Talk:Morning Joe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morning Joe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sweaters[edit]

Some mention should be made of Scarborough always wearing a sweater and not a suit and tie like the normal pundits. This was an attempt to make the show seem warmer and more friendly. OddibeKerfeld (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encylopedia, that should not be included. This is a serious website, inappriate, unreferenced content like that shall not be included. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, excuse me, but what the hell is "inappriate [sic]" or not serious about that fact? You know, people come to Wikipedia because they want to learn about topics that interest them, not to be spoon-fed what tiny nuggets of information pass <personal attacks redacted as they were redundant to the point already made sufficiently clear>. 98.14.160.180 (talk) 11:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to deny that clothing has some factor in the style of a TV show. If there is a suitable source, such information can definitely be included. --Nemo 14:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion[edit]

has garnered some audience appeal; though his co-panelists may have more to do with that than Scarborough himself. That sounds a little opinionated with no reference to back it up.--69.142.34.236 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup-Rewrite tag[edit]

I've rearranged and cleaned up some of the sections. Some citations are still needed, but I don't think that a rewrite is necessary. If no one objects I'll drop the {cleanup-rewrite|date=March 2008} tag in a couple weeks. Steveharoz (talk) 05:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna go ahead and drop it. --Steveharoz (talk) 11:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit: swear words on live television is not a notable 'incident'[edit]

The "Expletive Incident" section was recently removed under the premise that "swear words on live television is not a notable 'incident'". The justification for it being significant is as follows:

Scarborough interrupted the show to repeatedly apologize
The broadcasting of all future shows was modified to incorporate a 7-second delay
It only happened once on this show

Whether or not swearing in general is significant, it was significant for THIS show. Steveharoz (talk) 14:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. It's not up to our opinions of swear words that makes the incident notable. That it was covered in major publications and mocked by high-profile commentators is what makes it notable. Chicken Wing (talk) 20:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morningjoe.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Morningjoe.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Morning Joe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morning Joe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725064651/http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/matthews_credits_hillarys_success_to_fact_that_bill_messed_around_74705.asp to http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/matthews_credits_hillarys_success_to_fact_that_bill_messed_around_74705.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Point of view[edit]

The article may be neutral, but it strikes me as possibly a bit euphemistic. With regards to the relationship between the two hosts and their controversy with/around Trump (mentioned in different sections), Lesley Stahl of "60 Minutes" at CBS Sunday Morning sounds more critical, and I don't expect CBS to be particularly savage compared to the average. Someone with better knowledge of USA TV may want to check; I've only added a couple NYT articles.

Also, nothing happened between 2009 and 2016? --Nemo 14:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Error under contributors[edit]

The link for contributor; Elise Jordan opens a link to Michael Mahon Hasting. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.134.167.206 (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]