Talk:Service layer pattern

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Untitled 2010 comment[edit]

I have started working on adding more inline citations. Thanks. The constant contributor (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service Layer & Service Layers Pattern[edit]

The section Service layer in SOA describes a particular kind of service layer in an SOA whereas the Service Layers Pattern provides guidelines for creating multiple service layers according to different functional contexts, hence does not seem right to merge Service Layers Pattern with the Service Layer.The constant contributor (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Section?[edit]

I'd love to see a criticism section in this article. The service layers pattern generally just doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Of course, content in Wikipedia shouldn't be the editor's personal opinion, but I'm sure there are others out there who feel the same way as I do. (I just haven't found any yet, which is why I'd love to see a criticism section here...)

I'll see if I can do the necessary research and contribute such a section myself. If somebody else gets to it first, though, it would be awesome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.70.182.5 (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a tiny bit of context?[edit]

I came directly from Google to this article and it was basically impossible for me to deduce whether it's about software services, in other words whether this is a computer science topic or it refers to another sort of service. What do others think of this and should we add a tiny bit of context here? 45.154.8.242 (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]