Talk:Sanne Wevers/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Passed. (t · c) buidhe 10:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 20:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this review. (t · c) buidhe 20:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The quotebox does not seem to be necessary. Per MOS:QUOTE it should be shortened and/or paraphrased and integrated into the article text. (t · c) buidhe 08:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Y Removed. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I'm passing this because I have evaluated it against the criteria and I believe it passes. A further suggestion for improvement would be find more secondary sources to reduce reliance on primary sources that just give competition results in order to flesh out the article more. (t · c) buidhe 10:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.