Talk:Sanne Wevers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Sanne Wevers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 20:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I will take this review. (t · c) buidhe 20:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The quotebox does not seem to be necessary. Per MOS:QUOTE it should be shortened and/or paraphrased and integrated into the article text. (t · c) buidhe 08:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • checkY Removed. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: I'm passing this because I have evaluated it against the criteria and I believe it passes. A further suggestion for improvement would be find more secondary sources to reduce reliance on primary sources that just give competition results in order to flesh out the article more. (t · c) buidhe 10:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wevers at the 2016 Olympic Games
Wevers at the 2016 Olympic Games

Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is long enough, and was promoted to good article on 11 November. The image is cc-by-2.0, via Flickr. Both hook facts are reliably sourced, I prefer the first myself. Nice article @Riley1012:! DrThneed (talk) 00:07, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]