User talk:Southern Illinois SKYWARN

I have now more or less left Wikipedia, again, but you never know, I might suddenly decide to just randomly start editing again.

This user has probably left for real this time. Southern Illinois SKYWARN has not edited Wikipedia since October 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

#1-August 21, 2007 through February 4, 2009

Tornado Emergency Article[edit]

Thank you for that link to assist me in verifying bulletins and adding citations for the Tornado Emergency article. I finished the table using the information already listed on the page plus two new entires. Next (later tonight and tomorrow), I intend to go back and check the locations, warned counties, # of bulletins issued, and citation links for most of the entries and make sure everything is as correct as I can make it, adding missing information when I can find it. I probably will not search for missing entries, since this would be way too time consuming, but if you know of any Tornado Emergencies missing, feel free to add them. Only bulletins issued by the NWS that include the "Tornado Emergency" text are official and should be added.

Let me know if you have any additional suggestions or links. Thank you! Weatherworld (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back![edit]

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Radar request[edit]

If you can get something good for February 11, 2009 for the eastern united states (in reference to the February 2009 tornado outbreak article) that'd be really helpful. Thanks, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for May 2009 Southern Midwest derecho[edit]

On July 5, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article May 2009 Southern Midwest derecho, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 02:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

Hey, would you like access to the rollback feature to deal with stuff like this? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Severe weather RfC[edit]

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Derecho peer review[edit]

I saw this and took a look at the lead section and synopsis section, and I reworded a couple things as well as linked a couple terms. I don't want this to count as part of the peer review, however, as I am relatively knowledgeable in meteorology. It looks good to me, but I don't know how your "average Joe" will find the article. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 14:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help - thanks for the thanks! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Juliancolton (talk) 18:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]

Hello, Southern Illinois SKYWARN! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:36, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012[edit]


Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features U.S. Roads consolidates M-6 article makes headlines Planning Department debuts Stub drive concludes early, successfully Editorial	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for MD, MI, PA, and VA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks[edit]

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb} 22:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors[edit]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 04:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]