Talk:Worth It (Fifth Harmony song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Fifth Harmony (album)#Tour|PSA Tour]] The anchor (Tour) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Recent edit RE: Improper sourcing of material claimed.[edit]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worth_It_(Fifth_Harmony_song)&diff=prev&oldid=676079984. United States (RIAA) is shown to be supported by Reference 89, RIAA searchable database which CURRENTLY shows Platinum. But the certification column states 2x Platinum. RIAA does not say that! at this time. Material is to be properly sourced, we can't just say that they are going to update that in the future, we need to wait for them to update their certification.
Next look at Sales/shipments column: 2,000,000 is shown to be supported by Reference 90 which states "has sold 1.2 million downloads to date." There is absolutely no mention of 2,000,000 whatsoever!
Also PLEASE see HERE regarding the need to wait for the certifying agency to update THEIR database. Thank you.—Iknow23 (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Monitor Latino chart.[edit]

Re: Monitor Latino chart. I did a google translate of this site. Bottom left offers to "join our club". Since it's just a club, I am going to submit it for discussion to be added to WP:BADCHARTS. Once I do, I shall post a link to the discussion for anyone interested. Thank You.—Iknow23 (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. The consensus is that this is the primary topic. Cúchullain ^t/c 13:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Only one subject is notable enough to have an article, so no brackets needed. Unreal7 (talk) 17:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. I'm not even sure a disambiguation page is warranted here, but that's a discussion for another day. Calidum ¤ 18:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. A disambiguation page is suitable because the other topics meet WP:DABMENTION, but notability for these topics is unclear. SSTflyer 05:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there is another song with an article, the song which as "Worth It" was first single of the Brazilian singer Wanessa which is covered as the second half of the article on the original Beautiful_Encounter_(Yan_Yu)#Wanessa_version, but the redirect Worth It (Wanessa song) was removed from the disambiguation page prior to the RM proposal. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Nohomersryan (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Worth It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6hh144TjH to http://www.riaa.com/newsitem.php?content_selector=riaa-news-gold-and-platinum&news_month_filter=5&news_year_filter=2013&id=C19496E7-CEC0-C453-D8A1-BD80E56E610F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs info about sax sample[edit]

It would be helpful if the article contained some more information about the song's most distinctive element, the repetitive saxophone sample. Did it come from another song? Was it performed by Ori Kaplan, as implied by the photograph in the article? Robert K S (talk) 11:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Worth It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150525204824/http://monitorlatino.com/top-canciones-de-momento-mexico/ingles/ to http://monitorlatino.com/top-canciones-de-momento-mexico/ingles/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Composition[edit]

In the middle of this section there is an muted debate over what the song is about or can be about. One poorly written sentence sourced to the plugged in (Focus on the Family) source vs. an extended quote and more arguing the other side. Surely that belongs in a section below, either as part of reception or themes and/or analysis section. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 16:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 October 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved both per nom. No such user (talk) 07:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– There are several other uses, including other songs, and Worth It (TV series) gets more traffic than the Fifth Harmony song. Time to move the song to the disambiguated title and the disambiguation page to the plain title. —ShelfSkewed Talk 06:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support the TV series gets 6,244 while the Fifth Harmony song only gets 2,763[[1]] and there are now 2 other songs that didn't exist in the 2016 RM, only the album existed. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. No clear primary topic for this name. Move disambiguation page to basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I supported the other move since there were no other articles, but clearly that isn't the case anymore. Nohomersryan (talk) 23:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.