7. Gallium scan
  8. Gastric emptying study
  9. Immunoscintigraphy
  10. Indium-111 WBC scan
  11. Octreotide scan
  12. Radioactive iodine uptake test
  13. Radioisotope renography
  14. Radionuclide angiography
  15. Radionuclide ventriculography (R) → Radionuclide angiography
  16. Scintimammography (R) → Molecular breast imaging
  17. Sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy (R) → Sestamibi parathyroid scan
  18. Ventilation/perfusion scan

navboxes[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DePiep/iso-t&oldid=1150515784"