Talk:Nobody's Perfect (Jessie J song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References and help to improve/expand this article[edit]

Hello there, this single has recently received enough media coverage, and this link [1][2] gives sorta of how much info can be added to this article, if any of you could help me out I'd be amazed by it as I love co-editing on wikipedia. I'm asking this support because I have a focus on another article right now. Regards Eduemoni↑talk↓ 07:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion, Bad faith and other things[edit]

Well, I've created this article from scratch, no buzz around that, the problem is there are some people that are bumping against me about it, first they said about WP:NSONGS, that it needed to chart or receive an award or get covered by multiple artists, when in fact the song received a lot of media coverage from multiple sources (magazines, newspaper, online) some of them reliable, or else it would be kept as a redirection page, even though it charted, it was unnecessary work from me to wait, just one week to start it over, well I wrote the article (once again), put a great effort on it, I thought I think it is well written, I hope someone keeps it up and expand it to a good level, when these same figures once again says unreliable sources here, here and here, POV and SYNTH, OWN there, when I didn't write anything from my point of view, when I do know what sources to use, when I know that some of the style of writing I'm using was previously used on some WP:GOOD (including sources used, I even pointed them out to them[3][4][5]), I do not own this article, so what now, should I keep writing or keep involving myself on administrative works, because this is either Bad faith, or I dunno what policy else to cite they already cited them all. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 06:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the way I wrote it, I kept it really informal. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 06:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why your edit was reverted; WP:RS, "TheProphetBlog." What makes this WP:USERGENERATED blog reliable? "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable." You cited that 5 other articles use this, WP:OTHERSTUFF as all those articles, to put it bluntly, are not well written and this website is not reliable. The website it a gossip site in general which is not allowed. WP:LEAD and WP:MOS on the entire article. Articles should have sections, not one giant clump of a lead. Youtube? You're not allowed to say views and how fast they reached as its not archived and its WP:OR, youtube doesn't list anything you have written. "making the album Who You Are climb back in the top10 UK" is WP:POV, Synth, and OR as the source you cited does not say anything remotely similar to what you have written. I can go on and on about violations in the article. Thats why your edit was reverted. Now read the rules ive written, and learn from them. Thank you. This is my only comment on this manner - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 06:24, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I won't transclude any of my already posted discussions in here, please keep it fresh. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 06:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad faith here... All i'll say is see User Talk:Eduemoni where I've left numerous messages about why information/sources were removed, citing relevant policies etc. I've even provided detailed rationals for my edits (which have been opposed). — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 19:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've withdrawn the RfC, it is unnecessary hence the article is getting proper attention and expansion. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 19:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Sentence[edit]

The opening paragraph contains this sentence:

The single version was remixed by Tom Elmhirst and is slightly different from the album version with re-recorded vocals and a heavier beat.

It's unclear from this whether the single version or the album version is the one with re-recorded vocals and a heavier beat. If it's the single version, I suggest we add a comma after the phrase "album version". If it's the album version, I suggest we re-word to say "... different from the album version, which has re-recorded...". Since I don't know which is correct, I'll leave this problem to the experts! RomanSpa (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nobody's Perfect (Jessie J song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nobody's Perfect (Jessie J song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nobody%27s_Perfect_(Jessie_J_song)&oldid=1204313948"