User talk:The constant contributor

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, The constant contributor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Event-Driven Messaging

I am not sure, but I suspect that the article is a duplicate of Event-driven programming; you may want to contribute to that article instead. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Well the Event-driven programming is related to the traditional OO world, and does not take into account other issues that are faced by a service in a service-oriented world. The Event-Driven Messaging is particularly meant to be applied within service-orientation paradigm, although it is based on event-driven programming. The constant contributor (talk) 23:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Event-Driven Messaging

The article Event-Driven Messaging has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Written in nonsense business jargon, no salvageable useful content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Service Composability Principle

The article Service Composability Principle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism which has not received significant coverage enough to establish WP:Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 05:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Canonical Protocol Pattern

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Canonical Protocol Pattern, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Canonical Protocol Pattern and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cathardic (talk) 20:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I'm a new page patroller, and I've noticed abit of a pattern in your work. All of your articles link exclusively to books by Thomas Erl, or to Thomas Erl's website. I was hoping that there might be other authors who write about SOA. Thanks. Cathardic (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

To ALL Wikipedia Admins/Patrollers

First of all, please accept my apologies if my articles give the impression that this is some sort of a marketing campaign. I would like to assure that the only reason for writing the articles was purely educational in nature and to share the knowledge as I have used these principles and patterns in my thesis and SOA is my area of expertise. I do accept that not adding any reliable references (secondary sources) was an oversight and because of this I would not be adding any new articles and instead would be revisiting the already created articles in order to make them more Wiki friendly and to add more credible secondary sources. In the mean time, I would request all the admins and patrollers to give me some time as it would take me a while to conduct the search and add the citations. I would also request any input and suggestions from experts within SOA, in order to make these articles more neutral and Wiki friendly. Thanks.The constant contributor (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Service-oriented architecture types

The article Service-oriented architecture types has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A merge to SOA has been proposed for two and a half years with no discussion, not even the proposer. I merged the content into SOA where it can sink or swim and now this article can be deleted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jojalozzo 16:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Service loose coupling principle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Service loose coupling principle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://psulibrary.palawan.edu.ph/wtbooks/resources/pdf/9781280134067.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Utility abstraction pattern

The article Utility abstraction pattern has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Likely copyvio and borderline G11. Lacking in reliable sourcing to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 15:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)