Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 58

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSaskatchewan Highway 58 was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 5, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
January 11, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
April 6, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 21, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Saskatchewan Highway 58 travels the Missouri Coteau to an important shore bird site on Canada's second largest saline lake?
Current status: Former good article nominee


Peer review[edit]

It was stated that a simultaneous peer review could be requested. Trying to get quality Canadian/Saskatchewan articles online regarding highways. Any help appreciated.SriMesh | talk 18:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article review[edit]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This has about the same problems as Saskatchewan Highway 16 does, including one more. Along with the red links and the wrong junction table, this article has not one picture and a messed up shield. I have put this article as well on hold for the time being. After all are fixed, this can pass for GA.Mitch32contribs 17:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I have to fail this article. It does not meet the requirements that were raised. Sorry.Mitch32contribs 01:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]